Home  |  Archive  |  AJA @ Nature  |  Online Submission  |  News & Events  |  Subscribe  |  APFA  |  Society  |  Links  |  Contact Us  |  中文版

Long-term administration of large doses of paracetamol impairs the reproductive competence of male rats

W.D. Ratnasooriya, J.R.A.C. Jayakody

Department of Zoology, University of Colombo, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka.

Asian J Androl  2000 Dec; 2:  247-255


Keywords: paracetamol; fertility; sexual behaviour; oligozoospermia; pre-implantation loss;  capacitation; sperm motility
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the antireproductive effect of paracetamol in male rats. Methods: Male rats were orally administered daily with 500  mg/kg or 1000  mg/kg of paracetamol for 30 consecutive days.  Their sexual behaviour and fertility were evaluated using receptive females. Results: At 2 h after treratment, sexual behaviour was not inhibited but on day 30 both doses of paracetamol caused marked impairment of libido (assessed by % mounting, % intromission and % ejaculation), sexual vigour (number of mounts and intromissions and copulatory efficiency) or sexual performance (intercopulatory interval).  In mating experiments, the fertility (in terms of quantal pregnancy, fertility index, implantation index and number of implants) was significantly reduced.  All these effects were reversible.  The antireproductive effect was not due to a general toxicity but due to an increase in pre-implantation losses resulting from oligozoospermia, impairments of normal and hyper-activated sperm motility, and reduction in the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa. Conclusion: Long-term use of high doses of paracetamol may be detrimental to male reproductive competence.

1 Introduction

Paracetamol is a non-prescription drug commonly used for antipyresis and analgesia[1]. It contains a phenol ring, as does oestradiol, and an aceyl group as does progesterone[2]. These structural features suggest that paracetamol may possess sex steroid agonist or antagonist activity. Indeed, uterine, ovarian and testicular atrophy has been reported in mice fed with high doses of paracetamol[2]. Further, an inverse association between the use of paracetamol and ovarian cancer in women has been established[3]. Collectively, these observations indicate a possible antigonadotrophic effect of paracetamol. Further, it is now known that paracetamol can inhibit nitric oxide generation[4], which is essential for normal reproductive activity in the male rat[5].

Paracetamol also has a mild inhibitory action on prostaglandin synthesis in peripheral tissues[6]. Furthermore, prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors such as fenclozic acid[7], aspirin[8], sodium meclofenamate[9], naproxen[10] or indomethecin[11] in high doses impair fertility of male rats, but not with polyphloretin phosphate[12], a prostaglandin receptor blocking drug. These observations raise the possibility that long-term use of high doses of paracetamol may interrupt normal reproductive function due to its antigonadotrophic, and nitric oxide and prostaglandin synthesis blocking activity. This study was designed to investigate the effects of paracetamol on sexual behaviour and fertility in male rats.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials and instruments

Paracetamol (State Pharmaceutical Corporation, Colombo, Sri Lanka), methyl cellulose (Griffin & George Ltd., London, UK), oestradiol benzoate and progesterone (Sigma chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), ether (BDH, Poole, UK), haematoxylene, and eosin (Fluka Chemica, Buchs, Switzerland), enzyme assay kits for the measurement of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (EC 2.6.1.1, SGOT) and serum glutamic pyruvate transaminase (EC 2.6.1.2, SGPT) from Randox Laboratories Ltd., Antrium, UK. Pelleted rat food was obtained from Vet House Ltd., Colombo, Sri Lanka. The instruments used in the study were electronic balance (Chyo Balance Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), improved Neubauer haemocytometer (Fison Scientific Equipments, Loughborough, UK), microtome (Yamato Kohki Industrial Co., Tokyo, Japan), light microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan), spectrophotometer (Jasco V500, Jasco Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), Wifug Lab centrifuge (Eltex of Sweden Ltd., Bradford, UK), organ bath (Nutsume Seisakusho Co., Tokyo, Japan), pen recorder (Rikadenki Kogyo Co.,!Tokyo, Japan), isometric sensor (Model IM-20BG, Star Medicals, Tokyo, Japan) and SRI Stimulator (Scientific and Research Instrument Ltd., London, UK).

2.2 Paracetamol preparation

Paracetamol, 500 or 1000 mg, were suspended in 1 mL of 1% methyl cellulose for animal dosing.

2.3 Animals

Adult crossbred albino rats (males weighing 225-250 g and females weighing 220-240 g) were used. They were kept under standardised animal house conditions (temperature: 28-30; 12 h light/12 h dark, relative humidity 50-55%) with free access to food pellet and tap water.

2.4 Treatment and observation

Paracetamol and vehicle were administered orally by gastric intubation at 12.00 h daily for 30 consecutive days. Rats were observed twice daily (14.00 and 16.00 h) for signs of toxicity (salivation, rhinorrhoea, lachrymation, ptosis, squinted eyes, excessive gnawing and biting movements of jaw, wilting, convulsions, stupor, tremors, rapid rotational movement of head, neck and/or entire body around the spinal axis, yellowing of fur, pallor of lips, loss of hair, tail extension in a Straub-like reaction), postural changes, stress (erection of fur, exophthalmia) and non-sexual behaviour (such as cleaning of face, self grooming, climbing in the cage, rearings). Body weights were determined on days 1 and 30 of treatment. Food and water intake, consistency of faeces and colour of urine were noted.

2.5 Effects on sexual behaviour

Randomly selected male rats were treated with 500 mg/kg (n=6) or 1000 mg/kg (n=6) paracetamol daily for 30 consecutive days. The controls (n=6) were given 1 mL vehicle per day. On day 1 (2 h after treatment) and day 30, rats were individually caged with a 10 min adaptation period. Then a female that had been brought to oestrus by injecting subcutaneously 12 g of oestradiol benzoate in olive oil 56 h prior to pairing and 0.5 mg of progesterone in olive oil 8 h prior to pairing was placed into the cage[13]. The following parameters of masculine sexual behaviour were monitored until ejaculation or 15 min after pairing; mount latency (the time from introduction of the receptive female to the first mount), intromission latency (the time from introduction of the receptive female to the first intromission), ejaculatory latency (the time from introduction of receptive female to ejaculation), number of mounts and number of intromissions. Using these measures the following parameters were calculated: % mount, % intromission, % ejaculation, copulatory efficiency (number of intromissions/number of mounts)100, intercopulatory interval (average time between intromissions) and intromission ratio number of intromissions/(number of mounts+number of intromissions).

2.6 Effects on fertility

Male rats were randomly assigned to two groups. One group (n=12) was orally treated with 1000 mg/kg paracetamol, and the other (n=5) with 1 mL of vehicle daily for 30 consecutive days. Libido, ejaculatory ability and fertility of these rats were assessed 7 days prior to treatment, on day 30 of treatment and 30 days following cessation of treatment. Each male was paired overnight with a pro-oestrous female (at 16.30-17.00 h). The pre-coital sexual behaviour of the paired rats was observed 1-2 h later. Vaginal smears of the females were taken in the following morning (08.00-08.30 h). The presence of spermatozoa was considered day 1 of pregnancy. If spermatozoa were present, their motility was noted (qualitatively) and the numbers were estimated in duplicate using an improved Neubauer haemocytometer and the gross morphology was observed microscopically (100 and 400).

At day 14 post-coitum, the mated females were subjected to laparotomy under ether anaesthesia and the number of conceptuses (both viable and dead) were counted to permit analysis of fertility. In addition, the colour, the number and the gross morphology of the corpora lutea in each ovary were recorded.

The following reproductive parameters were then calculated: index of libido=(number mated/number paired)100; quantal pregnancy=(number pregnant/number mated)100; fertility index=(number pregnant/number paired)100; pre-implantation loss=(number of corpora lutea-number of implantations)/number of corpora luteaݡ100; post-implantation loss=(total number of implants-number of viable implants)/total number of implantsݡ100.

2.7 Effect on ejaculated sperm density

To determine the earliest day of sperm count reduction, rats treated with 1000 mg/kg paracetamol (n=6) or 1 mL vehicle (n=4) were paired 1:1 with pro-oestrous females on days 3, 7 and 17 of treatment and vaginal sperm counts were estimated.

2.8 Effect on sperm number in urine

Twelve rats were treated with 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol and another 12 with 1 mL vehicle daily for 21 consecutive days. Rats were placed individually on wooden stands attached with polythene funnels and glass bottles to collect urine samples over the treatment period as described elsewhere[14]. Urine collected over 24 h was removed, centrifuged at 1600g for 5 min and the precipitate was resuspended in normal saline. Ten L drops were examined in duplicate microscopically for the presence and the number of spermatozoa with an improved Neubauer haemocytometer.

2.9 Effect on hyperactivated sperm motility.

Hyperactivated motility was assessed as described by Yanagimachi[15]. Briefly, spermatozoa from the cauda epididymis of etherised rats were extruded into BWW medium. BWW 200 L was placed at the centre of a glass petri dish and covered with paraffin oil; 100 L of the sperm suspension was then added to the BWW and mixed well. Finally, 100 L of either paracetamol1 mg/mL (n=5), 0.5 mg/mL (n=14) or 0.25 mg/mL (n=12)or BWW (n=5) was added to the sperm suspension and mixed thoroughly. The final concentration of spermatozoa was 31106 mL. These preparations were incubated at 37 for 3 h in 5% CO2 in air under relative humidity of 95%. Ten L of the sperm suspension was then transferred on to a glass slide and was examined microscopically (100), and the number of capacitated sperm (showing characteristic hyperactivated motility) were counted at least in 5 fields and expressed as a percentage.

2.10 Effects on muscle strength and muscle co-ordination

Male rats (n=22) were randomly divided into two groups. One group (n=11) was orally treated with 1000 mg/kg paracetamol and the other (n=11) with 1 mL of vehicle daily for 30 consecutive days. Rats were subjected to bar holding test (to evaluate muscle strength[15]) and Bridge test (to evaluate muscle coordination[15]) at 5-6 h after the last administration. In the former test the time taken (in s) for the rat to fall from the bar and in the latter test the latency to slide off (in s) were recorded.

2.11 Effect on liver function

From the above rats, about 2 mL of blood was collected from the tail under mild ether anaesthesia, allowed to clot (25-30 min) at room temperature (28-30) and subjected to 15 min centrifugation (at 3200g). Serum was collected and SGOT and SGPT were determined (within 1-2 h) using a Randox enzyme kit and a spectrophotometer. All readings were taken within 10 min after incubation.

2.12 Effects on sperm counts and motility

The spermatozoa from the right cauda epididymis of rats (used in 2.10) were extracted into isotonic saline and immediately examined at 100 magnification for gross morphology and motility and the number of motile spermatozoa were counted and expressed in percentage[5]. The vasa deferentia, cauda epididymis and caput plus corpus epididymides were homogenised separately with a known volume of isotonic saline with a ground glass homogeniser. The number of spermatozoa present was determined in duplicate as described elsewhere[16].

2.13 Effects on external morphology and accessory gland weights

Rats (used in 2.10) were killed with ether and the animals were weighed and necropsied. The gross external morphology of the liver, kidney, testes, excurrent reproductive ducts and accessory glands was noted. The length of the testes was measured using a pair of vernier calipers. Wet weights were recorded for the paired seminal vesicles plus coagulating glands (with glandular secretions), lateral prostates, left testis, vasa deferentia, cauda epididymis, caput plus corpus epididymis, testis, and liver and kidney. The weights were expressed as a percentage of body weight. The interstitial volume of the testes was measured as described by Sharpe[17].

2.14 Effects on histopathology of liver, cauda epididymides and testes

Small pieces of liver, cauda epididymides and testes (of rats used in 2.10) were fixed in Bouin's fluid, mounted in paraffin, sectioned at 8 m and stained with haemotoxylin and eosin and were then examined microscopically (100 and 400).

2.15 Effects on contractility of epididymal tubules and vas deferens

Eighteen rats were anaesthetised with ether and their vasa deferentia (n=9) and epididymides (n=9) removed through a 4-5 cm midline lower abdominal incision. These were immediately placed in a 25 mL glass beaker containing fresh oxygenated (95 % O2 and 5% CO2) physiological salt solution of the following composition (mmol/L): Na+, 143; K+, 5.8; Ca2+, 2.6; Mg2+, 1.2; Cl-, 128; H2PO4-, 1.2; HCO3-, 25; SO42-, 1.2; and glucose 11.1.

A small portion of the cauda epididymides (approximate length 25 mm) was uncoiled at the vas deferens end and freed from the surrounding connective tissue under a magnifying lens using a fine pair of forceps as described elsewhere[13]. These portions of the cauda epididymides were suspended in a 50 mL organ bath at 371 under a resting tension of 0.25 g.

Following an equilibration period of 15-30 min three different concentrations of the paracetamol (2, 4 and 6 g/mL) were added cumulatively to the organ bath at 5 min intervals. Contractile responses were recorded isometrically with an isometric sensor and displayed on a pen recorder.

The isolated vasa deferentia (approximate length 35-40 mm) were also suspended in organ baths under 1.0 g resting tension and were allowed to equilibrate for 30-45 min. Nerve mediated contractions were elicited using platinum ring electrodes and an SRI stimulator (for 5 s at a frequency of 5 Hz with impulses of 0.5 ms and 90 V) as described elsewhere[13].

2.16 Statistical analyses

Data are given as meanSEM. Statistical evaluations were done using Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test as appropriate. Significance was set at P<0.05.

3 Results

3.1 General health, body weight, side effects and stress

There were no treatment-related deaths. The paracetamol treated rats showed normal food and water intake and their body weight was not significantly reduced (control vs treatment: 266.18.7 g vs 270.44.7 g). The consistency and the colour of urine of paracetamol treated rats remained essentially similar to that of controls. Further, neither doses of paracetamol induced overt signs of toxicity or stress. The non-sexual behaviour and general alertness of the paracetamol-treated rats remained unaltered.

3.2 Sexual behaviour

The results are summarised in Table 1. At 2 h, the low dose had no effect on sexual behaviour whilst the higher dose significantly inhibited the number of mounts and intromissions, and prolonged the intercopulatory interval. In contrast, on day 30, both doses of paracetamol inhibited all of the parameters of sexual behaviour investigated except copulatory efficiency with the lower dose. Further, at day 30, the magnitude of changes in the sexual behaviour induced by the two doses of paracetamol was not significantly different.

Table 1.  Effect of oral treatment of paracetamol (500 or 1000 mgkg-1d-1) on the sexual behaviour of male rats (n=6, meanSEM; ranges in parantheses). bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test).

 

Control

Treatment (2 h)

Control

Treatment (day 30)

500 mg/kg

1000 mg/kg

500 mg/kg

1000 mg/kg

% mounted

100

100

100

100

83.3c

66.7c

% intromitted

100

100

100

100

66.6c

66.7c

% ejaculated

100

100

100

100

50

33.3c

Number of mounts

18.61.9  
(13-26)

24.63.2  
(15-37)

13.31.1b  
(9-17)

19.82.2  
(15-30)

11.23.2b  
(7-22)

6.32.2c  
(7-12)

Number of intromissions

17.31.2  
(13-21)

24.03.2  
(15-37)

12.61.4c  
(8-17)

19.82.2  
(15-30)

9.03.4  
(0-21)b

5.31.9c  
(6-11)

Mount latency (s)

51.410.7  
(15-195)

34.312.5  
(16-95)

14328.7
(55-250)

31.323.7
(5-150)

234.289.4c  
(55-540)

307.3187.4b  
(11.5-108)

Intromission latency (s)

51.410.7
(15-260)

77.541.3  
(18-275)

16037.3
(55-312)

31.323.7
(5-150)

234.289.4b  
(55-540)

307.3187.4b  
(11.5-108)

Ejaculation latency (s)

652.076.2  
(376-864)

548.099.8  
(250-870)

730.072.0  
(538-1017)

615.070.8  
(420-840)

810.0127.5b  
(180-1020)

705.0123.8b  
(270-900)

Intromission ratio

0.480.01

0.490.0

0.48 0.0

0.500.0

0.310.09c

0.300.09c

Copulatory efficiency

95.73.2  
(80.7-100)

97.32.6  
(84.6-100)

92.77.1  
(57.1-100)

1000.0

1000.0

84.53.5c  
(0-91.6)

Intercopulatory interval (s)

37.64.6  
(20.8-54)

22.84.0  
(8.6-39.5)

57.74.8b  
(40.1-74.3)

33.05.1
(16-47)

55.416.5b  
(22.5-100)

81.926.9b  
(32.5-150)

3.3 Fertility

In the mating studies, pre-coital sexual behaviour of rats treated with the higher dose of paracetamol was essentially similar to those of control. Further, the index of libido was also not significantly depressed (see Table 2). The vaginal sperm count of rats mated with paracetamol treated rats were markedly and significantly reduced (by 60%). Moreover, the motility of the ejaculated spermatozoa of the treated rats was impaired. However, these spermatozoa were neither agglutinated nor decapitated nor grossly abnormal. The fertility of the paracetamol treated rats was also markedly and significantly reduced: measured in terms of quantal pregnancy (by 50%), number of uterine implants (by 62%), implantation index (by 62%) or fertility index (by 50%). Moreover, 5 out of 12 (42%) rats were totally infertile.

The paracetamol treatment also caused a profound and significant elevation (by 173%) in the pre-implantation losses. However, post-implantation loss was unchanged (Table 2). Following cessation of treatment, the affected fertility parameters returned to normal or close to normal.

Table 2. Effects of oral treatment of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1day-1) on some fertility parameters in male rat (meanSEM, range in parantheses). bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test).

Parameter

 

n

Pretreatment

Treatment day 30

Post treatment day 30

Index of libido (%)

control

5

100

100

100

treated

12

100

100

100

Quantal pregnancy (%)

control

5

100

100

100

treated

12

100

50c

100

Fertility index (%)

control

5

100

100

100

treated

12

100

50c

100

No. of implants

control

5

8.01.4  
(4-13)

9.41.3
(7-12)

6.81.0  
(4-10)

treated

12

9.31.0  
(0.3-13)

3.5b1.2  
(0-9)

8.40.7  
(6-10)

Implantation index (%)

control

5

800

940

680

treated

12

933

350b

840

Pre-implantation loss (%)

control

5

37.05.5  
(23.5-55.5)

24.74.0  
(10-30)

39.82.9  
(28-46.6)

treated

12

31.44.8  
(8.3-54.5)

67.711.4c  
(9-100)

31.14.8  
(18.1-45.4)

Post-implantation loss (%)

control

5

0.00

0.00

0. 00

treated

12

0.00

2.22.2  
(0-2.2)

0.00

Vaginal sperm counts106/mL

control

9

19.13.4  
(8.5-39)

15.71.8  
(6-25)

15.21.9  
(9.5-20.5)

treated

18

26.51.9  
(13-43)

6.21.0c  
(2.5-15)

25.83.2  
(15-49.5)

3.4 Sequential estimation of ejaculated sperm number

A significant impairment (compared to control by 35% and compared to pre-treatment by 51%) of ejaculated sperm numbers (as judged by vaginal sperm counts in paired females) of paracetamol treated rats were evident by day 17 (Table 3).

Table 3.  Effect of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1d-1) on ejaculated sperm number measured in terms of vaginal sperm counts. (meanSEM106, ranges in parantheses. bP<0.05, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test).

 

Pretreatment

Treatment

day 3

day 7

day 17

Control (n=4)  
(1% methylcellouse)

27.34.1  
(21-39)

24.65.8  
(18-42)

22.84.1  
(15-31)

19.01.9  
(15-24)

Paracetamol (n=6)  
 
1000 mg/kg

25.32.6  
(19-34)

24.82.1  
(20-37)

22.92.9  
(17-34)

12.40.8b
(10-14)

3.5 Sperm counts in urine

No spermatozoa were detected in the urine of both the control and paracetamol-treated rats when tested daily for 21 days during the treatment period.

3.6 Hyperactivated sperm motility

As shown in Figure 1, paracetamol impaired hyperactivated sperm motility in a dose-related manner (r2=0.92, P<0.01). However, this effect was significant only at the highest dose.

Figure 1. Effect of paracetamol (0.25, 0.50 or 1.0 mg/mL) on hyperactivated sperm motility (at 4 h of incubation) of rat in vitro.  meanSEM; n=12, cP<0.01 compared with controls, Mann-Whitney U-test.

3.7 Effect on muscle-strength and co-ordination

Chronic treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol did not significantly change the latency to fall in the bar holding test (control vs treatment; 19.910.7 vs 15.45.8 s) or the latency to slide off in the Bridge test (control vs treatment; 23.16.5 vs 26.75.0 s).

3.8 Liver function

Chronic treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol induced a significant (P<0.01) elevation (by 60%) in SGOT activity (control vs treatment; 45.56.7 U/L vs 72.03.2 U/L) but had no significant effect on SGPT activity (control vs treatment; 11.02.9s U/L vs 15.02.3 U/L).

3.9 Sperm count and motility

As shown in Figure 2 the higher dose of paracetamol caused a significant reduction in sperm numbers of caput + corpus epididymides (by 63%) and in the whole epididymis (by 47%). There was also a small (by 7%) drop in sperm count of the cauda epididymis too but this was not significant. In contrast, sperm count of the vas deferens was significantly (P<0.01) and markedly (by 69%) increased in the paracetamol treated rats.

The motility of spermatozoa extracted from the cauda epididymis of paracetamol treated rats was significantly (P<0.05) inhibited (control vs treatment; 62% vs 10%). However, their gross morphology was unaltered.

Figure 2. Effect of oral treatment of 1000 mg/kg of paracetamol for 30 consecutive days on epididymal sperm count in rats. meanSEM; cP< 0.01, Mann-Whitney U-test.

3.10 Organ weights

The gross external morphology of all the organs examined in treated rats was similar to that of controls with no obvious lesions. Further, there were no signs of sperm granulomas either in the epididymides or vasa deferentia of the treated rats.

The high dose of paracetamol caused significant reduction only in relative weights of testes (by 33%) and caput + corpus epididymides (by 25%) (Table 4).

Further, the lengths of the testes of treated rats were unaltered, but their interstitial fluid volume was significantly and moderately reduced (by 32%).

Table 4.  Effects of oral treatment (for 30 days) of paracetamol (1000 mgkg-1day-1) on organ weights, volume and length in male rats (meanSEM, n=11, range in parantheses). bP<0.05, compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U-test and G-test).

 

 

Liver

Kidney

Testes

Caput + Copus epididymis

Cauda epididymis

Seminal vesicle+ coagulating gland

Vas deferens

Prostate gland

Organ weights(g/100 g body weight)

Control

4.370.16
(3.7-5.1)

0.560.06
(0.3-0.7)

990.03
(0.8-1.1)

0.120.01
(0.08-0.13)

0780.01  
(0.06-0.1)

0.590.04  
 
(0.3-0.7)

0430.01  
(0.03-0.05)

240.02  
(0.18-0.33)

paracetamol

4.280.13
(3.6-5.0)

0.540.06
(0.3-0.8)

0.890.04b
(0.7-1.07)

0.100.01
(0.09-0.12)

0.0720.01
(0.06-0.09)

0.650.05(0.2-0.7)

0.0420.01  
(0.02-0.05)

0.340.06  
(0.15-0.66)

Organ length(mm)

Control

 

 

19.240.04
(17.5-21.1)

 

 

 

 

 

paracetamol

 

 

18.220.49
(14.6-20)

 

 

 

 

 

Organ volume(L)

Control

 

 

62.177.0
(45-92)

 

 

 

 

 

paracetamol

 

 

42.07.0b
(15-55)

 

 

 

 

 

3.11 Histopathology

Chronic paracetamol treatment caused moderate infiltration of inflammatory cells into the portal vessels of the liver. In addition, a mild hypertrophy of the hepatic lobules was recognized in some treated rats.

Paracetamol treatment did not induce any marked degenerative changes in the epididymal epithelium. The lumen of the epididymal tubules was unobstructed with sperm granulomas or desquamated epithelial cells. The tubular lumina of treated rats were almost filled with spermatozoa as in the control rats.

In the seminiferous tubules of paracetamol treated rats marked apoptosis of both spermatocytes, mainly in the pachytene stage and early spermatids (71.233.9%) were evident. The apoptotic spermatocytes were mostly sloughed from the germinal epithelium and were found in the lumen. Further, there were no signs of complete arrest of spermatogenesis and tubular regression in any of the treated rats. Sertoli and Leydig cells appeared to be normal and showed neither hypertrophy nor atrophy.

3.12 Contractility of epididymal tubules and vas deferens

None of the isolated cauda epididymal tubules exhibited spontaneous contractions during the equilibration period. Addition of paracetamol or vehicle did not induce contractions or relaxations in the tubules.

With the vehicle, the vasa deferentia responded to nerve stimulation by evoking an initial twitch (amplitude; 1.190.16 g) and a secondary sustained contraction (amplitude; 0.170.03 g). Paracetamol treatment did not significantly alter either the twitch component (1.230.20 g) or the secondary phase (0.120.03 g) of the response.

4 Discussion

This study has demonstrated that chronic paracetamol treatment impairs the sexual competence and fertility of male rats. This is a novel finding, which suggests that long term consumption of paracetamol may disrupt fertility. A four-week treatment period in male rats is considered sufficient for the evaluation of drug related effects on male reproduction[18].

This antireproductive effect of paracetamol was not accompanied with overt signs of toxicity or stress. However, there was a significant SGOT elevation and moderate leucocyte infiltration of the hepatic vessels, suggesting a damaging effect on the liver. It has been indicated that paracetamol overdose causes liver necrosis and failure[19]. The oral LD50 of paracetamol in rats is 3.71 g/kg[19]. Its therapeutic mechanism of action is still unclear, including whether paracetamol acts peripherally, centrally or both[14].

In the sexual behaviour study, the number of rats mounting (except for the lower dose), intromitting or ejaculating was reduced. This is generally indicative of impairment of libido[5]. Paradoxically, there was no  impairment of the libido index. Libido is androgen dependant[20]. No reduction in weights of the accessory organs (except the epididymis) and an apparently normal morphology of Leydig cells suggest that paracetamol was not acting through suppression of the testosterone level. The depression in the epididymal weight is more likely to be due to low sperm numbers, which could result from an increased rate of sperm transport through it. Alternatively, the reduction in the caput and corpus epididymal weight may reflect its high sensitivity to testosterone[21]. In sharp contrast, the antilibido action may have arisen from a direct inhibition of the sexual centre in the hypothalamus of brain[22]; paracetamol passes the blood brain barrier[1] and is claimed to provoke its antipyretic action through a selective effect on the hypothalamus[23].

Paracetamol caused a considerable prolongation in the latencies of mounting, intromission or ejaculation, indicative of impairment of sexual arousability/motivation. An inverse relationship exists between latencies of these three sexual parameters and sexual arousability/motivation[24]. In addition, paracetamol treatment resulted in a marked inhibition of mounting-and-intromission frequency and copulation efficiency (only with the higher dose) and intromission ratio. The former observation is suggestive of disruption in sexual vigour[25] and the latter, of erectile dysfunction[26]. Furthermore, the intercopulatory interval was prolonged even with acute paracetamol treatment indicating disturbed sexual performance[24,25].

In the mating study, paracetamol inhibited fertility reversibly. Several mechanisms appear to be mediating this antifertility action. Paracetamol induced marked oligozoospermia but without teratozoospermia. In the rat, the number of spermatozoa in the ejaculate is up to 1000-fold higher than that required for maximum fertility[27] and thus paracetamol induced oligozoospermia by itself cannot account for its antifertility action.

Paracetamol triggered apoptosis of spermatocytes and early spermatids, together with a reduction in testicular weight and interstitial volume, indicating a mild testicular toxicity. However, overall spermatogenesis remained uninhibited. Hence, the observed oligozoospermia cannot be attributed to decreased sperm production. Paracetamol failed to inhibit nerve mediated biphasic contraction[13] of isolated vasa deferentia. Therefore, oligozoospermia is unlikely to be due to inhibition of orgasmic contraction of vas and cauda epididymis at ejaculation. Urine analysis and histopathological studies suggest that oligozoospermia is neither due to spermatorhoea nor to enhanced epididymal sperm resorption. Sperm granulomas or any other form of obstructions were not evident in the sperm tract and thus it is not a case of obstructive oligozoospermia[28]. Paracetamol treatment caused a drastic drop in the sperm count of the caput and corpus epididymides, which could indicate accelerated sperm transport, thereby interrupting epididymal sperm maturation. In the rat, the immediate source of spermatozoa for ejaculation is the cauda epididymis[16]. However, the sperm count in the cauda epididymis was not reduced. The principle cause of oligozoospermia is therefore unlikely to have resulted from reduced epididymal sperm counts. On the other hand, ejaculatory dysfunction through retrograde ejaculation[29] and enhanced spontaneous ejaculations[30] may play a contributory role in the production of oligozoospermia in this study. However, we have no evidence in favour or against such a claim.

Paracetamol treatment caused a reduction in the intromission ratio which indicates an impairment in erectile function[26] possibly through its nitric oxide inhibiting activity[4]. In addition, paracetamol largely reduced the number of intromissions. In rats, a minimum number of intromissions of sufficient strength is required for a female to become pregnant[31]. These two effects on intromission may also contribute to the inhibition in fertility evident in this study.  

Paracetamol caused a profound elevation of pre-implantation losses suggesting an impairment in the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa. Defects in sperm functions via a direct and/or an indirect action could be the main mechanism of the antifertility effect of paracetamol. Motility of both epididymal and ejaculated sperm were severely depressed which would undoubtedly impair sperm transport. It is possible that paracetamol may induce its antimotility action either acting directly on spermatozoa through its nitric oxide inhibiting activity[4] or indirectly by altering the microenvironment of the epididymis through its inhibitory action on cyclooxygenase enzyme[6,32]. Furthermore, an inhibition in hyperactivated sperm motility was evident with paracetamol. There is evidence that nitric oxide is important in sperm hyperactivation[33] and therefore paracetamol could inhibit this event. Onset of hyperactivated motility is accepted to be a concomitant feature of sperm capacitation. Capacitation is mandatory for acrosome reaction, sperm ovum binding and subsequent fertilization[34]. Paracetamol induced inhibition of hyperactivated sperm motility would be likely to interrupt these events leading to successful fertilization. Further, high doses of paracetamol can lead to lipid peroxidation[35] and lipid peroxidation is known to impair the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa[36].

In conclusion, this study demonstrates for the first time, that long term administration of high doses of paracetamol is detrimental to the reproductive competence of male rats.

References

[1] Anderson BJ, Holford NHG, Woollard GA, Chan PLS. Paracetamol plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1998; 46: 237-43.
[2] Cramer DW, Harlow BL, Titus-Ernstoff L, Bohike K, Welch WR, Greenberg ER. Over-the-counter analgesics and risk of ovarian cancer. Lancet 1998; 351: 104-7.
[3] Rodriguez C, Henley SJ, Calle EC, Thun MJ. Paracetamol and risk of ovarian cancer motality in a prospective study of women in the USA. Lancet 1998; 352: 1354.
[4] Bjorkman R, Hallman KM, Hedner J, Hedner T, Henning M. Acetaminophen blocks spinal hyperalgesia induced by NMDA and substance P. Pain 1994; 57: 259-64.
[5] Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG, Wadsworth RM. Reduction in libido and fertility of male rats by administration of the nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N-nitro-L-arganine methyl ester. Int J Androl 2000; 23: 187-91.
[6] Flower RJ, Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthatase in brain explains the antipyretic activity of acetominophen. Nature 1972; 240: 410-1.
[7] Ratnasooriya WD, Wadsworth RM. The effects of fenclozic acid on fertility of male rats. Contraception 1979; 19: 129-34.
[8] Ratnasooriya WD, Lionel NDW. Effect of aspirin containing silastic implants placed adjacent to epididymis on fertility of rats. Indian J Exp Biol 1984; 22: 75-7.
[9] Ratnasooriya WD, Lionel NDW. Effect of sodium meclofenamate on fertility of male rats. J Natn Sci Coun Sri Lanka 1985; 13: 7-15.
[10] Ratnasooriya WD. Effect of naproxen on fertility in male rats. Vidyodaya J Arts Sci Lett 1985; 13: 33-8.
[11] Ratnasooriya WD, Wadsworth RM. Effect on fertility in rats of epididymal administration of indomethacin. Int J Fert 1987; 32: 152-6.
[12] Ratnasooriya WD, Lionel NDW. Effect of polyphloretin phosphate (a prostaglandin receptor-blocking drug) on fertility of male rats. Ceylon J Sci 1983; 16: 143-50.
[13] Plaznik A, Stefanski R, Palejko W, Kotawski W. The role of accumbens GMBA-B, receptors in the regulation of rat behaviour. Neurosci Res Comm 1993; 12: 23-30.
[14] Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG. Effect of water extract of small unripe Areca catechu nuts on sperm output in rats. Med Sci Res 1998; 26: 263-6.
[15] Yanagimachi R. In vitro sperm capacitation and fertilization of golden hamster eggs in a chemically defined medium. In: Hafaz ECE, Semm K, editors. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Lancaster: MTP Press; 1982. p 65-74.
[16] Ratnasooriya WD, Wadsworth RM. Effect of mating on sperm distribution in the reproductive tract of the male rat. Gamete Res 1987; 17: 261-6.
[17] Sharpe RM. The importance of testicular interstial fluid in the transport of injected hCG to the Leydig cells. Int J Androl 1981; 4: 64-74.
[18] Takayama S, Akaike M, Kawashima K, Takahashi M, Kurokawa Y. A collaborative study in Japan on optimal treatment period and parameters for detection of male fertility disorders induced by drugs in rats. J Am Coll Toxicol 1995; 14: 293-327.
[19] Boyd EM, Bereczky GM. Liver necrosis from paracetamol. Brit J Pharmacol 1966; 26: 606-14.
[20] Neuman F. Pharmacology and potential use of cyproterone acetate. Horm Metab Res 1977; 9: 1-13.
[21] Rajalakshmi M, Arora A, Bose TK, Dinakar N, Gupta G, Thampa TNRU, et al. Physiology of the epididymis and induction of functional sterility in the male. J Reprod Fert 1976; 243: 71-94.
[22] Ganong WF. Review of Medical Physiology. London: Prentice-Hall International Inc; 1995. p 214.
[23] Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM. Pharmacology. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p 248-55.
[24] Benelli A, Artetti R, Poggioli R,Cavazzuti E, Mameli M, Bertolini A. Effect of potassium channel modulators on male sexual behaviour. Life Sci 1977; 60: 263-7.
[25] Ratnasooriya WD, Dharmasiri MG. Effects of Terminalia catappa seeds on sexual behaviour and fertility of male rats. Asian J Androl 2000;  2:  213-9.
[26] Sachs BD, Yian-Cheng LIV. Mounting and brief noncontact exposure of males to receptive females facilitate reflexive erection in rats, even after hypogastric nerve section. Physiol Behav 1998; 65: 413-21.
[27] Spielmann H. Reproduction and development. Environ Health Perspect 1998; 106: 571-76.
[28]  Belmonte IG, de Serrano MNM. Partial obstruction of the seminal path, a frequent cause of oligozoospermia in men. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 3402-5.
[29] Kedia KR. Ejacualtion and emission: Normal physiology, dysfunction and therapy. In: Krane RJ, Siroky MB, Goldstein T, editors. Male sexual dysfunction. Boston: Little Brown and Company; 1983. p 37-53.
[30] Agmo A. The number of spermatozoa in the spontaneous ejaculates of rats. J Reprod Fert 1976; 48: 405-7.
[31] Chester RV, Zucker I. Influence of male copulatory behaviour on sperm transport, pregnancy and pseudopregnancy in female rats. Physiol Behav 1970; 5: 35-43.
[32] Gong XD, Leung GPH, Cheuk BLY, Wong PYD. Interference with the formation of the epididymal microenvironmenta new strategy for male contraception? Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 39-45.
[33] Yeoman RR, Jones WD, Rizk BM. Evidence for nitric oxide regulation of hamster sperm hyperactivation. J Androl 1998; 19: 58-64.
[34] Tulsiani DRP. Carbohydrates mediate sperm-ovum adhesion and triggering of the acrosome reaction. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 87-97.
[35] Wendel A, Feuerstein S, Konz KH. Acute paracetamol intoxication of starved mice leads to lipid peroxidation in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol 1979; 28: 2051-5.

[36] Aitken RJ. A free radical theory of male infertility. Reprod Fert Dev 1994; 6: 19-24.

home

Correspondence to: Professor W.D. Ratnasooriya, Department of Zoology, University of Colombo, Colombo 3, Sri Lanka. 
Tel: +94-1-503 399  Fax: +94-1-503 148  

e-mail: dappvr@sltnet.lk
Received 2000-10-08      Accepted 2000-11-23