Reconstruction
surgery for a female to male transsexual usually involves mastectomy, hysterectomy
and creating an aesthetically appealing neophallus. We have successfully
inserted an inflatable prosthesis using the AMS CX prosthesis in a 45 year
old transsexual, who had a large bulky neophallus constructed from the anterior
abdominal subcutaneous fat, about 9 years ago.
The single cylinder CX prosthesis was well anchored to the symphysis
pubis using a dacron windsock tubing, the
activation pump was placed in the dependent pouch of the right labium and
the reservior in the usual perivesical space. The patient subsequently had
debulking procedure using liposuction to create a more aesthetic and functional
phallus. To date, the
inflatable neophallus prosthesis is functioning well.
1
Introduction
Total
phallic reconstruction is commonly done for patients with severe penile
injury, total penectomy for cancer surgery, multiple congenital genitalia
abnormalities and after female to male transsexual surgery[1].
The anterior abdominal cutaneous flap is the most common pedicle
used in neophallus reconstruction in transsexual patients in Singapore and
Malaysia. A malleable
rod is the common prosthesis used for achieving rigidity.
This approach has a high failure rate dueto the frequent occurrence
of pressure necrosis of the subcutaneous flap pedicle, which
has poor blood supply.
We have had the opportunity to successfully insert an inflatable
prosthesis using the AMS CX prosthesis in a 45-year old transsexual with
anterior abdominal subcutaneous fat pedicle.
2
Patient
and surgery
The
patient is presently happily married female-to-male transsexual with adopted
children and is a very successful businessman. He has male external features
and a hoarse manly voice.
Abdominal examination revealed a puckered, midline lower abdominal
scar. The neophallus
was reconstructed from the anterior abdominal cutaneous flap done about
9 years ago. The
pedicle is 19 cm in length with a circumference of 14 cm.
It is chordeed and curved concavely dorsally.
Thick fibrotic incisional scar is noted dorsally over the curved
part of the neophallus.
The overlying skin throughout the whole pedicle including the tip
is sensitive to touch and pinprick.
The labial folds, clitoris, external urinary meatus and vaginal
opening are normal.
The
operation was performed 20 months ago. Antibiotics (cetafzidime, netromycin
and Flagyl) were given perioperatively.
The skin was prepared routinely using povidone solution. A midline
suprapubic incision extending about 5 cm into the proximal part of the
neophallus was done. An
infrapubic space was created and dilated for 8 cm along the left ischial
ramus with 18 mm diameter. A transverse incision across the distal dorsal
scar of the neophallus was made to correct the chordee.
Dilatation of the shaft of the neophallus along its central axis
was done up to 14 mm diameter.
Antibiotic (Cefuroxime) was constantly irrigated during dilatation
of the infrapubic space and the shaft of the neophallus.
A
Dacron tubular graft 16 mm diameter with one end closed like a windsock
was created and anchored to the symphysis pubis and left ischial ramus[2].
A single 20 cm cylinder
of AMS CX prosthesis with 5 cm rear tip extender was inserted into the
open end of the dacron graft.
The tubing of the cylinder was brought out by perforating
the dacron graft to ensure secured anchorage.
The open end of the dacron windsock was apposed around the cylinder
and sutured to the symphysis pubis, creating a neosuspensory ligament.
The distal part of the cylinder was inserted with a Furlow's inserter.
The CXM pump was inserted into the most dependent part of the right
labium. The second
cylinder tubing from the CXM pump was spigotted with a metal stopcap.
A 50 mL reservoir was inserted below the rectus muscle in the retropubic
space.
The
transverse incision over the distal shaft of the neophallus was closed
longitudinally correcting the chordee.
The midline suprapubic and infrapubic incision was closed in 2
layers, using an absorbable suture (Vicryl) for the subcutaneous layer
and nylon suture for the skin.
The
prosthesis was recycled and kept semi-inflated postoperatively.
No pressure dressing was applied over the shaft of the neophallus
(Figure 1).
Figure
1. The penile prosthesis implantation after operation.
3
Results
Recycling
of the prosthesis was started after 24 hours.
The patient was discharged well on the sixth postoperative day
with wound healing well and no skin necrosis.
The patient was taught to do self-recycling after 1 week.
He had no problem with the inflation pump.
However, to activate the deflating valve, he has to press it against
the pubic bone, which requires some practice.
The
patient had liposuction of the pedicle to decrease the circumference of
the shaft 8 months postoperatively.
The prosthesis is still in good function to date i.e. twenty months
postoperatively. The
patient and partner satisfaction was
graded as good to excellent.
4
Discussion
The
goal in the reconstruction surgery for a female-to-male transsexual is
to create a manly image.
This always includes mastectomy, hysterectomy and creating an aesthetically
appealing neophallus that can be made erect for sexual intercourse.
Reconstruction of the urethra to allow urination while standing
is currently not advisable as this usually prolongs the postoperative
recovery period and urinary fistula invariably occurs at the neourethra.
Neophallus
reconstruction can be done from local tubed pedicle flaps and skin flaps,
muscle and myocutaneous flaps, local fasciocutaneous flaps or sensate
fasciocutaneous microvascular free flaps.
Rigidity of the neophallus is currently achieved with either semi-rigid
or inflatable implants.
Reestablishing good sensation over the skin of neophallus using
either the ilioinguinal, genitofemoral or dorsal
nerves to the clitoris
will certainly allow erogenous sensation[3].
Most
reconstructive surgery for female-to-male transsexuals stopped at the
stage of reconstruction
of a neophallus. It
usually takes up to 2 years for completion.
The majority of these patients are indeed very satisfied to have
male external features.
Activation of the neophallus to allow coitus is desired but is
generally not possible because it involves further surgery and further
rehabilitation and it incurs more hospital expenditure.
Failures
of the implants in neophallus include extrusion of the prosthesis due
to pressure necrosis or shear force, infection and migration of implant.
Inflatable implant, whenever possible, is obviously the preferred
choice.
The
ideal functional neophallus which will provide erection and erogenous
sensation results from implantation of an inflatable prosthesis in a neophallus
that has been microsurgically reconstructed to reestablish good sensation
over the skin of the neophallus[3]. This can be done by microsurgically
re-anastomosing the flap
nerves or the local nerves to the ilioinguinal regiion, the genitofemoral
nerve or the dorsal nerves of the clitoris.
This will provide protection against pressure necrosis and allow
erogenous sensation.
5
Conclusion
Most
reconstructive surgery for female to male transsexuals stopped at the
stage of reconstruction
of a neophallus. This
usually takes up to 2 years for completion.
The majority of these patients are indeed very satisfied to have
male external features.
Activation of the neophallus to allow coitus is desired but is
generally not done because it involves
further surgery, further rehabilitation and it incurs hospital
expenditure.
Our
experience showed that implantation of an inflatable prosthesis is possible even
in a neophallus constructed from subcutaneous skin flap.
The postoperative recovery
for this relatively simple procedure is rapid, and the complications are
minor and easily correctable.
The functional result and long term potential complication
of an inflatable penile prosthesis is certainly superior to the result of
a rigid rod, which is usually used for neophallus of a transsexual in this
part of the world.
References
[1]
Jordan GH, Alter GJ, Gilbert DA, Horton CE, Devine CJ. Penile prosthesis
implantation in total phalloplasty. J Urol 1994; 152: 410-14.
[2] Levine LA, Zachary LS, Gottlieb LJ. Prosthesis placement after total
phallic reconstruction.
J Urol 1993; 149: 593-9.
[3] Gilbert DA, Horton CE, Terzis
JK, Devine CJ, Winslow BH, Devine PC. New concepts in phallic
reconstruction. Annals
Mastic Surg 1987; 18: 128-36.