Home  |  Archive  |  AJA @ Nature  |  Online Submission  |  News & Events  |  Subscribe  |  APFA  |  Society  |  Links  |  Contact Us  |  中文版

Androgen receptor isoforms in human prostatic cancer tissue and LNCaP cell line

Shu-Jie XIA1, Xiao-Da TANG2, Qing-Zheng MA1

1University Department of Urology, Shandong Provincial Hospital  Jinan 250021, China
2University Department of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital  Shanghai, 200080, China

Asian J Androl  2001 Sep; 3: 223-225


Keywords: LNCaP cell line; receptors,androgen; phenotype; prostate
Abstract

Aim: To investigate the androgen receptor (AR) isoform expressions in human prostatic cancer tissue and LNCaP cell line. Methods: With high resolution isoelectric focusing (IEF) method we demonstrated the different expressions of AR isoforms in human prostatic cancer tissues and LNCaP cell line. Results: Data were obtained from three prostatic cancer specimens and the LNCaP cell line. Three typesof AR isoforms were detected with pI values at 6.5, 6.0, and 5.3. For the 3 prostatic cancer specimens, 1 sample showed all the three types of AR isoforms, the second specimen expressed at 6.5 and 6.0, and the third failed to show any type of isoforms. The LNCaP cell line expressed all the three AR isoforms. Binding of 3H-dihydrotestosterone    (3 H-DHT) to these three isoforms was inhibited by the addition of l00-fold excess of DHT or testosterone, while not by progesterone, oestradiol and diethylstilboestrol. Conclusion: The expression of AR isoforms is different in different prostate cancer tissues, which may be related to the difference in the effect of anti-androgen therapy in different patients.

1 Introduction
Since the publication of androgen receptor (AR) cDNA sequence from human prostate[1], it has been generally accepted that AR is encoded by a single gene. However, there is evidence that the AR protein itself is heterogeneous[2,3]. A human prostate carcinoma cell line LNCaP expresses an AR that binds both testosterone (T) and R1881, resu1ting in ligands capable of stimulating the growth of the cell line in the culture.Recently two distinct clones of AR cDNA were isolated from the testes of the rainbow trout and the Japanese eel[4,5] and two types of AR proteins isolated from the fibroblasts of human genital skin[6]. In our previous paper[7], it was demonstrated that there were different AR isoform expressions in human benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue and rat prostate. However, the AR isoforms in human prostate cancer tissue and LNCaP cell line have not been reported so far. The present study was designed to investigate the existence of different AR isoforms in these tissues.
2 Materials and methods

2.1  Tissue culture

Stock culture of the LNCaP cell line was obtained from the Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and was maintained in RPMI-1640 medium containing l0 % (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) and 100 units/mL of penicillin. The cells were then harvested and stored in liquid nitrogen until processed.

2.2 Tissue handling

Human prostatic cancer tissues were obtained at operation from patients undergoing prostatectomy. Each of the samples was divided into two portions, one snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and the other used for pathological examination. The samples obtained were diagnosed as malignant tissues by a pathologist. All tissue processing was performed at 4 . The tissue was sliced and homogenized using a polytron homogeniser in glycerol phosphate buffer (10 % glycerol, 10  mmol/L phosphate,1.5  mmol/L EDTA and 5 mmol/L monothioglycerol, pH 7.4) containing l ng/mL each of the protease inhibitors, aprotinin and soybean trypsin inhibitor (both from Sigma, USA). The homogenate was centrifuged for l0 min at 800 g. The supernatant was further centrifuged for 60 min at 100,000 g and the final supernatant was used for receptor analysis.

2.3 Dextran coated charcoal (DCC) assay of AR

AR was measured by the single saturating dose (SSD) assay. The cytosol (3 mg-protein/mL cytosol) was incubated at 4 for 24 h with 50 nmol/M tritiated DHT in the presence or absence of an l00-fold excess of unlabe1led DHT, testosterone, oestradiol or diethylstilbestrol. Free hormone was separated from bound by incubation with DCC buffer charcoal (0.5 %, w/v) and dextran T70 (0.05 %, w/v) (Sigma) at 4 , followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 5 min. An aliquot of the supernatant was counted in a liquid scintillation counter. Another aliquot was used for IEF analysis.

2.4 Isoelectric focusing

The IEF gels were cast in slabs of size 125260 mm and separation was conducted along the short side of the polyacrylamide gels (2 mm thick), which contained 20 % (v/v) glycerol. A pH gradient was achieved using 1.5 % (w/v) ampholine 3.5-10.7 (LKB, Bromma, Sweden) and l % (w/v) ampholine 5-8. Gels were photopolymerized at room temperature by means of a TR 26 polymerization light, using riboflavin (0.004 % v/v) for at least 4 h. IEF was performed in a cold room and temperature of the cooling water was kept constant at 4 . Electrode solution of 1 M NaOH (cathode) and 1 M H2SO4 (anode) were used. Gels were pre-focused for 45 min at 20 mA/20 W/l200 V.

After DCC extraction, aliquots (150 L) of the radioactive (3H-DHT labelled) supernatants derived from SSD assay was loaded near the cathode. The runs were carried out using a 3000 xi CC power supply (LKB, Sweden) at 1200 v/20 mA/20 W constant power for l .5 h. A mixture of nine natural proteins (Bio-Rad) was used for pH calibration. After the run, the gels were cut into 2.5 mm slices and each slice was incubated with 5mL scinti1lation cocktail (Ready-Solv, Beckman, USA) for 24 h at room temperature and radioactivity assayed.

The ligand specificity of these isoforms was confirmed by performing IEF on samples that were incubated with labelled DHT and a 100fold excess of unlabelled DHT, T, oestradiol or diethylstilbestrol.

2.5 Protein determination

Proteins were determined by the method of Lowry[8] , using BSA as the standard.

3 Results  

The specimens included in this study were all AR positive. There were three radioactive peaks on the gels focusing at pI 6.5, 6.0, and 5.3. For three prostatic cancer specimens, one sample showed three types of AR isoforms, another one expressed at 6.5 and 6.0, and the third one failed to show any isoform. The LNCaP cells expressed all the three AR isoforms. Binding of 3H-dihydrotestosterone to these three types of isoforms was inhibited by the addition of l00-fold excess of DHT and testosterone, while not by progesterone, oestradiol and diethylstilbestrol. This data are summarized in Table l.

Table 1.  AR isoforms in human prostate cancer and LNCaP cells.

Samples

Isoforms

Frequency

Prostate cancer

6.5

6.0

5.3

1/3

6.5

6.0

--

1/3

--

--

--

1/3

LNCaP cells

6.5

6.0

5.3

1/1

4 Discussion

The isoelectric points of the cytoplasmic androgen receptors obtained from human prostatic cancer were found to be acidic (pH 6.5, 6.0 and 5.3). Auf and Ghanadian[9] using a synthetic ligand indicated that the pI of the androgen receptor isolated from BPH samples was also acidic (6.2). BPH tissue homogenates contain high levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) that makes the androgen receptor assay difficult when DHT is used as the ligand. However, our data indicates that the peak at pI 6.5 is not resulted from steroid binding to SHBG, as both oestradiol and diethylstilbestrol could not compete with labelled DHT for displacing binding from this peak. Puddefoot et al[10] and Marsigliante et al[11] observed a non-specific binding peak at 5.0.

It was reported that androgen receptor is coded by a single gene[1,12,13]. The AR isoforms mentioned above seems to arise as a consequence of protein modification or phosphorylation[3]. Recently Yamashita[4] and Ikeuchi et al[5] isolated two types of cDNA clones from rainbow trout and Japanese eel testis and both of the cDNA could encode proteins. The translation of mRNA transcribed from AR cDNAs yielded 94-, 76-kDa and other proteins in a protein synthesis system of rabbit reticulocyte lysate that could bind DNA and androgens with a high affinity[12]. The predicted molecular weight of the AR was approximately 90-95 kDa[12], which was confirmed by SDS--PAGE analysis of photoaffinity labelled receptor[14]. We found there are three AR isoforms that should be necessary for the function of AR. The androgen receptor heterogeneity observed in LNCaP cells is not due to mutation, because the same micro-heterogeneity (110-112 kDa doublet) is also found after expression of wild type androgen receptor protein in COS-l cells[3]. Our data clearly showed that there were three isoforms in human prostatic cancer tissues and LNCaP cells. The genetic basis for human prostate AR isoforms needs further studies.

In humans, a rare group of males with a defect in 5-alpha reductase activity have been noted to develop incomplete differentiation of the male external genitalia and prostate gland, whilst retaining normal development of Wolffian duct derivatives, which undergo masculinization at puberty. In these subjects, the prostate remains rudimentary and BPH does not occur[15]. Furthermore studies on castrated male rats implanted with the Dunning rat prostatic carcinoma R-3327 and treated with testosterone and a 5-reductase inhibitor, finasteride (MK906), did not influence tumor growth. This suggests that the R-3327 tumor responds to testosterone[16]. The AR can bind both T and DHT, but T cannot substitute for DHT to induce development of the prostate gland and the male external genitalia. In our studies both T and DHT are able to bind all three isoforms, thus the differential tissue response to T and DHT may be a consequence of the ability of tissues to express different AR isoforms.

Oestrogen receptor (OR) is encoded by a single gene. The OR in human breast cancer samples is heterogeneous, expressing four isoforms in different tumors; the difference in the isoform expression is related to the efficacy of endocrine treatment[10,17]. The clinical significance of the different expressions of AR isoforms remains to be clarified.

References

[1] Lubahn DB, Joseph DR, Sullivan PM, Willard HF, French FS, Wilson EW. Cloning of human androgen receptor complementary DNA and localization to the X chromosome. Science 1988; 240: 327-30.
[2] van Laar JH, Bolt-de Vries J, Zegers ND, Trapman J, Brinkmann AO. Androgen receptor heterogeneity and phosphorylation in human LNCaP cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1990; 166: 193-200.
[3] Kuiper GG, de Ruiter PE, Brinkmann AO. Androgen receptor heterogeneity in LNCaP cells is caused by a hormone independent phosphorylation step. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 1992; 41: 697-700.
[4] Takeo J, Yamashita. Two distinct isoforms of cDNA encoding rainbow trout androgen receptors.  J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 5674-80.
[5] Ikeuchi T, Todo T, Kobayshi T, Kobayashi T, Nagahama Y. cDNA cloning of a novel androgen receptor subtype.  J Biol Chem 1999; 274:  25205-9.
[6] Wilson CM, McPhaul MJ. A and B forms of the androgen receptor are present in human genital skin fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 91:  1234-8.
[7] Xia SJ, Hao GY, Tang XD. Androgen receptor isoforms in human and rat prostate. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 307-10.
[8] Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem  1951; 193:  265-75.
[9] Auf G, Ghanadian R. Analysis of androgen receptors in the human prostate by isoelectric-focusing in Polyacrylamide gel. J Steroid Biochem 1981;l4:  126l-7.
[10] Puddefoot JR, Anderson E, Vinson GP, Gilmore OJA. Heterogeneity of oestrogen receptors in human breast tumors. In:  Peeters H editor. Protides of the biological fluids. Oxford: Pergmon Press;1987. p 307-10.
[11] Marsigliante S, Baker VA, Puddefoot J, Barker S, Vinson GP. 4 S Oestrogen receptor isoforms and their distribution in breast cancer samples. J Molec Endocrinol 1991; 7:  205-11. 
[12] Chang C, Kokontis J, Liao S. Structural analysis of complementary DNA and amino acid sequences of human and rat androgen receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA  1988; 85: 7211-5.
[13] Tilley WD, Marcela M, Wilson JD, McPhaul MJ. Characterization and expression of a cDNA encoding the human androgen receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 327-31. 
[14] Stamatiadis D, Dadoun F. Isoelectric focusing and 2D electrophoresis of the human androgen receptor. J Steroid Biochem Molec Bio 1992; 4l:  3.
[15] Imperato-McGinley J, Guerrero L, Gautier T, Peterson RE.Steroid 5-alpha-reductase deficiency in man:  an inherited form of male pseudohermaphroditism. Science 1974; 186: 1213-5.
[16] Brooks JR, Berman C, Nguyen H, Prahalada S, Primka RL, Rasmusson GH, Slater EE. Effect of castration, DES, flutamide, and the 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor, MK-906, on the growth of the Dunning rat prostatic carcinoma, R-3327. Prostate 1991; 18:  215-7.

[17] Baker VA, Puddefoot J, Marsigliante S, Barker S, Goode AW, Vinson GP. Oestro
gen receptor isoforms, their distribution and relation to progesterone receptor levels in breast cancer samples. Br J Cancer 1992; 66:  l083-7.

home


Correspondence to: Prof. Shu-Jie XIA, University Department of Urology, Shanghai First People's Hospital, 85 Wu Jin Rd. Shanghai 200080, China.
Tel: +86-21-6324 0090 Ext  5511     Fax: +86-21-6324 0825
E-mail: xiashujie@yahoo.com
Received 2001-03-15                      Accepted 2001-08-28