|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
administration of large doses of paracetamol impairs the reproductive
competence of male rats
W.D.
Ratnasooriya, J.R.A.C. Jayakody Department
of Zoology, University of Colombo, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka. Asian J Androl 2000 Dec; 2: 247-255 Keywords:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Control |
Treatment
(2 h) |
Control |
Treatment
(day 30) |
||
| 500
mg/kg |
1000
mg/kg |
500
mg/kg |
1000
mg/kg |
|||
|
%
mounted |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
83.3c |
66.7c |
|
%
intromitted |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
66.6c |
66.7c |
|
%
ejaculated |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
50 |
33.3c |
|
Number
of mounts |
18.61.9 |
24.63.2 |
13.31.1b |
19.82.2 |
11.23.2b |
6.32.2c |
|
Number
of intromissions |
17.31.2 |
24.03.2 |
12.61.4c |
19.82.2 |
9.03.4 |
5.31.9c |
|
Mount
latency (s) |
51.410.7 |
34.312.5 |
14328.7 |
31.323.7 |
234.289.4c |
307.3187.4b |
|
Intromission
latency (s) |
51.410.7 |
77.541.3 |
16037.3 |
31.323.7 |
234.289.4b |
307.3187.4b |
|
Ejaculation
latency (s) |
652.076.2 |
548.099.8 |
730.072.0 |
615.070.8 |
810.0127.5b |
705.0123.8b |
|
Intromission
ratio |
0.480.01 |
0.490.0 |
0.48 |
0.500.0 |
0.310.09c |
0.300.09c |
|
Copulatory
efficiency |
95.73.2 |
97.32.6 |
92.77.1 |
1000.0 |
1000.0 |
84.53.5c |
|
Intercopulatory
interval (s) |
37.64.6 |
22.84.0 |
57.74.8b |
33.05.1 |
55.416.5b |
81.926.9b |
3.3
Fertility
In
the mating studies, pre-coital sexual behaviour of rats treated with the
higher dose of paracetamol was essentially similar to those of control.
Further, the index of libido was also not significantly depressed (see
Table 2). The vaginal
sperm count of rats mated with paracetamol treated rats were markedly
and significantly reduced (by 60%). Moreover, the motility of the ejaculated
spermatozoa of the treated rats was impaired. However, these spermatozoa
were neither agglutinated nor decapitated nor grossly abnormal. The fertility
of the paracetamol treated rats was also markedly and significantly reduced:
measured in terms of quantal pregnancy (by 50%), number of uterine implants
(by 62%), implantation index (by 62%) or fertility index (by 50%). Moreover,
5 out of 12 (42%) rats were totally infertile.
The
paracetamol treatment also caused a profound and significant elevation (by
173%) in the pre-implantation losses. However, post-implantation loss
was unchanged (Table 2). Following cessation of treatment, the affected
fertility parameters returned to normal or close to normal.
Table
2. Effects of oral treatment of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1day-1)
on some fertility parameters in male rat (meanSEM, range in parantheses). bP<0.05,
cP<0.01, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney
U-test and G-test).
|
Parameter |
|
n |
Pretreatment |
Treatment
day 30 |
Post
treatment day 30 |
|
Index
of libido (%) |
control |
5 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
treated |
12 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
|
Quantal
pregnancy (%) |
control |
5 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
treated |
12 |
100 |
50c |
100 |
|
|
Fertility
index (%) |
control |
5 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
treated |
12 |
100 |
50c |
100 |
|
|
No.
of implants |
control |
5 |
8.01.4 |
9.41.3 |
6.81.0 |
|
treated |
12 |
9.31.0 |
3.5b1.2 |
8.40.7 |
|
|
Implantation
index (%) |
control |
5 |
800 |
940 |
680 |
|
treated |
12 |
933 |
350b |
840 |
|
|
Pre-implantation
loss (%) |
control |
5 |
37.05.5 |
24.74.0 |
39.82.9 |
|
treated |
12 |
31.44.8 |
67.711.4c |
31.14.8 |
|
|
Post-implantation
loss (%) |
control |
5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0. |
|
treated |
12 |
0.00 |
2.22.2 |
0.00 |
|
|
Vaginal
sperm counts106/mL |
control |
9 |
19.13.4 |
15.71.8 |
15.21.9 |
|
treated |
18 |
26.51.9 |
6.21.0c |
25.83.2 |
3.4
Sequential estimation of ejaculated sperm number
A
significant impairment (compared to control by 35% and compared to pre-treatment
by 51%) of ejaculated sperm numbers (as judged by vaginal sperm counts
in paired females) of paracetamol treated rats were evident by day 17
(Table 3).
Table
3. Effect of paracetamol
(1000 mgkg-1d-1) on ejaculated sperm number
measured in terms of vaginal sperm counts. (meanSEM106,
ranges in parantheses.
bP<0.05, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test
and G-test).
|
|
Pretreatment |
Treatment |
||
|
day
3 |
day
7 |
day
17 |
||
|
Control
(n=4) |
27.34.1 |
24.65.8 |
22.84.1 |
19.01.9 |
|
Paracetamol
(n=6) |
25.32.6 |
24.82.1 |
22.92.9 |
12.40.8b |
3.5
Sperm counts in urine
No
spermatozoa were detected in the urine of both the control and paracetamol-treated
rats when tested daily for 21 days during the treatment period.
3.6
Hyperactivated sperm motility
As
shown in Figure 1, paracetamol
impaired hyperactivated sperm motility in a dose-related manner (r2=0.92,
P<0.01). However, this effect was significant only at the highest
dose.
Figure
1. Effect of paracetamol (0.25, 0.50 or 1.0 mg/mL) on hyperactivated
sperm motility (at 4 h of incubation) of rat in vitro.
meanSEM; n=12, cP<0.01 compared with controls,
Mann-Whitney U-test.
3.7
Effect on muscle-strength and co-ordination
Chronic
treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol did not significantly change the
latency to fall in the bar holding test (control vs treatment;
19.910.7 vs 15.45.8 s) or the latency to slide off in the
Bridge test (control vs treatment; 23.16.5 vs 26.75.0
s).
3.8
Liver function
Chronic
treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol induced a significant (P<0.01)
elevation (by 60%) in SGOT activity (control vs treatment; 45.56.7
U/L vs 72.03.2 U/L) but had no significant effect on SGPT activity
(control vs treatment; 11.02.9s U/L vs 15.02.3 U/L).
3.9
Sperm count and motility
As
shown in Figure 2 the higher
dose of paracetamol caused a significant reduction in sperm numbers of
caput + corpus epididymides (by 63%) and in the whole epididymis (by 47%).
There was also a small (by 7%) drop in sperm count of the cauda epididymis
too but this was not significant. In contrast, sperm count of the vas
deferens was significantly (P<0.01) and markedly (by 69%) increased
in the paracetamol treated rats.
The
motility of spermatozoa extracted from the cauda epididymis of paracetamol
treated rats was significantly (P<0.05) inhibited (control
vs treatment; 62% vs 10%). However, their gross morphology
was unaltered.
Figure
2. Effect of oral treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol for 30
3.10
Organ weights
The
gross external morphology of all the organs examined in treated rats was
similar to that of controls with no obvious lesions. Further, there were
no signs of sperm granulomas either in the epididymides or vasa deferentia
of the treated rats.
The
high dose of paracetamol caused significant reduction only in relative weights
of testes (by 33%) and caput + corpus epididymides (by 25%) (Table 4).
Further,
the lengths of the testes of treated rats were unaltered, but their interstitial
fluid volume was significantly and moderately reduced (by 32%).
Table
4. Effects of oral
treatment (for 30 days) of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1day-1)
on organ weights, volume and length in male rats (meanSEM, n=11,
range in parantheses). bP<0.05, compared
with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test).
|
|
|
Liver |
Kidney |
Testes |
Caput
+ Copus epididymis |
Cauda
epididymis |
Seminal
vesicle+ coagulating gland |
Vas
deferens |
Prostate
gland |
|
Organ
weights(g/100 g body weight) |
Control |
4.370.16 |
0.560.06 |
990.03 |
0.120.01 |
0780.01 |
0.590.04 |
0430.01 |
240.02 |
|
paracetamol |
4.280.13 |
0.540.06 |
0.890.04b |
0.100.01 |
0.0720.01 |
0.650.05(0.2-0.7) |
0.0420.01 |
0.340.06 |
|
|
Organ
length(mm) |
Control |
|
|
19.240.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
paracetamol |
|
|
18.220.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organ
volume(L) |
Control |
|
|
62.177.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
paracetamol |
|
|
42.07.0b |
|
|
|
|
|
3.11
Histopathology
Chronic
paracetamol treatment caused moderate infiltration of inflammatory cells
into the portal vessels of the liver. In addition, a mild hypertrophy
of the hepatic lobules
was recognized in some treated rats.
Paracetamol
treatment did not induce any marked degenerative changes in the epididymal
epithelium. The lumen of the epididymal tubules was unobstructed with
sperm granulomas or desquamated epithelial cells. The tubular lumina of
treated rats were almost filled with spermatozoa as in the control rats.
In
the seminiferous tubules of paracetamol treated rats marked apoptosis
of both spermatocytes, mainly in the pachytene stage and early spermatids
(71.233.9%) were evident. The apoptotic spermatocytes were mostly sloughed
from the germinal epithelium and were found in the lumen. Further, there
were no signs of complete
arrest of spermatogenesis and tubular regression in any of the treated
rats. Sertoli and Leydig cells appeared to be normal and showed neither
hypertrophy nor atrophy.
3.12
Contractility of epididymal tubules and vas deferens
None
of the isolated cauda epididymal tubules exhibited spontaneous contractions
during the equilibration period. Addition of paracetamol or vehicle did
not induce contractions or relaxations in the tubules.
4
Discussion
This
study has demonstrated that chronic paracetamol treatment impairs the
sexual competence and fertility of male rats. This is a novel finding,
which suggests that long term consumption of paracetamol may disrupt fertility.
A four-week treatment period in male rats is considered sufficient for
the evaluation of drug related effects on male reproduction[18].
This
antireproductive effect of paracetamol was not accompanied with overt signs
of toxicity or stress. However, there was a significant SGOT elevation
and moderate leucocyte infiltration of the hepatic vessels, suggesting
a damaging effect
on the liver. It has been indicated that paracetamol overdose causes liver
necrosis and failure[19]. The oral LD50 of paracetamol
in rats is 3.71 g/kg[19]. Its therapeutic mechanism of action
is still unclear, including whether paracetamol acts peripherally, centrally
or both[14].
In
the sexual behaviour study, the number of rats mounting (except for the lower
dose), intromitting or ejaculating was reduced. This is generally indicative
of impairment of libido[5]. Paradoxically, there was no
impairment of the libido index. Libido is androgen dependant[20].
No reduction in weights of the accessory organs (except the epididymis)
and an apparently normal morphology of Leydig
cells suggest that paracetamol was not acting through suppression of the testosterone
level. The depression in the epididymal weight is more likely to be due
to low sperm numbers, which could result from an increased rate of sperm
transport through it. Alternatively, the reduction in the caput and corpus
epididymal weight may reflect its high sensitivity to testosterone[21].
In sharp contrast, the antilibido action may have arisen from a direct
inhibition of the sexual centre in the hypothalamus of brain[22];
paracetamol passes the blood brain barrier[1] and is claimed
to provoke its antipyretic action through a selective effect on the hypothalamus[23].
Paracetamol
caused a considerable prolongation in the latencies of mounting, intromission
or ejaculation, indicative of impairment of sexual arousability/motivation.
An inverse relationship exists between latencies of these three sexual
parameters and sexual arousability/motivation[24]. In addition,
paracetamol treatment resulted in a marked inhibition of mounting-and-intromission
frequency and copulation
efficiency (only with the higher dose) and intromission ratio. The former
observation is suggestive of disruption in sexual vigour[25]
and the latter, of erectile dysfunction[26]. Furthermore, the
intercopulatory interval was prolonged even with acute paracetamol treatment
indicating disturbed sexual performance[24,25].
In
the mating study, paracetamol inhibited fertility reversibly. Several
mechanisms appear to be mediating this antifertility action. Paracetamol
induced marked oligozoospermia but without teratozoospermia. In the rat,
the number of spermatozoa in the ejaculate is up to 1000-fold higher than
that required for maximum
fertility[27] and thus paracetamol induced oligozoospermia
by itself cannot account for its antifertility action.
Paracetamol
triggered apoptosis of spermatocytes and early spermatids, together with
a reduction in testicular weight and interstitial volume, indicating a
mild testicular toxicity. However, overall spermatogenesis remained uninhibited.
Hence, the observed oligozoospermia cannot be attributed to decreased
sperm production. Paracetamol failed to inhibit nerve mediated biphasic
contraction[13] of isolated vasa deferentia. Therefore, oligozoospermia
is unlikely to be due to inhibition of orgasmic contraction of vas and
cauda epididymis at ejaculation. Urine analysis and histopathological
studies suggest that oligozoospermia is neither due to spermatorhoea nor
to enhanced epididymal
sperm resorption. Sperm granulomas or any other form of obstructions were
not evident in the sperm tract and thus it is not a case of obstructive
oligozoospermia[28]. Paracetamol treatment caused a drastic
drop in the sperm
count of the caput and corpus epididymides, which could indicate accelerated
sperm transport, thereby interrupting epididymal sperm maturation. In
the rat, the immediate source of spermatozoa for ejaculation is the cauda
epididymis[16]. However, the sperm count in the cauda epididymis
was not reduced. The principle cause of oligozoospermia is therefore unlikely
to have resulted from reduced epididymal sperm counts. On the other hand,
ejaculatory dysfunction through retrograde
ejaculation[29] and enhanced spontaneous ejaculations[30]
may play a contributory
role in the production of oligozoospermia in this study. However, we
have no evidence in favour or against such a claim.
Paracetamol treatment caused a reduction in the intromission ratio which indicates an impairment in erectile function[26] possibly through its nitric oxide inhibiting activity[4]. In addition, paracetamol largely reduced the number of intromissions. In rats, a minimum number of intromissions of sufficient strength is required for a female to become pregnant[31]. These two effects on intromission may also contribute to the inhibition in fertility evident in this study.
Paracetamol
caused a profound elevation of pre-implantation losses suggesting an impairment
in the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa. Defects in sperm functions
via a direct and/or an indirect action could be the main mechanism of the
antifertility effect of paracetamol. Motility of both epididymal and ejaculated
sperm were severely depressed which would undoubtedly impair sperm transport.
It is possible that paracetamol may induce its antimotility action either
acting directly on spermatozoa through its nitric oxide inhibiting activity[4]
or indirectly by altering
the microenvironment of the epididymis through its inhibitory action on
cyclooxygenase enzyme[6,32]. Furthermore, an inhibition in
hyperactivated sperm motility was evident with paracetamol. There is evidence
that nitric oxide is important in sperm hyperactivation[33]
and therefore paracetamol could
inhibit this event. Onset of hyperactivated motility is accepted to be
a concomitant feature
of sperm capacitation. Capacitation is mandatory for acrosome reaction,
sperm ovum binding and subsequent fertilization[34]. Paracetamol
induced inhibition of hyperactivated sperm motility would be likely to
interrupt these events
leading to successful fertilization. Further, high doses of paracetamol
can lead to lipid peroxidation[35] and lipid peroxidation is
known to impair the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa[36].
References
[1]
Anderson BJ, Holford NHG, Woollard GA, Chan PLS. Paracetamol plasma and
[2] Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Titus-Ernstoff L, Bohike K, Welch WR, Greenberg
ER. Over-the-counter analgesics and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet 1998;
351: 104-7.
[3] Rodriguez C, Henley SJ, Calle EC, Thun MJ. Paracetamol and risk of
ovarian cancer motality in a prospective study of women in the USA. Lancet
1998; 352: 1354.
[4] Bjorkman R, Hallman KM, Hedner J, Hedner T, Henning M. Acetaminophen
blocks spinal hyperalgesia induced by NMDA and substance P. Pain 1994;
57: 259-64.
[5] Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG, Wadsworth RM. Reduction in libido
and fertility of male rats by administration of the nitric oxide (NO)
synthase inhibitor N-nitro-L-arganine methyl ester. Int
J Androl 2000; 23: 187-91.
[6] Flower RJ, Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthatase in brain
explains the antipyretic activity of acetominophen. Nature 1972; 240:
410-1.
[7] Ratnasooriya WD, Wadsworth RM. The effects of fenclozic acid on fertility of
male rats. Contraception 1979; 19: 129-34.
[8] Ratnasooriya WD, Lionel NDW. Effect of aspirin containing silastic
implants placed adjacent to epididymis on fertility of rats. Indian J
Exp Biol 1984; 22: 75-7.
[9] Ratnasooriya WD, Lionel NDW. Effect of sodium meclofenamate on fertility
of male rats. J Natn Sci Coun Sri Lanka 1985; 13: 7-15.
[10] Ratnasooriya WD. Effect of naproxen on fertility in male rats. Vidyodaya J
Arts Sci Lett 1985; 13: 33-8.
[11] Ratnasooriya WD, Wadsworth RM. Effect on fertility in rats of epididymal administration
of indomethacin. Int J Fert 1987; 32: 152-6.
[12] Ratnasooriya WD, Lionel NDW. Effect of polyphloretin phosphate (a
prostaglandin receptor-blocking drug) on fertility of male rats. Ceylon
J Sci 1983; 16: 143-50.
[13] Plaznik A, Stefanski R, Palejko W, Kotawski W. The role of accumbens
GMBA-B, receptors in the regulation of rat behaviour. Neurosci Res Comm
1993; 12: 23-30.
[14] Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG. Effect of water extract of small
unripe Areca catechu nuts on sperm output in rats. Med Sci Res
1998; 26: 263-6.
[15] Yanagimachi R. In vitro sperm capacitation and fertilization
of golden hamster eggs in a chemically defined medium. In: Hafaz ECE,
Semm K, editors. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Lancaster:
MTP Press; 1982. p
65-74.
[16] Ratnasooriya WD, Wadsworth RM. Effect of mating on sperm distribution
in the reproductive tract of the male rat. Gamete Res 1987; 17: 261-6.
[17] Sharpe RM. The importance of testicular interstial fluid in the transport of
injected hCG to the Leydig cells. Int J Androl 1981; 4: 64-74.
[18] Takayama S, Akaike M, Kawashima K, Takahashi M, Kurokawa Y. A collaborative
study in Japan on optimal treatment period and parameters for detection
of male fertility disorders induced by drugs in rats. J Am Coll Toxicol
1995; 14: 293-327.
[19] Boyd EM, Bereczky GM. Liver necrosis from paracetamol. Brit J Pharmacol
1966; 26: 606-14.
[20] Neuman F. Pharmacology and potential use of cyproterone acetate.
Horm Metab Res 1977; 9: 1-13.
[21] Rajalakshmi M, Arora A, Bose TK, Dinakar N, Gupta G, Thampa TNRU,
et al. Physiology of the epididymis and induction of functional
sterility in the male. J Reprod Fert 1976; 243: 71-94.
[22] Ganong WF. Review of Medical Physiology. London: Prentice-Hall International
Inc; 1995. p 214.
[23] Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM. Pharmacology. London: Churchill Livingstone;
1995. p 248-55.
[24] Benelli A, Artetti R, Poggioli R,Cavazzuti E, Mameli M, Bertolini
A. Effect of potassium channel modulators on male sexual behaviour. Life
Sci 1977; 60: 263-7.
[25] Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG. Effects of Terminalia catappa seeds
on sexual behaviour and fertility of male rats. Asian J Androl 2000;
2: 213-9.
[26] Sachs BD, Yian-Cheng LIV. Mounting and brief noncontact exposure
of males to receptive females facilitate reflexive erection in rats, even
after hypogastric nerve section. Physiol Behav 1998; 65: 413-21.
[27] Spielmann H. Reproduction and development. Environ Health Perspect
1998; 106: 571-76.
[28] Belmonte IG,
de Serrano MNM. Partial obstruction of the seminal path, a frequent cause
of oligozoospermia in men. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3402-5.
[29] Kedia KR. Ejacualtion and emission: Normal physiology, dysfunction
and therapy. In: Krane RJ, Siroky MB, Goldstein T, editors. Male sexual
dysfunction. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1983. p 37-53.
[30] Agmo A. The number of spermatozoa in the spontaneous ejaculates of
rats. J Reprod Fert 1976; 48: 405-7.
[31] Chester RV, Zucker I. Influence of male copulatory behaviour on sperm
transport, pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in female rats. Physiol Behav
1970; 5: 35-43.
[32] Gong XD, Leung GPH, Cheuk BLY, Wong PYD. Interference with the formation
of the epididymal microenvironmenta new strategy for male contraception?
Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 39-45.
[33] Yeoman RR, Jones WD, Rizk BM. Evidence for nitric oxide regulation
of hamster sperm hyperactivation. J Androl 1998; 19: 58-64.
[34] Tulsiani DRP. Carbohydrates mediate sperm-ovum adhesion and triggering
of the acrosome reaction. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 87-97.
[35] Wendel A, Feuerstein S, Konz KH. Acute paracetamol intoxication of
starved mice leads to lipid peroxidation in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol
1979; 28: 2051-5.
[36] Aitken RJ. A free radical theory of male infertility. Reprod Fert
Dev 1994; 6: 19-24.
Correspondence
to: Professor
W.D. Ratnasooriya, Department of Zoology, University of Colombo, Colombo
3, Sri Lanka.
Tel: +94-1-503 399 Fax: +94-1-503 148
e-mail: dappvr@sltnet.lk
Received
2000-10-08 Accepted 2000-11-23
