|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term
administration of large doses of paracetamol impairs the reproductive
competence of male rats
W.D.
Ratnasooriya, J.R.A.C. Jayakody Department
of Zoology, University of Colombo, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka. Asian J Androl 2000 Dec; 2: 247-255 Keywords:
AbstractAim: To evaluate the antireproductive effect of paracetamol in male rats. Methods: Male rats were orally administered daily with 500 mg/kg or 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol for 30 consecutive days. Their sexual behaviour and fertility were evaluated using receptive females. Results: At 2 h after treratment, sexual behaviour was not inhibited but on day 30 both doses of paracetamol caused marked impairment of libido (assessed by % mounting, % intromission and % ejaculation), sexual vigour (number of mounts and intromissions and copulatory efficiency) or sexual performance (intercopulatory interval). In mating experiments, the fertility (in terms of quantal pregnancy, fertility index, implantation index and number of implants) was significantly reduced. All these effects were reversible. The antireproductive effect was not due to a general toxicity but due to an increase in pre-implantation losses resulting from oligozoospermia, impairments of normal and hyper-activated sperm motility, and reduction in the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa. Conclusion: Long-term use of high doses of paracetamol may be detrimental to male reproductive competence.1 Introduction Paracetamol
is a non-prescription drug commonly used for antipyresis and analgesia[1].
It contains a phenol ring, as does oestradiol, and an aceyl group as does
progesterone[2]. These structural features suggest that paracetamol
may possess sex steroid
agonist or antagonist activity. Indeed, uterine, ovarian and testicular
atrophy has been reported in mice fed with high doses of paracetamol[2].
Further, an inverse association between the use of paracetamol and ovarian
cancer in women has been established[3]. Collectively, these
observations indicate a possible antigonadotrophic effect of paracetamol.
Further, it is now known that paracetamol can inhibit nitric oxide generation[4],
which is essential for normal reproductive activity in the male rat[5]. Paracetamol
also has a mild inhibitory action on prostaglandin synthesis 2 Materials and methods2.1
Materials and instruments Paracetamol
(State Pharmaceutical Corporation, Colombo, Sri Lanka), methyl cellulose
(Griffin & George Ltd., London, UK), oestradiol benzoate and progesterone
(Sigma chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), ether (BDH, Poole, UK), haematoxylene,
and eosin (Fluka Chemica, Buchs, Switzerland), enzyme assay kits for the
measurement of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (EC 2.6.1.1, SGOT)
and serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase (EC 2.6.1.2, SGPT) from Randox
Laboratories Ltd., Antrium, UK. Pelleted rat food was obtained from Vet
House Ltd., Colombo, Sri Lanka. The instruments used in the study were
electronic balance (Chyo Balance Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), improved
Neubauer haemocytometer (Fison Scientific Equipments,
Loughborough, UK), microtome (Yamato Kohki Industrial Co., Tokyo, Japan),
light microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan), spectrophotometer
(Jasco V500, Jasco Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Wifug Lab centrifuge (Eltex
of Sweden Ltd., Bradford, UK), organ bath (Nutsume Seisakusho Co., Tokyo,
Japan), pen recorder (Rikadenki Kogyo Co.,!Tokyo, Japan), isometric sensor
(Model IM-20BG, Star Medicals, Tokyo, Japan) and SRI Stimulator (Scientific
and Research Instrument Ltd., London, UK). 2.2
Paracetamol preparation Paracetamol,
500 or 1000 mg, were suspended in 1 mL of 1% methyl cellulose for animal
dosing. 2.3
Animals Adult
crossbred albino rats (males weighing 225-250 g and females weighing 220-240
g) were used. They were kept under standardised animal house conditions
(temperature: 28-30; 12 h light/12 h dark, relative humidity 50-55%)
with free access to
food pellet and tap water. 2.4
Treatment and observation Paracetamol
and vehicle were administered orally by gastric intubation at 12.00 h
daily for 30 consecutive days. Rats were observed twice daily (14.00 and
16.00 h) for signs of toxicity (salivation, rhinorrhoea, lachrymation,
ptosis, squinted eyes,
excessive gnawing and biting movements of jaw, wilting, convulsions, stupor,
tremors, rapid rotational movement of head, neck and/or entire body around
the spinal axis, yellowing of fur, pallor of lips, loss of hair, tail
extension in a Straub-like reaction), postural changes, stress (erection
of fur, exophthalmia) and non-sexual behaviour (such as cleaning of face,
self grooming, climbing
in the cage, rearings). Body weights were determined on days 1 and 30
of treatment. Food and water intake, consistency of faeces and colour
of urine were noted. 2.5
Effects on sexual behaviour Randomly
selected male rats were treated with 500 mg/kg (n=6) or 1000 mg/kg (n=6)
paracetamol daily for 30 consecutive days. The controls (n=6) were
given 1 mL vehicle per day. On day 1 (2 h after treatment) and day 30,
rats were individually caged with a 10 min adaptation period. Then a female
that had been brought
to oestrus by injecting subcutaneously 12 g of oestradiol benzoate in
olive oil 56 h prior to pairing and 0.5 mg of progesterone in olive oil
8 h prior to pairing was placed into the cage[13]. The following
parameters of masculine sexual behaviour were monitored until ejaculation
or 15 min after pairing; mount latency (the time from introduction of
the receptive female to the first mount), intromission latency (the time
from introduction of the receptive female to the first intromission),
ejaculatory latency (the time from introduction of receptive female to
ejaculation), number of mounts and number of intromissions. Using these
measures the following parameters were calculated: % mount, % intromiss 2.6
Effects on fertility Male
rats were randomly assigned to two groups. One group (n=12) was
orally treated with 1000 mg/kg paracetamol, and the other (n=5)
with 1 mL of vehicle
daily for 30 consecutive days. Libido, ejaculatory ability and fertility
of these rats were assessed 7 days prior to treatment, on day 30 of treatment
and 30 days following cessation of treatment. Each male was paired overnight
with a pro-oestrous female (at 16.30-17.00 h). The pre-coital sexual behaviour
of the paired rats was observed 1-2 h later. Vaginal smears of the females
were taken in the
following morning (08.00-08.30 h). The presence of spermatozoa was considered
day 1 of pregnancy. If spermatozoa were present, their motility was noted
(qualitatively) and the numbers were estimated in duplicate using an improved
Neubauer haemocytometer and the gross morphology was observed microscopically
(100 and 400). At
day 14 post-coitum, the mated females were subjected to laparotomy under
ether anaesthesia and the number of conceptuses (both viable and dead)
were counted to permit analysis of fertility. In addition, the colour,
the number and the gross morphology of the corpora lutea in each ovary
were recorded. The
following reproductive parameters were then calculated: index of libido=(number
mated/number paired)100; quantal pregnancy=(number pregnant/number mated)100;
fertility index=(number pregnant/number paired)100; pre-implantation
loss=(number of corpora lutea-number of implantations)/number of corpora
luteaݡ100; post-implantation loss=(total number of implants-number
of viable implants)/total number of implantsݡ100. 2.7
Effect on ejaculated sperm density To
determine the earliest day of sperm count reduction, rats treated with
1000 mg/kg paracetamol (n=6) or 1 mL vehicle (n=4) were
paired 1:1 with pro-oestrous females on days 3, 7 and 17 of treatment
and vaginal sperm counts were estimated. 2.8
Effect on sperm number in urine Twelve
rats were treated with 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol and another 12 with 1
mL vehicle daily for 21 consecutive days. Rats were placed individually
on wooden stands attached with polythene funnels and glass bottles to
collect urine samples over the treatment period as described elsewhere[14].
Urine collected over 24 h was removed, centrifuged at 1600g for 5 min
and the precipitate was resuspended
in normal saline. Ten L drops were examined in duplicate microscopically
for the presence and the number of spermatozoa with an improved Neubauer haemocytometer. 2.9
Effect on hyperactivated sperm motility. Hyperactivated
motility was assessed as described by Yanagimachi[15] 2.10
Effects on muscle strength and muscle co-ordination Male
rats (n=22) were randomly divided into two groups. One group (n=11)
was orally treated with 1000 mg/kg paracetamol and the other (n=11)
with 1 mL of vehicle daily for 30 consecutive days. Rats were subjected
to bar holding test (to evaluate muscle strength[15]) and Bridge
test (to evaluate muscle coordination[15]) at 5-6 h after the
last administration. In the former test the time taken (in s) for the
rat to fall from the bar and in the latter test the latency to slide off
(in s) were recorded. 2.11
Effect on liver function From
the above rats, about 2 mL of blood was collected from the tail under mild
ether anaesthesia, allowed to clot (25-30 min) at room temperature (28-30)
and subjected to 15 min centrifugation (at 3200g). Serum was collect 2.12
Effects on sperm counts and motility The
spermatozoa from the right cauda epididymis of rats (used in 2.10) were
extracted into isotonic saline and immediately examined at 100 magnification
for gross morphology and motility and the number of motile spermatozoa
were counted and expressed in percentage[5]. The vasa deferentia,
cauda epididymis and caput plus corpus epididymides were homogenised separately
with a known volume of isotonic
saline with a ground glass homogeniser. The number of spermatozoa present
was determined in duplicate as described elsewhere[16]. 2.13
Effects on external morphology and accessory gland weights Rats
(used in 2.10) were killed with ether and the animals were weighed and
necropsied. The gross external morphology of the liver, kidney, testes, excurrent
reproductive ducts and accessory glands was noted. The length of the testes
was measured using a pair of vernier calipers. Wet weights were recorded
for the paired seminal vesicles plus coagulating glands (with glandular
secretions), lateral prostates, left testis, vasa deferentia, cauda epididymis,
caput plus corpus epididymis, testis, and liver and kidney. The weights
were expressed as a percentage of body weight. The interstitial volume
of the testes was measured as described by Sharpe[17]. 2.14
Effects on histopathology of liver, cauda epididymides and testes Small
pieces of liver, cauda epididymides and testes (of rats used in 2.10)
were fixed in Bouin's fluid, mounted in paraffin, sectioned at 8 m and
stained with haemotoxylin and eosin and were then examined microscopically
(100 and 400). 2.15
Effects on contractility of epididymal tubules and vas deferens Eighteen
rats were anaesthetised with ether and their vasa deferentia (n=9)
and epididymides (n=9) removed through a 4-5 cm midline lower abdominal
incision. These were immediately placed in a 25 mL glass beaker containing
fresh oxygenated (95 % O2 and 5% CO2) physiological
salt solution of the following composition (mmol/L): Na+, 143;
K+, 5.8; Ca2+, 2.6; Mg2+, 1.2; Cl-,
128; H2PO4-, 1.2; HCO3-,
25; SO42-, 1.2; and glucose 11.1. A
small portion of the cauda epididymides (approximate length 25 mm) was uncoiled
at the vas deferens end and freed from the surrounding connective tissue under
a magnifying lens using a fine pair of forceps as described elsewhere[13].
These portions of the cauda epididymides were suspended in a 50 mL organ bath
at 371 under a resting tension of 0.25 g. Following
an equilibration period of 15-30 min three different concentrations of
the paracetamol (2, 4 and 6 g/mL) were added cumulatively to the organ bath
at 5 min intervals. Contractile responses were recorded isometrically
with an isometric sensor and displayed on a pen recorder. The
isolated vasa deferentia (approximate length 35-40 mm) were also suspended
in organ baths under 1.0 g resting tension and were allowed to equilibrate
for 30-45 min. Nerve mediated contractions were elicited using platinum
ring electrodes and an SRI stimulator (for 5 s at a frequency of 5 Hz
with impulses of 0.5 ms and 90 V) as described elsewhere[13]. 2.16
Statistical analyses 3
Results 3.1
General health, body weight, side effects and stress There
were no treatment-related deaths. The paracetamol treated rats showed
normal food and water intake and their body weight was not significantly
reduced (control vs treatment: 266.18.7 g vs 270.44.7
g). The consistency and the
colour of urine of paracetamol treated rats remained essentially similar
to that of controls.
Further, neither doses of paracetamol induced overt signs of toxicity
or stress. The non-sexual behaviour and general alertness of the paracetamol-treated
rats remained unaltered. 3.2
Sexual behaviour The
results are summarised in Table 1. At 2 h, the low dose had no effect Table
1. Effect of oral
treatment of paracetamol (500 or 1000 mgkg-1d-1)
on the sexual behaviour
of male rats (n=6, meanSEM; ranges in parantheses). bP<0.05,
cP<0.01, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney
U-test and G-test).
3.3
Fertility In
the mating studies, pre-coital sexual behaviour of rats treated with the
higher dose of paracetamol was essentially similar to those of control.
Further, the index of libido was also not significantly depressed (see
Table 2). The vaginal
sperm count of rats mated with paracetamol treated rats were markedly
and significantly reduced (by 60%). Moreover, the motility of the ejaculated
spermatozoa of the treated rats was impaired. However, these spermatozoa
were neither agglutinated nor decapitated nor grossly abnormal. The fertility
of the paracetamol treated rats was also markedly and significantly reduced:
measured in terms of quantal pregnancy (by 50%), number of uterine implants
(by 62%), implantation index (by 62%) or fertility index (by 50%). Moreover,
5 out of 12 (42%) rats were totally infertile. The
paracetamol treatment also caused a profound and significant elevation (by
173%) in the pre-implantation losses. However, post-implantation loss
was unchanged (Table 2). Following cessation of treatment, the affected
fertility parameters returned to normal or close to normal. Table
2. Effects of oral treatment of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1day-1)
on some fertility parameters in male rat (meanSEM, range in parantheses). bP<0.05,
cP<0.01, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney
U-test and G-test).
3.4
Sequential estimation of ejaculated sperm number A
significant impairment (compared to control by 35% and compared to pre-treatment
by 51%) of ejaculated sperm numbers (as judged by vaginal sperm counts
in paired females) of paracetamol treated rats were evident by day 17
(Table 3). Table
3. Effect of paracetamol
(1000 mgkg-1d-1) on ejaculated sperm number
measured in terms of vaginal sperm counts. (meanSEM106,
ranges in parantheses.
bP<0.05, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test
and G-test).
3.5
Sperm counts in urine No
spermatozoa were detected in the urine of both the control and paracetamol-treated
rats when tested daily for 21 days during the treatment period. 3.6
Hyperactivated sperm motility As
shown in Figure 1, paracetamol
impaired hyperactivated sperm motility in a dose-related manner (r2=0.92,
P<0.01). However, this effect was significant only at the highest
dose. Figure
1. Effect of paracetamol (0.25, 0.50 or 1.0 mg/mL) on hyperactivated
sperm motility (at 4 h of incubation) of rat in vitro.
meanSEM; n=12, cP<0.01 compared with controls,
Mann-Whitney U-test. 3.7
Effect on muscle-strength and co-ordination Chronic
treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol did not significantly change the
latency to fall in the bar holding test (control vs treatment;
19.910.7 vs 15.45.8 s) or the latency to slide off in the
Bridge test (control vs treatment; 23.16.5 vs 26.75.0
s). 3.8
Liver function Chronic
treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol induced a significant (P<0.01)
elevation (by 60%) in SGOT activity (control vs treatment; 45.56.7
U/L vs 72.03.2 U/L) but had no significant effect on SGPT activity
(control vs treatment; 11.02.9s U/L vs 15.02.3 U/L). 3.9
Sperm count and motility As
shown in Figure 2 the higher
dose of paracetamol caused a significant reduction in sperm numbers of
caput + corpus epididymides (by 63%) and in the whole epididymis (by 47%).
There was also a small (by 7%) drop in sperm count of the cauda epididymis
too but this was not significant. In contrast, sperm count of the vas
deferens was significantly (P<0.01) and markedly (by 69%) increased
in the paracetamol treated rats. The
motility of spermatozoa extracted from the cauda epididymis of paracetamol
treated rats was significantly (P<0.05) inhibited (control
vs treatment; 62% vs 10%). However, their gross morphology
was unaltered. Figure
2. Effect of oral treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol for 30 3.10
Organ weights The
gross external morphology of all the organs examined in treated rats was
similar to that of controls with no obvious lesions. Further, there were
no signs of sperm granulomas either in the epididymides or vasa deferentia
of the treated rats. The
high dose of paracetamol caused significant reduction only in relative weights
of testes (by 33%) and caput + corpus epididymides (by 25%) (Table 4).
Further,
the lengths of the testes of treated rats were unaltered, but their interstitial
fluid volume was significantly and moderately reduced (by 32%). Table
4. Effects of oral
treatment (for 30 days) of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1day-1)
on organ weights, volume and length in male rats (meanSEM, n=11,
range in parantheses). bP<0.05, compared
with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test).
3.11
Histopathology Chronic
paracetamol treatment caused moderate infiltration of inflammatory cells
into the portal vessels of the liver. In addition, a mild hypertrophy
of the hepatic lobules
was recognized in some treated rats. Paracetamol
treatment did not induce any marked degenerative changes in the epididymal
epithelium. The lumen of the epididymal tubules was unobstructed with
sperm granulomas or desquamated epithelial cells. The tubular lumina of
treated rats were almost filled with spermatozoa as in the control rats. In
the seminiferous tubules of paracetamol treated rats marked apoptosis
of both spermatocytes, mainly in the pachytene stage and early spermatids
(71.233.9%) were evident. The apoptotic spermatocytes were mostly sloughed
from the germinal epithelium and were found in the lumen. Further, there
were no signs of complete
arrest of spermatogenesis and tubular regression in any of the treated
rats. Sertoli and Leydig cells appeared to be normal and showed neither
hypertrophy nor atrophy. 3.12
Contractility of epididymal tubules and vas deferens None
of the isolated cauda epididymal tubules exhibited spontaneous contractions
during the equilibration period. Addition of paracetamol or vehicle did
not induce contractions or relaxations in the tubules. 4
Discussion This
study has demonstrated that chronic paracetamol treatment impairs the
sexual competence and fertility of male rats. This is a novel finding,
which suggests that long term consumption of paracetamol may disrupt fertility.
A four-week treatment period in male rats is considered sufficient for
the evaluation of drug related effects on male reproduction[18].
This
antireproductive effect of paracetamol was not accompanied with overt signs
of toxicity or stress. However, there was a significant SGOT elevation
and moderate leucocyte infiltration of the hepatic vessels, suggesting
a damaging effect
on the liver. It has been indicated that paracetamol overdose causes liver
necrosis and failure[19]. The oral LD50 of paracetamol
in rats is 3.71 g/kg[19]. Its therapeutic mechanism of action
is still unclear, including whether paracetamol acts peripherally, centrally
or both[14]. In
the sexual behaviour study, the number of rats mounting (except for the lower
dose), intromitting or ejaculating was reduced. This is generally indicative
of impairment of libido[5]. Paradoxically, there was no
impairment of the libido index. Libido is androgen dependant[20].
No reduction in weights of the accessory organs (except the epididymis)
and an apparently normal morphology of Leydig
cells suggest that paracetamol was not acting through suppression of the testosterone
level. The depression in the epididymal weight is more likely to be due
to low sperm numbers, which could result from an increased rate of sperm
transport through it. Alternatively, the reduction in the caput and corpus
epididymal weight may reflect its high sensitivity to testosterone[21].
In sharp contrast, the antilibido action may have arisen from a direct
inhibition of the sexual centre in the hypothalamus of brain[22];
paracetamol passes the blood brain barrier[1] and is claimed
to provoke its antipyretic action through a selective effect on the hypothalamus[23]. Paracetamol
caused a considerable prolongation in the latencies of mounting, intromission
or ejaculation, indicative of impairment of sexual arousability/motivation.
An inverse relationship exists between latencies of these three sexual
parameters and sexual arousability/motivation[24]. In addition,
paracetamol treatment resulted in a marked inhibition of mounting-and-intromission
frequency and copulation
efficiency (only with the higher dose) and intromission ratio. The former
observation is suggestive of disruption in sexual vigour[25]
and the latter, of erectile dysfunction[26]. Furthermore, the
intercopulatory interval was prolonged even with acute paracetamol treatment
indicating disturbed sexual performance[24,25]. In
the mating study, paracetamol inhibited fertility reversibly. Several
mechanisms appear to be mediating this antifertility action. Paracetamol
induced marked oligozoospermia but without teratozoospermia. In the rat,
the number of spermatozoa in the ejaculate is up to 1000-fold higher than
that required for maximum
fertility[27] and thus paracetamol induced oligozoospermia
by itself cannot account for its antifertility action. Paracetamol
triggered apoptosis of spermatocytes and early spermatids, together with
a reduction in testicular weight and interstitial volume, indicating a
mild testicular toxicity. However, overall spermatogenesis remained uninhibited.
Hence, the observed oligozoospermia cannot be attributed to decreased
sperm production. Paracetamol failed to inhibit nerve mediated biphasic
contraction[13] of isolated vasa deferentia. Therefore, oligozoospermia
is unlikely to be due to inhibition of orgasmic contraction of vas and
cauda epididymis at ejaculation. Urine analysis and histopathological
studies suggest that oligozoospermia is neither due to spermatorhoea nor
to enhanced epididymal
sperm resorption. Sperm granulomas or any other form of obstructions were
not evident in the sperm tract and thus it is not a case of obstructive
oligozoospermia[28]. Paracetamol treatment caused a drastic
drop in the sperm
count of the caput and corpus epididymides, which could indicate accelerated
sperm transport, thereby interrupting epididymal sperm maturation. In
the rat, the immediate source of spermatozoa for ejaculation is the cauda
epididymis[16]. However, the sperm count in the cauda epididymis
was not reduced. The principle cause of oligozoospermia is therefore unlikely
to have resulted from reduced epididymal sperm counts. On the other hand,
ejaculatory dysfunction through retrograde
ejaculation[29] and enhanced spontaneous ejaculations[30]
may play a contributory
role in the production of oligozoospermia in this study. However, we
have no evidence in favour or against such a claim. Paracetamol treatment caused a reduction in the intromission ratio which indicates an impairment in erectile function[26] possibly through its nitric oxide inhibiting activity[4]. In addition, paracetamol largely reduced the number of intromissions. In rats, a minimum number of intromissions of sufficient strength is required for a female to become pregnant[31]. These two effects on intromission may also contribute to the inhibition in fertility evident in this study. Paracetamol
caused a profound elevation of pre-implantation losses suggesting an impairment
in the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa. Defects in sperm functions
via a direct and/or an indirect action could be the main mechanism of the
antifertility effect of paracetamol. Motility of both epididymal and ejaculated
sperm were severely depressed which would undoubtedly impair sperm transport.
It is possible that paracetamol may induce its antimotility action either
acting directly on spermatozoa through its nitric oxide inhibiting activity[4]
or indirectly by altering
the microenvironment of the epididymis through its inhibitory action on
cyclooxygenase enzyme[6,32]. Furthermore, an inhibition in
hyperactivated sperm motility was evident with paracetamol. There is evidence
that nitric oxide is important in sperm hyperactivation[33]
and therefore paracetamol could
inhibit this event. Onset of hyperactivated motility is accepted to be
a concomitant feature
of sperm capacitation. Capacitation is mandatory for acrosome reaction,
sperm ovum binding and subsequent fertilization[34]. Paracetamol
induced inhibition of hyperactivated sperm motility would be likely to
interrupt these events
leading to successful fertilization. Further, high doses of paracetamol
can lead to lipid peroxidation[35] and lipid peroxidation is
known to impair the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa[36]. References [1]
Anderson BJ, Holford NHG, Woollard GA, Chan PLS. Paracetamol plasma and
Correspondence
to: Professor
W.D. Ratnasooriya, Department of Zoology, University of Colombo, Colombo
3, Sri Lanka.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |