No-scalpel
vasectomy outside China
Bing
XU, Wei-Dong HUANG
Chongqing
Li Shun-Qiang Andrologic Hospital, Chongqing
400020, China
Asian
J Androl 2000
Mar;
2: 21-24
Keywords:
vasectomy;
no-scalpel
vasectomy; sterilization
Abstract
Since
1985, the no-scalpel
vasectomy technique has been widely used outside
China. The prevalence of this technique has helped to increase the acceptability
of male sterilization in many parts of the world. More than 5000 physicians in
twenty-five
developing countries have been trained in the no-scalpel
vasectomy technique.
In the United States in 1995, nearly one third of vasectomies employed
the no-scalpel
technique, and in the whole Northern American region, a total of 1100
doctors have been made familiar with the technique. Doctors believe that
there are
several advantages of the no-scalpel
technique, including no incision, no stitches,
faster procedure, faster recovery, less chance of bleeding, less discomfort
and high efficacy. The key steps of the technique include fixation of the
vas and
infiltration anaesthesia of the spermatic cord, as well as grasping, delivering
and isolating the vas. No-scalpel
technique provides a good approach to expose the vas, in conjunction
with which, different vas-end
occlusion methods
may be used.
1
Introduction
In
1976, the no-scalpel
vasectomy (NSV) technique was developed by Dr Shun-Qiang
LI and associates from the clamping method and the percutaneous vas
occlusion technique. Since then, NSV has been widely promulgated and practiced
in China
as a routine fertility regulation method. In June 1985, an expert group
sponsored by the Association for Voluntary Surgical Contraception (AVSC)
visited the Chongqing Family Planning Scientific Research Institute, China,
to learn the new
vasectomy technique. Surgeons of AVSC concluded that all vasectomists should
now use only the no-scalpel vasectomy technique[1]. In November
1986, the 1st International Training Course on no-scalpel vasectomy was
conducted in Bangkok, Thailand. Up to now, this technique has been widely
used in many parts of the world, and
a total of one million men have undergone NSV in countries and regions employing
the method (AVSC International: http://www.noscalpelvasectomy.org). The
present article reviews the extensive use of the method outside China during
the last decade.
2
Prevalence of NSV outside China
2.1
Asia
As
the first country introducing NSV technique, Thailand hopes NSV will become
the standard vasectomy procedure, which may then promote the acceptability
of vasectomy. Between November 1986 and June 1989, 13 Thai PDA physicians
performed NSV in 6238 cases, PDA used a commercial marketing technique
to promote the vasectomy activities, i.e. product (vasectomy), promotion,
program and pricing. Surgeons at the Ramathibodi hospital, who attended
the 1st International training course in Bangkok in 1986, have had a total
of 1500-2000 NSV acceptors (Nirapathpongporn A et al, unpublished
data, 1989). Ramathibodi hospital started to
provide a 3-day NSV training course for 13 Thai physicians from the provincial
hospitals in 1987. Since then the demand for the training increased, and
the training centre
had to be moved to a regional hospital in the next two years, where a
sufficient case load for 100 trainees would be available[2].
A
hospital in India has employed the new vasectomy technique since September
1991. The first training course was organized by that hospital in March
1992, and the NSV
procedure was thus officially introduced into India. Based on the data
of the hospital, after the use of NSV, the number of vasectomy increased
three times as compared with the corresponding period in 1988-91[3].
The no-scalpel vasectomy
attracted more educated and higher income men although in India the acceptability
of vasectomy is influenced by religious factors[4].
In
1989, four Turkish urologists were trained in the no-scalpel technique
at the PDA, Bangkok. They, in turn, trained 19 colleagues at their home
clinics. As a result, vasectomy for which there had been no demand in
Turkey, became popular. Between 1990 and 1993, 5726 men and 3320 women
were received at the counseling service for vasectomy in hospitals and
health centers, and 1203 men underwent no-scalpel vasectomy[5].
2.2
America
United
States is among the countries introducing NSV at an early date. Training
courses were held in 1988 in California, Massachusetts and New York (Antarsh
L, unpublished data, 1989). By December 1992, 417 urologists and surgeons
from 44 states and Washington D.C. were trained in no-scalpel vasectomy,
and these doctors
in turn trained other practitioners at their hometowns (Antarsh L, restricted
publication, 1993). Vasectomy in the United States has traditionally been
chosen by white, middle- to upper-middle-class, men. A recent study found
that low-income and minority men are also willing to choose NSV. In 1995,
approximately 494,000 vasectomies have been performed by 15,800 physicians
in the United States and nearly one third (29%) were of the no-scalpel
type[6]. At present,
American couples can choose their doctors on the Internet from
297 physicians in
42 states. The number of clinics providing vasectomy rose from 23 to
32, an increase of almost 40%, while the number of vasectomies performed
rose by 18%. Seventeen of the 32 clinics are performing more vasectomies
after training, and 10 clinics had not provided this procedure previously[7].
Canadian
doctors held the first Canadian no-scalpel workshop in April 1993. Fifty
doctors from around the country attended the workshop. Vasectomy has been
used by 18% of all married couples in Canada at present; the percentage
is a little higher than that in the US (17%)[8]. Approximately,
a total of 1100 doctors have been trained on NSV in the whole north American
region.
The
ratio of tubal ligation to vasectomy was 18 to 1 in Colombia. In 1989, the
first group of surgeons underwent NSV training in Bogota. By 1995 the
ratio of tubal ligation
to vasectomy dropped to 10 to 1 nationwide, and 4 to 1 in Bogota[9].
Of
all contraceptive acceptors in Mexico during 1972-1989, only 0.6% had
opted for vasectomy. In early 1990, 19 NSV training centers were established
throughout the country. In Mexico City alone, the number of vasectomies
performed in the 1st
half of 1990 increased by 65.4% over the corresponding period of the previous
year[10]. By June 1995, over 55,000 men received vasectomy
from more than 300 doctors (de Cordero C, et al, restricted publication,
1996).
2.3
Africa
At
present, African countries are bearing a huge pressure from the population
boom. Limited advances have been experienced in male sterilization, although AVSC
believes that in the next few years male contraceptive methods, including
condoms and vasectomy will become far more popular in Africa. AVSC trained
8 Kenya surgeons in no-scalpel vasectomy and have opened six centers in
the country that can provide NSV (Danforth N, restricted publication,
1994). The no-scalpel technique
is also the most popularly used vasectomy technique in Uganda, although
male sterilization is relatively sparse there.
2.4
Developing countries
According
to the International Planned Parenthood Federation, AVSC is now assisting
in training more than 5000 physicians in twenty-five developing countries,
including Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ghana, Guatemala,
Indonesia, India, Jamaica, Kazakhistan, Kenya, Mexico, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan,
Peru, Rwanda, Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Thailand, Turkey, Uganda, Vietnam, and
Zimbabwe[11].
3
Evaluation on no-scalpel technique
According
to AVSC, the no-scalpel technique possesses seven advantages as compared
with conventional vasectomy;
they are: no incision, no stitches, faster procedure,
faster recovery, less chance of bleeding and other complications, less
discomfort, and high effeciency (AVSC International, restricted publication,
1997). Nirapathpongporn reported that in a total of 1203 operations performed
at the Thai King's birthday vasectomy festival, an average of 57 vasectomies
were done per day per physician using NSV, compared
to 33 vesectomies done with the standard technique. The complication
rate was 0.4% for NSV and 3.1% for the standard vasectomy,
the difference being significant[12]. Another multi-center
comparative study involving 716 men reported that
there was less bleeding and less time required in NSV
than in the conventional vasectomy procedure despite the relative difficulty
of vas isolation and entering the scrotum in the case of NSV
(Family Health International, unpublished data, 1989). According
to the literature, performing one no-scalpel procedure requires
15-20 minutes by American, 8 minutes by Thai, 16 minutes by
Danish, and 5-12 minutes by Spanish doctors[3,13-15].
In an
Indian study with 274 and a US study with 273 acceptors, not a single complication
was found during follow-up observation[3,13]. In Colombia, though not
statistically significant, men opting for the no-scalpel approach had fewer complications
than did men undergoing traditional procedures; it is believed that the
attributes of NSV method, including the need for less equipment, also represent
cost-saving programmatic advantages over traditional procedures[16].
By 1995, 7513 NSV procedures were done by five trained surgeons in Colombia,
and the incidence of
complications was 3%, including 0.3% hematoma, 0.26% infection, 1.14% epidydimitis,
0.22% vaso-cutaneous fistula, and 0.3% other complications[9]. A
review of the first 1000 cases of no-scalpel vasectomy performed in Mexico
in 1990-93 confirmed
that 97.9% had no postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma and there was not
a single case of wound infection; three follow-up visits showed that the
postoperative azoospermia rates were 97.4%, 95.7%, and 94.1%, respectively[17].
Skriver reported that in a comparative study of 256 men undergoing conventional
vasectomy and no-scalpel technique, NSV reduced the post-vasectomy pain,
the use of analgesics, the frequency of infections, and the necessary contacts
with physicians, which were self-assessed on a 10-cm visual analogue scale[18].
In 100 Spanish men who accepted the no-scalpel procedure in Barcelona, no
haematomas or infections were reported[15]. Holt believed that
these benefits are attributable
to the minimal dissection and reduced tissue handling required to expose
and isolate the vas[19].
4
NSV Training
Although
no-scalpel technique is a simple outpatient procedure, physicians generally
find the technique difficult to master when only reading the teaching
materials. They believed that the key steps of the technique including
three finger fixation of the vas, anaesthesia infiltration
of the spermatic cord, and grasping, exposing, delivering and
isolating the vas are critical and certain movement and position
of hands and fingers, to assure great accuracy, is required at each step
of the technique[1,14].
Scarcity of acceptors can be a problem in some countries where
vasectomy is not popular due to large time intervals between
surgeries. The US trainers use a scrotal model as
an essential part of training. This consists of a gauze-like
material that simulates the scrotal skin and a strip of plastic tubing
that represents the vas deferens. The doctors usually spend one or two
hours practicing on the scrotal model[20].
In 1994, a training film was prepared by WHO
and AVSC International for providing a standard NSV training procedure.
The film was then distributed to all the member countries and
regions.
Based
on the analysis of 489 Chinese NSV trainees, Xu et al believed
that the minimum solo practice should be no less than five
cases during the training course, although 10-15 cases would
be better[21]. It has been reported that 6-9 solo
operations in the US (Family Planning International, unpublished data,
1989), 10-15 in Denmark[14], and 15-20 in Thailand (Nirapathpongporn
A, unpublished data, 1989) are required to develop
proficiency. Obviously, training is important to ensure the
quality of the no-scalpel procedure. There is a good example in Gentofte
county hospital, Denmark, where 102 consecutive no-scalpel vasectomies
were performed by 2 urologists during a period of 1.5 years. An experienced
surgeon performed the operation with a less experienced resident
and neither had received NSV training. Although the doctor
believed that there was a low rate of primary surgical complications,
7 cases of infection, one case of granuloma, 39 (45%) cases
of discolouration, and 34 postoperative cases of discomfort occurred,
and 5 of these were hospitalized[22].
All these are related to inadequate techniques on infiltration
of anaesthesia, dissection of scrotal wall and vas, which are especially
emphasized in NSV training course.
Chinese
data shows that the result of NSV training is influenced by the
sex of the trainees (males appear to be more proficient, which might be
due to psychological differences between the two sexes), their affiliation and
location, their previous experience with vasectomy, and the number of cases
performed during the training course. Besides, paramedics should also be
required to efficiently practice NSV in a high-quality training course[21].
It should be emphasized, however, that when the use of a new technique is
rapidly expanding, it is difficult to maintain a consistent quality control
standard, as experienced in China during the past two decades[23].
5
Occlusion techniques used in NSV
In
NSV a loop of vas deferens is delivered outside the scrotal skin by two special
instruments without the practice of vas occlusion. Thus, unnecessary and
invasive dissection on the scrotal wall is avoided, however, the occlusion
technique of vas ends is nearly the same as the traditional
methods. In a multi-center perspective study during 1988-1990,
Li SQ et al[24] randomized 2713 NSV
cases into seven groups using 7 different occlusion techniques. The results
showed that sperms were still present in the ejaculate of 78
men (3.29%), and a
total of 27 spouses (1.14%) became pregnant at the end of 2 years
post-vasectomy. The rates of recanalization and occurrence of complications
between 7 occlusion groups were significantly different, the
open-ends method without fascial interposition showing the
highest rates (recanalization 7.53% and complications 2.17%).
The authors suggested that ligation of the vas ends with fascial interposition is
the most advisable occlusion technique.
Reynolds
described modified techniques on dissecting and fascial interposing
of the vas, including the use of an extra-delicate curved mosquito hemostat,
cautery of the cut vas ends, and the employment of the purse-string suture
to close
the sheath[25]. The only widely accepted modification was cautery
of the vas[1].
The most common occlusion technique in the United States (1995) was the
concurrent use of ligation and cautery, and slightly less than one half
(48%) of all US physicians interposed the fascial sheath over one end of
the vas[6]. In 1223 Canadian vasectomies, two groups of doctors
used the noscalpel technique in combination with either the tantalum clip
or cautery. One group using tantalum clips on the ends of the vas had complication
and recanalization rates of 5% and 2.8%, respectively; the other group using
cauterisation of the prostatic end of the vas, leaving the epidydimal end
open had rates of 12.3% and 1.2%, respectively. The authors concluded that
the occlusive techniques used by the two groups might partially explain
the differences[26].
References
[1]
Huber D. No-scalpel vasectomy: the transfer of a refined surgical technique
from China to other countries. Adv
Contracep 1989; 5: 217-8.
[2] Ratana-Olarn K. Promotion of vasectomy in Thailand. J
Med Assoc Thai 1991; 74: 518-21.
[3] Das HC, Bhattacharjee J. No-scalpel vasectomy: hope for the future. J
Fam Welfare
1993; 39: 14-6.
[4] Nigam SK, Malik SK, Das HC. A profile of acceptors of non-scalpel
vasectomy. J Fam Welfare 1994; 40: 19-21.
[5] Gural D. Vasectomy
in Turkey. Lancet
1993; 342(8870): 556.
[6] Haws JM, Morgan GT, Pollack AE, Koonin LM, Magnani RJ, Gargiullo PM.
Clinical aspects
of vasectomies performed in the United States in 1995. Urology 1998; 52:
685-91.
[7] Haws JM, McKenzie M, Mehta M, Pollack AE. Increasing the availability
of vasectomy in public-sector clinics. Family Planning Perspec 1997;
79: 185-6.
[8] Haws JM. No-scalpel
vasectomy activities expand in Canada. AVSC News 1993; 31(3):
8.
[9] Perez Nino JF, Daza Milkes EA. No-scalpel vasectomy. Profaminia: Planidicacion,
Poblacion y Desarrollo 1995; 13(26): 36-41.
[10] Martinez-Manautou J, Hernandez D,Alarcon F, Correu S. Introduction
of no-scalpel vasectomy at the Mexican Social Security Institute.
Adv Contracep 1991; 7: 193-201.
[11] Anonymous. No-scalpel vasectomy in the United States. IPPF Med Bull
1993; 33: 2.
[12] Nirapathpongporn A, Huber DH, Krieger JN. No-scalpel vasectomy at
the King's birthday vasectomy festival. Lancet 1990; 335 (8694):
894-5.
[13] Li SQ, Goldstein M, Zhu J, Huber D. The no-scalpel vasectomy. J Urol
1991; 145: 341-4.
[14] Harvald TB, Miskowiak J. Vasectomy using the Li method. Ugeskrift
Laeger 1994; 156: 2383-5.
[15] Viladoms Fuster JM, Li PS. No-scalpel vasectomy. Arch Espanoles Urologia
1994; 47: 695-701.
[16] Anonymous. Successful trial of no-scalpel vasectomy.
IPPF/WHR Forum 1990; 6:11.
[17] Arellano Lara S, Gonzalez Barrera JL, Hernandez Ono A, Moreno Alcazar
O, Espinosa Perez J. No-scalpel vasectomy: review of the first
1000 cases in a family medicine unit. Arch Med Res 1997; 28:
517-22.
[18] Skriver M, Skovsgaard F, Miskowiak J. Conventional or Li vasectomy:
a questionnarie study. Brit J Urol 1997; 79: 596-8.
[19] Holt BA, Higgins AF. Minimally invasive vasectomy. Brit J Urol 1996;
77: 585-6.
[20] Harper PB. Dr. Philip Li trains US doctors in no-scalpel vasectomy.
AVSC News 1991; 29 (4): 4.
[21] Xu B, Feng H, Liu XZ. No-scalpel
vasectomy training in China.
Adv Contracep Del Sys 1993; 9 (1): 1-8.
[22] Dorfelt A. No-scalpel vasectomy (Li method). Ugesrift Laeger 1997;
159: 7500-2.
[23] Xu B. Male sterilization
in China. Brit J Fam Plan 1993; 19: 243-5.
[24] Li SQ, Xu B, Hou YH, Pan QR, Cheng DS. Relationship between vas occlusion
techniques and re-canalization. Adv Contracep Del Sys 1994;
10: 153-9.
[25] Reynolds RD. Vas
deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy.
J Fam Pract
1994; 39: 577-82.
[26] Labrecque M, Bedard L, Laperriere L. Efficacy and complications associated
with
vasectomies in two clinics in the Quebec region. Canadian Family Physician
1998; 44; 1860-6.
Correspondence
to: Dr. Bing XU, Deputy Director, Chongqing Li Shunqiang Andrologic
Hospital, 167 East Jianxin Road, Jiangbei District, Chongqing, 400020,
China.
Tel: +86-23-6775 6755 Fax: +86-23-6775 6759
e-mail: lsq@lia.com.cn
and wdhuang@cta.cq.cn
Received 2000-01-18 Accepted 2000-02-20
|