|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Low
dose gossypol for male contraception
Zhi-Ping
GU1, Bai-Yong MAO1, Yi-Xin WANG2, Ren-An
ZHANG3, Yong-Zhi TAN4,
Zheng-Xing CHEN2, Lin CAO1, Gen-Di YOU1,
S.J. Segal5 1Shanghai
Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai
200031, China Asian J Androl 2000 Dec; 2: 283-287 Keywords:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Month |
0 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
12 |
16-18 |
| 10
mg |
29 |
29 |
27 |
|
21 |
|
9 |
11 |
| 12.5
mg |
26 |
26
|
26 |
15 |
|
4 |
|
|
3.3
Length of the loading phase
Table
2 shows the distribution of subjects by length of the loading phase. At
the end of 6 month medication, in 69% of subjects in the 10 mg group and
73% of subjects in the 12.5 mg group, semen data reached the infertile
levels. In the 12.5 mg group, the sperm count in one case decreased to
less than 4 million/mL by the end of month 2
and in 9 cases, by the end of month 3 of treatment. By the
end of month 4, the semen data of 12 cases in the 12.5 mg group and 13
case in the 10 mg
group reached infertile level; these values were not significantly different.
Table
2. Distribution
of subjects according to the duration of the loading phase.
|
Group |
Loading
phase |
No.
of cases |
|
| Sperm
count<4 million/mL |
Motile
sperm<5% |
||
| 10
mg |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
4 |
13 |
11 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
9 |
|
|
|
Total
20 |
23 |
|
| 12.5
mg |
2 |
1 |
6 |
|
4 |
11 |
11 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
Total
19 |
20 |
|
3.4
Semen examination
As
shown in Tables 3 and 4, in both treated groups the average sperm density
and motility started to decrease significantly by the end of month 2 of
medication and gradually
reached infertile levels. Figures
1 and 2 show the pharmacodynamic
profiles of sperm density and percentage of the mobile sperm in both groups.
Table
3. Sperm density,
motility and serum potas 10
mg gossypol group
means (n). bP<0.05, cP<0.01,
as compared with the control or admission level.
|
|
|
Admission |
Month
of medication |
|||||
|
2 |
4 |
6 |
9 |
12 |
16-18 |
|||
|
Sperm
density106/mL |
Control |
76.581.4(22) |
93.46.6(13) |
70.417.7(22) |
64.447.1(20) |
51.126.3(13) |
82.817.0(5) |
70.427(9) |
|
Treatment |
86.157.7(42) |
41.432.3b(29) |
10.613.8c(29) |
5.38.6c(27) |
1.23.7c(21) |
2.56.3c(9) |
3.05.9c(11) |
|
|
Motility:(%) |
Control |
6220 |
807 |
7419 |
5636 |
4636 |
6918 |
766 |
|
Treatment |
7013 |
3530b(29) |
1621c |
815c |
28c |
49c |
1017c(11) |
|
|
Serum
K+: (mEq/L) |
Control |
4.20.3(22) |
4.00.3(13) |
3.90.3(22) |
4.20.4(20) |
4.10.3(13) |
4.10.2(5) |
3.90.2(9) |
|
Treatment |
4.30.3(42) |
4.20.4(29) |
3.90.3(29) |
4.20.3(27) |
4.20.3(21) |
4.30.5(9) |
3.80.3(11) |
|
Table
4. Sperm
density, motility and serum potassium
in 12.5 mg gossypol group means (n). bP<0.05,
cP<0.01,as compared with the admission level.
|
|
Admission |
Month
of medication |
|||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
||
|
Sperm
density:(106/mL) |
6639 |
4817(16) |
3015b(16) |
2119b(26) |
1419b(25) |
918c(20) |
48c |
1317b(15) |
78c(15) |
43c |
115b(4) |
|
Motility:(%) |
6610 |
3016(16) |
1414c(16) |
1214c(26) |
1016c(25) |
611c(20) |
610c(14) |
916c(15) |
813c(15) |
45c |
21c |
|
Serum
K+(mEq/L) |
4.50.5(11) |
4.30.4(10) |
4.20.2(6) |
4.10.1(11) |
3.90.4(9) |
3.80.4(8) |
3.60.1b(3) |
3.50.4b(10) |
4.20.2(6) |
3.80.2(5) |
4.40.2(4) |
Figure
1.
Average Sperm density (meanSD) of subjects in control and treated
groups.
Figure 2.
Average Percent of motile sperm (meanSD) of subjects in control
and treated groups.
3.5
Hormone profiles
Table 5 shows serum levels of FSH, LH and testosterone in the 10 mg group. They were not significantly different from the levels at admission.
Table
5. Serum concentration of LH, FSH and testostero
in 10 mg gossypol medication means (n).
|
|
Admission |
Month
of medication |
|||||
|
2 |
4 |
6 |
8 |
12 |
16-18 |
||
|
FSH
(IU/L) |
4.02.0(20) |
2.71.1(19) |
2.91.4(24) |
4.95.1(22) |
4.63.6(15) |
3.01.5(9) |
4.14.0(11) |
|
LH
(IU/L) |
8.86.8(9) |
6.22.8(6) |
6.82.7(8) |
8.54.8(7) |
7.02.6(6) |
6.94.3(7) |
6.53.6(7) |
|
Testosterone
(nmol/L) |
18.13.6(9) |
15.73.2(6) |
17.64.7(8) |
19.44.9(7) |
20.95.3(6) |
16.63.2(7) |
16.23.1(7) |
3.6
Serum potassium
The
serum potassium levels of subjects in treated groups are presented in
Table 3 and 4. In the 12.5 mg group (Table 6), the serum K levels in 7
cases were occassionally lower than 3.5 mEq/L during the whole observation
period. However, it would spontaneously return to the normal level during
the next follow up even when the subject continued to take gossypol. None
of them complained of hypokalemic myoasthenia.
Figure 3 shows the profile of blood K+ during the whole
year in the 10 mg group and control group. Lower serum K+ was
seen in the summer season
both in the control and treated groups. The K+ values in control
subjects in August of 1987 and 1988 was 3.900.25 and 3.900.22 mEq/L
respectively, while
in treated group they were 3.860.30 and 3.750.28 mEq/L respectively.
There were no significant differences between the data of the two groups.
Table
6. Subjects in whom serum potassium levels appeared below 3.5 mEq/L in
12.5 mg group.
|
Name |
Serum
K+(mEq/L) |
|||||||||
|
Admission |
Date
of sample collection |
|||||||||
|
89.6 |
90.1 |
89.12 |
90.3 |
90.4 |
90.5 |
90.6 |
90.7 |
90.8 |
90.10 |
|
|
Li |
5.6 |
|
4.6 |
4.2 |
4.1 |
4.2 |
3.7 |
3.1 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
|
Meng |
4.6 |
|
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.0 |
3.6 |
3.1 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
|
Hua |
4.1 |
|
4.2 |
4.0 |
|
4.3 |
|
3.2 |
3.8 |
4.2 |
|
Da |
3.7 |
|
4.3 |
3.9 |
|
4.3 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
3.5 |
4.2 |
|
Wang |
5.2 |
|
|
4.5 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
|
3.4 |
3.7 |
4.7 |
|
Qin |
|
4.4 |
|
4.2 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.5 |
3.4 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
|
Shen |
|
4.2 |
|
3.7 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
3.2 |
|
3.4 |
4.1 |
Figure
3. The profile of blood
potassium during a year in 10 mg group and control.
4 Discussion
Results
of the present study indicated that the low dose gossypol regimen (10
or 12.5 mg) could induce infertility in the majority of subjects. The
requirement for a longer loading phase, however, was the principal disadvantage
of this regimen. No demonstrable alterations were found in the hormone
profiles. Our previous study provided evidence that FSH might be the only
hormone stepping up significantly at the early stage of the maintenance
phase in subjects exhibiting irreversibility and hence, we concluded that
monitoring of serum FSH levels could be used as a diagnostic tool
for identifying these kind of subjects during gossypol treatment[4].
In the present low dose trial, normal FSH levels during medication might
indicate that there would not be much risk for the development of irreversibility.
References
[1]
National Coordinating Group on Male Antifertility Agents. Gossypol --
a new antifertility
agent for males. Chin
Med J (New series) 1978; 58, 455-60.
[2] National Coordinating Team on the clinical study of gossypol as Male
Antifertility Drug. The
clinical study of gossypol in 8806 men.
Reprod Contraception (in Chinese) 1985; 5 (4), 5-11.
[3] Segal SJ, editor. Gossypol:
A potential contraceptive for men. Plenum, New York; 1985. p 271-4.
[4] Gu ZP, Wan YX, Sang GW, Wang WC, Chen ZX, Zhao XJ,
et al. Relationship between hormone profiles and the testoration
of spermatogenesis in men treated with gossypol.
Int J Androl 1990; 13: 253.
[5] Reidenberg MM, Gu ZP, Lorenzo B, Coutinho E, Athayde C, Frick J, et
al. Difference
in serum potassium concentration in normal men in different geographic locations.
J Clin Chem 1993; 39: 72-5.
[6] Gu ZP, Reidenberg MM, Segal S.
Serum potassium value in normal man in Shanghai vs those in men
from Shanghai living abroad. Clin
Chem 1994; 10: 340.
Correspondence
to: Prof.
Zhi-Ping GU, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, 294 Taiyuan Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
Tel: +86-21-6431 1833 Ext 310
Fax: +86-21-6437 0269
e-mail: zpgu@mail.shcnc.ac.cn
Received
2000-08-22 Accepted 2000-11-08
