Editor-in-Chief |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aging
men - Challenges ahead
Bruno
Lunenfeld Faculty
of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Israel Asian J Androl 2001 Sep; 3: 161-168 Keywords:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Population |
Fertility
Rate |
| European
Union (15 countries) |
370
million |
1.51 |
| Other
European Countries |
355
million |
1.65 |
Table 2. Effects of decrease in fertility rate and increase in life expectancy.
|
Country/district |
Fertility
rate |
Life
expect |
%>65
years |
|||
| 2000 |
2025 |
2000 |
2025 |
2000 |
2025 |
|
| Burma |
2.4 |
1.7 |
54.9 |
63.4 |
7.1 |
12.6 |
| Vietnam |
2.0 |
2.0 |
69.3 |
75.8 |
7.6 |
13.1 |
| Philippines |
3.5 |
2.4 |
67.5 |
74.6 |
5.7 |
10.1 |
| Thailand |
1.9 |
1.7 |
68.6 |
75.3 |
9.7 |
19.9 |
| Malaysia |
3.3 |
2.6 |
70.8 |
76.9 |
6.52 |
12.2 |
| Singapore |
1.2 |
1.5 |
80.1 |
82.5 |
9.7 |
18.4 |
| China |
1.8 |
1.8 |
71.4 |
77.4 |
10.2 |
19.7 |
| Taiwan,
China |
1.8 |
1.7 |
76.4 |
80.4 |
12.6 |
24.1 |
| Japan |
1.4 |
1.6 |
80.7 |
82.9 |
17.1 |
27.6 |
| India |
3.1 |
2.2 |
62.5 |
70.9 |
7.0 |
11.8 |
| South
Korea |
1.7 |
1.7 |
74.4 |
79.2 |
10.8 |
23.4 |
Table 3. Life expectancy of males at different ages.
|
Year |
At
birth |
At
15 years |
At
45 years |
At
65 years |
| 1888 |
43.9 |
43.9
(58.9) |
22.6
(67.6) |
10.8
(75.8) |
| 1988 |
70.5 |
56.4
(71) |
28.2
(73.2) |
13.0
(78) |
Courtesy of the Registrar General for Scotland (From “cheating time by Roger Gosden”).
For a long time, life expectancy, the rate of infant mortality and the distribution of the causes of death were enough to assess population's health status and to determine national public health priorities. These indicators remain indispensable, as important mortality inequalities remain between different countries, different populations and different socio-economic categories. With the lengthening of life expectancy at birth, non-communicable diseases and associated disability receive increasing importance. Consequently the need of a new type of indicator, namely “Health expectancies: disability free-life expectancy (DALE), healthy life expectancy or active life! expectancy” became necessary. The introduction of the concepts of the international Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps[5] allowed the efficient use of Health Expectancy indicators. The recent Jakarta Declaration on leading Health promotion into the 21st century confirms that “the ultimate goal is to increase health expectancy and to narrow the goal in health expectancy between countries and groups”[6]. Today the first estimate of health expectancy (in most cases “disability-free life expectancy”) is available in most developed countries and increasingly also in developing countries (Table 4). Calculations on gains, differences or losses in health expectancy (disability-free life expectancy, disease-free life expectancy, life expectancy without chronic diseases and dementia-free life expectancy) make it possible to define public health priorities and assess health strategies, social inequalities, life styles and therapeutic interventions. This kind of indicators demonstrated that not only do the poorest and least educated live less, but also experience a greater part of their life with disability or handicap. Whereas in Canada for example the difference of life expectancy between the highest and lowest income levels was 6.3 years and the difference of handicap-free life expectancy was 14.3 years (Table 5, adopted from[7]).Table 4. Occupational handicap-free life expectancy in Canada (Wilkins & Adamas 1983).
|
Income
level |
LE |
HE |
| Lowest |
67.1 |
50 |
| Second |
70.1 |
57.9 |
| Fourth |
72.0 |
62.6 |
| Highest |
73.4 |
64.3 |
| Total |
70.8 |
59.5 |
| Differences
Riches/poorest |
6.3 |
14.3 |
Table 5. Health expectancy (WHO 2000).
|
|
Life
exp. at birth |
DALE
at birth |
Disability
(y) |
| 1
Japan |
81 |
74.5 |
6.5 |
| 2
Australia |
79.5 |
73.2 |
6.3 |
| 30
Singapore |
78 |
69.3 |
8.7 |
| 51
S. Korea |
72.8 |
65 |
7.8 |
| 59
Brunei |
77.2 |
64.4 |
12.8 |
| 81
China |
69.7 |
62.3 |
7.4 |
| 89
Malaysia |
68.8 |
61.4 |
7.4 |
| 99
Thailand |
68.2 |
60.2 |
8.0 |
| 113
Philippines |
66.7 |
58.9 |
7.8 |
| 134
Inia |
60.4 |
53.2 |
7.2 |
| 145
N. Guinea |
55 |
47 |
8 |
| 148
Cambodia |
53.8 |
45.7 |
8.1 |
The
majority of older men today reside in developing countries. As the demographic
transition gathers pace in the poorer regions of the world, an even greater
proportion of the world's older men will live in countries and regions
that have the least resources to respond to their needs.
The
communication revolution and its consequence globalization which started
at the end of the last century will peak during this century. But if we
will not learn to share the resources and wealth of mother earth, poverty
will remain enemy number
one. It must be our honest aim to achieve the goal that every human being
on this earth should be able to age in health and with dignity. The cost
of caring for the increasing population of senior citizens will become
prohibitive with its attendant socio-economic consequences. To the prudent
health care administrators, the establishment of preventive measures,
rather than concentration on interventive care is an important strategic
thrust in overall management of the aging population[4]. Frailty,
disability and dependency will increase immensely the demand to the social
and health services. The very high cost in relation to these services
may strain to the limit the ability of health, social and even political
infrastructures not only of developing but also of the most developed
and industrialized nations. The ability to permit men to age gracefully,
maintain independent living, free of disability, for as long as possible
is a crucial factor in aging with dignity and would furthermore reduce
health service costs significantly. To achieve this objective, a holistic
approach to the management of aging has to be adopted[4].
The
promotion of healthy aging and the prevention, or drastic reduction of
morbidity and disability of the elderly must assume a central role in
the formulation of
the health and social policies of many, if not all, countries in the next
century. It must emphasize
an all encompassing
life long approach to the aging process
beginning with pre-conceptual events and focus on appropriate interventions
at all stages of life.
Life-history
studies of childhood and adolescence demonstrate clearly that social factors
probably operate in a cumulative fashion.
There are significant social class differences in height growth
and other aspects of physical development, as well as in incidence of
infectious and other diseases and risk of injury.
For example, the nutritional status of the mother is now known
to influence intrauterine growth rates, birth weights, and the later life
risks of several important health problems. In addition, a whole host
of factors influence growth and development and in turn these factors
influence the health status of men in the latter decades of their lives.
Vulnerability to physical ill health in childhood and later adult life
is associated with poor parental socio-economic circumstances and
low levels of parental education and concern.
Cross-sectional studies show differences
in mortality and morbidity as a function of socio-economic status, across
various disease categories throughout the life span. Poverty has a significant
impact on both life and health expectancy. It should not only be measures
in terms of property, employment, wages and income, but also in terms
of basic education, healthcare nutrition, water and
sanitation. Educational attainment and marital status have also
been shown in several longitudinal studies to be powerful predictors of
morbidity, health expectancy and mortality.
In addition, age, gender and socio-economic status influence disability-free
life expectancy. The economic consequences of retirement place many older
citizens in positions of financial vulnerability. As populations age,
in both the developing and the developed worlds, the issue becomes how
to keep older persons economically viable within their respective societies.
No community is exempt from the financial hardships experienced by aging
populations.
The
life course perspective leads to important policy and strategy decisions.
Firstly, it is clearly possible and desirable to improve the health status
of men when they are old, although this approach is still not fully implemented.
Secondly, a complementary approach to improving the health of older men
would focuson appropriate interventions at all stages of their lives.
The determinants of “aging” and of “life expectancy” extend from genetic
and molecular determinants to the increasingly powerful forces of environmental,
economical, technological and cultural globalization. Specific measures
for the promotion of healthy aging should include:
1. the promotion of a safe envirment,
2. healthy lifestyle including proper nutrition,
3. appropriate exercise,
4. avoidance of smoking,
5. avoidance of drug and alcohol abuses,
6. social interactions to maintain good mental health,
7. and medical health care including the control of chronic illnesses.
If
done effectively, it should result in a significant reduction of the health
and social costs, reduce pain and suffering, increase the quality of life
of the elderly and
enable them to remain productive and contribute to the well-being of society.
The medical and socioeconomic implication of a demographic reality of a
new world, will be very different from all preceding epochs in history,
indeed so new that most people, their governments, national and private
pension funds as well
as most health insurers did not yet have sufficient time vision, determination
or courage to face up to this immediate challenge. The medical profession,
pharmaceutical and health industries are not yet prepared for these emerging
markets.
Before
a thing has made its appearance, order should be secured before this order
has begun. Lao Zi
It
is impossible to understand aging and health without a gender perspective.
Both from a physiological and from a psychosocial point of view, the determinants
of health as we age are intrinsically related to gender.
There is increasing recognition that unless research and programmes-on
both clinical science and public health - acknowledge these differences,
they will not be effective.
While women
experience greater burdens of morbidity and disability, men die earlier,
yet the reasons for such premature mortality are not fully understood.
The rapidity with which the world-wide population is aging will
require a sharp focus on gender issues if meaningful policies are to be
developed. Yet so
often gender in the
health context is taken as being synonymous only with women's issues[8].
In
contrast to the recent
and much needed attention to the social position and health status in
women, men health concerns have been relatively neglected. Men continue
to have a higher morbidity and higher mortality rate[8]. Life
expectancy for men is significant
shorter then that for women in most regions of the world[2].
The course of disease, response to disease and societal response to
illness exhibit gender differences and often result in different treatments
and different access to health care. The conventional
approach of
the medical, behavioral
and social sciences
to the problem
of male aging has been for a
long time
subject of oversight, absence of focusing, disconnection and most of all
lack of interdisciplinary
collaboration.
The
major causes of morbidity and mortality all take effect over extended
periods. DNA is constantly
being damaged and being repaired,
Bones are constantly worn away and rebuilt and atheromas
are constantly accumulating
in side arteries, and are constantly being removed . If the rate of decay
is faster then the rate of repair, healthy tissue will be lost
until damage will
produce in symptoms and
finally result in
disease. Therefore, primary prevention strategies will be most effective
when initiated at the earliest opportunity. Prevention of ischemic heart
disease, hypertension and stroke as well as lung cancer, are diseases
which primary prevention needs to be addressed.
When problems are more prevalent at older ages, as with prostate
and colorectal cancers and osteoporosis early diagnostic
tests, such as appropriate
and periodic use
of laboratory
tests (e.g.
PSA) and screening procedures
can play an important role
in secondary prevention and self care strategies[9].
Significant numbers of male related health problems such as:
changes in body constitution,
fat distribution,
muscle weakness,
urinary incontinence,
loss of cognitive functioning,
reduction in well being,
depression,
as
well as sexual
dysfunction, could
be detected
and treated in
their early
stage if both
physicians and public
awareness of
these problems
was more
pervasive. This could effectively decrease morbidity, frailty and
dependency, increase quality of life and reduce health service costs.
Women visit the doctor 150% as often as men, enabling them to detect
health problems in their early stages. However usually men cost the
health services more then women since they seek the medical services
at a more advanced
stage of disease. While women are geared to preventive care, men generally
come for “reparation”.
When
discussing age related problems, it is often difficult to separate and
to distinguish between
1) the natural aging process, primarily genetically determined
(which today can not be changed),
2) aging amplifiers
determined by environmental and developmental factors
(which can be modified)
and
3) an acute or chronic
illness or intercurrent diseases (which can be prevented,
delayed or cured).
It must not be forgotten, that aging by itself is associated with reduced productivity, decreased general vigor (“frailty of the aged”) as well as with increased incidence of defined diseases. These include:
cardiovascular
diseases,
malignant
neoplasm,
chronic
obstructive pulmonary diseases;
degenerative
and metabolic diseases (arthrosis, diabetes, osteoporosis, etc.)
visual
loss (macular degeneration, cataract)
hearing
loss
anxiety,
mood, depression and sleep disorders
sexual
dysfunction
various
dementia (i.e., Alzheimer disease).
Endocrine
deficiencies
Five
of six men in their sixties have one or more of these diseases. The chronic degenerative
diseases have a long latency period before symptoms appear, and adiagnosis
is finally made. Once the diagnosis is made, drugs may alleviate symptoms,
but are not very effective to alter the underlying disease which unfortunately
usually continues to deteriorate.
Heart
disease and stroke are the major causes of death and disability in aging men.
Approximately 52 million deaths occur worldwide each year; 39 million
occurring in developing countries. About one-quarter of all deaths in
developing countries and half of all deaths in developed countries are
attributed to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Globally, there are more deaths
from coronary heart disease (5.2 million) than from stroke (4.6 million).
Age specific death rates from cardiovascular disease increase dramatically
with age. Within each country, age-specific death rates for all cardiovascular
diseases increase at least twofold between the age groups 65- 74 years
and 75-84 years in both sexes, with consistently at
least 50% higher rates for elderly men then for women. Morbidity and disability
from these diseases are also high. For example, the Global Burden of Disease
project estimates that by 2020, coronary heart disease and stroke will
be the first and second leading cause of death. Lack of exercise, smoking
and obesity are recognized risk factors for CVD. A significant relationship
exists between body fat mass and both cardiovascular and overall mortality
in men. The increased mortality as observed in obese men was inversely
related with physical fitness.
Worldwide,
more than nine million people developed cancer in 1997 and more than six
million died of cancer. Cancer deaths increased from 6% to 9% of total
deaths from 1985 to 1997 in developing countries, but remained about constant
at 21% of total deaths
in developed countries. The highest mortality rate was observed for
lung cancer with approximately 790,000 deaths in 1997, followed by stomach,
liver, colorectal, esophageal, and prostate cancer.
For men, prostate cancer is the most prevalent malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer death. In 1990, worldwide, there were 193,000 deaths from prostate cancer, with 127,000 of those deaths occurring amongst those aged 70 years and over and 51,000 amongst those aged 60-69. Since prostate cancer is primarily a disease affecting men over 50, the worldwide trend towards an aging population means that the number