|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of Alstonia scholaris bark extract on testicular function of Wistar rats R. S. Gupta1, Rakhi Sharma1, Aruna Sharma1, A.K. Bhatnager2, M.P. Dobhal3, Y.C. Joshi4, M.C. Sharma4
2 Department of Chemistry, S.S. Jain Subodh P.G. College, Jaipur-302004, India 3 Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, New York-14263, USA 4 Department of Chemistry, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur - 302004, India Asian J Androl 2002 Sep; 4: 175-178 Keywords:
|
|
Body
wt. (g) |
Organ
Weight (mg/100g body weight) |
Seminiferous
tubulediameter(mm) |
Leydig
cell nuclear area (mm) |
|||
Testes |
Epididymides |
Seminal
vesicle |
Ventral
prostate |
||||
Control |
2401.4 |
13454.7 |
529.51.2 |
605.71.2 |
308.52.0 |
2689 |
11.10.02 |
treated |
2306a |
97517c |
404.49c |
156.9431c |
115.975.1c |
200.410c |
5.320.16c |
3.2 Cell population dynamics
The number of step 19 spermatids was reduced by 79.6 %, spermatogonia by 55.8 %, preleptotene spermatocytes by 61.9 % and pachytene spermatocytes by 60.1 %. The total number of Sertoli cells were also reduced after Alstonia extract feeding (Table 2).
Table 2. Effect of A. scholaris on testicular cell population in rats. MeanSEM, n=10. cP<0.01 vs control. Percent variations vs control in parentheses.
|
Testicular
cell counts (number/10 cross section) |
|||||
Sertoli
cell |
Spermatogonia |
Prelaptotene |
Pachytene |
Secondary
Spermatocytes |
Step-19
Spermatids |
|
Control
|
2.81
0.02 |
6.870.02 |
19.951.9 |
29.290.73 |
48.10.6 |
34.750.8 |
Treated |
1.310.08c
(-53.3) |
3.040.21c |
7.61.2c |
11.70.6c |
20.63.6c |
7.13.0c |
The seminiferous tubular diameter and the Leydig cell nuclear area were reduced significantly (P<0.01) when compared to controls (Table 1).
3.3 Biochemical parameters
As shown in Table 3, the protein contents of testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles and ventral prostate were reduced significantly (P<0.01) in the treated group. The sialic acid contents of the testes, cauda epididymides and ventral prostate were depleted. The glycogen contents of testes were decreased significantly (P<0.01). The fructose content in seminal vesicle was also lowered, whereas the testicular cholesterol was significantly elevated (P<0.01).
Table 3. Effect of A. scholaris on tissue biochemistry in rats. All units in mg/g. MeanSEM, n=10. aP>0.05; cP<0.01 vs control.
|
Protein |
Sialic
acid |
Glycogen
Testes |
Cholesterol
Testes |
Fructose
seminal vesicle |
||||||
|
Testes |
Cauda
epididymis |
Seminal
vesicle |
Ventral
prostate |
Testes |
Cauda
epididymis |
Seminal
vesicle |
Ventral
prostate |
|||
Control |
178.80.5 |
268.73.6 |
1863.4 |
162.40.18 |
4.640.16 |
5.340.15 |
4.20.09 |
5.20.23 |
4.850.6 |
7.820.11 |
4.240.04 |
Treated |
132.561.48c |
204.411.73c |
134.045.9c |
141.452.96c |
3.880.14c |
3.660.06c |
3.800.16a |
3.720.12c |
2.010.01c |
15.150.6c |
3.510.073c |
3.4 Sperm indices
As shown in Table 4, the treated rats showed a significant (P<0.01) reduction in the sperm concentration of testes and cauda epididymides. The sperm motility of the cauda epididymides was also reduced significantly (P<0.01). Alstonia treatment reduced the fertility of male rats by 100 %.
Table 4. Effect of A. scholaris on sperm motility and concentration and fertility in rats. MeanSEM; cP<0.01 vs control.
|
Sperm
motility (%) cauda eipdidymides |
Sperm
density (million/mL) |
Fertility |
|
Testes |
Cauda
epididymides |
|||
Control |
74.12.38 |
4.150.21 |
52.22.66 |
100%(+ve) |
Alstonia
scholaris |
29.851.15c |
2.250.1c |
11.81.28c |
100%(-ve) |
3.5 Isolation of compounds
The following compounds were isolated from the final ethanol extract by means of chromatographic separation over Si-gel column. By eluting the column with pet ether:benzene (3:1), b-amyrin and lupiol acetate were obtained. Further elution of column with pet ether:benzene (2:2) yielded a-amyrin, with benzene:chloroform (3:1) yielded venenative, with benzene:chloroform (1:3) yielded rhazine and with chloroform (100 %) yielded yohimbine.
4 Discussion
Oral administration of Alstonia scholaris bark exrelated to the number of spermatids and spermatozoa present in the organ. The reduced testicular weights and shrunken seminiferous tubular dimension indicate a wide spread testicular damage [10].
A. scholaris bark extract exerted a strong inhibitory effect on epididymides, seminal vesicle and prostate gland as evinced by decrease in their weights. A reduction in the weight of accessory reproductive organs suggested the reduced availability of androgens [11]. Rat prostate glands contain some androgen receptors which are the direct target of androgen action [12] and mainly dependent on testicular androgens [13]. Russell and Clermont [14] found that the regression of seminiferous tubular epithelium after depletion of the pituitary hormone was due to the discriminate degeneration of mid-pachytene spermatocytes and step 19 spermatids in stage VII. In the mammalian spermatogenic cycle, normally step-19 spermatids are found in stage-VII and VIII and are particularly androgen dependent [15,16]. A reduction in the number of Sertoli cells will adversely affect spermatogenesis as sertoli cells provide all or most nutritional and physical support for the developing germ cells[15]. Sperm count and motility, which were markedly reduced in the present study, show statistically significant correlation with the fertility [17,18].
It is evident that testicular function would be altered by reduced protein content [19]. Sialic acid acts as a lubricant?to facilitate the downward movement of sperm and to reduce friction among spermatozoa [20]. Mukherjee et al.[11] studied the effect of flutamide on testes and accessory organs of male rats and also found a reduction in sialic acid contents. Cholesterol is involved in steroidogenesis in testes. Increased level of cholesterol in testes is attributed to decreased androgen concentration, which resulted in impaired spermatogenesis [21]. Depletion in testicular glycogen was possibly attributed to the decreased number of post-meiotic germ cells [22]. Reduction in the fructose concentration in the seminal vesicle might be the result of a decreased secretory activity [23].
5 Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to the Head, Dept. of Zoology and Chemistry; Prof. N. K. Lohiya, Coordinator, SAP, Dept. of Zoology, University of Rajasthan and Principal, S.S. Jain Subodh P. G. College, Jaipur (India) for providing necessary facilities and University Grants Commission, Regional Office, Bhopal (MP) India for financial support.
References
[1] Dassanayake MD. A Revised hand book of the flora of Geylox; IV. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; 1982.
[2] Sexton JE. The Alkaloids chemistry and physiology, VIII. London: Academic Press New York; 1965. p 159.
[3] Rahman AU, Qureshi MM, Ali SS. Chemical constituents of Alstonia species. J Chem Soc Pak 1990; 12: 355-406.
[4] Lowry OH, Rosebrough MJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265-75.
[5] Montogomery R. Determination of glycogen. Arch Biochem Biophys 1957; 57: 378-81.
[6] Warren L. A Thiobarbituric acid assay of sialic acid. J Biol Chem 1959; 234: 1971-5.
[7] Prasad MRN, Chinoy NJ, Kadam KM. Changes in succinate dehydrogenase levels in the rat epididymis under normal and altered physiological conditions. Fert Steril 1972, 23: 186 - 90.
[8] Leblond CP, Clermont Y. Definition of the stages of the cycle of the seminiferous epithelium in the rat. Ann NY Acad Sci 1952; 55: 548-73.
[9] Berndtson WE. Methods for quantifying mammalian spermato-genesis: a review. J Anim Sci 1977; 44: 818-33.
[10] Keel AB, Abhey TO. Influence of bilateral cryptorchidism in the mature rat: Alteration in testicular function and serum hormonal levels. Endocrinology 1980; 107: 1226-33.
[11] Mukherjee M, Chattopadhyay S, Mathur PP. Effect of Flutamide on the physiological status of epididymis and epididymal sperms. Andrologia 1992; 24: 113-6.
[12] Prins G, Birch L, Greene G. Androgen receptor localization in different cell types of the adult rat prostate. Endocrinology 1991; 129: 3187-99.
[13] Reiter E, McNamara M, Closset J, Hennen G. Expression and functionality of luteinizing Hormone/chorions. Gonadotropin receptor in the rat prostate. Endocrinology 1995; 136: 917-23.
[14] Russell LD, Clermont Y. Degeneration of germcells in normal, hypophysectomized and hormone treated hypophysectomized rats. Anat Rec 1977; 187: 347-66.
[15] Ritzen EM, Boitani C, Parvinen M. Cyclic secretion of protein by the rat seminiferous tubules depending on the stage of spermatogenesis. Int J Androl (Suppl) 1981; 3: 57-8.
[16] Parvinen M, Ruokonen A. Endogenous steroids in the rat seminiferous tubules. Comparison of the stages of the epithelial cycle isolated by transillumination assisted microdissection. J Androl 1982; 3: 211-20.
[17] Bostofte E, Jorgen S, Rebbe H. Interrelations among the characteristics of human semen and a new system for classification of male infertility. Fertil Steril 1984; 41: 95-102.
[18] Aitken RJ, Best FSM, Warner P, Templeton A. A prospective study of the relationship between semen quality and fertility in cases unexplained infertility. J Androl 1984; 5: 297-303.
[19] Robaire B, Hermo L. Efferent ducts, epididymis and vas deferens. Structure, function and their regulation. In: Knobil E, Neil JD, editors. The physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1988. p 999-1080.
[20] Riar SS, Setty BS, Kar AB. Studies on the physiology and bio-chemistry of mammalian epididymis: Biochemical composition of epididymis. A comparative study. Fertil Steril 1973; 24: 353-62.
[21] Bedwal RS, Edwards MS, Katoch M, Bahuguna A, Dewan R. Histological and biochemical changes in testes of zinc deficient BALB/C strain of mice. Ind J Exptl Biol 1994; 32: 243-7.
[22] Gunaga KP, Rao MC, Seth AR, Rao SA. The role of glycogen during the development of the rat testes and prostate. J Reprod Fert 1972; 29: 157-62.
[23] Farook T, Vanithakumari G, Bhuvaneswari G, Malini T. Effect of Anethole on accessory sex tissue of albino rats. JRAS 1989; XV: 167-70.
Correspondence to: Dr. R.S. Gupta, Reproduction Physiology Section, Department of Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur-302004, India.
Received 2001-11-06 Accepted 2002-05-10