Prosaposin
ablation inactivates the MAPK and Akt signaling pathways and interferes
with the development of the prostate
gland
Carlos R. Morales, Haitham Badran
Department of Anatomy and
Cell Biology, McGill University, 3640 University Street,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada (H3A 2B2)
Asian J Androl 2003
Mar; 5: 57-63
Keywords:
mouse; prostate; prosaposin; mitogen activating phosphokinases (MAPKs)
Abstract
The recent development of
a prosaposin -/- mouse model has allowed the investigation of the role
of prosaposin in the development of the male reproductive organs. A morphometric
analysis of the male reproductive system of 37 days old mice revealed
that prosaposin ablation produced a 30 % reduction in size and weight
of the testes, 37 % of the epididymis, 75 % of the seminal vesicles and
60 % of the prostate glands. Light microscopy (LM) showed that smaller
testis size from homozygous mutant mice was associated with reduced spermiogenesis.
Both, dorsal and ventral lobules of the prostate glands were underdeveloped
in the homozygous mutant. LM analysis also showed that prostatic alveoli
were considerably smaller and lined by shorter epithelial cells in the
homozygous mutant. Smaller tubular diameter and shorter undifferentiated
epithelial cells were also observed in seminal vesicles and epididymis.
In the efferent ducts of the homozygous mutant mice, the epithelium was
composed exclusively of ciliated cells in contrast to the heterozygotes,
which showed the presence of nonciliated cells. Radioimmunoassays demonstrated
that testosterone levels were normal or higher in mice with the inactivated
prosaposin gene. Immunostaining of prostate sections with an anti-androgen
receptor antibody showed that the epithelial cells lining the alveoli
express androgen receptor in both the heterozygous and homozygous tissue.
Similarly, sections immunostained with antibodies to the phosphorylated
MAPKs and Akts strongly reacted with tall prostatic secretory cells in
prostate from heterozygous mouse. On the other hand, the epithelial cells
in the homozygous prostate remained unstained or weakly stained. These
findings demonstrate that inactivation of the prosaposin gene affected
the development of the prostate gland and some components of the MAPK
pathway.
1 Introduction
Prosaposin is a non-enzymatic
factor that promotes the intracellular degradation of sphingolipids by
specific hydrolases [1]. It is also found extracellularly in the nervous
and male reproductive systems where it is linked to the activation of
intracellular signaling pathways [2-4]. In the lysosomes, prosaposin is
processed into four 10-15 kDa saposins (A-D). Saposins activate the hydrolysis
of sphingolipids (SLs) with short oligo-saccharide chains by specific
acidic hydrolases [1]. The deficiency of saposin B is linked to a variant
form of metachromatic leukodystrophy [5] and the deficiency of saposin
C is linked to a variant form of Gaucher's
disease [1]. Gaucher's
disease is considered the most prevalent
lysosomal storage disorder.
Deficiencies of saposin A and D have not yet been reported. However, a
genetic disease caused by the complete absence of prosaposin is related
to a multiple glycosphingolipid elevation including lactosyl ceramidosis
[6, 7]. Thus, the lysosomal form of prosaposin plays a role in the hydrolysis
of SLs [1, 5].
SLs are components of plasma
and Golgi membranes of eukaryotic cells. SLs contain a hydrophobic ceramide
moiety, which acts as a membrane anchor, and a hydrophilic oligosaccharide
chain, that faces the cisternal lumen of the Golgi apparatus [8-11]. In
the plasma membrane the catabolism of sphingolipids is involved in the
generation of well known lipophilic intermediates that are involved in
the transmission of extracellular signals to intracellular regulatory
systems [11].
In addition to its well-documented
role in the hydrolysis of SLs, secreted prosaposin has been reported to
have neurotrophic activity [2-4]. Prosaposin is abundant in cerebrospinal
fluid and is capable of stimulating neurite outgrowth in murine cells
and choline acetyl-transferase (ChAT) activity in human neuroblastoma
cells [2-4, 12]. A 12 amino acid sequence in the N-terminal end of saposin
C has been implicated in the activation of the mitogen activated protein
kinase (MAPK) pathway [4, 12].
The objective of this review
is to examine the role of prosaposin and sphingolipids in the activation
of the MAPK pathway and in the development of the prostate. The role of
other regulators of prostate growth will be discussed as well. Finally,
this report will also examine the effect of prosaposin ablation in the
mouse prostate.
2 Prosaposin and the activation
of the MAPK pathway
Prosaposin appears not only
to exhibit neurotrophic activity [2] but also to be an essential factor
for cell growth, differentiation and survival of the prostatic epithelium
and the epithelial lining of other reproductive organs [13]. Prosaposin
deficient mice exhibit a severe reduction of prostate size due to the
presence of under-veloped alveoli and the absence of secretory cells [7,
13].
The trophic region of prosaposin
encompasses 12 amino acids within the functional C domain [4, 12, 14].
Preliminary evidence suggests, that to exert its trophic effect, prosaposin
must bind to a high affinity receptor which activates the mitogen-activated
kinase pathway (MAPK) [2]. MAPK is a general name for a family of serine/threonine
kinases that play an important role in cell signaling. They are activated
by a variety of ligands and receptors including tyrosine kinases and G-protein-coupled
receptors [2]. The extracellular signal regulated protein kinases ERK1
(p44 MAPK) and ERK 2 (p42 MAPK) are part of the MAPK family. Activation
of ERKs can be the result of linear signaling cascades from growth factor
receptors, adaptor proteins, guanine nucleotide exchange factors, Ras,
Raf 1, and MAPK-activating kinases such as MEK [2]. Emerging data indicate
that signaling proteins such as phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) and
protein kinase C (PKC) can also phosphorylate MEK and ERKs independent
of the Ras pathway. Therefore, the activation of the MAPKs is often complex
and involves multiple signaling systems. Recent evidence in Schwann and
PC12 cells suggests that prosaposin induces the entry of these cells into
the S-phase of the cell cycle and prevents apoptosis by activating ERKs
and sphingosine kinase via a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein associated
receptor [2, 15]. Pro-saposin also prevents programmed cell death of rat
cerebellar granule neurons in culture by activating PI3K and Akt [2].
In the NS20Y and SHSY5Y cell lines prosaposin also operates through a
G protein associated receptor, possibly the GO-a [15, 16].
The serine / threonine kinases
Ras and PAK have emerged as the molecules that can converge signaling
on the Raf-ERK pathway. Receptor-mediated activation of Raf, the upstream
MAPK kinase in the ERK cascade, is Ras dependent and involves recruitment
of the kinase to the plasma membrane. On the other hand PAK which is a
Cdc 42 and Rac target, can phosphorylate MEK 1 on Ser298 in a region that
mediates the interaction of MEK 1 with Raf. Activation of PAK has been
shown to be dependent upon PI3K-dependent activation of Akt. This evidence
emphasizes the notion that activation of MAPKs depends on multiple signaling
pathways and also on signal convergence [17].
Activated ERK can enter the
nucleus and phosphorylate transcription factors providing the link between
cell surface receptor-mediated events and nuclear induction of gene expression.
In the nucleus activated ERK promotes the transcription and the activity
of transcription factors c-fos, c-myc, c-jun and p21 [18, 19]. The c-myc
proto-oncogene encodes a short-lived transcription factor that promotes
cell proliferation and suppresses growth arrest by the regulation of appropriate
growth target genes [20]. The c-myc transcription factor is essential
for cell proliferation [21] and overexpression of c-myc is associated
with the inability of cells to withdraw from the cell cycle, resulting
in uncontrolled cellular proliferation. In addition, c-myc can induce
delayed late genes, such as cyclins D1, E and A [22, 23]. Hence proto-oncogene
proteins normally act at critical steps in normal growth factor mitogenic
signaling pathways. Overexpression or constitutive activity of mitogenic
proto-oncogenes singly or in combination may cooperate and lead to transformation
of cells and thus play a causal role in oncogenesis. In summary, the potential
role of prosaposin in the activation of the MAPK pathway has been presented
in a simplified manner (Figure 1).
Finally, multiple evidence from various laboratories suggest that different
signaling MAPK pathways have biological versatility in promoting complex
biological responses such as cell proliferation and cell transformation.
Figure
1. Simplified model of prosaposin activation of the MAPK signaling
pathway. The model is based on data from several laboratories.
The prosaposin receptor is still unknown.
3 Sphingolipids and their
role in signal transduction
Glycolipids are constituents
of biological membranes which are composed of a carbohydrate moiety linked
to a hydrophobic aglycon. They are divided into glyco-glycerolipids abundant
in bacteria and plants, and glycosphingolipids (GSL), abundant in eukaryotic
cells [8]. GSLs contain a hydrophobic ceramide moiety that acts as membrane
anchor and a hydrophilic, extracellular oligosaccharide chain. Ceramide
consists of a long chain amino alcohol, D-erythro-sphingosine, which is
acylated with a fatty acid. Ceramide is also a structural component of
sphingomyelin, a sphingolipid not linked to carbohydrates. GSLs are heterogeneous
with respect to both their carbohydrate and ceramide portions. Variations
in the type, number, and linkage of sugar residues within the oligosaccharide
chain, give rise to the wide range of naturally occurring sphingolipids.
Sialic acid-containing GSLs (gangliosides), are abundant on neuronal cells.
GSL patterns change with cell growth, differentiation, viral transformation,
ontogenesis and oncogenesis [8, 9]. Part of the plasma membrane destined
for degradation is endocytosed and trafficked through the endosomal compartment
to reach lysosomes [8, 9]. The composition of sphingolipids entering lysosomes
depends on the cell type. Neuronal plasma membranes are rich in gangliosides
while oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells have a higher content of galactosylceramide
and sulfatide [8, 9]. Within lysosomes, hydrolyzing enzymes sequentially
cleave off the sugar residues. Ceramide first and then sphingosine are
finally produced. Sphingosine leaves lysosomes to re-enter the biosynthetic
pathway [6, 8, 11]. For GSLs with long carbohydrate chains of more than
four sugar residues, the presence of an enzymatically active lysosomal
hydrolase is sufficient for degradation in vivo. However, degradation
of membrane bound GSLs with short oligosaccharide chains requires the
cooperation of lysosomal hydrolases and saposins.
Catabolism of plasma membrane
sphingolipids generates lipophilic intermediates which are involved in
the transmission of extracellular signals to intracellular regulatory
systems [10, 11]. For example, hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to ceramide
can be induced by certain ligands and receptors in various cell types.
The identity of cellular targets of ceramide and other molecules downstream
the signal flow is not known but several target proteins in the MAPK pathway
are currently under investigation[10, 11]. In addition, a growing body
of evidence suggests a mechanism of Ras-MAPK activation by sphingosine-1P
activated protein kinases [10].
Because of the dual role
of prosaposin (i.e., lysosomal activator of hydrolases and trophic factor),
it is unclear which of these two mechanisms is more important in the development
of the prostate. The inactivation of the prosaposin gene not only causes
the loss of the trophic activity of prosaposin, but also the suppression
of sphingolipid hydrolysis which may alter the distribution of lipophilic
second messengers in the plasma membrane.
4 Regulators of prostate
growth
The prostate gland develops
from a complex interplay between mesenchymal and epithelial tissues [24].
The prostate evolves late in gestation as a consequence of signaling events
between the urogenital sinus epithelium and the urogenital sinus mesenchyme
(UGM). In rodents, the prostatic buds are formed during embryo-genesis,
while the full ductal branching occurs postnatally. Androgens are important
for all aspects of prostate development. During embryogenesis, androgen-dependent
signaling events in the UGM give rise to paracrine factors that act on
local epithelial cells to induce morphogenesis and ductal branching [24].
During puberty
and adulthood, androgen-dependent
signaling events in the epithelium are required for full differentiation
and production of secretory proteins [24]. In adult males, the prostate
is subject to two primary age-related diseases, prostate cancer and benign
prostatic hyperplasia. Prostatic cancer is currently the most commonly
diagnosed neoplasm in men [25]. The disease follows a progression from
an early, organ-defined disease, which may be clinically asymptomatic
and treatable by prostatectomy or androgen ablation therapy, to a highly
invasive, androgen-independent, metastatic disease for which there is
no current effective therapy or cure [26]. Most genes that are involved
in normal and abnormal prostate growth and development are important in
cell proliferation and/or differentiation. Proto-oncogenes such as c-met
or bcl-2 are believed to be important in the metastatic properties of
prostate cancer and in the development of androgen independence [26, 27].
Transcription factors may also exert their effects in a prostate-specific
manner such as the androgen receptor (AR). Amplification of AR is not
involved in tumorigenesis but occur in advanced-stage prostate cancer
[28].
The role of various growth
factors on prostate growth has been examined. Growth factors appear to
be local substances responsible for mediating the mesenchymal and epithelial
interactions important for prostate development. Although no single growth
factor family has been demonstrated to have a direct role in prostate
cancer, it is clear that growth factor pathways are altered during prostatic
carcinogenesis. Some evidence points to the role of growth factors: (1)
isolated prostatic epithelial or stromal cells respond to growth factors
in vitro [29]; (2) Overexpression of growth factors in transgenic
mice perturbs prostatic growth and development [30, 31]; (3) Prostatic
cells express growth factor receptors [32, 33, 34]; (4) Androgens directly
influence the expression of growth factors [35, 36]. Following androgen
withdrawal, the production of stimulatory growth factors, EGF, IGF and
FGF by prostate cells decreases whereas the expression of TGFb-1
and TGFb-2
receptors increases [18, 37-39]. The net effect of these growth factors
alteration is prostatic involution. Androgen replacement restores normal
EGF, IGF and FGF levels and the prostate recovers its original size [40,
41].
5 Effects of prosaposin
inactivation in the male reproductive system
The development of a prosaposin
-/- mouse model allowed the investigation of the role of prosaposin in
different tissues [6]. Inactivation of the prosaposin gene caused accumulation
of lactosylceramide, glucosylcera-mide, digalactosylceramide, sulfatide,
ceramide and globotriaosylceramide in lysosomes of affected cells [6].
Ultrastructural analysis of these cells showed accumulation of undigested
membranes in multivesicular bodies. Mice generally die at day 35~40 after
birth due to neurological defects [6].
A morphometric analysis of
the male reproductive system of 37 days old mice revealed that disruption
of the prosaposin gene produced a 30 % reduction in size and weight of
the testes, 37 % of the epididymis, 75 % of the seminal vesicles and 60
% of the prostate glands (Figure 2).
Light microscopy (LM) showed that smaller testes from homozygous mutant
mice were associated with reduced spermiogenesis, and that late spermatids
were the most affected cells. Underdeveloped prostate glands in homozygous
mutant were characteristic of both, dorsal and ventral lobules (Figure
2). In addition, LM analysis showed that the tubuloalveolar glands
were considerably smaller and that the prostatic epithelial cells were
shorter in the homozygous mutant (Figure
3). Smaller tubular diameter and shorter undifferentiated epithelial
cells were also observed in seminal vesicles and epididymis. In the efferent
ducts of the homozygous mutant mice, the epithelium was composed exclusively
of ciliated cells in contrast to the heterozygotes, which showed a majority
of nonciliated cells [7, 13].
Figure
2. Dorsal prostate (solid stars) and seminal vesicle (open stars).
Note that the inactivation of the prosaposin gene (left picture) caused
a significant reduction in size of the prostate and seminal vesicles.
The right picture illustrates a control normal prostate and the seminal
vesicle of a heterozygous (-/+) mouse. Both pictures are flanked by their
respective drawings to permit a better appreciation of the developmental
effect of prosaposin ablation.
Figure
3. Immunoperoxidase staining of prostate sections with an anti-phospho-Akt
antibobody. Note that the prostatic epithelial cells of prosaposin KO
are unstained (A). On the other hand, the supranuclear region of secretory
epithelial cells of heterozygous (control) prostate (B) is heavily stained.
400
Radioimmunoassay of blood
samples from homo-zygous mutant, heterozygous and control mice (n=6)
revealed that testosterone levels were normal or higher in mice with the
inactivated prosaposin gene. Moreover, the immunostaining of prostate
sections with an anti-androgen receptor antibody indicates that the epithelial
cells lining the alveoli express androgen receptor in both the heterozygous
and homozygous tissue. Involution of the prostate gland and other male
reproductive organs appears to be independent of androgen levels and androgen
receptor. Thus, inactivation of the prosaposin gene seems to interfere
with the proliferative activities of prostatic epithelial cells [7, 13].
Due to the dual role of prosaposin as a lysosomal activator of hydrolases
and a trophic factor, it is unclear what is the determining cause for
the lack of development of the prostate. Inactivation of the gene not
only causes the loss of prosaposin trophic activity but also affects the
lysosomal degradation of sphingolipids which may alter the distribution
of lipophilic second messengers such as ceramide in the plasma membrane.
In fact, catabolism of plasma membrane sphingolipids generates lipophilic
intermediates, which are involved in the transmission of extracellular
signals to intracellular regulatory systems [42]. For example, hydrolysis
of sphingomyelin to ceramide can be induced by certain ligands and receptors
in various cell types. In general, ceramide appears to mediate cell differentiation,
and apoptosis [11]. The identity of the cellular targets of ceramide and
other molecules downstream the signal flow is not fully known [11] but
a strong body of evidence indicates that ceramide is also involved in
the activation of the MAPK pathway [43]. To examine if this was the case,
prostate sections from homozygous and hetero-zygous mice were immunostained
with two monoclonal antibodies, which recognize the phosphorylated and
non-phosphorylated forms of MAPKs. Sections immuno-stained with the antibody
to the non-phosphorylated form of MAPKs reacted with all epithelial cells
in heterozygous and homozygous prostates. Sections immunostained with
the antibody to the phosphorylated MAPKs strongly reacted with tall prostatic
secretory cells in prostate from heterozygous mouse. On the other hand,
the epithelial cells in the homozygous prostate remained unstained. We
have recently found that the Akt signaling pathway is also affected by
the disruption of the prosaposin gene. Prostate sections immunostained
with an antibody to a phospho-threonine 308 form of Akt reacted with tall
prostatic secretory cells in prostate from heterozygous mouse. Conversely,
the epithelial cells of the homozygous prostate were weakly stained with
the Akt antibody (Figure 3). The
Akt signaling pathway, activated by several growth factors, promotes cell
survival by inhibiting apoptosis through phosphorylation and deactivation
of proapoptotic proteins [43]. Therefore, the involution of the prostate
and other reproductive organs may be explained, in part, by the activation
of apoptotic proteins due to the inhibition of Akt [43]. Since apoptosis
is not readily observed in the epithelium lining the alveoli of the prostate
of 38-40 day old mutant mice, it is possible that this process occurs
gradually during prenatal and/or posnatal development. Nevertheless, this
observation requires further verification. In summary, our results demon-strated
for the first time, that inactivation of the prosa-posin gene affects
the development of the prostate gland and some components of the MAPK
and Akt signaling pathways [7].
The molecular basis of prostate
cancer is still poorly understood but it is clear that the limitations
of androgen-deprivation therapy will be circumvented by the development
of more specific growth factors, signal transduction and angiogenesis
inhibitors. Thus, the study of this unique protein may provide information
on the role of prosaposin in normal and pathological conditions.
References
[1] O'Brien
JS, Kishimoto Y. Saposin proteins: structure, function, and role in human
lysosomal storage disorders. FASEB J 1991; 5: 301-8.
[2] Campana WM, Hiraiwa M, O'Brien
JS. Prosaptide activates the MAPK pathway by a G-protein-dependent mechanism
essential for enhanced sulfatide synthesis by Schwann cells. FASEB J 1998;
12: 307-14.
[3] O'Brien JS, Carson GS, Seo HC, Hiraiwa M, Kishimoto Y. Identification
of prosaposin as a neurotrophic factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:
9593-6.
[4] O'Brien JS, Carson GS, Seo HC, Hiraiwa M, Weiler S, Tomich JM, et
al. Identification of the neurotrophic factor sequence of prosaposin.
FASEB J 1995; 9: 681-5.
[5] Stevens RL, Fluharty AL, Kihara H, Kaback MM, Shapiro LJ, Marsh B,
et al. Cerebroside sulfatase activator deficiency induced metachromatic
leukodystrophy. Am J Hum Genet 1981; 33: 255-65.
[6] Fujita N, Suzuki K, Vanier M, Popko B, Maeda N, Klein A, et al.
Targeted disruption of the mouse sphingolipid activator gene: a complex
phenotype, including severe leukodystrophy and wide-spread storage of
multiple sphingolipids. Human Mol Gen 1996; 5: 711-25.
[7] Morales CR, Zhao Q, El Alfy M, Suzuki K. Targeted disruption of the
mouse prosaposin gene affects the development of the prostate gland and
other male reproductive organs. J Androl 1999; 21: 765-75.
[8] Sandhoff, K, Kolter T. Topology
of Glycosphingolipid Degradation. TINCB 1996; 6: 98-103.
[9] Sandhoff K, Kolter T, Van Echten
G. Sphingolipid Metabolism. In: Ledeen RW, Hakomori AI, Yates AJ, Ccheider
JS, Yu RK, editors. Sphingolipids as signaling modulators in the nervous
system. Ann N Y Acad Sci, New York: Academic Press; 1996. p139-51.
[10] Spiegel S, Merill A. Sphingolipid metabolism and cell growth regulation.
FASEB J 1996; 10: 1388-97.
[11] Spiegel S, Foster R, Kolesnick R. Signal transduction through lipid
second messengers Curr Opin Cell Biol 1996; 8: 159-67.
[12] Qi X, Qin W, Sun Y, Kondoh K,
Grabowski GA. Functional organization of saposin C. Definition of the
neurotrophic and acid beta-glucosidase activation regions. J Biol Chem
1996; 271:6874-80.
[13] Morales CR, Zhao Q, Lefrancois S, Ham D. Role of prosaposin in the
male reproductive system. Effect of prosaposin inactivation on the testis,
epididymis, prostate and seminal vesiscles. Arch Androl 2000; 44: 173-86.
[14] Kotani Y, Matsuda S, Wen TC, Sakanaka
M, Tanaka J, Maeda N, et al. A hydrophilic peptide comprising 18
amino acid residues of the prosaposin sequence has neurotrophic activity
in vitro and in vivo. J Neurochem 1996; 66: 2197-200.
[15] Misasi R, Sorice M, Di Marzio L, Campana WM, Molinari S, Cifone MG,
et al. Prosaposin treatment induces PC12 entry in the S phase of
the cell cycle and prevents apoptosis: activation of ERKs and sphingosine
kinase. FASEB J 2001; 15: 467-74.
[16] Hiraiwa M, Campana WM, Martin BM, OBrien
JS. Prosaposin receptor: evidence for a G-protein-associated receptor.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 240: 415-8.
[17] Bar-Sagi D, Hall A. Ras and Rho GTPases: A family reunion. Cell 2000;
103: 227-38.
[18] Alvarez E, Northwood IC, Gonzales FA, Latour DA, Seth A, Abate C,
et al. Pro-Leu-Ser/Thr-Pro is a consensus primary sequence for
substrate protein phosphorylation. Characteri-zation of the phosphorylation
of c-myc and c-jun by an epidermal growth factor receptor threonine 669
protein kinase. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 15277-85.
[19] Liu Y, Martindale JL, Gorospe M, Holbrook NJ. Regulation of p21WAF1/CIP1
expression through mitogen activated protein kinase signaling pathway.
Cancer Res 1996; 56: 31-5.
[20] Harrington EA, Fanidi A, Evan G. Oncogenes and cell death. Curr Opin
Genet Dev 1994; 4: 120-7.
[21] Amati B, Land H. Myc-max-mad:
A transcription factor network controlling cell cycle progression, differentiation
and death. Curr Opin Genet Dev1994; 4: 10-10.
[22] Hunter T, Pines J. Cyclins and Cancer: Cyclin D and Cdk inhibitors
come of age. Cell 1994; 79: 573-80.
[23] Jansen-Durr P, Meichle A, Steiner P, Pagano M, Finke K, Botz J, et
al. Differential modulation of cyclin gene expression by myc. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90: 3685-90.
[24] Cunha GR. Role of mesenchymal-epithelial
interactions in normal and abnormal development of male urogenital glands.
In: Riva A, Testa-Riva F and Ta PM, editors. Ultrastructure of male urogenital
glands: prostate, seminal vesicle urethral and bulbourethral glands. New
York: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1994. p 15-34.
[25] Kirby RS. Breaking bad news. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 1998 1:
177-8.
[26] Dong J-T, Issacs WB, Isaacs JT. Molecular advances in prostate cancer.
Curr Opin Oncol 1997; 9: 101-7.
[27] Pisters LL, Troncoso P, Zhau HE,
Li W, von Eschenbach AC, Chung LW. c-met proto-oncogene expression in
benign and malignant human prostate tissues. J Urol 1995; 154: 293-8.
[28] Koivisto P, Kononen J, Palmberg
C, Tammela T, Hyytinen E, Isola J, et al. Androgen receptor gene
amplification: a possible molecular mechanism for androgen deprivation
therapy failure in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 314-9.
[29] Mansson PE, Adams P, Kan M, McKeehan
WL. Heparin-binding growth factor gene expression and receptor characteristics
in normal rat prostate and two transplantable rat prostate tumors. Cancer
Res 1989; 49: 2485-91.
[30] Muller WJ, Lee FS, Dickson C, Peters G, Pattengale P, Leder P. The
int-2 gene product acts as an epithelial growth factor in transgenic mice.
EMBO J 1990; 9: 907-13.
[31] Sandgren EP, Luetteke NC, Palmiter
RD, Brinster RL, Lee DC. Overexpression of TGF alpha in transgenic mice:
induction of epithelial hyperplasia, pancreatic metaplasia, and carcinoma
of the breast. Cell 1990; 15: 1121-35.
[32] Fiorelli G, De Bellis A, Longo
A, Giannini S, Natali A, Costantini A, et al. Insulin-like growth
factor-I receptors in human hyperplastic prostate tissue: characterization,
tissue localization, and their modulation by chronic treatment with a
gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991; 72:
740-6.
[33] Story MT, Livingston B, Baeten L, Swartz SJ, Jacobs SC, Begun FP,
et al. Cultured human prostate-derived fibroblasts produce a factor
that stimulates their growth with properties indistinguishable from basic
fibroblast growth factor. Prostate 1989; 15: 355-65.
[34] Wilding G, Zugmeier G, Knabbe C, Flanders K, Gelmann E. Differential
effects of transforming growth factor beta on human prostate cancer cells
in vitro. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1989; 62: 79-87.
[35] Kyprianou N, Isaacs JT. Identification
of a cellular receptor for transforming growth factor-beta in rat ventral
prostate and its negative regulation by androgens. Endocrinology 1988;
123: 2124-31.
[36] Kyprianou N, Isaacs JT. Expression of transforming growth factor-beta
in the rat ventral prostate during castration-induced programmed cell
death. Mol Endocrinol 1989; 3: 1515-22.
[37] Hiramatsu M, Kashimata M, Minami
N, Sato A, Murayama M, Minami N. Androgenic regulation of epidermal growth
factor in the mouse ventral prostate. Biochem Int 1988; 17: 311-7.
[38] Katz AE, Benson MC, Wise GJ, Olsson CA, Bandyk MG, Sawczuk IS, et
al. Gene activity during the early phase of androgen-stimulated rat
prostate regrowth. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 5889-94.
[39] McKeehan WL, Adams PS, Rosser MP. Direct mitogenic effects of insulin,
epidermal growth factor, glucocorticoid, cholera toxin, unknown pituitary
factors and possibly prolactin, but not androgen, on normal rat prostate
epithelial cells in serum-free, primary cell culture. Cancer Res 1984;
44: 1998-2010.
[40] Steiner M. Molecular biology of prostate growth regulation. In: Lepor
H, editors. Prostatic Diseases. London: WB Saunders Co; 2000. p41-57.
[41] Steiner M. Review of peptide growth factors in benign prostatic hyperplasia
and urological malignancy. J Urol 1995; 153:1085-96.
[42] Kolesnick R. Ceramide: a novel
second messenger. TICB 1992; 2: 232-6.
[43] Garrington TP, Johnson G. Organization and regulation of mitogen-activated
protein kinase signalling pathways. Current Opinion in Cell Biol 1999;
11: 211-8.
[44] Brazil DP, Hemmings BA. Ten years of protein kinase B signaling:
a hard Akt to follow. Trends Biol Sci 2001; 26: 657-64.
home
Correspondence
to: Carlos R. Morales,
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University, 3640 University
Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2B2
Tel: +1-514-398 6398, Fax: +1-514-398 5047
E-mail: carlos.morales@mcgill.ca
Received 2003-02-28 Accepted 2003-03-07
|