Management
of symptomatic ureteric stumps laparoscopically
A.M.
Khan, S. Jacob
Department
of Surgery, King George Hospital,Ilford Essex IG1 2HL, UK
Asian
J Androl 2001 Jun; 3: 147-150
Keywords:
ureter;
laparoscopy; retroperitoneal space
Abstract
Aim:
To study the
advantage of excision of the distal symptomatic ureteric stumps with the
retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach.
Methods: Four
patients who had failed to settle their symptoms with the initial conservative
management were included in the study. All underwent excision of the distal
symptomatic ureteric stumps with the retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach
and then received prophylactic antibiotics. Results:
We
have achieved better results than those reported in the literature in
terms of operating time (mean 1 h
45 min), blood loss (<10 mL), postoperative recovery (within
12 h) and hospital stay (<48 h). Conclusion:
Retroperitoneal
laparoscopic excision is a safe, simple and effective method in the management
of symptomatic ureteric stumps.
1
Introduction
Leaving
the ureteric stump behind after surgical removal of the kidneys is a common
practise. Complications may occur in the retained distal ureteric segment
after nephrectomies. The debate to treat or not to treat redundant distal
ureteric stumps continues[1-5]. Different modes of treatment
options have been employed with varying results. These include from conservative
treatment to operative management. While there is no consensus on the
treatment, secondary excision of the distal ureter is commonly performed
for tumours, recurrent infection from refluxing or obstructive stumps,
or stones in the stump.
Herein
we report our preliminary experience in treating symptomatic distal ureteric
stumps with retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach. Extensive search of the
literature has shown that though the laparoscopic approach has been used
extensively in the management of different urological conditions, it has
not been applied to the treatment of distal symptomatic ureteric stumps.
2
Materials
and methods
2.1
Patients
Four
patients were included in the study. All had failed to settle their
symptoms with the initial conservative management. Firstly a 28-year-old
Caucasian patient presented with recurrent attacks of urinary tract infection
and right loin pain for 2 years. Past history included a right nephrectomy
for a reflux nephropathy 18 years ago.
The
second patient was a 33-year-old Caucasian who had recurrent infection
in left ureteric stump, on and off for the last 4 years since being treated
with a left nephrectomy for a reflux nephropathy. A micturating cystogram
confirmed a refluxing redundant ureter in both the later cases. The third
patient was a 55-year-old Caucasian who had recurrent episodes of right
loin pain since being treated with a right nephrectomy, off and on for
the last 2 years.
The
fourth patient, a 56 year old Caucasian who underwent a right nephrectomy
5 years ago for renal stones, presented to us with recurrent attacks of
urinary tract infection and right loin pain, on and off for 2 years. A
plain radiograph showed a calculus in the retained right ureteric stump
(Figure 1).
2.2
Surgery
The
procedure is performed with the patient in the supine position. A small
transverse incision is made 3 cm medial and above the anterior superior
iliac spine. The abdominal muscles are then incised and retracted down
to reach the peritoneum. The peritoneum after its identification is pushed
medially with a lahey's swab. Care is taken not to puncture the peritoneum.
A balloon dissector is inserted and inflated to approx. 30 insufflations.
An extra peritoneal space is thus created.
After
deflation of the balloon the origin trocar is inserted and the balloon
inflated with saline to hold the trocar in place. Two further ports, a
10 mm port is inserted 5 cm below and another 5 mm port inserted 5 cm
above the Mcburneys point. The bladder is filled with sterile saline via
a Foleys catheter, which is then clamped.
The
iliac arteries are taken as land marks over which the ureteric stump is
identified. The ureter is dissected free along its entire course. The
lower end of ureteric stump close to the bladder is carefully dissected
and a cone of bladder is pulled up. An endo-loop (Ethicon) is introduced
through a 10 mm port and is passed through the ureter up to the cone of
bladder. The endo-loop is tightened around the cone of bladder. A second
endo-loop is inserted and tightened close to the first one. It is ensured
that continuous traction is applied to the cone of bladder during this
manoeuvre. The stump is then excised distal to the second ligature and
retrieved through the 10 mm port.
Haemostasis
is secured and a redivac drain inserted. The Foleys catheter is left in
for 24 hours postoperatively. At the end of the procedure, the abdomen
is desufflated and all ports and instruments are withdrawn and the port
sites closed with nylon skin stitches. All patients are given i.v. 1.5
g cefuroxime during the operation.
Figure
1. A:a plain
radiograph, showing a calculus in the retained right ureteric stump; B:
an enlarged view of the same ureteric calculus. 3
Results
The
mean operative time in our group of patient was 1 hour and 45 minutes.
Minimum blood loss was noticed in all cases (< 10 mL). All patients
made an uneventful postoperative recovery, started oral intake within
12 hours and were discharged within 48 hours after surgery. Their wound
sites healed up nicely without any complications. They had return to their
normal activities within 3 weeks.
Histological
examination confirmed the presence of a chronically inflamed ureteric stump.
All patients have remained asymptomatic to date. 4
Discussion
The
treatment for symptomatic ureteric stumps varies from conservative management
to active surgical intervention. Advocates for conservative treatment
suggest that complications of the retained distal ureteric stumps are
scarce and that a second incision with added morbidity should be avoided[1].
They also argue that the ureter retains its peristaltic activity, which
improves drainage and prevents urinary stasis[2].
However
many studies have established that ureteric stumps may cause recurrent
infection and is a potential site of complications[3-5], hence
should be treated. Wickham et al, initiated the first therapeutic
retroperitoneoscopy in the treatment of ureteric stones in 1978[6].
In 1990 Clayman et al, performed the first clinical laparoscopic
nephrectomy[7]. Gaur described the first experience of a ballon
to expand the retroperitoneal space and then went on to describe many
successful procedures laparoscopically with this technique[8,9].
In
1993, Chandhoke et al described the first attempt to perform total ureterctomy
for ureter cancer with a combined cystoscopic and laparoscopic technique
in 3 patients[10]. Since then many different operation have
been devised to treat symptomatic distal ureteric stumps including electofulgration[11],
PTFE Teflon[12] and fibrin[13] injection into the
ureteric lumen. The results have been variable.
The
mean operative time in this group is 1 h and 40 min. This is satisfactory
and may be due to the relative simplicity of the procedure as compared
to the open technique. We expect the operating time to be shortened even
further after we acquire more expertise and skill in
this technique[14].
The
retroperitoneal approach seems to be more advantageous in regard to the
safety, the amount of blood loss, the duration of postoperative recovery
and wound healing, the time for resuming normal food intake, the requirment
for postoperative analgesia, the time for hospitalization and the problem
of intra-abdominal contamination as compared with the open technique[15-18].
5
Conclusion
Symptomatic
distal ureteric stumps may be problematic in terms of their clinical presentation
and management. The authors excised them by the retroperitoneal laparoscopic
technique. This approach is a safe, simple and effective way in the management
of symptomatic ureteric stumps.
References
[1]
Cain MP, Pope JC, Casale AJ, Adams MC, Rink RC. Natural history of refluxing
distal ureteric stumps after nephrectomy and partial ureterectomy for
vesicoureteral reflux. J Urol 1998; 160: 1026-7.
[2] Yalla VS, Burros HM, Zimsking PD. Peristaltic behaviour of disused
ureteric stump. Urology 1973; 1: 417-9.
[3] Amar A. Refluxing Ureteral Stump. Reservior of urinary tract infection.
J Urol 1964; 1: 493-5.
[4] Krarup T, Wolf H. Refluxing ureteric stump. Scand
J Urol 1978; 12:
181-3.
[5] Persad R, Kamineni S, Mouriquand PDE. Recurrent symptoms of urinary
tract infection in 8 patients with refluxing ureteric stumps. Br J Urol
1994; 74: 720-2.
[6] Wickham JEA, Miller RA. Percutaneous renal access in:
Percutaneous renal surgery; Chap. 2. New York:
Churchill Livingstone;
1983. p 33-42,.
[7] Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Long SR. Laparoscopic nephrectomy:
initial report of pelviscopic organ ablation in the pig. J Endourol
1990; 4: 247-9.
[8] Gaur DD. Laparoscopic operative retroperitoneoscopy:
use of a new device. J Urol
1992; 148: 1137-9.
[9] Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy
and renal biopsy. J Urol. 1992, 149 (pt 2): 408A, abstract 783.
[10] Chandhoke PS, Clayman RV, Kerbl K, McDougall EM, Kavoussi LR, Stone
AM. Laparoscopic ureterectomy:
initial clinical experience. J Urol 1993; 149:
992-7.
[11] Ehrlich RM, Koyle MA, Shanberg AM, Zimmern PE. A new technique of
exclusion of the remaining refluxing ureteral stump in cases of ectopic
ureteral implantation. J d'Urology 1998; 94: 329-31.
[12] Bullock KN, Deane AM, Ashken MH. Endoscopic Teflon injection for
a refluxing ureteric stump after simple nephrectomy. Brit Med J Clin Res
1985; 290: 1109-10.
[13] Carini M, Serni S, Lapini A, Selli C. Endoscopic treatment of refluxing
ureteric stump following nephrectomy with Tissucol and Teflon injections.
Eur Urol 1989; 16: 312-4.
[14] Kerbl K, Clayman RV.Advances in laparoscopic renal and ureteral surgery.
Eur Urol 1994; 25: 1-6.
[15] McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign disease:
comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches.
J Endourol 1996; 10: 45-9.
[16] Wolf JS Jr, Marcovich R, Gill IS, Sung GT, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV,
et al. Survey of neuromuscular injuries to the patient and
surgeon during urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 2000; 55:
831-6.
[17] Elashry OM, Nakada SY, Wolf Jr, Figenshau RS, McDougall EM, Clayman
RV. Ureterolysis for extrinsic ureteral obstruction:
a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. J
Urol 1996; 156: 1403-10.
[18] Gill IS, Clayman RV, McDougall EM. Avances in urological laparoscopy.
J Urol 1995; 154:
1275-94.
home
Correspondence
to: Dr.A.M.
Khan, 96-Lowbrook Rd, Ilford
Essex IG1 2HJ, UK.
Tel: +44-7944 208-514 7410
Fax: +44-208-514 7010
E-mail: dramirkhan@hotmail.com
Received 2001-02-27
Accepted 2001-04-27
|