|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Penile venous anatomy: application to surgery for erectile disturbance Geng-Long HSU, Cheng-hsing HSIEH, Hsien-Sheng WEN, Tzu-Jan KANG, Han-Sun CHIANG1 Department of Urology, Taiwan
Adventist Hospital, Po-Jen General Hospital, Taipei Asian
J Androl 2002
Mar;
4: 61-66 Keywords:
|
No. of |
Circumference (cm) |
Predominant |
Length (cm) |
|||||
Corpora |
DDV |
Cavernosal |
Ratio (%) |
DDV |
Cavernosal |
Ratio (%) |
||
1 |
5.02 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
36.9 |
Left |
12.0 |
>10 |
>83 |
2 |
5.96 |
0.8 |
0.5 |
21.8 |
Left |
10.6 |
10.6 |
100 |
3 |
7.06 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
28.4 |
Left |
12.0 |
> 7.9 |
>66 |
4 |
4.72 |
0.8 |
0.4 |
25.4 |
Left |
11.0 |
> 6.5 |
>59 |
5 |
5.02 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
27.9 |
Left |
11.5 |
> 7 |
>61 |
6 |
4.72 |
1.0 |
0.4 |
29.7 |
Right |
11.0 |
> 8.0 |
73 |
7 |
6.12 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
19.6 |
Left |
10.0 |
> 3.5 |
>35 |
8 |
4.94 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
20.3 |
Left |
11.0 |
> 8.9 |
>81 |
9 |
4.94 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
18.2 |
Left |
7.5 |
3.0 |
40 |
10 |
5.12 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
29.3 |
Right |
10.5 |
> 6.5 |
> 62 |
11 |
6.30 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
28.57 |
Left |
10.2 |
7.5 |
74 |
3.3 Venous stripping
Of the 155 patients undergoing venous stripping surgery, 148 are available for follow up and 5 of them received cavernosography (Figure 5). Their mean IIEF-5 score was 9.3 preoperatively and increased to 22.7 after the operation that remained stationary 6 months after operation. Interestingly, 88.5% (131/148) of the patients believed that venous stripping was a worthy treatment modality. Five cases required sildenafil to maintain their potentia, which was not working preoperatively.
Figure 5. Cavernosography, 29-year-old patient: A) Venous surgery performed around 1997 resulted in improvement in potentia for 5 months only, the proximal stump of deep dorsal vein and cavernosal vein being conspicuous. Veno-occlusive dysfunction prompted him to consult us. B) After venous stripping based on the new technique, the film shows a complete venous removal. Note that the corpus spongiosum is opacified due to the presence of ample amount of blood. Erection is resulted after injection of 45 mL of contrast medium diluted with normal saline.
4 Discussion
The tunica albuginea of the corpora cavernosa is a bilayered structure with multiple sublayers [6] through which the emissary veins traverse. The subtunical venular plexus collects sinusoidal blood and is the origin of the emissary veins. Interestingly, in our dissection the majority of the emissary veins were often found to run in an oblique path between the inner and outer layers of the tunica albuginea, whereas the arteries took a more direct path. It was not unusual to see twin tunnels in one venous chamber located exactly at the transition between the inner circular and outer longitudinal tunical layers.
Although the cavernous vein has been traditionally described in the literature as a short vein, in our study the venous system is found to course almost the entire length of the corpus cavernosum, although distally it becomes smaller. It sends a communicating vein, which may be bigger than itself, to the deep dorsal vein and numerous, albeit small, emissary veins proximally to the corpora cavernosa. It is housed within a different perivascular sheath from that of the deep dorsal vein. Therefore, it deserves the term of cavernosal vein. Once the deep dorsal vein is completely removed, the cavernosal vein becomes very conspicuous (Figure 4). Distally it is prone to bleeding if its removal is attempted, not only because of its relationship to the sinusoids but also its fragility. In addition, the proximity of the cavernosal vein to the corpus cavernosum not only risks bleeding but also makes it difficult for the surgeon to distinguish venous from arterial blood.
The para-arterial veins, found consistently in our eleven cadavers, have heretofore not been reported in the literature. They are always prominent in the pendulous portion of the penis; the medial one communicates with the glanular sinusoids and cavernosal vein, and the lateral one with the glans and, in some cases, with the corpus spongiosum directly via its own circumflex vein. During venous surgery, these para-arterial veins become greatly engorged if the cavernous sinusoids are squeezed, implying that a substantial amount of the sinusoidal blood is drained via the emissary veins, which appear to be more prominent during postoperative cavernosography. These veins are regarded as residual rather than recurrent ones as they become very conspicuous as soon as they are left aside during operation (Figure 4).
Venous surgery for erectile dysfunction was advocated as early as a century ago [7-9]. However, many surgeons have now abandoned it because of poor long-term results, which have been ascribed to recurrent veins and intracorporeal defect [10]. Although the offender has been thought to be the deep dorsal vein [11-17], in our study the presence of para-arterial veins and/or a residual cavernosal vein provide the possibility of additional contributory factors. Both the cavernosal and para-arterial veins are vulnerable to be overlooked at the operation. In venous surgery, the deep dorsal vein, as well as the cavernosal vein should be stripped completely, despite the difficulty. However, the para-arterial veins should be treated segment by segment. Any longitudinal tissue, except the veins, is not allowed to be severed (but separated) in the whole procedure, otherwise an irreversible trauma will result.
The number of veinlets at the level of the retrocoronal sulcus varied greatly and could be numerous (Figure 1). These could be seen to merge separately with the deep dorsal vein, cavernosal vein, and para-arterial veins (the last also had communicating veins). Hemodynamically, the result is a pressure-dependent phenomenon in the pendulous portion of the penis, where venous leakage may be initiated clinically. The amount of blood within the penile tissues and the complexity of the venous anatomy (intermingling with arteries and numerous small nerves) discourage surgeons from attempting penile venous surgery. In our experience, asking an assistant to compress the cavernous and glanular sinusoids to control bleeding will facilitate dissection and encourage the complete stripping necessary for operative success. We have applied this anatomical knowledge to our recent venous stripping procedures. A significant improvement of our patients after surgery greatly encouraged us.
References
[1] Breza J, Aboseif SR,
Orvis BR, Lue TF, Tanagho EA. Detailed anatomy of penile neurovascular
structures: surgical significance. J Urol 1989; 141: 437-43.
[2] Bookstein
JJ, Lurie AL. Selective penile venography: anatomical and hemodynamic
observations. J Urol 1988; 140: 55-60.
[3] Fuchs
AM, Mehringer CM, Rajfer J. Anatomy of penile venous drainage in potent
and impotent men during caver-nosography. J Urol 1989; 141: 1353-6.
[4] Rajfer
J, Mehringer M. Cavernosography following clinical failure of penile vein
ligation for erectile dysfunction. J Urol 1990; 143: 514-7.
[5] Moscovici
J, Galinier P, Hammoudi S, Lefebvre D, Juricic M, Vaysse P. Contribution
to the study of the venous vasculature of the penis. Surg Radiol Anat
1999; 21:193-9.
[6] Hsu GL, Brock G, Martinez-Pinerio L, Nunes L, von Heyden B, Lue TF.
The three dimensional architecture of the human penis. Int J Impot Res
1992; 4: 117-23.
[7] Wooten JS. Ligation of the dorsal vein of the penis as a cure for
atonic impotence. Texas Med J 1902; 18: 325-7.
[8] Wespes E, Schulman CC. Venous leakage: surgical treatment of a curable
cause of impotence. J Urol 1985; 133: 796-9.
[9] Bennett AH, Rivard DJ, Blang RP, Moran M. Reconstructive surgery for
vasculogenic impotence. J Urol 1986; 136: 599-601.
[10] Nehra A, Goldstein I, Pabby A, Nugent M, Huang YH, de las Morenas,
et al. Mechanism of venous leakage: a prospective clinicopathological
correlation of corporeal function and structure. J Urol 1996; 156: 1320-9.
[11] Lewis RW. Venous surgery for impotence. Urol Clin North Amer 1988;
15: 115-21.
[12] Lue TF. Penile venous surgery. Urol Clin North Amer 1989; 16: 607-11.
[13] Rossman B, Mieza M, Melman A. Penile vein ligation for corporeal
incompetence: an evaluation of short-term and long-term results. J Urol
1990; 144: 679-82.
[14] Knoll LD, Furlow WL, Benson RC. Penile venous ligation surgery for
the management of cavernosal venous leakage. Urol Int 1992; 49: 33-9.
[15] Freedmen AL, Neto FC, Mehringer CM, Rajfer J. Long-term results of
penile vein ligation for impotence from venous leakage. J Urol 1993; 149:
1301-3.
[16] Tsai TC, Hsu GL, Chen SC, Wang CL. Analysis of the result of reconstructive
surgery for vasculogenic impotence. J Formos Med Assoc 1988; 87: 182-7.
[17] Vale JA, Feneley MR, Lees WR, Kirby RS. Venous leak surgery: long-term
follow-up of patients undergoing excision and ligation of the deep dorsal
vein of the penis. Br J Urol 1995; 76: 192-5.
Correspondence
to: Dr. Han-Sun CHIANG,
MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Taiwan Medical University Hospital, 252
Wu Hsing Street, Taipei.
Tel: +886-2-2737 2181 Ext. 1125, Fax: +886-2-2377 4700
E-mail: hansun@tmu.edu.tw
Received
2001-11-17 Accepted 2002-01-28