|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect
of nitrofurazone on the reproductive organs in
adult male mice
Shio
Kumar Singh, Sumana Chakravarty Department
of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India Asian J Androl 2001 Mar; 3: 39-44 Keywords:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Group
and treatment |
Body
weight (g) |
Sex
organ weights (mg/100 g body weight)1 |
|||
|
Initial |
Final |
Testis |
Epididymis |
Seminal
vesicle |
|
|
I
Control (untreated) |
34.401.14 |
35.000.70 |
269.632.75 |
99.016.09 |
369.685.33 |
|
II
Control (distilled water-treated) |
34.401.14 |
35.000.70 |
269.752.71 |
97.713.75 |
364.252.00 |
|
III
Nitrofurazone 10 days |
31.801.30 |
30.802.38 |
142.3832.22b |
88.2115.70 |
152.8946.81b |
|
IV
Nitrofurazone 20 days |
37.801.78 |
36.601.51 |
176.7255.15b |
107.6719.41 |
230.9239.17b |
|
V2
Nitrofurazone 20 days |
37.801.30 |
40.402.30 |
250.4419.6 |
9100.8912.15 |
349.9538.38 |
1Values
are meanSD (n=5) and refer to the weight of the single organ.
2Treatment was discontinued after 20 days, and animals were
sacrificed 56 days after drug withdrawal.
bSignificantly different from controls (P<0.05);
analyzed by ANOVA followed
by Newman-Keul's multiple range test.
3.2
Organ weights
3.3
Testicular histology
The testes of untreated controls (Figure 1) and distilled water-treated controls exhibited normal histological features; the seminiferous tubules showed spermatogenic activity with successive stages of transformation of spermatogonia into spermatozoa. By contrast, marked regressive changes were observed in the seminiferous tubules in testes of nitrofurazone-treated mice (Figures 2 and 3). In testes of mice treated with nitrofurazone for 10 days (Group III), there was marked depletion of germ cells in the seminiferous tubules, and the germinal epithelium was lined mainly with Sertoli cells, spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and a few round spermatids (Figure 2). The tubules showed intraepithelial vacuoles and the occurrence of multinucleated giant cells; such giant cells contained 3-9 nuclei of germ cells arranged either at the periphery or scattered in the cytoplasm of the cell body (Figure 2). Giant cells formed with nuclei of early spermatids were more common than those with nuclei of spermatocytes. In testes of mice treated with nitrofurazone for 20 days (Group IV), regressive changes in the tubules were further pronounced (Figure 3). In many tubules, there was severe depletion of germ cells, and the epithelium consisted of a thin layer of Sertoli cells and spermatogonia. The most advanced germ cells noticed in the tubules were pachytene spermatocytes and these cells presented a necrotic appearance. However, by 56 days after drug withdrawal, testes showed histological features similar to those seen in the controls.
Figure
1. Testis
of a control mouse (Group I). Note the normal appearance of the seminiferous
tubules. (175)
Figure
2. Testis
of a mouse treated with nitrofurazone, 64 mg/kg body weight per
day,
for 10 days and sacrificed 24 h after the last treatment (Group III).
Note marked
depletion of germ cells in the seminiferous tubules; the germinal epithelium
is lined mainly with Sertoli cells, spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and
a few round
spermatids. Intraepithelial vacuoles and multinucleated giant cells (arrows)
can also be seen in the tubules. (175)
Figure 3. Testis
of a mouse treated with nitrofurazone, 64 mg/kg body weight per
day,
for 20 days and sacrificed 24 h after the last treatment (Group IV).
Note further
regressive changes in the seminiferous tubules. The most advanced germ
cells
in the tubules are pachytene spermatocytes, and these cells show a necrotic
appearance.
(175)
3.4
Sperm parameters
Nitrofurazone treatment caused significant reductions in both motility and number of spermatozoa in cauda epididymidis of the treated mice (Groups III and IV) as compared with controls; by 56 days after drug withdrawal, however, these parameters in treated mice returned to control levels (Table 2).
Table 2. Effect of nitrofurazone administration (64 mg/kg body weight) on motility and number of spermatozoa in the cauda epididymidis.
|
Group
and treatment |
Motility
(%)1 |
Sperm
number (106)1 |
| I
Control (untreated) |
85.911.67 |
7.340.29 |
| II
Control (distilled water-treated) |
86.961.75 |
7.640.56 |
| III
Nitrofurazone 10 days |
57.701.56b |
2.970.42b |
| IV
Nitrofurazone 20 days |
8.103.00b |
0.040.02b |
| V2
Nitrofurazone 20 days |
85.183.09 |
7.630.89 |
1Values
are meanSD (n=5).
2Treatment was discontinued after 20 days, and animals were
sacrificed 56 days after drug withdrawal.
bSignificantly different from controls (P<0.05);
analyzed by ANOVA followed
by Newman-Keul's multiple range test.
3.5
Chemical analyses
Table
3. Effect
of nitrofurazone administration (64 mg/kg body weight) on concentrations
of sialic acid in the caput and cauda epididymides, and fructose in the
seminal vesicle.
|
Group
and treatment |
Sialic
acid concentration in the |
Fructose
concentration |
|
|
Caput |
Cauda |
||
| I
Control (untreated) |
65.233.33 |
92.009.08 |
405.3324.11 |
| II
Control (distilled water-treated) |
64.015.55 |
85.4014.75 |
401.758.15 |
| III
Nitrofurazone 10 days |
69.228.05 |
93.9311.90 |
290.339.22b |
| IV
Nitrofurazone 20 days |
46.9313.93b |
66.348.49b |
274.9413.83 |
| V2
Nitrofurazone 20 days |
69.918.99 |
93.705.80 |
414.9116.56 |
1Values
are meanSD (n=5).
2Treatment was
discontinued after 20 days, and animals were sacrificed 56 days after
drug withdrawal.
bSignificantly different
from controls (P<0.05); analyzed by ANOVA followed by Newman-Keul's
multiple range test.
4 Discussion
As
in the rat[2-6], nitrofurazone treatment in P mice caused regressive
histological
changes in the seminiferous tubules resulting in the suppression of spermatogenesis.
Furthermore, the antispermatogenic effects
induced
by nitrofurazone
in testes of P mice were reversible; this is consistent with the findings
of Nelson and Steinberger[12] and Paul et al[13]
in the rat after treatment with nitrofurazone. The present results showed
that the most advanced germ cells noticed in the regressed seminiferous
tubules were pachytene spermatocytes, though a few round spermatids were
sometimes observed in the tubules in testes of mice treated with the drug
for 10 days. Nelson and Steinberger[14] and Paul et al[13]
have also reported the inhibition of spermatogenesis at the pachytene
spermatocyte stage
in rat testes following nitrofurazone treatment. Multinucleated giant
cells as observed in the seminiferous tubules in testes of drug-treated
mice in the present
study are also reported in rat testis after nitrofurazone treatment[3-5].
It is pertinent to note that such giant cells have also been reported in
mouse testes after
efferent duct ligation[15], vasectomy[16], and treatment
with several antispermatogenic agents[17]; in these experimental
conditions, the testis
exhibited regressive changes in the seminiferous tubules. The occurrence
of giant cells in the testis is considered to be an expression of germ
cell degeneration. In P mice, nitrofurazone treatment for 20 days caused
a marked reduction in the
level of sialic acid in the epididymis, while treatment for 10
days had no such effect. Since sialic acid is known to be a true secretory
product of the epididymis[18], the results suggest that treatment
with nitrofurazone for 20 days
has adverse effects on the secretory functions of the organ. The treatment
also caused marked reductions in motility and number of spermatozoa in
the cauda epididymidis. Albert et al[19,20]
have also shown in in vitro studies in humans that nitrofurazone
causes impairment of sperm motility. Furthermore, Nissim[7]
reported the enlargement of seminal vesicles in mice after treatment with
nitrofurazone. In the present study, however, enlargement of seminal vesicles
was not noticed in nitrofurazone-treated mice, and the treatment, on the
other hand, caused marked reductions in the weight and the level of fructose
in the gland. It is relevant to mention here that Nissim[7] fed
nitrofurazone at a concentration of 0.15%-0.3% in diet for 2-5 weeks,
and each mouse received 5 g of diet daily. If one extrapolates the dose
of nitrofurazone used by Nissim[7] it
turns out to be 290-580 mg/kg body weight/day. However, in the present
study, nitrofurazone was given at a dosage of 64 mg/kg body weight/day,
for 10 or 20 days. Thus, it is probable that the differences in the dose-regimen
employed in the two studies
may have some bearing on differences in observations of seminal vesicle as
reported by Nissim[7] and those in the present study.
The
mechanism by which nitrofurazone causes its antispermatogenic effect is not
properly understood. Studies of Uematsu[4] suggest that nitrofurazone
treatment causes suppression of spermatogenesis by acting directly on
the seminiferous epithelium, and that this action is not mediated via
the hypophysis. Further, Hagenas et al[5] have shown
that nitrofurazone acts directly on germ cells
and thereby causes arrest of spermatogenesis. In the present study, intraepithelial
vacuoles were noticed in the seminiferous tubules in testes of nitrofurazone-treated
mice. It is pertinent to mention here that Hoffer[21] has also
reported occurrence of intraepithelial vacuoles in affected seminiferous
tubules in rat testes after gossypol treatment, and that these vacuoles
occurred primarily in the Sertoli cells. Such vacuoles are also reported
to occur in the Sertoli cells after several
kinds of testicular injuries, and they have, however, often been interpreted
as a nonspecific reaction of these cells[22]. Thus, it is difficult
to say in P mice as
to how nitrofurazone treatment induces antispermatogenic effect in the
testes, though the possibility of a direct action of the drug on the germ
cells can not be ruled out.
Acknowledgements
References
[1]
Gomes WR. Chemical agents affecting testicular function and male fertility.
In: Johnson AD, Gomes
WR, VanDemark NL, editors. The Testis. Academic Press; 1970. p 483-554.
[2] Montemurro DG. The effect of nitrofurazone on the testis and accessory
sex organs of normal rats and rats bearing the Walker carcinoma 256. Br
J Cancer 1960; 14:
319-26.
[3] Miyaji T, Miyamoto M, Ueda Y. Inhibition of spermatogenesis and atrophy
of the testis caused by nitrofuran compounds. Acta Pathol Jpn 1964; 14:
261-73.
[4] Uematsu K. Testicular changes of rats induced by nitrofurazone. A
light and electron microscopic study. Med J Osaka Univ 1966; 16: 287-320.
[5] Hagenas L, Ploen L, Ritzen EM. The effect of nitrofurazone on the
endocrine, secretory and spermatogenic functions of the rat testis. Andrologia
1978; 10: 107-26.
[6] Nishimura T, Aze Y, Ozeki Y. Effects of nitrofurazone on spermatogenesis
and reproductive toxicity in male rats part of a collaborative work
to determine optimal administration period and endpoints. J Toxicol Sci
1995; 20: 341-9.
[7] Nissim JA. Increased pituitary gonadotrophin activity after degeneration
of seminiferous tubules produced by nitrofurazone. Lancet 1957; i: 304-5.
[8] Chakravarty S. Control of fertility in the male laboratory mouse.
Ph.D. Thesis, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 1997.
[9] WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and semen-cervical
mucus interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
1987.
[10] Aminoff D. Methods for the quantitative estimation of N-acetyl neuraminic
acid and their application to hydrolysates of sialomucoids. Biochem J
1961; 81: 384-92.
[11] Lindner HR, Mann T. Relationship between the content of androgenic
steroids in the testes and the secretory activity of the seminal vesicles
in the bull. J Endocrinol 1960; 21: 341-60.
[12] Nelson WO, Steinberger E. Effects of nitrofuran compounds on the
testis of the rat. Fed Proc 1953; 12: 103.
[13] Paul HE, Paul MF, Kopko F, Bender RC, Everett G. Carbohydrate metabolism
studies on the testis of rats fed certain nitrofurans. Endocrinology 1953;
53: 585-92.
[14] Nelson WO, Steinberger E. The effect of furadoxyl upon the testis
of rat. Anat Rec 1952; 112: 367.
[15] Singh SK, Abe K. Light and electron microscopic observations of giant
cells in the mouse testis after efferent duct ligation. Arch Histol Jap
1987; 50: 579-85.
[16] Singh SK, Chakravarty S. Histologic changes in the mouse testis after
bilateral vasectomy. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 115-20.
[17] Singh SK. Antispermatogenic agents. In: Joy KP, Krishna A, Haldar
C, editors. Comparative
Endocrinology and Reproduction. New Delhi/Berlin: Narosa/Springer V
[18] Hamilton DW. Structure and function of the epithelium lining the
ductuli efferentes, ductus epididymidis, and ductus deferens in the rat.
In: Hamilton DW, Greep RO, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Vol 5, Sect
7. Washington DC: American Physiological Society; 1975. p 259-302.
[19] Albert PS, Mininberg DT, Davis JE. Nitrofurans: sperm-immobilizing
agent. Urology 1974; 4: 307-10.
[20] Albert PS, Salerno RG, Kapoor SN, Davis JE. The nitrofurans as sperm-immobilizing
agents, their tissue toxicity, and their clinical application in vasectomy.
Fertil Steril 1975; 26: 485-91.
[21] Hoffer AP. Effects of gossypol on the seminiferous epithelium in
the rat: a light and
electron microscope study. Biol Reprod 1983; 28: 1007-20.
[22] Fawcett DW. Ultrastructure and function of the Sertoli cells. In:
Greep RO, Astwood
EB, editors. Handbook of Physiology, Vol 5, Sect 7. Bethesda: American
Physiological
Society; 1975. p
21-55.
Correspondence
to: Dr.
Shio Kumar Singh, Department of Zoology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi
221 005, India.
Fax: +91-542-368 174
Received
2000-10-13 Accepted 2001-02-14
