Human
papillomavirus and p53 protein immunoreactivity in condylomata acuminatum
and squamous cell carcinoma of penis
Xin-Hua
ZHANG, Gui-Qin SUN, Yu YANG, Tai-He ZHANG
Department
of Pathology, General Hospital of Nanjing Command, PLA, Nanjing 210002,
China
Asian
J Androl 2001 Mar;
3: 75-77
Keywords:
condylomata
acuminata; penile diseases; carcinoma; HPV; protein p53
Abstract
Aim:
To
determine the immunoreactive pattern of human papillomavirus (HPV) antigen
and p53 protein in condylomata acuminatum (CA) and squamous cell carcinoma
(SCC)
of penis. Methods:
Immunohistochemistry for HPV and p53 were performed in 40 specimens
of formalin fixed, paraffin
embedded tissues using a polyclonal (rabbit)
antibody against HPV and a monoclonal (mouse) antibody against human p53
protein. Twenty one cases of CA and nineteen cases of SCC were examined.
Results: HPV
antigen was detected in all 21 CA and 2 penile SCC. p53 protein overexpression
was observed in 12 of 19 (63%) SCC in which 6 cases were strong positive.
Five
of 21 CA (24%) showed low-grade p53 protein overexpression. Conclusion: CA
is related to HPV infection and some cases show p53 protein low-grade
overexpression.
In contrast, p53 protein overexpression is common in penile SCC, which
is seldom related to HPV infection.
1
Introduction
Oncogenic
human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been implicated in the pathogenesis
of cervical carcinoma, vulvar carcinoma, and their pre-cancerous lesions[1].
Another important factor in the development of the carcinoma appears
to be the
presence of alterations in p53 gene activity. In the current study, HPV
infection
and p53 protein overexpression were detected in condylomata acuminatum (CA)
and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of penis. 2
Materials
and methods
Twenty
one CA and nineteen SCC formalin fixed and paraffin embedded specimens
of penile tissues
were prepared. The histological diagnosis was confirmed by viewing the
haematoxylin and eosin stained sections. Immunohistochemistry was performed
using a standard labeled streptavidin method. The presence of HPV infection
and overexpression of p53 were assessed by using rabbit anti-human papillomavirus
(RAB-0144) and mouse anti-human p53 protein (DO-7).
The
presence or absence of staining and the number of nuclei with a positive
reaction
were observed. For HPV, it was assessed as positive reaction regardless
of the
number of positive nuclei. For p53 protein, less than 10% inclusive positive
nuclei was considered negative, 11-50% as positive, and >50% as highly
positive.
3
Results
3.1
Presence of HPV
HPV
infection was detected in all 21 CA cases with a 100% positive rate (Figure
1). In 19 cases of
penile SCC, HPV antigen was detected in two
cases (a 10% positive rate).
Fig
1. HPV positive reaction in CA. Immunostaining (S-P method).
3.2
Expression of p53 protein in the specimens
P53
protein overexpression was detected in 5 of 21 CA (24%). The positive
reaction was seen in the nuclei of the basal and supra-basal layers of
the epithelium, with mild to moderate nuclear atypia, but no one was strongly
positive, i.e., the number of positive nuclei was below 50%.
Of
the 19 cases of penile SCC, p53 protein overexpression was observed in
12 cases (63%), of which 6 (32%) were strongly positive. Seven of the
12 p53 positive carcinoma were keratinizing squamous carcinoma, and five
were low to moderate differentiated squamous carcinoma. The site of these
p53 immunoreactive cells in penile SCC was not in conformity with the
cellular differentiation or keratinization tendency, i.e., the nuclei
of basal and supra-basal layer or poorly differentiated cells had much
more and stronger positive reaction (Figure
2). In other words, fewer and fainter positive nuclei were seen in
the superficial layer or marked keratinized malignant cells. The negative
controls showed no staining.
A
significant difference was found in p53 protein positive rate between
CA and penile SCC (P<0.05) (Data not shown).
Fig
2. p53 protein positive reaction in penile SCC. Immunostaining (S-P
method).
4
Discussion
Penile
squamous cell carcinoma has been considered a disease of old men. Its
etiology and carcinogenetic mechanism are largely unknown. There was a
general agreement that circumcision performed in infancy gives almost
100% protection against the disease, while circumcision performed later
in the life gives less protection. Secretion retained in the preputial
sac appears to play an important role in the genesis of the penile cancer[2].
However, a number of recent epidemiological studies have linked the penile
carcinomas with the following risk factors: multiple sexual partners,
a history of venereal warts, and cigarette smoking[3]. In the
current study, HPV antigen was detected in 2 of 19 penile SCC (10%) suggesting
that HPV infection may have some association with the subsequent development
of the penile cancer. Other investigators also showed a higher HPV infection
rate in penile cancer. In one study using PCR, 15% (6/41) of the penile
cancers had evidence of HPV infection and most of them had HPV type 16
or/and HPV18[4]. An investigation in 53 Brazilian men with
penile cancer showed that nearly half (49%) were HPV type 16 positive[5].
Another
important factor in the development of ano-genital carcinomas appears to be
the presence of alterations in p53 activity. The current study showed
that p53 protein overexpression was detected in 5 of 21 CA (24%). On the
contrary, p53 overexpression
is common in penile SCC. Approximately 63% of 19 penile SCC had p53 overexpression.
Overexpression of p53 protein in tissues has generally been assumed to
reflect p53 mutation, which could result in loss of suppressor function
and induction of growth-promoting potential[6]. Mutant p53
proteins have a longer half-life and accumulate in the cells. However,
several reports suggest that p53 immunoreactivity does not correlate with
mutation but may reflect the change in wild-type p53 from a suppressor
to a promoter form during the cell growth response, or a longer halflife
of the protein due to binding by another protein[7,8]. Lam
et al[9] found p53 protein overexpression in 17 of 42
(40%) primary penile
carcinomas. Positive p53 staining was identified only in the less differentiated
tumor cells in the periphery of the tumor cell nests. Levi et al[10]
demonstrated p53 overexpression in 26% of 64 penile carcinomas. They also
revealed point mutations in p53 exons 6 (1 case), 7 (1 case) and 8 (5
cases). Suzuki et al[11] investigated p53 mutations
in 13 Japanese penile cancers. Neither HPV-detected nor HPV-undetected
tissues showed alterations in exon 4-9 of p53 gene. The present study
indicated that p53 overexpression was a frequent finding in Chinese penile
carcinomas. Nevertheless, two HPV-positive penile carcinomas had no p53
protein overexpression, and another five cases showed neither p53 overexpression
nor HPV infection, indicating that one-third of the penile squamous cell
carcinomas might arise through a mechanism independent of p53 inactivation
or mutation.
In
conclusion, HPV infections were invariably found in CA, and p53 overexpression
was frequently detected in Chinese penile carcinomas. References
[1]
Gupta JW, Saito K, Saito A, Fu YS, Shah KV. Human papillomaviruses and
the pathogenesis of cervical neoplasia. Cancer 1989; 64: 2104-10.
[2] Mostofi FK, Price Jr EB. Tumors of the male genital system. In: Firminger
HI, editor: Atlas
of tumor pathology. Second series, Fascicle 8. Washington, D.C.: Armed
Forces Institute of Pathology; 1987. p 277-94.
[3] Daling JR, Sherman KJ, Hislop TG, Maden C, Mandelson MT, Beckmann
AM, et al. Cigarette
smoking and the risk of anogenital cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 135: 180-9.
[4] Chan KW, Lam KY, Chan AC, Lau P, Srivastava G. Prevlaence of human
papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in penile carcinoma: a study of 41 cases
using PCR. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47: 823-6.
[5] McCance DJ, Kalache A, Ashdown K, Andrade L, Menezes F, Smith P,
et al. Human papillomavirus type 16 and 18 in carcinomas
of the penis from Brazil. Int J Cancer 1986; 37: 55-9.
[6] Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. p53 function and dysfunction. Cell 1993;
70: 523-6.
[7] Cooper K, Herrington CS, Evans MF, Gatter KC, McGee JO. p53 antigen
in cervical condylomata, intraepithelial
neoplasia, and carcinoma:
relationship to HPV infection and integration. J Pathol 1993; 171:
27-34.
[8] Helland A, Holm R, Kristensen G, Kaern J, Karlsen F, Trope C, et
al. Genetic alterations
of the TP53 gene, p53
protein expression and HPV infection in primary cervical carcinomas. J
Pathol 1993; 171: 105-14.
[9] Lam KY, Chan AC, Chan KW, Leung ML, Srivastava G. Expression of p53
and its relationship with human papillomavirus in penile carcinomas. Eur
J Surg Oncol 1995: 21: 613-6.
[10] Levi JE, Rahal P, Sarkis AS, Villa L. Human papillomavirus DNA and
p53 status in penile carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998; 76: 779-83.
[11] Suzuki H, Sato N, Kodama
T, Okano T, Isaka S, Shirasawa H, et al. Detection of
human papillomavirus DNA
and state of p53 gene in Japanese penile cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1994;
24: 1-6.
home
Correspondence
to: Dr.
Xin-Hua ZHANG, Department of Pathology, General Hospital of
Nanjing Command, PLA, Nanjing 210002, China.
Tel: +86-25-338 7871 Ext. 58192
Received
2000-04-21 Accepted 2001-02-28
|