Home  |  Archive  |  AJA @ Nature  |  Online Submission  |  News & Events  |  Subscribe  |  APFA  |  Society  |  Links  |  Contact Us  |  中文版

Xenoesterogens and male infertility: myth or reality?

Roya Rozati, P.P. Reddy1, P. Reddanna2, Rubina Mujtaba

Assisted Conception Services Unit, Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre, Hyderabad (A.P.)  500 028, India
1Institute of Genetics and Hospital for Genetic Diseases, Hyderabad, India 
2Department of Animal Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad, India

Asian J Androl  2000 Dec; 2:  263-269


Keywords: polychlorinated biphenyls; xenoestrogens; male infertility; sperm
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the role of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as a potential environmental hazard in the deterioration of male fertility. Methods: Fifty-three males were studied. After a thorough case history evaluation and relevant clinical and laboratory investigations, PCBs were estimated in the seminal plasma of 21 infertile men with Unexplained Male Factor and 32 fertile controls. Peak retention times of the eluants were compared with those of the commercially available standard PCB Mix, and the results confirmed spectrophotometrically. Seminal PCB concentrations were compared between i) fertile and infertile men and ii) men from different areas and diets. The relationship between PCB concentrations and measures of sperm quality such as the total motile sperm count, was assessed. Results: PCBs were detected in seminal plasma of infertile men but absent from controls. Sperm quantity and quality were significantly lower in infertile men compared to controls. The highest average PCB concentrations were found in fish-eating urban dwellers, and followed in succession by fish-eating rural dwellers, non fish-eating urban dwellers and non fish-eating rural dwellers. The total motile sperm counts were inversely proportional to the PCB concentrations and were significantly lower than those of the respective controls. Conclusion: PCBs may be instrumental in the deterioration of sperm quantity and quality, a contaminated fish diet being the main source of exposure.
1 Introduction

Several studies have reported a decline in semen quality over time[1-3]. Circumstantial evidence is accumulating that environmental xenobiotics may disrupt reproductive processes in human males. These include disorders of development and function of the male reproductive tract such as testicular cancer[4], maldescent (cryptorchidism)[5], urethral abnormalities (hypospadias)[6], and a striking drop in semen volume and sperm counts[7]. These abnormalities have occurred during periods of increased exposure to and body burdens of oestrogenic chemicals[8].

PCBs are halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons consisting of complex lipophilic mixtures of 200 or more congeners with oestrogenic and anti-oestrogenic effects[9]. Several adverse have been documented in animals on different organs and at different metabolic levels such as the thyroid hormone metabolism[10], gonadal steroidogenesis and semen quality[11], enzyme metabolism[12], and immune system[13]. In man, levels of some PCB congeners have been inversely correlated to sperm motility in semen samples with sperm concentrations <20 million/mL[14]. Boys exposed to PCBs in utero were shown to have significantly smaller penis[15].

PCBs have been used extensively as insulators in electrical equipment such as transformers, ballasts in fluorescent lighting, circuit breakers and switchgear, as plasticisers in PVC products, in carbonless copy paper, as de-inking solvents for recycling of newspaper and as waterproofing agents. They are resistant to degradation, hence widespread and persistent in the environment. Different routes of exposure include dermal exposure, ingestion of contaminated water and food, and inhalation of ambient air contaminated with PCBs. They tend to accumulate in marine and terrestrial food chains and due to the low biodegradation and excretion in humans, these substances accumulate in the body fat. Humans are the potential endpoint reservoirs for PCB contamination in the aquatic ecosystem. The current major sources of concern are their entry into the environment from unauthorized disposal practices, landfill leachate, leaks in transformers and hydraulic and heat transfer systems, and from transformer fires and transportation spills. Rigorous placebo controlled trials have revealed many of the supposed treatments for male infertility to be ineffective[16]. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), the most significant advance in the treatment of men who will not respond to specific treatment, may carry a substantial recurrence risk for infertility in the offspring of treated couples[17] as it allows fertilization with defective sperm without knowing the cause of the infertility. Identifying and eliminating toxic factors in the environment that result in this condition is an urgent need of the day.

Hence, the objective of the study was to further evaluate the role of PCBs in male infertility by i) estimating and comparing seminal PCB levels in infertile men with unexplained male factor and fertile controls, ii) comparing seminal PCBs in infertile men from different areas and with different diets with controls, and iii) examining their relationship with fertility parameters such as total motile sperm counts.
2 Materials and methods

2.1 Subjects

Five hundred and fifty-seven infertile couples were screened at The Assisted Conception Services Unit, Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre, a referral centre that receives cases from all over Andhra Pradesh. A complete case history evaluation including the nature and duration of infertility, residential area, habits and addictions, history of illness/disease, occupation, life style, and diet was made. Laboratory investigations included a routine semen analysis after a proscribed three-day abstinence[18]. Seminal volume, sperm count, the number and quality of sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) test, sperm nuclear chromatin stability, and sperm DNA normality were recorded. The HOS was assessed in a sodium citrate fructose medium[19]. Sperm nuclear chromatin decondensation was analysed following treatment of spermatozoa with 1% SDS+6 mmol/L EDTA, stained according to the Shorr method and classified according to the scheme of Rodriguez et al[20].

Individuals with sperm counts <20 million/mL,  grade A motility 25%, and/or 30% normal forms, and/or hypo-osmotic swelling test scores 50% were considered to have a male factor problem. In 300 individuals with a male factor problem, an obvious cause for the infertility could be found in 44.52% of the men, while no cause could be identified in 9.34%. These men were diagnozed Unexplained Male Factor infertility. PCBs were estimated in the seminal plasma of 21 infertile men with unexplained male factor and 32 controls. Male partners of women with a previous conception were selected as controls. Criteria for the inclusion of infertile men included i) no history of associated clinical pathology eg, varicocoele, retractile testis, cryptorchidism, hormonal disorders, ii) no history of febrile illness in the six months prior to analysis, iii) no history of smoking or tobacco consumption, iv) no evidence of semen infection. On the basis of the possible source of PCBs, men were further subcategorized into i) fish-eating urban dwellers, ii) fish-eating rural dwellers, iii) non fish-eating urban dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet, and iv) non fish-eating rural dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet. The total motile sperm count was taken as a measure of semen quality. It was calculated as the product of grade 2+3 motility and the sperm concentration. For the sake of comparison of semen quality between these sub-categories of men, two control groups of fertile men were considered: i) Control 1: urban men with a mixed diet and no reported consumption of fish, and ii) Control 2: rural men with a mixed diet and no reported consumption of fish. Urban was used to denote areas within the control of the Muncipal Health Corporation whereas 'Rural' was used to denote areas not within Muncipal control.

2.2 Assays

The extraction of xenoestrogens was carried out by the method described by Burse et al[21]. The extraction procedure was divided into five phases.

2.2.1 Phase 1: Isolation of seminal plasma

Semen was collected as a part of the treatment protocol and after analysis of the semen parameters, seminal plasma was isolated by centrifugation at 2000g for 20 min.

2.2.2 Phase 2: Removal of sex steroids by Charcoal-Dextran treatment.

Charcoal (Norit A, acid washed, Sigma) was washed with cold sterile water immediately before use. A 5% charcoal and 0.5% dextran T-70 (D-4876, Sigma) suspension was prepared. Charcoal-Dextran (CD) suspension aliquots of a volume similar to that of seminal plasma aliquots to be processed were centrifuged at 100g for 10 min. Supernatants were aspirated and seminal plasma aliquots mixed with charcoal pellets. The charcoal seminal plasma mixture was maintained by rolling at 4 cycles/min at 37 for 1 hour. The suspension was centrifuged at 2000g for 20 min. The supernatant was then filtered through a Nalgene filter with a pore size of 0.45 m.

2.2.3 Phase 3: Extraction of xenoestrogens

Extraction of xenoestrogens was performed by the method described by Burse et al[21] with modifications. CD-treated seminal plasma was divided into two parts. One part was used as a blank and a known quantity of standard PCB (Polychlorinated biphenyl mix, Supelco) was added to the other part to establish a comparison with the blank and so as to monitor the recovery of the added chemical. The two aliquots were allowed to equilibrate at room temperature. The extracts from the blank preparation are devoid of absorbance at 280 nm, and therefore do not interfere with the quantification of synthetic xenoestrogens. CD-treated seminal plasma lacks estrogenic activity.

Sample extraction: 1 mL of methanol was added to each of 2 mL aliquots of seminal plasma, mixed by vortexing, and then 3 mL of hexane:ethyl ether (1:1 by vol) (HPLC grade, Spectrochem) was added to extract the mixture. The mixture was agitated on a rotary mixer for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 2000g for 5 min. The organic phase was collected and the aqueous phase extracted twice more. The organic phases were pooled and subsequently concentrated to 1  mL by evaporation under nitrogen steam.

2.2.4 Phase 4: Acid clean-up of the organic phase prior to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

Concentrated sulphuric acid 0.5 mL was added to the concentrated 1 mL of sample of organic phase. The organic phase was seperated, and the aqueous phase extracted twice more with 1 mL hexane. The organic phases were pooled and dried completely under nitrogen. The sample was resuspended in hexane and then injected into HPLC.

2.2.5 Phase 5: HPLC analysis

Seperation was performed by the method of Medina and Sherman[22] modified by Sonnenschein et al[23] in a Shimadzu LC6A Liquid Chromatograph Solvent Delivery System; Shimadzu SCL-6A System Controller; Shimadzu SPD-6AV UV-vis Spectrophotometric detector equipped with a C-R6A Chromatopac.

Aliquots of 500 L were injected into a 4220 Partisil 5 silica column (Whatman) equilibrated with 100% n-hexane (Phase A), and n-hexane: methanol: isopropanol (40:45:15 by vol) (Phase B) at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and a pressure of 510-6 Pa. All the organic solvents were of HPLC grade, filtered with a 0.22 m filter and degassed prior to use. The gradient was developed as follows: 100% n-hexane was allowed to pass through the column for 2 min, following which the concentration of solvent B was increased to 10% in 10 min, 20% in the next 15 min, 50% in the next 5 min, and 100% in the next 5 min. Solvent B 100%  was maintained in the column for 5 min before the concentration of solvent B was reduced to zero. The elution profile was monitored on a Shimadzu SPD-6AV UV-Vis Spectrophotometric detector at 280 nm with an absorbance range of 0.001 to 2.56. The chromatogram was recorded on a C-R6A Chromatopac (Shimadzu).

Prior to standardisation with the commercially available standards and the sample runs, a hexane blank was injected. For each patient, 2 samples were run: a seminal plasma blank and a seminal plasma to sample  which a known amount of PCB was added. The peak HPLC fractions were collected in aliquots and the spectrum of each fraction confirmed spectrophotometrically with a UV 1601 UV Visible Spectrophotometer using a working wavelength of 210-320 nm. Fractions with peak absorbances at the suggested wavelength were recorded to differentiate compound peaks from solvent peaks. The peak retention times of the blank sample were compared with those of the PCB-added sample and standard PCB retention times. Following spectrophotometric estimation, the fractions with peak absorbances at 280 nm were pooled, evaporated under liquid nitrogen, resuspended in hexane and reinjected into the HPLC unit to purify the compound and verify the peak retention times of the eluted compounds. 

Estrogenic pesticides, PCBs, hydroxylated PCBs, phenolic antioxidants and plasticizers elute from the HPLC column during the first 10 min, whereas ovarian estrogens, phytoestrogens, DES, and mycoestrogens are retained for more than 12 min. The concentration of the eluted compound was calculated from the area percentage under each peak. Individual PCB fractions were pooled and expressed as total PCBs in g/mL. Individual PCB congener levels are however presented as a separate publication. The PCB concentrations and semen parameters namely sperm count, sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm osmoregulatory capacity and measures of sperm function such as sperm nuclear chromatin stability and DNA normality were compared between infertile men and controls. PCB levels and total motile counts were compared among infertile men from different areas and with different diets. The detection limits of PCBs ranged from 0.00323 to 14.97 g/mL with a percentage recovery of 80.75%.

2.3 Ethics

Evaluation of semen analysis parameters was executed as a part of the treatment protocol, thus obviating the need for an informed consent.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using distribution-free, non-parametric methods, namely the Kolmogorov Smirnov Test for comparison of semen quality between different categories of infertile men. Differences in semen parameters between fertile and infertile men were analysed using the Student's t-test.

3 Results

It was observed  that the ejaculate volume, sperm concentration, grade 3, grade 2+3 motility, the hypo-osmotic swelling test, and sperm nuclear chromatin stability were significantly lower in the infertile men compared to controls. Head defects and percentage of single,  stranded DNA were significantly higher in the infertile men. PCBs were detected in the seminal plasma of infertile patients but absent in fertile controls (Table 1).

Table 1. Semen values and xenoestrogen concentrations (meanSD) in infertile men and controls.

Characteristics

Infertile
(n=21)

Controls
(n=32)

P

Age (yrs)

343

325

 

PCB concentration (g/mL)

85

0

 

Ejaculate volume (mL)

2.51.0

3.51.4

0.01

Sperm concentration (106/mL)

1716

7318

0.01

Sperm motility 

Grade 3

3934

536

0.05

Grade 2+3

5245

7019

0.05

Abnormal morphology (%)

6124

3713

0.01

Head defects

3620

181

0.0005

Mid-piece defects

2322

1511

NS

Tail defects

2.31.2

3.02.5

NS

Hypo-osmotic swelling test (%)

5417

7413

0.01

Nuclear chromatin decondensation (%)

17.52.0

204

0.05

Single stranded DNA (%)

166

4.32.0

0.001

Irrespective of the diet, when a comparison was drawn between urban and rural infertile men, it was found that urban dwellers had higher seminal PCB concentrations and significantly lower total motile sperm counts than rural dwellers. Likewise, a comparison between fish-eaters and non fish-eaters, irrespective of the dwelling revealed higher PCB concentrations and significantly lower total motile sperm counts in fisheaters than in non fisheaters (Tables 2,3).

Table 2. PCB concentration and semen quality (mean values).

Subjects

n

PCB concentrations
(g/mL)

Total motile count
(106/mL)

Control 1

13

0.0

25.107

Control 2

19

0.0

30.28

Urban Dwellers

15

9.38

0.655

Rural Dwellers

6

3.27

4.21

Fish Eaters

15

9.44

0.59

Non-Fish Eaters

6

3.1

4.37

Fish-eating Urban Dwellers

12

10.49

0.51

Non Fish-eating Urban Dwellers

3

4.92

1.2375

Fish-eating Rural Dwellers

3

5.26

0.923

Non Fish-eating Rural Dwellers

3

1.28

7.5

Control 1: Fertile men from urban areas with a mixed diet (excluding fish).
Control 2: Fertile men from rural areas with a mixed diet (excluding fish).

Table 3. Kolmogobov smirnov test for the differences in total motile sperm counts between infertile men and controls.

Groups

KS values

Control 1 vs Control 2

0.115

Urban vs Rural dwellers

0.32b

Fish-eaters vs Non-fish eaters

0.35b

Urban Dwellers vs Control 1

0.68b

Rural Dwellers vs Control 2

0.93b

Fish-eating urban dwellers vs Control 1

0.742b

Non fish-eating urban dwellers vs Control 1

0.967b

Fish-eating rural dwellers vs Control 2

0.9b

bP<0.05

Fish-eating urban dwellers had the highest PCB concentrations, followed in order by fish-eating rural dwellers, non fish-eating urban dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet and non fish-eating rural dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet. The total motile sperm counts in these men were inversely related to their PCB concentrations, being the least in fish-eating urban dwellers followed by fish-eating rural dwellers, non fish-eating urban dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet and non fish-eating rural dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet (Tables 2). The Kolmogorov Smirnov Test revealed significantly lower total motile counts in fish-eating urban dwellers and non fish-eating urban dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet when compared to Control Group 1. Total motile counts in fish-eating rural dwellers and non fish-eating rural dwellers with an exclusively vegetarian diet were significantly lower than in Control Group 2 (Tables 2,3).

4 Discussion

This study carried out on infertile men is the first report from the Indian sub-continent demonstrating the presence of PCBs in semen samples. The presence of PCBs in the seminal plasma of occupationally unexposed infertile men, their absence from fertile controls, and the significantly poor semen parameters in this group is a clue to the possible role of PCBs in the deterioration of sperm quantity and quality. These chemicals are ubiquitous in the environment.

The significantly lower ejaculate volume in infertile men with PCBs provides evidence for the effect of these chemicals on accessory gland function. Organs that appear to be at particular risk for estrogenic effects are those with receptors for gonadal hormones in the male- the prostate, seminal vesicles, epididymides and testes[24]. Xenoestrogens may modulate the hormonal milieu within the prostate and seminal vesicles by possibly interfering with androgen binding to the androgen receptors. They may interfere with hormone mediated events in the testis and epididymis by either binding to sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and androgen binding protein (ABP), or blocking the cell-surface receptors[25] for these proteins, thus inhibiting normal signal transduction.

The underlying cause of most of the reproductive effects of PCBs may be alterations in steroid hormone metabolism. PCBs may interfere with hormone-mediated events in the testis and epididymis by down-regulating testicular androgenesis through an acute inhibition of 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 17alpha-hydroxylase/lyase, and 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activities[26]. Studies have reported an over 50% inhibition of the activity of mitochondrial CYP11A, the rate-limiting enzyme for steroidogenesis in testes of the PCB-contaminated bulls[27]. Loosened intercellular contacts between germ cells and Sertoli cells, cellular fragmentation in the layer of round spermatids, and susceptibility of early spermiogenesis to single PCB congeners in concentrations of background magnitude[28] are some of the additional adverse effects mediated by PCBs. The net effect of decreased testosterone levels may be a decrease in spermatogenesis and androgen-dependent epididymal sperm maturation. Epididymal dysfunction may have a detrimental effect on various cytostructural modifications and biochemical changes that sperm undergo resulting in decreased motility and sperm fertilizing capacity. The documented adverse effect of PCBs on gonadal steroidogenesis in animals[11] and men[14-15] further substantiate their role as disruptors of the reproductive endocrine system.

The higher PCB concentrations in fish-eaters than non fish-eaters observed in our study are comparable to studies reporting elevated concentrations of organochlorine compounds in the tissues of people consuming large amounts of contaminated seafood when compared to the general population[29]. The dietary intake of PCBs is expected to account for 89-99% of human exposure to these compounds[30]. PCB concentrations dominate the levels of the six contaminants that are most often detected in fish which concentrate the toxicants to millions of times the background levels.  PCBs that are associated with the fats of fish or animal flesh cannot be removed by washing and are only partially removed by cooking procedures[31]. Due to the low biodegradation and excretion in humans, these substances accumulate in the body fat, and their concentrations reflect external exposure[32].

Environmental exposure to improperly disposed industrial effluents from major industries such as cement and cement products, synthetic drugs and pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, plastic industries, heavy electricals, fertilisers, tobacco and coal, may account for observations of higher PCB concentrations and the concomitantly lower total motile sperm counts in urban dwellers than in rural dwellers in our study.

The presence of PCBs in rural dwellers with a vegetarian diet can be traced to the bio-magnification of the chemical through the consumption of edible plants grown on contaminated soil. In developing nations, as much as 95% of untreated sewage is dumped directly into rivers, lakes, and coastal waters which may be used for irrigation, drinking and bathing. Sewage effluents are estrogenic[33]. Sewage treatment appears to remove particulate PCBs from water but not PCBs in solution which may ultimately be stored in the lipopolysaccharides of the plant cells and the toxicity bio-magnified within the higher portion of the food chain in either land animals or humans.

In addition to data indicating the adverse effects of xenobiotics on multiple signalling pathways and the synergistic effects of multiple xenobiotics on estrogen responsive genes[25], this study showing indirect evidence of the deleterious effect of PCBs on semen quality, the first of its kind from the Indian sub-continent, reinforces the concept that environmental xenobiotics, though present at low concentrations, may pose a threat to human health. Further studies are however necessary to evaluate the epidemiological risk assessment in terms of minimum exposure limits.

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely appreciate the scientific advice given by Prof. P.R.K. Reddy and the contribution of researchers of Department of Animal Sciences, University of Hyderabad, Dr. Srinivas Reddy, Dr. Narsa Reddy, Dr. V. Manjari, and Dr. Ramakrishna towards the study.

References

[1] Auger J, Kuntsmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P. Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the past 20 years. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 281-5.
[2] Irvine S, Cawood E, Richardson D, MacDonald E, Aitken J. Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. BMJ 1996; 312: 467-71.
[3] Menchini-Fabris F, Rossi P, Palego P, Simi S, Turchi P. Declining sperm counts in Italy during the past 20 years. Andrologia 1996; 28: 304.
[4] Osterlind A. Diverging trends in incidence and mortality of testicular cancer in Denmark, 1943-1982. Br J Cancer 1986; 53: 501-5.
[5] Jackson MB. The epidemiology of cryptorchidism. Horm Res 1988; 30: 153-56.
[6] Giwercman  AE, Skakkebaek  NE. The human testis-an organ at risk? Int J Androl 1992; 15: 373-35. 
[7] Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during the past 50 years. BMJ 1992; 305: 609-13.
[8] Sharpe RM. Declining sperm counts in men-is there an endocrine cause? J Endocrinol 1993; 137: 357-60.
[9] Jansen HT, Cooke PS, Porcelli J, Liu TC, Hansen LG. Estrogenic and anti-estrogenic actions of PCBs in the female rat: in vitro and in vivo studies. Reprod Toxicol 1993; 7: 237-48.
[10] Byrne JJ, Carbone JP, Hanson EA. Hypothyroidism and abnormalities in the kinetics of thyroid hormone metabolism in rats treated chronically with polychlorinated biphenyl and polybrominated biphenyl. Endocrinol 1987; 121: 520-7.
[11] Toppari  J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, Giwercman A, Grandjean P, Guillette LG Jr, et al. Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104 (suppl 4): 741-76. 
[12] Kovacevic R, Vojinovic-Miloradov M, Teodorovic I, Andric S. Effect of PCBs on androgen production by suspension of adult rat Leydig cells in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1995; 52: 595-7.
[13] Bernhoft A, Skaare JU, Wiig O, Derocher AE, Larsen HJ. Possible immunotoxic effects of organochlorines in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard. J Toxicol Environ Health 2000; 59: 561-74.
[14] Bush B, Bennett A, Snow JT. Polychlorinated biphenyl congeners, p-p'-DDE, and sperm function in humans. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1986; 15: 333-41.
[15] Yu ML, Hsu CC, Guo YL, Lai TJ, Chen SJ, Luo JM. Disordered behavior in the early-borne Taiwan Yucheng children. Chemosphere 1994; 29: 2413-22.
[16] Hargreave TB. Non-specific treatment to improve fertility. In Hargreave TB, editor. Male Infertility. Berlin D: Springer-Verlag; 1983.
[17] Meschede B, Lemcke HM, Behre CH, De Nieschlag GE, Horst J. Clustering of male infertility in the families of couples treated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reprod 2000;  15: 1609-12. 
[18] World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical mucus interaction, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. 
[19] Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Peleaz M, Crabo BG, Zaneveld LJ. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil 1984; 70: 219-28.
[20] Rodriguez H, Ohanian C, Bustos-Obregon E. Nuclear chromatin decondensation of spermatozoa in vitro: a method for evaluating the fertilizing ability of ovine semen. Int J Androl 1985; 8: 147-58.
[21] Burse VW, Groce DF, Caudill SP, Korver MP, Phillips DL, McClure PC, et al. Determination of polychlorinated biphenyl levels in the serum of residents and in the homogenates of sea food from the  New Bedford, Massachusetts area: a comparison of exposure sources through pattern recognition  techniques. Sci Total Environ 1994; 144: 153-77.
[22] Medina MB, Sherman JT. High performance liquid chromatographic separation of anabolic oestrogens and ultraviolet detection of 17 beta-oestradiol, zeranol, diethylstilboestrol or zearalenone in avian muscle tissue extracts.Food Addit Contam 1986; 3: 263-72.
[23] Sonnenschein C, Soto AM, Fernandez MF, Olea N, Olea-Serrano MF, Ruiz-Lopez MD. Development of a marker of estrogenic exposure in human serum. Clin Chem 1995; 41: 1888-95.
[24] Colborn T, vom Saal FS, Soto AM. Developmental effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in wildlife and humans. Environ Health Perspect 1993; 101: 378-84.
[25] Arnold SF, Klotz DM, Collins BM, Vonier PM, Guillette LJ Jr, McLachlan JA. Synergistic activation of estrogen receptor with combinations of environmental chemicals. Science 1996; 272: 1489-92.
[26] Andric SA, Kostic TS, Stojilkovic SS, Kovacevic RZ. Inhibition of rat testicular androgenesis by a polychlorinated biphenyl mixture aroclor 1248. Biol Reprod 2000; 62: 1882-8.
[27] Machala M, Neca J, Drabek P, Ulrich R, Sabatova V, Nezveda K, et al. Effects of chronic exposure to PCBs on cytochrome P450 systems and steroidogenesis in liver and testis of bulls (Bos taurus). Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 1998; 120: 65-70.
[28] Pflieger-Bruss S, Hanf V, Behnisch P, Hagenmaier H, Rune GM. Effects of single polychlorinated biphenyls on the morphology of cultured rat tubuli seminiferi. Andrologia 1999; 31: 77-82.
[29] Dewailly  E,  Ryan  JJ, Laliberte C, Bruneau S, Weber  JP, Gingras S, et al. Exposure of remote maritime populations to coplanar PCBs. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102 (suppl 1): 205-9.
[30] Schecter A, Ryan  JJ, Masuda Y, Brandt-Rauf  P, Constable J, Hoang DC, et al. Chlorinated and brominated dioxins and dibenzofurans in human tissue following exposure. Environ Health  Perspect 1994; 102 (suppl 1): 135-47.
[31] D'Itri M, Frank , Kamrin MA. PCBs: Human and environmental hazards. Woburn, MA: Butterworth Publishers; 1983. p 299-310.
[32] Duarte-Davidson R, Jones KC. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in the UK population: estimated intake, exposure and body burden. Sci Total Environ 1994; 151: 131-52. 

[33] Purdom CE, Hardiman PA, Bye VJ, Eno NC, Tyler CR, Sumpter JP. Estrogenic effects of effluents from sewage treatment works. Chem Ecol 1994; 8: 275-85.

home

Correspondence to: Dr. Roya Rozati, Assisted Conception Services Unit, Mahavir Hospital and Research Centre, 10-1-1/A, Bhagwan Mahavir Marg, A.C.  Guards, Hyderabad (A.P.) 500 028, INDIA. 
Tel: +91-40-332 4181  
e-mail: drrozati@rediffmail.com
Received 2000-05-09     Accepted 2000-10-31