Epididymal
changes associated with cryptorchidism in rats
Izzet
Kocak1, Mehmet Dundar1, Nil Culhaci2
1Department
of Urology, 2Department of Pathology, Adnan Menderes University
School of Medicine, Aydin
09100, Turkey Asian
J Androl 2001 Dec;
3: 277-280
Keywords:
cryptrorchidism;
epididymis; histology; rats
Abstract
Aim:
To
investigate the effect of a new mechanically induced cryptorchidism mode l
on rat epididymal histology. Methods: Eighteen
21-day-old Sprague Dawley rats were randomly divided into 3 groups
of 6 animals each. Animals of Groups 1 and 2 were made unilaterally
cryptorchid by closing the left inguinal canal, while Group 3 (controls),
sham operated. At Day 60 (Group 1) and Day 90 (Group 2 and 3), the
rats were sacrificed. The epididymides of both sides were weighed, and
the diameter of the epididymal tubules, the height of the tubular
epithelium and the presence of fibrosis of the caput epididymides
were examined under a light-microscope.
Results: The
cryptorchid epididymis had a significantly lower weight increase than
the contralateral ones and the controls, but the epithelial height and
diameter of caput epididymal tubules were not significantly different.
Fibrosis was not observed.
Conclusion: The
authors proposed that this new model is a convenient method to evaluate
the epididymal changes associated with experimental cryptorchidism.
1
Introduction
Cryptorchidism
is not only associated with changes in the gonads but also the spermatic
duct system[1], that may lead to additional fertility problems[2,3].
The histopathological changes of the cryptorchid testis has been precisely
described in both the experimental animals and the humans[3].
However, the epididymal alterations associated with cryptorchidism have
not been well identified[4,5], only macroscopic changes were
observed in the humans[1,6]. In the present study, we
examined the histology of the caput epididmides in rats that had been
subjected to a newly designed mechanically-induced experimental cryptorchidism.
The effect of cryptorchidism on the epididymal growth was also evaluated.
2
Materials and methods
2.1
Animals and treatment
After
approval of the protocol by the local ethics commitee, the animals supplied
by the Experimental Research Center of the University of Adnan Menderes.
Eighteen SD rats weighing 60-70 g were accommodated at an environment
of 252 and
12 h light/12 h darkness.
On
day 21 after birth, the rats were weaned, housed in cages of 3 each and
had free access to the pellet diet and tap water. They were divided
at random into 3 groups of 6 animals each. After an overnight fast, the
rats were anaesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of 2 mg/kg xylazine
hydrochloride (Rompun, Bayer, Germany) and 10 mg/kg ketamine hydrochloride
(Ketalar, Parke Davis, Eczacibasi, Turkey). In animals of Groups 1 and
2, the left inguinal ring was closed by a 6/0 non-absorbable suture
material (Prolen: Ethicon, UK) through the inguinoscrotal approach as
described by Dudar et al[7]. The animals of Group 3 were
sham operated and served as the controls. On day 60 (Group 1) and day
90 (Groups 2 and 3) after operation, the animals were sacrificed
and their testes and epididymides of both sides were removed and the epididymides
weighed.
2.2
Histological
examination of epididymis
The
epididymis was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution overnight.
A transverse segment of the caput epididymis was processed by routine
techniques and embedded in paraffin. Sections of 4 m thickness
were cut using a standard rotary microtome and stained with hematoxylin-eosin
(HE) and Masson's trichrome (MT). The stained slides were examined under
a light microscope (Olympus B 50). The diameter of the tubules and the
height of the columnar epithelium were measured and the presence or absence
of inflammation and fibrosis was evaluated. For each epididymis, 10 tubular
cross-sections were randomly selected and measurements were made by means
of a micrometric ocular.
2.3
Data analysis
The
data were expressed as meanSEM. Statistical analyses were carried out
using Wilcoxon signed ranks test and Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of
variance test for comparison between groups. P<0.05 were considered
statistically significant.
3
Results
None
of the animals were lost during the study period and no surgical complications
occurred. In all the animals of Groups 1 and 2, the left testis was found
in the abdominal cavity. The histologic appearance of the cryptorchid
caput epididymis was similar in animals of Groups 1 and 2 as exemplified
in Figure 1. In the epididymis fibrosis was not found (MT stain) in all
the Groups (Figure 2).
Table
1 shows the average weight of the epididymis. The difference between the left
(cryptorchid) and the right epididymis was statistically significant both
in Groups 1 and 2
(P<0.01). The weight difference between the right and left epididymides
was insignificant in Group 3. The cryptorchid epididymides had a significantly
lower weight increase than the contralateral ones and in case of Group
2 also than that of the controls
(P<0.01).
The
histologic findings of the cryptorchid and the descended epididymides
showed no significant differences with respect to the height of the
epithelium (Table2) and the tubular diameter (Table 3).
Figure
1. Cryptorchid caput epididymis at d 60 (HE, 200).
Figure 2. Cryptorchid caput epididymis: tubules
and connective tissue at d 90 (MT, 200).
Table
1. Epididymal weight (mg). cP<0.01and fP<0.01, compared
with the control and right, respectively.
Table 2.
Epithelial height (m) of caput epididymides.
Table 3.
Tubular diameter (m) of caput epididymides.
4
Discussion
Many
models have been introduced in the literature for the induction of cryptorchidism
in experimental animals. In rats, cryptorchidism was usually constituted
by endocrinological[5,8-14] or mechanical[5,8,9,12,15-22]
methods. Congenital cryptorchid mutant (CCM) rats have also been used
as a natural model[23,24]. We introduced
a new model of mechanically-induced cryptorchidism consisting of the closure
of the inguinal canal via inguinoscrotal approach in rats, the validity of
which has been previously documented[7].
Abnormalities
from simple epididymal elongation to more complex forms such as complete
disruption between testes and epididymis have been found in cryptorchid
patients with an overall frequency of 36-90%[6,25]. These malformations may
present problems for sperm maturation and transportation. Nistal et
al[26] shown the presence of dysgenetic rete testis in
patients with cryptorchidism. They concluded that it could have resulted
from incomplete pubertal maturation or primary abnormality of the rete
testis. Moreover, De Miguel et al[27] evaluated the
alterations in the growth of efferent ducts and epididymis in patients
with cryptorchidism from the infancy to the adulthood. Their studies showed
a normal growth pattern of the cryptorchid efferent ducts and ductus epididymides
compared with the controls.
In
rats, the maturation of genital duct begins at the ductus deferens on
day 7 of life, progresses
to more cranial segments with time and ends at the epididymis on day 35
after birth[28]. A current study confirmed the staged postnatal growth
of the epididymis by means of histological and morphometric analysis[29].
The development of the epididymis and accessory glands are under the control
of androgens[30]. However, the efferent ducts and the initial
portion of the caput epididymis do not express androgen receptors[31].
Johansen
et al[4] suggested that the lower weight of the cryptorchid
epididymis is the
result of diminished local androgen stimulation from the ipsilateral testis.
However, the histology and the diameter of the epididymal tubules were
found to be unaltered. In the present study, the histology of the cryptorchid
caput epididymides were found to be similar to that of the the controls,
which may be explained by the androgen-independence of the caput epididymis.
On
the other hand, Zakaria et al[5] emphasized the more
pronounced decrease
in fertility and degeneration of the contralateral testis in the flutamide
induced cryptorchid rats compared to the mechanically-induced cryptorchid
rats. Hypospadias and a small epididymis were also more frequently noted
in the flutamide-treated rats[5,14]. Watts et al[24]
also showed that mechanically-induced cryptorchid SD rats were relatively
resistant to the negative effect of cryptorchidism on fertility than the
CCM rats. However they did not evaluate the associated epididymal lesions.
In
this study, we indicated a suppression of the development of the cryptorchid epididymis
without evident histological changes. The findings were in accordance with
the results of previous studies employing mechanically-induced models
of cryptorchidism. These data also support the validity of our model.
In conclusion, we propose that this new mechanical model is a convenient
method for the investigation of the epididymis in cryptorchidism.
References
[1]
D'Agostino S, Campobasso P, Spata F, Belloli G. Cryptorchidism:
anomalies of excretory ducts and azoospermia. Pediatr Med Chir 1994; 16:
509-12.
[2] De Palma L, Carter D, Weiss RM. Epididymal and vas deferens immaturity
in cryptorchidism. J Urol 1988; 140: 1194-6.
[3] Nistal M, Paniagua R. Non-Neoplastic diseases of the testis. In:
Bostwick DG, Eble JN, editors.Urologic Surgical Pathology; St Louis,
MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1996. p 457-565.
[4] Johansen TE, Clausen OP, Nesland JM. The effect of nonunion
of testis and epididymis and of cryptorchidism on the development of epididymis
and ductus deferens in the rat. Andrologia 1989; 21: 441-8.
[5] Zakaria O, Shono T, Imajima T, Suita S. Comparative studies of fertility
and histologic development of contralateral scrotal testes in two rat
models of unilateral cryptorchidism. Pediatr Surg Int 2000; 16:
498-501.
[6] Koff WJ, Scaletscky R. Malformations of the epididymis in undescended
testis. J Urol 1990; 143: 340-3.
[7] Dundar M, Kocak I, Çulhaci N. A new experimental model
for cryptorchidism: inguinoscrotal approach. Urol Res 2001; 29:
178-81.
[8] Goh DW, Momose Y, Middlesworth W, Hutson JM. The relationship among
calcitonin gene-related peptide, androgens and gubernacular development
in three animal models of cryptorchidism. J Urol 1993;150: 574-6.
[9] Husmann DA, McPhaul MJ. Reversal of flutamide-induced cryptorchidism
by prenatal time specific androgens. Endocrinology 1992; 131: 1711-5.
[10] Juenemann KP, Kogan BA, Abozeid MH. Fertility in cryptorchidism:
an experimental model. J Urol 1986; 136: 214-6.
[11] Kogan BA, Gupta R, Juenemann KP. Fertility in cryptorchidism:
further development of an experimental model. J Urol 1987; 137:
128-31.
[12] Lein M, Fahlenkamp D, Schonberger B, Prollius S, Loening S. The pharmacological
effect of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone on experimental cryptorchidism
in rats. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1996; 30: 185-91.
[13] Spencer JR, Torrado T, Sanchez RS, Vaughan ED, Jr ImperatoMcGinley
J. Effect of flutamide and finasteride on rat testicular descent.
Endocrinology 1991; 129: 741-8.
[14] Van der Schoot P. Disturbed testicular descent in the rat after prenatal
exposure to the antiandrogen flutamide. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 96:
483-96.
[15] Kort WJ, Hekking-Weijma I, Vermeij M. Artificial intra-abdominal
cryptorchidism in young adult rats leads to irreversible azoospermia.
Eur Urol 1990; 18: 302-6.
[16] Penson DF, Lugg JA, Coyne C, Sadaghi F, Freedman AL, Gonzales-Cadavid
NF, Fajfer J. Effect of cryptorchidism on testicular histology in a naturally
cryptorchid animal model. J Urol 1997; 158: 1978-82.
[17] Quinlan DM, Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD. Abdominal wall defects and cryptorchidism:
an animal model. J Urol 1988; 140: 1141-4.
[18] Shono T, Suita S. The effect of the excision of future scrotal skin
on testicular descent in neonatal rats: a new experimental model
of cryptorchidism. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30: 734-8.
[19] Shono T, Zakaria O, Imajima T, Suita S. Extra-abdominal fixation
of the gubernaculum inhibits testicular descent in newborn rats. J Pediatr
Surg 1996; 31: 503-6.
[20] Stewart RJ, Brown S. Unilateral cryptorchidism: an animal model.
Aust NZ J Surg 1990; 60: 905-6.
[21] Zakaria O, Shono T, Imijama T, Suita S. Fertility and histological
studies of the contralateral testis in two different intra- and extra-abdominal
rat models of unilateral cryptorchidism. Br J Urol 1998; 82: 574-7.
[22] Zini A, Abitbol J, Schulsinger D, Goldstein M, Schlegel PN. Restoration
of spermatogenesis after scrotal replacement of experimentally cryptorchid
rat testis: assessment of germ cell apoptosis and eNOS expression.
Urology 1999; 53: 223-7.
[23] Patkowski D, Czernik J, Jelen M. The natural course of cryptorchidism
in rats and the efficacy of orchidopexy or orchidectomy in its treatment
before and after puberty. J Pediatr Surg 1992; 27: 870-3.
[24] Watts LM, Hasthorpe S, Farmer PJ, Hutson JM. Apoptotic cell death
and fertility in three unilateral cryptorchid rat models. Urol Res 2000;
28: 332-7.
[25] Mollaeian M, Mehrabi V, Elahi B. Significance of epididymal and ductal
anomalies associated with undescended testis: study in 652 cases.
Urology 1994; 43: 857-60.
[26] Nistal M, Jimenez-Heffernan JA. Rete testis dysgenesis. A characteristic
lesion of undescended testes. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997; 121: 1259-64.
[27] De Miguel MP, Marino JM, Gonzalez-Peramato P, Nistal M, Regadera
J. Epididymal growth and differation are altered in human cryptorchidism.
J Androl 2001; 22: 212-25.
[28] Francavilla S, Moscardelli S, Properzi G, De Matteis MA, Scorza Barcellona
P, Natali PG, De Martino C. Postnatal development of epididymis and ductus
deferens in the rat. A correlation between the ultrastructure of the epithelium
and tubule wall, and the fluorescence-microscopic distribution of actin,
myosin, fibronectin, and basement membrane. Cell Tissue Res 1987; 249:
257-65.
[29] Limanowski A, Miskowiak B, Otulakowski B, Partyka M, Konwerska A.
Morphologic studies on rat epididymis in the course of postnatal development
(computerised image analysis). Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2001; 39:
201-2.
[30] Wilson JD, George FW, Renfree MB. The endocrine role in mammalian
sexual differention. Recent Prog Horm Res 1995; 50: 349-64.
[31] Ungefroren H, Ivell R, Ergun S. Region-specific expression of the androgen
receptor in the human epididymis. Mol Hum Reprod 1997; 3: 933-40.
home
Correspondence
to: Dr.Izzet
Kocak M.D., Adnan Menderes University Tip Fakltesi Uroloji
Anabilim Dali, 09100 Aydin, Turkey.
Tel: +90-542-232 7032
Fax:
+90-256-212 0146,
E-mail: ikocak@excite.com
Received 2001-10-19
Accepted 2001-12-03
|