|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carbohydrates
mediate sperm-ovum adhesion and triggering of the acrosome reaction
Daulat
R.P. Tulsiani Departments
of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University
School of Medicine, Room D-3243 MCN, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2633, USA Asian J Androl 2000 Jun; 2: 87-97 Keywords:
AbstractThe fertilization process is the net result of a complex sequence of events that collectively result in the fusion of the opposite gametes. The male gamete undergoes continuous morphological and biochemical modifications during sperm development in the testis (spermatogenesis), maturation in the epididymis, and capacitation in the female reproductive tract. Only the capacitated spermatozoa are able to recognize and bind to the bioactive glycan residue(s) on the ovum's extracellular coat, the zona pellucida (ZP). Sperm-zona binding in the mouse and several other species is believed to take place in two stages. First, capacitated (acrosome-intact) spermatozoa loosely and reversibly adhere to the zona-intact ovum. In the second stage tight irreversible binding occurs. Both types of bindings are attributed to the presence of glycan-binding proteins (receptors) on the sperm plasma membrane and their complementary bioactive glycan units (ligands) on the surface of the ZP. The carbohydrate-mediated adhesion event initiates a signal transduction cascade resulting in the exocytosis of acrosomal contents. This step is believed to be prerequisite which allows the hyperactivated acrosome-reacted spermatozoa to penetrate the ZP and fertilize the ovum. This review focuses on the role of carbohydrate residues in sperm-ovum interaction, and triggering of the acrosome reaction. I have attempted to discuss extensive progress that has been made to enhance our understanding of the well programmed multiple molecular events necessary for successful fertilization. This review will identify these events, and discuss the functional significance of carbohydrates in these events.1 Introduction For
successful fertilization in several species, capacitated acrosome-intact
spermatozoa recognize and bind to the ovum's extracellular coat, the zona
pellucida (ZP) in a receptor-ligand-mediated manner[1-4]. Sperm-ovum
interaction in the mouse and several other species, including man, is
believed to take place in two stages.
First, the capacitated spermatozoa loosely and reversibly adhere
to the ZP by means of plasma membrane overlying the acrosome, followed
by a tight species-specific irreversible binding[1,2]. Both
types of bindings are thought to be mediated by glycan-binding molecules
(glycosyltransferases, glycosidases and/or lectin-like proteins) on sperm
plasma membrane (receptors) and complementary terminal sugar residues
(ligands) on glycan moiety(ies) of ZP[1-3]. In recent years
considerable progress has been made in the identification and characterization
of molecules on the sperm plasma membrane and complementary terminal sugar
residues on ZP that are believed to be important for gamete interaction
and triggering of sperm activation (i.e., induction of the acrosome reaction). The
exocytosis of acrosomal contents during sperm activation is believed to
be a prerequisite event which allows acrosome-reacted spermatozoa to penetrate
the ZP and fertilize the ovum[5].
There has been a longstanding interest in the basic biology of the fertilization process. The success of in vitro fertilization in domestic animals and humans is a result of the knowledge gained in small laboratory animals. Among mammals, the events leading to fusion of the opposite gametes are best illustrated in the mouse, although there is considerable information in other species, including man[1,2]. Successful fertilization in the mouse following mating involves several orchestrated steps. These are: 1) sperm capacitation in the female genital tract, 2) binding of the capacitated spermatozoa to the ZP and induction of the acrosome reaction, 3) secondary binding of the acrosome-reacted sperm to ZP and its penetration, and 4) fusion of the spermatozoon with the ovum vitelline membrane (Figure 1). This review will focus on the recent advances made toward elucidating the molecular basis of the first two steps. Figure
1. Progressive stages of sperm-ovum interaction in the mouse: 1,
the acrosome-intact spermatozoon passes through cumulus cells and the
innermost layer, the corona radiata; 2, sperm receptor(s) bind to glycan
moiety(ies) of mZP3 and starts a signal transduction cascade resulting
in acrosomal exocytosis; 3, the acrosome-reacted spermatozoon penetrate
the ZP; and 4, the spermatozoon passes through the perivitelline space
and fuses with the ovum plasma membrane. 1.1
Sperm capacitation Mammalian spermatozoa released from the seminiferous tubules and those present within the proximal regions of the epididymis are non-motile and unable to bind to the ZP and undergo the acrosome reaction. They acquire progressive motility during transit through epididymis, a process termed epididymal maturation[1]. During this passage, the epididymis provides a specific intraluminal environment in which functionally immature sperm cells undergo morphological and biochemical alterations necessary to produce competent spermatozoa capable of undergoing capacitation and successful binding to the ZP[1]. During epididymal maturation, sperm plasma membrane, a vital component in the early events of fertilization undergoes extensive biochemical changes and remodeling[5-7]. These modifications are an essential part of the maturation process resulting in the production of a self-propelled, functionally-competent spermatozoon. In
addition to maturation in the epididymis, spermatozoa must undergo functional
changes between the events of mating and fertilization[1,2]. During
residence in the female reproductive tract, they undergo a series of biochemical
and functional modifications collectively referred to as capacitation[1]. The
net change during this process is a combined effect of multiple molecular
modifications in the sperm plasma membrane proteins/glycoproteins and
lipid components that are thought to modify the ion channels in the plasmalemma[8]. The
preparatory alterations
include removal of seminal plasma molecules adsorbed to the surface of
ejaculated spermatozoa as well as modification and/or reorganization of
sperm surface components[2]. The
adsorbed seminal plasma factors are believed to prevent spermatozoa from
undergoing premature acrosome reaction before completing their migratory
journey through the female reproductive tract.
As a result of these alterations, capacitated spermatozoa become
acrosomally responsive by yet unknown mechanisms. Experimental
evidence from several studies strongly suggests that
sperm loses cholesterol before becoming acrosomally responsive[9]. Although
the significance of capacitation has been known for nearly 40 years[10,11],
the molecular mechanisms responsible for the functional changes are not
fully understood. Most
researchers agree that capacitation results from multiple molecular changes
in sperm plasma membrane proteins/glycoproteins and lipid components that
likely modify ion channels. The
reported changes in cholesterol and phospholipid during
in vivo capacitation is consistent with this possibility[12].
As capacitation proceeds, a number of biochemical changes
occur on spermatozoa. These
modifications allow the transmembrane flux of ions that are believed to
be important in initiating the events of capacitation, hyperactivation
and acrosome reaction[2]. The
former two events take place before sperm-ovum (zona) interaction, and
the latter event, at least in the mouse and several other species including
man, is initiated after sperm-ovum binding. It
is, therefore, reasonable to assume that the three events are independent
and involve region-specific alterations in sperm plasma membrane. In most mammalian species studied, spermatozoa become hyperactive in the isthmus region of the oviduct, and the hyperactivated spermatozoa move to the ampullary environment, the site of in vivo fertilization[13-15]. A possible functional significance of hyperactivation could be that the hyperactivated beat pattern of a spermatozoon will definitely enhance its thrust (physical force) at the site of its binding to ZP and undergoing the acrosome reaction[16]. The hydrolytic action of glycohydrolases and proteases released at the site of sperm-zona binding, along with the enhanced thrust generated by the hyperactivated beat pattern of the bound spermatozoon, are important in regulating the penetration of ZP and fusion with the ovum plasma membrane. All
mammalian spermatozoa studied thus far undergo capacitation after residing
in the female genital tract for a certain period of time. Similarly,
spermatozoa recovered from the female genital tract after mating, or cauda
epididymal spermatozoa following incubation with oviductal secretions,
are able to fertilize an ovum in vitro[17,18]. The
precise site of capacitation may be different in different species; however,
several studies suggest that capacitation is most efficient when the spermatozoa
pass through the uterus and oviduct. The
oviductal secretions collected from the estrous females have been demonstrated
to be most efficient in rendering the functional changes in spermatozoa
in vitro[1,18].
Mammalian
sperm can also be capacitated in vitro in a chemically defined
medium supplemented with energy substrates, such as glucose and pyruvate,
bovine serum albumin, and appropriate buffer[1,19]. It
is noteworthy that albumin is the major protein in the female genital
tract secretions and is an important
component for in vitro and in vivo capacitation[19,20] As capacitation proceeds, a number of intracellular and cell surface changes occur on spermatozoa. The known changes include a) increased adenylate cyclase and cAMP[21,22], b) increase in intracellular pH[23], c) calcium influx[24], d) loss of sperm surface components[25], e) modification/alteration of sperm plasma membrane[26], and f) tyrosine phosphorylation of a subset of sperm proteins[27,28]. Recent studies suggest that the tyrosine phosphorylation is dependent on increased cAMP, a result consistent with the suggestion of a relationship between cAMP-dependent protein kinase A and tyrosine kinases and/or phosphatases[27-29]. Whether any of the above changes are necessary for capacitation is not yet known. The molecular mechanism(s) as to how these changes affect the functional state of spermatozoa is currently under intensive investigation. One
important surface alteration that happens following capacitation is a
change in the lectin-binding properties of spermatozoa[30-33],
a result indicative that the terminally exposed carbohydrate moieties
are altered during this process. A
possible explanation for these changes in vivo could be the association
of an oviductal glycoprotein secreted from oviductal epithelial cells,
and reported to bind
to the posterior region of the spermhead, midpiece, and flagellum[2,34]. A
second possibility is that the existing sperm plasma membrane glycoproteins
are modified in vivo by glycosyltransferases present in the uterus
and oviduct secretions, and which display a temporal surge in the genital
tract during the esterous
cycle[35]. The
plausible modification of the endogenous sperm surface glycoproteins by
addition of sugar residues to the terminally exposed glycan moieties will
be expected to alter the lectin-binding properties of capacitated spermatozoa. Alternatively,
the glycohydrolases present within the sperm acrosome of noncapacitated
spermatozoa could translocate (redistribute) on the sperm surface of capacitated
sperm as has been reported for hyaluronidase[36]. These enzymes
not only hydrolyze glycosyl residues from glycoproteins, they themselves
are glycoproteins[6]. The
appearance of intra-acrosomal glycohydrolases (glycoproteins) on the sperm
surface following capacitation is expected to alter the lectin-binding
properties of spermatozoa. Finally,
several studies have provided evidence suggesting a role for proteoglycans
and glycosaminoglycans in altering the functional state of spermatozoa.
Heparin, the most effective glycosaminoglycan, binds to spermatozoa
from several species, including man[37]. The
binding is said to be sensitive to pH, ionic strength, and temperature,
and thus has characteristics of a typical receptor-ligand interaction.
However, the receptor for glycosaminoglycan has not been identified,
and the molecular mechanisms responsible for these interactions are not
fully understood. 2 Sperm-Zona (Egg) binding The
capacitated spermatozoa bind to the ZP in a highly precise manner. Extensive
studies in the mouse seem to suggest that sperm binding is a two-step
process. First,
capacitated sperm loosely and reversibly adhere to ZP by means of plasma
membrane overlying the acrosome, followed by a tight and irreversible
binding[1]. Both
types of bindings are attributed to the presence of glycan-binding proteins
(receptors) on the sperm plasma membrane and their complementary glycan
chains (ligands) on ZP glycoconjugates[38,39]. Thus
sperm-ovum interaction is a carbohydrate-mediated receptor-ligand binding
event. This
type of binding is analogous to cellular adhesion events of bacteria,
viruses, and many pathogens to their respective host cells. 2.1
Zona pellucida glycoconjugates ZP
is the extracellular glycocalyx which surrounds all mammalian ovums. The
ZP in all species studied is a relatively simple structure composed of
three families of glycoproteins, designated as ZP1, ZP2, and ZP3, and
the pig has a fourth form as well (Table 1). The
main functions of ZP in fertilization have been generally accepted as
the mediation of the relative species specificity of
sperm binding, induction of the sperm acrosome reaction, secondary binding
events, blocking of polyspermy, and protection of growing embryo from
fertilization to implantation[1]. It
is now clear that the proteins which make up the zona pellucida are highly
conserved among mammalian species, suggesting that their organization
may also be conserved.
In the mouse, the three glycoproteins are synthesized and secreted
by the growing oocytes. Two
of the glycoproteins, mouse ZP2 (mZP2) and mZP3, interact noncovalently
to form filaments of structural repeats that are
interconnected by mZP1 forming a three-dimensional network of cross-linked
filaments[40].
Such a structure may explain the elasticity of ZP and the relative
ease of its penetration by the hyperactivated acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. Table
1. Characteristics of mammalian ZP glycoproteins.
1Gupta
SK, Govind CK, Senthil D, Srivastava M, Jethanandani P, Kaul R, Mittal
A, Sivapurapu N, Sheela P.
Molecular characterization of non-human primate zona pellucida
glycoproteins.
In: Gupta SK, editor.
Reproductive Immunology. New
Delhi: Narosa Publishing House; 1999.
p 33-44. In
recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding structure-function
of various zona components. In
particular, work on mZP has resulted in identification of primary (mZP3)
and secondary (mZP2) binding sites for homologous spermatozoa[41]. This
conclusion was based on the experimental evidence suggesting that only
mZP3 is able to inhibit sperm-ovum binding in an in vitro assay
in a dose-dependent manner. The
observed inhibition is apparently caused by
competition of the added mZP3 for the complementary receptor(s) on the
plasma membrane overlying capacitated sperm head.
Moreover, when the radioiodinated mZP2 or mZP3 was incubated with
capacitated (acrosome-intact) or acrosome-reacted spermatozoa, the former
glycoprotein showed higher binding to the acrosome-reacted spermatozoa,
whereas the latter glycoconjugate showed higher binding to capacitated
sperm head[42]. Further
support that the primary binding sites are present on mZP3 comes from
the experimental evidence demonstrating that mZP3 from fertilized ovums
is no longer able to inhibit sperm-ovum binding. This
result is consistent
with the assumption that the loss of primary binding sites on ZP of the
fertilized ovums is due to modification of mZP3. Several
lines of evidence listed in previous review articles[2,40] Work
from my group[52,53] and others[56,57] suggests
that N-linked (asparagine-linked) glycans may be bioactive molecules
that are recognized
by sperm surface receptor(s). It
is interesting to notice that N-linked glycans contribute nearly half
of the molecular mass of mZP3 and over 40% of mZP2[58]. Thus
a discussion on the complexities in the structure of N-linked glycans
will contribute to
a better understanding of their role in sperm-ovum interaction. The
N-linked glycans may be either of high mannose, hybrid type or
complex (bi-, tri-, tetraantennary) structures[5]. The
three types of glycans contain the basic structure composed of a branched
trimannose region to an N,N'-diacetylchitobiose which is attached
to the amide nitrogen of an asparagine residue on the protein. In
the high mannose oligosaccharide, the core structure is substituted by
-linked mannosyl residues
whereas in complex structures, the core structure is elongated by the
presence of trisaccharide (sialic acid-galactose-N-acetylglucosamine).
The hybrid type glycan is a combination of high mannose and complex
type where one antenna of the core structure contains only mannosyl residues
and the other antenna contains one or two trisaccharide units on 1,3-branch[59]. In
addition, many glycoproteins, including mZP2, mZP3[58], and
porcine ZP3[60] contain N-linked poly-N-acetylglucosaminyl
glycans. These
glycans contain repeat units of disaccharide (3Gal1,4GlcNAc1) present
on complex-type tri- and
tetraantennary structures (Figure 2). The
fact that these glycans were demonstrated by us to contribute 23 kDa and
16 kDa to the molecular mass of mZP2 and mZP3, respectively[58],
suggests that the two zona components may contain a variety of structurally
variable polylactosaminyl chains. Indeed,
current evidence indicates that polylactosaminyl glycans present in many
cell surface glycoconjugates[61-63] may contain four variable
terminal sugars (Figure 2), suggesting that
polylactosaminyl glycan chains on mZP2 and mZP3 may also be quite complex
structures with many variables. From the above discussion, it is obvious
that the number of N-linked glycan species identified in glycoproteins
is very large and could run in the hundreds. However,
although individual cells are able to synthesize many N-linked
glycan chains, the process is highly specific and is controlled in such
a way that the glycan chains at a particular glycosylation site have one
or a small number of closely related structures[64].
Nonetheless, the fact that a large number of glycan
structures are possible makes it difficult to identify and chemically
characterize the bioactive glycan residue(s). The
efforts are further hampered by Figure
2. Structure of N-linked polylactosaminyl glycan chains present
on a number of well-defined cell-surface glycoproteins (61-63) and perhaps
mZP3. A,
tetraantennary; B, triantennary; and C, triantennary with side chains. R represents
one of the following structures: sialyl
2,6; Gal 1,3; GlcNAc 1,3; and Gal 1,4 GlcNAc. The
sum of m+n+o+p may vary from 4-10 disaccharide units. My
laboratory has met reasonable success in the structural analysis of
N-linked glycans present on the mZP2 and mZP3. In
these studies, purified mZP2 and mZP3 were exhaustively treated with N-glycanase,
and the released N-glycan chains
were radiolabeled by reduction with3HNaBH4 as
described[65]. The3Hlabeled
glycan units when subjected to gel filtration on a column of Bio-Gel P-4,
separated into several peaks indicating that both zona glycoproteins contain
a variety of N-linked glycans. Interestingly,
the radioactive peaks present in the mZP2
and mZP3 were quite different, a result indicating the qualitative and
quantitative differences in the N-linked glycan chains. The
peak fractions containing3Hlabeled glycans present in the
mZP2 and mZP3 were pooled and fractionated by serial lectin column chromatography. The
following immobilized lectins were used. Serotonin,
specific for sialic acid; Ricinus communis (RCA-1), specific for
N-acetylglucosamine; Griffonia simplicifolia (GS-1), specific
for -galactose; Concanavalin A, specific for -mannose (high mannose/hybrid type
glycans), and Griffonia simplicifolia (GS-11), specific for -galactose. It
is noteworthy that, whereas some studies suggest that O-linked
glycan units are the bioactive molecules[47], several lines
of evidence suggest that N-linked glycans also have a role in sperm-ovum
interaction. First,
treatment of zona-intact mouse ovums with almond glycopeptidase F (N-glycanase),
an endoenzyme that hydrolyzes
-aspartyl-glucosamine of all classes of N-linked glycans,
greatly reduced sperm-ovum binding[57]. This
study implies that N-linked glycan chains are also important.
Second, our own studies have provided evidence suggesting that
N-linked high mannose/hybrid type glycans on the mouse[52] and
rat[53] It
should be noted that, like mZP3, the porcine ZP glycoprotein (pZP3) has
been reported to contain sperm binding activity[60,69]. The
55 kDa molecule is also highly glycosylated, containing N-linked
and O-linked 2.2
Sperm receptors for zona pellucida Although
the ZP is a relatively simple structure consisting of 3 or 4 glycoproteins,
the sperm plasma membrane overlying the acrosome is more complex structure
containing several dozen proteins/glycoproteins. For
nearly two decades, investigators have applied multiple approaches to
identify and isolate the complementary receptor molecules in several species. Their
efforts have resulted in the recognition of several putative receptor
molecules (for review, see 2, 4, and 73).
Why
are there so many putative receptors on the sperm plasma membrane? The
following factors may contribute to the long list of proposed multiple
receptor and ligand molecules. First,
several receptor-ligand interactions may occur between spermatozoa and
zona-intact ovum before a committed sperm-ovum binding. The
multiple receptors may participate either individually or as multimeric
receptor complexes. The
experimental evidence, suggesting that the initial molecular mechanism
between spermatozoa and ZP is a complex binding event that reflects interaction
between multiple sperm proteins with multivalent ZP3[46], is
consistent with the above possibility. Second,
since sperm-ovum interaction is relatively species-specific, it is possible
that different molecules are involved in different mammalian species. Alternatively,
multiple sperm receptors may interact with complementary ligands in a
well programmed sequence; the precise order of these interactions or the
dominant receptor-ligand interaction may vary among species and may contribute
to the species-specificity of fertilization. Regardless of the mechanism
underlying sperm-ovum interaction, the research of numerous investigators
strongly suggests the occurrence of multiple receptors on spermatozoa
and multiple ligands on homologous ZP.
2.3
The sperm acrosome and acrosome reaction
The
acrosome plays an important role at the site of sperm-zona (ovum) binding
during the fertilization process. The
organelle is a Golgi-derived secretory granule which is formed during
an early stage of spermiogenesis[74]. It
is a sac-like structure surrounded by inner and outer acrosomal membranes
and filled with a host of enzymes such as acid glycohydrolases, proteases,
esterases, acid phosphatases, aryl sulfatases, etc[5]. It
is noteworthy that over 35 years ago, de Duve proposed that penetration
of vestments surrounding the ovum may be mediated by the release of hydrolytic
enzymes from the sperm acrosome[75]. Today,
most researchers agree that the powerful hydrolytic enzymes released during
the acrosomal exocytosis, along with the enhanced thrust generated by
the hyperactivated beat pattern of the bound spermatozoa[16],
are important factors that regulate the penetration of ZP and fusion of
the gametes.
The
carbohydrate-mediated sperm-ovum binding initiates a signal transduction
cascade resulting in the exocytosis of acrosomal contents (i.e., induction
of the acrosome reaction (AR).
This step is believed to be a prerequisite which enables the acrosome-reacted
spermatozoa to penetrate the ZP and fertilize the ovum.
In most species, including man, multiple fusions between the sperm
plasma membrane and outer acrosomal membrane (i.e., the AR) is triggered
by components of the
ZP[5]. In
addition to ZP, a number of physiological and nonphysiological substances
have been used to induce the AR in epididymal and ejaculated spermatozoa. These
inducers have been described in two earlier reports[5,76] and
will not be repeated here. In
the mouse, the binding of capacitated spermatozoa to the terminal sugar
residue(s) on mZP3 starts a cascade of signaling events prior to the fusion
of membranes and induction of the AR[5,74]. As
stated above, the ability of
mZP3 to be the natural agonist of the AR depends on the glycan moiety(ies)
as well as the
polypeptide portion of the molecule. The
multiple glycan moieties are recognized by the sperm surface receptor(s)
prior to its aggregation and triggering of the AR. Our
studies with neoglycoproteins demonstrated the need for the sugar residues
as well as the protein backbone[20]. Combined,
the studies emphasize the role of sugar moiety(ies) in initial recognition
by sperm surface receptors, and the role of the protein backbone in the
cross-linking and aggregation of receptors prior to triggering the AR. The
involvement of multiple sugar residues and
the protein backbone strongly supports the concept that the ZP3/neoglycoprotein-induced
acrosome reaction is a net result of multivalent interactions. What
is the molecular mechanism of the calcium-dependent induction of the AR? There
is a good evidence that ZP3 stimulation of spermatozoa activates G proteins,
particularly G1-like proteins[77,78]. Inactivation
of G1-like proteins with pertussis toxin blocks triggering
of the AR by the solubilized mZP/mZP3. The
bacterial toxin blocks ZP3-induced Ca2+ influx, leading to
the suggestion that G1-like
proteins regulate the Ca2+ influx and raise the levels of free
calcium. The
increase in intracellular Ca2+ is thought to be necessary prior
to the AR. 3
Conclusion This
review supports a role for glycan-binding enzymes (glycosyltransferases
and glycohydrolases) or lectin-like molecules on sperm plasma membrane
and complementary bioactive glycan units on the surface of ZP in sperm-ovum
binding. Although the sequence of events during fertilization varies among
species, the mechanisms underlying sperm capacitation, sperm-ovum interaction,
and induction of the
acrosome reaction share many similarities. These
events are best understood in the mouse, although there is some understanding
in other species, including man. In
the mouse, irreversible binding of capacitated spermatozoa to the glycan
moiety(ies) of homologous ZP triggers signal transduction pathway resulting
in induction of the AR. The
evidence for the presence of a large diversity in the structure of glycans
on ZP3 suggests that successful sperm-ovum interaction is a
net result of several ligand (glycan)-receptor interactions. Consistent
with this suggestion is the finding that initial molecular interaction
between spermatozoa and ZP3 is a complex binding event that reflects multiple
sperm proteins with
multivalent ZP3. In
this review, I have attempted to highlight current advances to explain
mechanisms underlying capacitation, sperm-ovum interaction, and induction
of the AR. I hope
that some of these advances will allow new strategies to regulate these
events and alter sperm function. 4
Acknowledgements References [1]
Yanagimachi R.
Mammalian fertilization. In:
Knobil E, Neil JD, editors. The
Physiology of
Reproduction, vol 1.
New York: Raven Press; 1994.
p 189-317. The
work was supported in part by grants H
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |