Home  |  Archive  |  AJA @ Nature  |  Online Submission  |  News & Events  |  Subscribe  |  APFA  |  Society  |  Links  |  Contact Us  |  中文版

Potentiation of apomorphine effect on sildenafil-induced penile erection in conscious rabbits

Jae-Young Park1, Hwancheol Son2, Soo Woong Kim1, Jae-Seung Paick1
1Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Urology, Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Asian J Androl 2004 Sep; 6: 205-209


Keywords: penile erection; sildenafil; apomorphine; conscious rabbit; combination therapy
Abstract

Aim: To investigate a possible potentiation effect of apomorphine (APO) on sildenafil-induced penile erection in the conscious rabbit. Methods: Erection of male New Zealand White rabbits (3.5 - 4.0 kg, n=12) was assessed by measuring the length of the uncovered penile mucosa and the duration of erection before and after intravenous administration of agents. After injection of APO (0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg), sildenafil was administered intravenously in a dose-response manner (0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg). In additional experiments, the effect of increasing doses of sildenafil in combination with APO on systemic blood pressure was evaluated. Results: Systemic administration of sildenafil induced a dose-dependent increase in the penile length. Intravenous injection of APO alone did not produce any change in the penile length, while significantly enhanced the penile erection induced by sildenafil. The co-administration of 0.1 mg/kg of APO and 1 mg/kg of sildenafil was found to be the most effective combination in producing penile erection. Intravenous administration of sildenafil caused a concentration-dependent decrease in systemic blood pressure, but no additional decrease was observed with co-administration of APO. Conclusion: APO enhances the penile erection induced by sildenafil in the conscious rabbit without causing an additional decrease in blood pressure.

1 Introduction

Sildenafil citrate is a potent, competitive cGMP-specific phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor that is the first line oral treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) of various etiology [1, 2]. However, several studies showed that administering sildenafil could not resulted in rigidity sufficient for satisfactory sexual intercourse in  11 % - 22 % of patients with psychogenic and 36 % - 65 % with organic ED [1, 2].

Combination drug therapy is appealing to salvage patients in whom monotherapy with sildenafil failed. In an early empirical trial, the most popular approaches have been the use of sildenafil plus intraurethral or intracaver-nous PGE1 [3, 4]. However, previous study clearly demonstrated a patient preference for the least invasive forms of therapy (oral medication) despite the prior unavailability of effective oral agents [5]. Recently, the clinical efficacy and safety of sublingual apomorphine (APO), a dopamine receptor agonist, has been documented [6, 7]. Combining centrally acting drug (APO) with peripheral conditioner (sildenafil) might be an attractive approach. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible potentiating effect of APO on sildenafil-induced penile erection using the conscious rabbit model.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Animals

All studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at this medical center. Twelve male New Zealand White rabbits (3.5 - 4.0 kg) were used. Animals were housed individually in cages and food and drink were available ad libitum. Room lights were on from 7 am to 7 pm, the room temperature was 22 - 24 .

2.2 Treatment and observations

A 24 gauge angiocatheter filled with normal saline was inserted into a marginal ear vein and taped up in position. The animals became accustomed and were not disturbed by repeated handling. In a separate study to investigate effects of drugs on systemic blood pressure, a 24 gauge angiocatheter was placed into the central ear artery in a restrain cage and connected to a transducer to continuously monitor the systemic blood pressure (n=12). Sedation was maintained with an intravenous bolus injection of urethane (800 mg/kg) as required and 150 mL of normal saline was administered very slowly to maintain patency.

Sildenafil, an extract from Viagra (Pfizer Inc., Brooklyn, USA) was dissolved in normal saline (2.8 mg/mL) and APO (A4393, Sigma, USA) in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and then diluted in distilled water (1 mg/mL).

The drug combinations injected were as follows: APO (0, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg) and sildenafil (0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg). As a result, 12 different combinations of drugs were each administered to 12 animals. APO was administered intravenously followed by sildenafil. Typically, the drugs were administered via an ear vein, followed by a small volume of saline and then the angiocatheter was removed. The time was noted and animals were gently removed from the cage and held by one individual. The length of uncovered penile mucosa was measured using a caliper as described previously [8]. Penile erection was evaluated at 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after agent administration and continued for 150 minutes in case of a persistent erection.

The penis was not handled at all to avoid direct stimulation. Between measurements, animals were returned to their cages and given access to water and food. Later, animals were randomized for administration of different doses. The minimal time between experiments for each animal was one week. Each dose was repeated six times in different animals randomly chosen. All animals tolerated this well.

Systemic blood pressure was recorded about 10 min after placing an angiocatheter into the artery and vein. Systemic blood pressure was continuously recorded before and after drug administration. The minimal interval between each experiment for each animal was three days. Each dose was repeated six times in different animals.

2.3 Data processing

Data were expressed as meanSD and Student's t-test was used for statistical analysis with P<0.05 as significant.

3 Results

In the preliminary study, intravenous injection of drug vehicle (saline or DMSO) did not cause any change in penile length. Systemic administration of sildenafil produced a dose-dependent increase in the length of the exposed penile mucosa (Figure 1). Doses of 0.5, 1 and 5 mg/kg induced a maximal mucosa response of 2.3 2.1, 3.7 2.2 and 9.9 4.8 mm, respectively. The response to 5 mg/kg was significantly higher (P<0.01) compared with those to 0.5 and 1 mg/kg, while there was no significant difference between the responses to 0.5 and 1 mg/kg of sildenafil. Maximal responses were produced at about 5 min after sildenafil administration. Then, the response gradually waned, but sometimes there was a substantial and measurable erection after 2 h at the highest dose (5 mg/kg).

Figure 1. Change in length of uncovered penile mucosa measured after systemic administration of sildenafil at indicated doses into ear vein of conscious rabbits. cP<0.01, compared with 0.5 and 1 mg/kg.

Intravenous administration of APO at concentrations of 0.05, 0.1 and 0.4 mg/kg did not cause erection over the 5-h observation period. However, with co-administration of sildenafil and APO, the penile erection was clearly greater than that induced by sildenafil alone (Figure 2-4). The co-administration of 0.5 mg/kg sildenafil and 0.1 mg/kg APO induced erections greater than those by sildenafil alone at 5, 10 and 15 min after administration (P<0.01, P0.05, P0.05, respectively), as did the co-administration of 0.5 mg/kg sildenafil and 0.4 mg/kg APO at 5, 10 and 45 min after administration (P<0.04, P<0.01, P<0.05, respectively) (Figure 2). The co-administration of sildenafil (1 mg/kg) with APO (0.1 mg/kg) also induced erections greater than those induced by sildenafil alone at each point during 60 min (P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.05, P<0.05, P<0.05, P<0.05, respectively) (Figure 3). The synergistic effect of APO were also observed with co-administration of sildenafil at the dose of 5 mg/kg; APO 0.05 mg/kg at 15 min (P<0.05), APO 0.1 mg/kg at 10 min (P<0.05) and APO 0.4 mg/kg at 10 min (P<0.05) after drug administration (Figure 4).

Figure 2. Change in length of uncovered penile mucosa measured after systemic administration of APO at indicated doses and 0.5 mg/kg sildenafil into ear vein of conscious rabbits. bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with sildenafil alone.

Figure 3. Change in length of uncovered penile mucosa measured after systemic administration of APO at indicated doses and 1 mg/kg sildenafil into ear vein of conscious rabbits. bP<0.05, cP<0.01, compared with sildenafil alone.

Figure 4. Change in length of uncovered penile mucosa measured after systemic administration of APO at indicated doses and 5 mg/kg sildenafil into ear vein of conscious rabbits. bP<0.05, compared with sildenafil alone.

As a result, the co-administration of 1 mg/kg sildenafil and 0.1 mg/kg APO produced the most effective penile erection among 12 different combinations. In addition, the synergistic effect caused by APO was more obvious at a sildenafil dose of 1 mg/kg than at 0.5 or 5 mg/kg. However, there was no increase in the duration of penile erection with the addition of APO.

The mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) before injection was 83.9 ?10.4 mmHg. Administration of sildenafil caused a transient, dose-dependent decrease in MAP (Figure 5), which returned to baseline values within 10 min of the injection. The administration of APO at 0.05 mg/kg and 0.1 mg/kg also caused a mild, transient decrease in MAP, while 0.4 mg/kg of APO increased MAP slightly (data not shown). Combined administration of sildenafil and APO did not significantly decrease the MAP compared with sildenafil alone (P>0.05) (Figure 5).

Figure 5. The maximal decrease of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) after systemic administration of APO and sildenafil in indicated doses into ear vein of anesthetized rabbits.

4 Discussion

In this study, we used the conscious rabbit model, which was originally proposed by Naganuma et al [9]. To investigate the effects of drugs on penile erection, the anesthetized animals have been commonly used, in which the intracavernosal pressure is recorded during electro-stimulation of the peripheral nerves to the penis. Compared with this conventional method the conscious animal model is simpler, less invasive and can exclude the potential influence of anesthesia on the activity of drugs. One prerequisite of this method is that the agents should be able to induce erection by themselves without sexual or direct penile stimulation.

Usually the rabbit penis is not visible as it is covered by fur. However, the length of the penis and the duration of the erection are easily measured during penile erection [8]. We produced penile erection in the conscious rabbit by intravenous administration of sildenafil and demonstrated the potentiation effect of APO on sildenafil-induced penile erection for the first time. As for the conscious rat, Andersson et al [10] reported that APO elicits a rise in intracavernosal pressure, which can be prolonged by sildenafil.

The doses of sildenafil and APO used in this study were determined based on previous reports [8, 11] and our pilot study. The bioavailability of sildenafil and APO in humans are about 40 % [12] and 17 % [13], respectively, thus the doses of both drugs used in this experiment may be relatively higher than those prescribed in men [14]. The conscious rabbits are not sexually stimulated and higher doses seem to be needed to induce penile erection.

Sildenafil effect is dose-dependent. However, intravenous administration of APO at high concentrations could not induce penile erection. This finding is consistent with that of the previous study using the conscious rabbit model [9]. In contrast, subcutaneously and centrally administered APO has been shown to induce penile erection in rats [10, 15]. Thus, the mode of action of APO may be species-specific.

Interestingly, APO, which did not induce penile erection by itself, significantly enhanced the penile erection produced by sildenafil. The present results showed that the administration of sildenafil at doses of 5 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg was less effective than at 1 mg/kg when combined with APO. This reduced effectiveness may be due to the fact that sildenafil at 5 mg/kg might have already triggered the maximal response and sildenafil at 0.5 mg/kg might not have induced sufficient response to be affected by APO co-administration.

Previous studies in rats showed that the maximum effect on penile erection was obtained with APO at 0.1 mg/kg and that the response decreased on increasing APO doses from 0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg [10, 16]. Tarcan et al [11] also reported that APO at 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg most effectively increases nerve-stimulated peak clitoral intracavernous and vaginal wall blood flows in the rabbits and that at more than 0.2 mg/kg it is less effective and produces adverse effects. Based on these results, the most effective dose of APO for inducing penile erection in the rabbits or rats is 0.1 - 0.2 mg/kg and doses greater than 0.2 mg/kg may not be as effective due to activation of the D1 dopaminergic receptor.

The site of action of APO stimulation is considered to be in the central nervous system. The fact that the effects of APO were abolished after NO synthase inhibition suggests that the action of APO is dependent on release of NO [17]. If minimal amount of nitric oxide (NO) is present at the nerve terminals even in the absence of sexual stimulation, lower than usual doses of PDE5 inhibitor could induce penile erection. Furthermore the efficacy of vardenafil, another PDE5 inhibitor, was also strengthened by the presence of NO donor in the same model [8].

APO activates the central dopaminergic receptor and then induces penile erection via NO secretion [17]. Nitrates, precursors of NO, enhance the production of cyclic GMP and in the presence of PDE 5 inhibitors, this can lead to severe hypotension [18]. If the combination of APO and PDE 5 inhibitors induces hypotension, the combination therapy should not be used. Vardi et al [19] reported that sildenafil (100 mg) caused small, clinically insignificant reductions in ambulatory blood pressure in active and resting normotensive and hypertensive men. Moreira et al [20] reported that the side-effect profile of sildenafil was dose related and mild. On the other hand, Nakayama et al [21] studied the cardiovascular function in anesthetized dogs given APO at the standard emetic dose (0.05 mg/kg) or at 10 times this dose; no significant changes were seen at 0.05 mg/kg and the reduction in systemic vascular resistance and mean systemic arterial pressure were minimal at 0.5 mg/kg. Fagan et al [22] showed that in patients receiving common antihypertensive agents and nitrates, sublingual APO at higher than recommended doses produced no clinically significant changes in heart rate or blood pressure as with APO alone.

The results of the above studies are consistent with our results that sildenafil induced a dose-dependent decrease in the mean blood pressure, but that additional APO caused no further significant decrease. Recently, it was indicated that the combined administration of sildenafil and APO with maximal doses (100 mg and 3 mg, respectively) did not lead to any increase in the rate of the cardiovascular side effects compared with monotherapy group in healthy volunteers [23]. Due to different NO release sites, the hypotension caused by the nitrate/sildenafil combination might not be duplicated by APO/sildenafil combination [24]. According to the present and other study, the cardiovascular effects of APO and sildenafil/APO combination seems to be insignificant. Moreover, the smaller effective dose of APO and sildenafil may further reduce these effects.

References

[1] McMahon CG, Samali R, Johnson H. Efficacy, safety and patient acceptance of sildenafil citrate as treatment for erectile dysfunction. J Urol 2000; 164: 1192-6.
[2] Jarow JP, Burnett AL, Geringer AM. Clinical efficacy of sildenafil citrate based on etiology and response to prior treatment. J Urol 1999; 162: 722-5.
[3] Nehra A, Blute ML, Barrett DM, Moreland RB. Rationale for the combination therapy of intraurethral prostaglandin E(1) and sildenafil in the salvage of erectile dysfunction patients desiring noninvasive therapy. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: S38-42.
[4] McMahon CG, Samali R, Johnson H. Treatment of intracor-poreal injection nonresponse with sildenafil alone or in combination with triple agent intracorporeal injection therapy. J Urol 1999; 162: 1992-8.
[5] Jarow JP, Nana-Sinkam P, Sabbagh M, Eskew A. Outcome analysis of goal directed therapy for impotence. J Urol 1996; 155: 1609-12.
[6] Dula E, Keating W, Siami PF, Edmonds A, O
neil J, Buttler S. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose and dose-optimization regimens of sublingual apomorphine versus placebo in men with erectile dysfunction. The Apomorphine Study Group. Urology 2000; 56: 130-5.
[7] Kongkanand A, Opanuraks J, Tantiwongse K, Choeypunt N, Tantiwong A, Amornvejsukit T. Evaluating dose regimens of apomorphine, an open-label study. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: S10-2.
[8] Bishoff E, Schneider K. A conscious-rabbit model to study vardenafil hydrochloride and other agents that influence penile erection. Int J Impot Res 2001; 13: 230-5.
[9] Naganuma H, Egashira T, Fujii I. Neuroleptics induce penile erection in the rabbit. Clin Exper Pharmacol Physiol 1993; 20: 177-83.
[10] Andersson KE, Gemalmaz H, Waldeck K, Chapman TN, Tuttle JB, Steers WD. The effect of sildenafil on apomorphine-evoked increases in intracavernous pressure in the awake rat. J Urol 1999; 161: 1707-12.
[11] Tarcan T, Siroky MB, Park K, Goldstein I, Azadzoi KM. Systemic administration of apomorphine improves the hemodynamic mechanism of clitoral and vaginal engorgement in the rabbit. Int J Impot Res 2000; 12: 235-40.
[12] Walker DK, Ackland MJ, James GC, Muirhead GJ, Rance DJ, Wastall P, et al. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of sildenafil in mouse, rat, rabbit, dog and man. Xenobiotica 1999; 29: 297-310.
[13] van Laar T, Neef C, Danhof M, Roon KI, Roos RA. A new sublingual formulation of apomorphine in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 1996; 11: 633-8.
[14] Hatzichristou DG, Pescatori ES. Current treatments and emerging therapeutic approaches in male erectile dysfunction. BJU Int 2001; 88: 11-7.
[15] Melis MR, Argiolas A, Gessa GL. Apomorphine-induced penile erection and yawning: site of action in brain. Brain Res 1987; 415: 98-104.
[16] Sharifzadeh M, Zarrindast MR, Samini M. Effects of adenosine analogues on apomorphine-induced penile erection in rats. Gen Pharmacol 1995; 26: 1785-90.
[17] Andersson KE, Wagner G. Physiology of penile erection. Physiol Rev 1995; 75: 191-236.
[18] Simonsen U. Interactions between drugs for erectile dysfunction and drugs for cardiovascular disease. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 178-88.
[19] Vardi Y, Klein L, Nassar S, Sprecher E, Gruenwald I. Effects of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) on blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive men. Urology 2002; 59: 747-52.
[20] Moreira SG Jr, Brannigan RE, Spitz A, Orejuela FJ, Lipshultz LI, Kim ED. Side-effect profile of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in clinical practice. Urology 2000; 56: 474-6.
[21] Nakayama H, Nakayama T, Carnes CA, Strauch SM, Hamlin RL. Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of apomorphine in dogs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001; 177: 157-61.
[22] Fagan TC, Buttler S, Marbury T, Taylor A, Edmonds A; SL APO Study Group. Cardiovascular safety of sublingual apomorphine in patients on stable doses of oral antihypertensive agents and nitrates. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 760-6.
[23] Sommer F, Rosenkranz S, Engelmann U. Combining sildenafil with apomorphine -Does more also mean more side effects? J Urol 2003; 169 (Suppl): 376-7.
[24] Melis MR, Stancampiano R, Argiolas A. Prevention by NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester of apomorphine- and oxytocin-induced penile erection and yawning: site of action in the brain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1994; 48: 799-804.


Correspondence to: Jae-Seung Paick, M.D., Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Korea.
Tel: +82-2-760 2422, Fax: +82-2-762 4665
Email: jspaick@snu.ac.kr
Received 2004-02-02       Accepted 2004-05-27