|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N-Acetyl -D-glucosaminidase is not attached to human sperm membranes through the glycosylphosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchorT. Hutchinson, K. Dwivedi, A. Rastogi , R. Prasad, B.M.J. Pereira Reproductive Biology Laboratory,
Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology, Asian
J Androl 2002
Mar;
4: 27-33 Keywords:
|
Step |
Total
protein |
Total
activity |
Specific |
Purification |
Recovery |
Culture
medium |
80 |
666 |
8.32 |
1 |
100 |
60%-satd.-(NH4)2SO4
precipitation |
22 |
490 |
21.80 |
2.62 |
74 |
DEAE
cellulose |
1.3 |
320 |
246.10 |
29.60 |
48 |
CM
Cellulose |
0.6 |
289 |
481.60 |
57.80 |
43 |
NAGA is known to exist in a soluble form within the acrosome of sperm and also in a form bound to its plasma membrane. We wanted to first test if the NAGA bound to sperm membranes could be released from the sperm. Therefore, we treated whole sperm with PI-PLC and then centrifuged the sample to measure the released NAGA in the supernatant (Figure 1). Even though NAGA activity was predominantly confined to the pellet, the activity in supernatant was not low enough to be ignored. There was only a 4-7 % increase in the number of acrosome-reacted sperm after the treatment implying that NAGA activity in the supernatants of sperm samples with and without PI-PLC treatment may be due to a loosely adsorbed isoform of the enzyme released during the incubation and centrifugation procedure. Besides, the results also demonstrate that membrane bound NAGA is not released by PI-PLC treatment and therefore its association with the membrane is not likely to be through the GPI anchor. However, we needed to confirm that the PI-PLC used was potent and had not lost its activity. Therefore, we inducted a positive (AP) and negative (ATPase) control, both enzymes found on microsomal membranes along with studies on NAGA in subsequent experiments.
Figure 1. Pattern of release of NAGA from whole sperm after PI-PLC treatment. Equal aliquots of ejaculated sperm (4107 cells) were incubated with and without PI-PLC at 37 for 2 h. The mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000g for 20 min and NAGA measured in both the supernatant and pellet fractions. No significant difference in NAGA activity between the two supernatants was observed.
Membrane bound enzymes have been solubilized in a variety of detergents. We specifically chose the two detergents OG and TX-100 since GPI anchored proteins are better solubilised in OG than in TX-100 (Table 2). This is clearly reflected in the OG/TX-100 ratio of solubilization of proteins (Figure 2). In the present studies, as expected, the positive control (AP) was better solubilized in OG than TX-100 while the reverse was true of the negative control (ATPase) and sperm NAGA activity.
Figure 2. OG / TX-100 solubilization ratio of membrane bound enzymes. Isolated membrane fractions were subjected to cold solubilization using detergents at 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 %. Enzymes showing values greater than 1 are supposed to be GPI-anchored. (OG, octylglycoside; TX-100, triton X-100)
Table 2: Detergent solubilization of membrane bound enzymes.
Detergent
solubilization |
MF
- ATPase |
MF
- AP |
SPM-
NAGA |
|
OG |
0.1% |
13.4
0.8 |
73
4 |
0.409
0.016 |
0.2% |
8.6
0.5 |
70
3 |
0.325
0.012 |
|
0.3% |
7.9
0.4 |
69
5 |
0.157
0.008 |
|
TX-100 |
0.1% |
16.8
1.0 |
62
6 |
0.431
0.020 |
0.2% |
12.8
0.7 |
57
4 |
0.363
0.018 |
|
0.3% |
11.6
0.6 |
54
4 |
0.248
0.013 |
The specific activity of the three enzymes after cold solubilization by the respective detergents is tabulated (n=3). MF: microsomal fraction from goat kidney; SPM: sperm plasma membrane from human ejaculates; AP: alkaline phosphatase; ATPase: adenosine triphosphatase; NAGA: N-acetyl b-D-glucosaminidase.
Detection of enzyme activity in purified membrane preparations is a direct evidence for their strong association with membrane structure. Besides, it helps in ruling out the interference from soluble / loosely adsorbed forms of the same enzyme contained in whole cell preparations. Therefore investigations were carried out in MF and SPM and the pattern of enzymes released by the action of PI-PLC was analyzed (Table 3).
Table 3: Pattern of release of ecto-enzymes from membrane preparations after PI-PLC treatment.
Enzyme |
Total
enzyme |
Control
(-PI-PLC) |
Test
(+PI-PLC) |
||
Pellet |
Supernatant |
Pellet |
Supernatant |
||
Microsomal |
95.2
6.5 |
83.1
4.6 |
1.98
0.88 |
69.2
4.0c |
100.0
5.2c |
Microsomal |
46.4
3.0 |
40.72.5 |
3.07
1.01 |
42.73.7 |
4.9
1.3 |
Sperm
membrane |
14.6
1.0 |
11.9
0.9 |
1.160.80 |
12.90.4 |
2.051.02 |
Microsomal and sperm plasma membranes were prepared as described in materials and methods. These membranes were divided into three equal aliquots. Total enzyme activity was measured in one aliquot and the remaining two were incubated in appropriate buffer with and without bacterial PI-PLC at 37 for 2h. The enzyme released from the membranes were quantified in the pellet and supernatant (n=3) after centrifuging the incubation mixture at 105,000g. cP< 0.01. Values obtained for the pellet/supernatant fraction are compared with the corresponding controls.
From the results presented it is pretty obvious that the activity of NAGA was not released into the supernatant fraction from SPM by PI-PLC, just as ATPase was not released from MF. It is therefore highly unlikely that sperm membrane associated NAGA is GPI anchored. The decrease in the AP activity of the pellet fraction in PI-PLC treated MF compared to the untreated control strongly suggests that AP was released by PI-PLC treatment as expected for GPI anchored proteins. This also implies that the PI-PLC used as a tool for cleavage was potent and could release proteins from their GPI anchors. One more interesting fact that came to light from these studies is that the activity of AP in the supernatant of PI-PLC treated MF was substantially higher than even the total activity of AP in the membrane preparation before digestion with PI-PLC. We checked our PI-PLC preparation and found no trace of any AP activity thus ruling out the possibility that the AP detected in the supernatant was due to contamination. We suspect that the activity of membrane-bound AP increases when the enzyme is released from the membrane. Perhaps the lipid environment of membranes suppresses AP activity and may be an important mechanism involved in the regulation of enzyme activity.
4 Discussion
NAGA is an active glycosidic enzyme found in sperm and its surrounding fluid [15]. Their action is of significance in reproductive processes since they have been implicated in a variety of functions ranging from prevention of premature acrosomal reaction [8] to blocking polyspermy [11]. There is now increasing evidence to suggest that the enzyme is not only carried by sperm in a soluble form within the acrosome but is also present on the sperm membranes [7]. In the present studies too centrifugation of whole sperm incubated with and without PI-PLC showed substantial amounts of NAGA in both supernatant and pellet fractions. While it is logical to assume that NAGA activity in the pellet is due to enzyme associated with sperm, the NAGA activity in the supernatant of samples with and without PI-PLC treatment is intriguing. Perhaps the NAGA activity in the supernatant is derived from a loosely adsorbed isoform of the enzyme released during the centrifugation. The enzyme firmly attached to sperm membrane is suggested to play a ligand-like role in binding the egg during the process of fertilization [18]. Alpha mannosidase is another sperm surface glycosidase that acts as a ligand for mannose residues found on egg vestments. Recently, this enzyme was reported to be GPI anchored in boar sperm [19]. Therefore we wanted to know how NAGA is associated with sperm membrane. The mode of anchorage of enzymes to the sperm surface often gives important clues to deciphering the possible mechanism by which it is acquired by sperm and hence this study is of interest.
The fact that NAGA was not released from sperm membrane preparation by repeated washing but readily solubilized with detergents like TX-100 and OG indicated that the enzyme was an integral not peripheral type of protein. It has been suggested before that GPI anchored proteins are better extracted by OG than triton X-100 at low temperatures. The reverse is true of other trans-membranal polypeptides [20]. This is primarily due to the fact that GPI anchored proteins are associated with microdomains of the membranes called 'rafts' which are resistant to solubilization with non-ionic detergents. On the other hand, the resemblence of OG to components present in these rafts enables the solubilization of GPI proteins [21]. We used this criterion to check the pattern of solubilization of AP, a known GPI anchored protein and ATPase, which is not GPI anchored in microsomal membranes of goat kidney. The ratio of the specific activity of enzyme extracted by OG to that extracted by TX-100 was used as an index to judge if the NAGA attached to sperm membrane was GPI anchored. The pattern obtained was similar to that of ATPase and not of AP, indicating that sperm surface NAGA was not GPI anchored.
Using the same two microsomal enzymes as positive and negative controls we tried to see the pattern of enzymes released by PI-PLC. In general, GPI anchored membrane proteins are amphipathic molecules. The protein component together with its glycan backbone when cleaved and released from GPI anchors by PI-PLC becomes hydrophilic. Therefore, centrifugation after PI-PLC treatment would pellet the membrane and the released hydrophilic proteins would appear in the super-natant. On the other hand, proteins not attached via GPI anchors would pellet along with the membranes after PI-PLC treatment. In line with this notion PI-PLC was able to release AP but not ATPase from the microsomal fraction of goat kidney. NAGA from the sperm membrane preparation was also not released indicating that it was resistant to PI-PLC cleavage. Once again these experiments argue against a GPI anchorage for the association of NAGA on human sperm membranes. Just as in this study, NAGA of ascidian and drosophila sperm were also shown to be associated with sperm membranes but not through the GPI anchor [22,23].
Mammalian sperm require a large number of molecules including enzymes that could augment their chances of fertilizing the egg. Many of these are synthesized in testicular germ cells during the development of sperm. Unfortunately, due to its miniscule size it is unlikely that they would be able to cart all the molecules needed in the journey to meet with the egg. Besides, fully developed sperm lack endoplasmic reticulum and therefore has limited capacity for protein synthesis. The GPI-anchor by virtue of spanning only the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer on sperm membranes facilitates lateral diffusion of molecules they hold. This not only economizes on the number of molecules needed but also enables better dispersion and interaction with other molecules on the sperm surface. The fact that NAGA is not GPI anchored means it cannot have the structural advantage of GPI-anchored molecules. Since NAGA is very important for fertilization related events, it follows that sperm will have to acquire this enzyme on a continuous basis from various sites along the male reproductive tract.
Dynamic changes leading to remodeling of lipid and protein components of the sperm surface are known to occur [12,24]. Culture studies have proved that NAGA is secreted by the epididymal epithelium [5]. Several routes of transport and transfer of proteins secreted by the male reproductive tract to the sperm are now known. A GPI anchor mediated cell-to-cell mechanism of protein transfer from epithelial cells of the male reproductive tract to the sperm surface has been suggested [25]. Another mechanism involving phospholipid transfer proteins (PL-TP) is also reported in literature [26]. Since our investigations did not support the view that NAGA is attached to the sperm membrane through the GPI anchor, we would like to examine other possibilities.
It has been suggested that high affinity sites that recognize fructose 6-phosphate derivatives (FPR-binding system) form part of a peculiar transport route that permits maturing spermatozoa to acquire hydrolytic enzymes secreted by the epididynal epithelium [27]. Whether NAGA is acquired by sperm in this fashion needs to be investigated. In rat epididymal fluid, membrane bound vesicles with NAGA activity have been isolated [28]. In human ejaculated semen too membrane bound vesicle characterized as prostosomes have been detected and shown to deliver enzymes like CD13/aminopeptidase to sperm by a fusion process [29,30]. Taken together, it seems more than likely that the enzyme is delivered from the epididymal epithelium to the sperm through membrane bound vesicles. However, more investigations would be needed to confirm this view.
While trying to decipher the exact mechanism of enzyme transfer, several issues also need to be addressed: We first need to know if NAGA is present on the membrane of testicular sperm. If so, whether the properties of the enzyme present on testicular, epididymal and ejaculated sperm remain the same. Further detailed analysis would be needed to clarify these points.
Acknowledgements
Financial assistance to carry out this work was provided by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, (CSIR), Government of India. Dr. T. Hutchinson received an institutional fellowship. Dr. A. Rastogi was a Research Associate and K. Dwivedi a Junior Research Fellow both supported by CSIR at the time this work was done. The technical assistance of Mr. Ved Pal Saini is appreciated.
References
[1]
Benoff S. Carbohydrates and
fertilization: an overview. Mol Human Reprod 1997; 3: 599-637.
[2] Tulsiani DRP, Yoshida-Komiya H, Araki Y. Mammalian fertilization:
a carbohydrate-mediated event. Biol Reprod 1997; 57: 487-94.
[3] Tulsiani DRP. Carbohydrates mediate sperm-ovum adhesion and triggering
of the acrosomal reaction. Asian J Androl 2000; 2: 87-97.
[4] Tulsiani DRP, Orgebin-Crist MC, Skudlarek MD. Role of luminal fluid
glycosyltransferase and glycosidases in the modification of rat sperm
plasma membrane glycoproteins during epididymal maturation. J Reprod Fertil
Suppl 1998; 53: 85-97.
[5] Castellon EA, Balbontin JB, Huidobro CC. Secretion of glycosidases
in human epididymal cell cultures. Arch Androl 2000; 45: 35-42.
[6] Raczek S, Yeung CH, Hasilik A, Robenek H, Hertle L, Schulze H, Cooper
TG. Immunocytochemical localization of some lysosomal hydrolases, their
presence in luminal fluid and their directional secretion by human epididymal
cells in culture. Cell Tissue Res 1995; 280: 415-25.
[7] Miranda PV, Brandelli A, Tezon TG. Characterization of -N-acetylglucosaminidase
from human epididymis. Int J Androl 1995; 18: 263-70.
[8] Brandelli A, Miranda PV, Tezon JG. Participation of glycosy-lated
residues in the human sperm acrosome reaction: possible role of N-acetylglucosaminidase.
Biochim Biophys Acta 1994; 1220: 299-304.
[9] Kytzia HJ, Sandhoff K. Evidence for two different active sites on
human b-D-hexosaminidase A. Interaction of GM2 activator protein
with b-hexosaminidase. J Biol Chem 1985; 260: 7568-72.
[10] Barbieri MA, Sosa MA, Couso R, Ielpi L, Merello S, Tonn CE, Bertini
F. Affinity sites for N-acetyl D-glucosaminidase on the
surface of rat epididymal spermatozoa. Int J Androl 1994; 17: 43-9.
[11] Miller DJ, Gong X, Decker G, Shur BD. Egg cortical granule N-acetylglucosaminidase
is required for the mouse zona block to polyspermy. J Cell Biol 1993;
123: 1431-40.
[12] Kirchhoff C, Pera I, Derr P, Yeung CH, Cooper T. The molecular biology
of the sperm surface. Post-testicular membrane remodeling. Adv Exp Med
Biol 1997; 424: 221-32.
[13] Ohta K, Sato C, Matsuda T, Toriyama M, Vacquier VD, Lennarz WJ, Kitajima
K. Co-localization of receptor and transducer proteins in the glycosphingolipid-enriched,
low density, detergent-insoluble membrane fraction of sea urchin sperm.
Glycoconj J 2000; 17: 205-14.
[14] Kominami T, Miki A, Ikehara Y. Electrophoretic characterization of
hepatic alkaline phosphatase released by phosphatidy-linositol-specific
phospholipase C: a comparison with liver membrane and serum-soluble forms.
Biochem J 1985; 227: 183-9.
[15] Tulsiani DRP, Skudlarek MD, Orgebin-Crist MC. Human sperm plasma
membrane possess a-D-mannosidase activity but no galactosyltransferase
activity. Biol Reprod 1990; 42: 843-58.
[16] Low MG, Finean JB. Release of alkaline phosphatase from membranes
by a phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C. Biochem J 1977; 167:
281-4.
[17] Leigh RA, Walker RR. ATPase and acid phosphatase activities associated
with vacuoles isolated from storage roots of red beet (Beta vulgaris).
Planta 1980; 150: 222-9.
[18] Miranda PV, Gonzalez-Echeverria F, Blaquier JA, Mahuran DJ, Tezon
JG. Evidence for the participation of beta-hexosaminidase in human sperm-zona
pellucida interaction in vitro. Mol Human Reprod 2000; 6: 699-706.
[19] Kuno M, Yonezawa N, Amari S, Hayashi M, Ono Y, Kiss L, et al.
The presence of a glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol- anchored alpha-mannosidase
in boar sperm. IUBMB Life 2000; 49: 485-9.
[20] Hooper NM, Bashir A. Glycosylphosphatidyl inositol-anchored membrane
proteins can be distinguished from transmembrane polypeptide anchored
proteins by differential solubilization and temperature induced phase
separation in triton X-114. Biochem J 1991; 280: 745-51.
[21] Kasahara K, Sanai Y. Functional roles of glycosphingolipids in signal
transduction via lipid rafts. Glycoconj J 2000; 17: 153-62.
[22] Downey JC, Lambert CC. Attachment of the Ascidian sperm surface egg
receptor N-acetyl glucosaminidase to the cell membrane. Mol Reprod
Dev 1994; 38: 453-8.
[23] Pasini ME, Cattaneo F, Pinto MR, De Santis R, Perotti ME. Plasma
membrane association and preliminary characterization of Drosophila sperm
surface glycosidases. Mol Reprod Dev 1999; 52:166-73.
[24] Jones R. Plasma membrane structure and remodeling during sperm maturation
in the epididymis. J Reprod Fertil 1998; 53 Suppl: 73-84.
[25] Kirchhoff C., Hale G. Cell to Cell transfer of glycosyl-phosphatidyl
inositol- anchored membrane proteins during sperm maturation. Mol Human
Reprod 1996; 2: 177-84.
[26] Wirtz K.W.A. Phospholipid transfer proteins revisited. Bio-chem J
1997; 324: 353-60.
[27] Grimalt P, Barbieri MA, Sosa MA, Bertini F. Organ specific binding
system for beta-galactosidase in the male reproductive tract. Int J Androl
1995; 18: 243-7.
[28] Fornes WM, Sosa MA, Bertini F, Burgos MH. Vesicles in rat epididymal
fluid. Existance of two populations differing in ultrastructure and enzymatic
composition. Andrologia 1995; 27: 233-7.
[29] Arienti G, Carlini E, Palmerini CA. Fusion of human sperm to prostasome
at acidic pH. J Membrane Biol 1997; 155: 89-94.
[30] Arienti G, Carlini E, Verdacchi R, Cosmi EV, Palmerini CA. Prostasome
to sperm transfer of CD13/aminopeptidase N (EC 3.4.11.2). Biochim Biophys
Acta 1997; 1336: 533-8.
Correspondence
to: Dr. B.M.J. Pereira,
Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Biotechnology,
Indian Institute of Technology-Roorkee, Roorkee-247 667, Uttaranchal,
India.
Tel: +91-1332-85790 Fax: +91-1332-73560
E-mail: benmjfbs@iitr.ernet.in
Received
2001-11-16 Accepted 2002-01-28