This web only provides the extract of this article. If you want to read the figures and tables, please reference the PDF full text on Blackwell Synergy. Thank you.
- Original Article -
Immunolocalization assessment of metastasis-associated protein 1 in human and mouse mature testes and its association with spermatogenesis
Wei Li1, Xin-Ping Liu2, Ruo-Jun
Xu3, Yuan-Qiang Zhang1
1Department of Histology and Embryology,
2Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Fourth Military
Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
3Department of Zoology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the stage-specific localization of metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) during spermatogenesis
in adult human and mouse testis. Methods: The immunolocalization of MTA1 was studied by immunohistochemistry
and Western blot analysis. The distribution pattern of MTA1 in mouse testis was confirmed by using quantitative
analysis of purified spermatogenic cells. Results:
The specificity of polyclonal antibody was confirmed by Western
blot analysis. MTA1 was found expressed in the
nucleus of germ cells, except elongate spermatids, and in the
cytoplasm of Sertoli cells; Leydig cells did not show any specific reactivity. MTA1 possessed different distribution
patterns in the two species: in humans, the most intensive staining was found in the nucleus of round spermatids and
of primary spermatocytes while in mice, the most intense MTA1 staining was in the nucleus of leptotene, zygotene
and pachytene spermatocytes. In both species the
staining exhibited a cyclic pattern. Conclusion:
The present communication initially provides new evidence for the potential role of MTA1 in mature testis.
In addition, its distinctive expression in germ cells suggests a regulatory role of the peptide during
spermatogenesis. (Asian J Androl 2007 May; 9: 345_352)
Keywords: human metastasis-associated protein1; mouse metastasis-associated protein 1; spermatogenesis; nuclear remodeling and
deacetylation complex; chromatin remodeling; spermiogenesis; deacetylation
Correspondence to: Dr Yuan-Qiang Zhang, Department of Histo-logy and Embryology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an
710032, China.
Tel/Fax: +86-29-8477-4508
E-mail: zhangyq@fmmu.edu.cn
Received 2006-06-22 Accepted 2006-08-28
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00245.x
1 Introduction
Metastasis-associated protein1 (MTA1) is representative of a family of genes that are highly conserved through
evolution, and its high expression has previously been found to be associated with progression to the metastatic state
in various cancers, such as breast, esophageal, colorectal, gastric and prostate carcinomas [1]. The full-length
human MTA1 cDNA sequence contains an open reading frame encoding a protein of 714 amino acid residues. The
MTA1 protein contains several possible phosphorylation sites. A proline-rich amino acid stretch at the
carboxyl-terminal completely matched the consensus sequence for the
src homology 3 domain-binding motif [2]. As a part of
the nuclear remodeling and deacetylation (NuRD) complex, it is thought to modulate transcription by influencing the
status of chromatin remodeling [3]. However, MTA1 expression is not restricted to tumors [4]; several normal
mouse tissues and organs also express low levels of MTA1 [5]. Interestingly, the expression of MTA1 in mouse testis
is dominantly higher than that in any other normal
organs [5], suggesting its potential function during mouse
spermatogenesis. Therefore, the possibility of additional,
yet unknown, physiological effects of this newly cloned
peptide in reproduction could not be ruled out.
The aim of the present study is to reveal the
presence and cellular localization of MTA1 in mammalian testis.
We investigated the stage-specific localization of MTA1
during spermatogenesis in adult human and mouse
testes by immunohistochemical staining method employing
specific polyclonal antibodies. Furthermore,
quantitative analysis was done on purified germ-cell types to
confirm the cellular expression of MTA1 during mouse
spermatogenesis. As there is no published evidence of
in vivo function of MTA1 in spermatogenesis, this
report might be informative for further investigations into
the physiological function of MTA1 in this field.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Tissue collection and preparation
Fourteen testes were collected from autopsy cases
following accidental deaths (23_45 years old). To
ensure the usability of the testes, normal tissue and
spermatogenesis were identified in accordance with the
criteria by Suarez-Quian et al. [6] and only eight testes,
taken from six traffic accidents victims aged 25 to 40
years old, were selected for analysis. Some testes were
frozen in liquid nitrogen. The others were immediately
fixed in Bouin's acid after being taken out of the body
and then processed for routine paraffin embedding. The
use of the human tissue in this study was approved by
the Human Research Committee of the Fourth Military
Medical University for Approval of Research Involving
Human Subjects. The human tissue was supplied by Department of Urology of Xijing Hospital in Xi'an, China.
Twenty-five 8-week-old outbred male BALB/c mice
were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of the
Fourth Military Medical University, and were fed with
standard food pellets and given water ad
libitum throughout the experimental period. They were housed at 22ºC
and a light:dark cycle of 12:12 h, five in a cage, with
standard food and water provided ad libitum. All selected
animals were housed under these conditions for less than 1
week before the experiment. The preparation was performed
according to animal protocols institutionally approved by
the Fourth Military Medical University. The preparation of
mouse testes was performed as discussed above.
2.2 Antibody
MTA1 goat polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), which was raised
against peptides mapping the carboxy terminus of the
precursor forms of human MTA1, was recommended for the detection of precursor and mature MTA1 in mice,
humans and rats.
2.3 Western blot analysis
Specificity of anti-human MTA1 goat polyclonal
antibody was tested by Western blot analysis carried out
by using rat mammary adenocarcinoma cell line MTLn3,
normal mouse testes and specimens of human testes.
Cells were lysed in phosphate-buffered saline containing
0.5% Nonidet P-40, 100 µg/mL phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride and 2 µg/mL aprotinin. Tissues were homogenized in
ice-cold modified radioimmunoprecipitation buffer (RIPA)
buffer (Tris-HCl 50 mmol/L, NaCl 150 mmol/L, Triton
X-100 1% [v/v], sodium deoxycholate 1% [wt/v], and
SDS 0.1% [wt/v] pH 7.5) supplemented with complete
proteinase-inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche Diagnostic,
Mannheim, Germany). After centrifugation at 15 000 ×
g for 15 min at 4ºC, the supernatant was assayed for total
protein concentration using the Bradford assay. Samples
were homogenized in a ten-fold volume of boiled 25
mmol/L Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.4) containing 1% SDS
using a glass homogenizer, and were then heated for 10
min at 90_95ºC to inactivate intrinsic proteases. After being
cooled on ice, samples were re-homogenized with a polytron mixer, and were then centrifuged at 15 000 ×
g for 30 min. Routinely prepared samples (30 µg of proteins)
were separated by modified 10% SDS-PAGE, and were then transferred to NC membranes. After blocking with
0.25% casein/PBS, membranes were incubated with
primary anti-MTA1 antibody diluted (1:500) in blocking
solution overnight at 4ºC. After washing with PBS
containing 0.05% Tween-20 (PBST), the membranes were
incubated with peroxidase conjugated rabbit anti-goat IgG
diluted (1:1 000) in blocking solution for 60 min. The bands
were finally detected by using an ECL kit (Amersham
Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
2.4 Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemical staining,
paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned to 4 µm. The
avidin_biotin_peroxidase (ABC) method was employed in the
immunohistochemical assay on serial slides as previously
described [7]. After endogenous peroxidase activity was
blocked with 0.5% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min, slides
were incubated with the anti-MTA1 goat antibody
(1:150 dilution; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA,
USA), diluted in PBS at 4ºC overnight in a moist box.
Biotinylated rabbit anti-goat IgG (1:500 dilution; Sigma,
St. Louis, MO, USA) was incubated for 1 h at room
temperature and detected with streptavidin_peroxidase
complex. Peroxidases were detected with 0.7 mg/mL
3-3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis,
MO, USA) in 1.6 mg/mL urea hydrogen peroxide, 60
mmol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.6, room temperature as the chromogen
and the sections were briefly counter-stained with
hematoxylin. Negative control slides were incubated with
PBS substituted for the primary antibody.
Immunohistochemical reactions for all samples were repeated for at
least five times, and typical results were illustrated.
2.5 Analysis of seminiferous epithelium stages of
human and of mouse testis
We employed the criterion by Russell et
al. [8] to identify the germ cell types, and the
criteria by Zhang et al. [9] and Kurth et al.
[10] to define the stages of seminiferous epithelium cycle in the human testis. In humans,
typical germ-cell associations of fixed composition were
identified with the nuclear morphology of the germ cell
and the topographical arrangement of spermatids as the
principal criteria. Briefly, the human seminiferous
epithelium cycles were divided into six stages: stage I is
characterized by the presence of two generations of
spermatids and pachytene spermatocytes; stage II by the
appearance that more mature spermatids (elongated spermatids) were in the process of release into the
lumen moving to the luminal aspect of the seminiferous
epithelium; stage III by only one generation of round
spermatids; stage IV by spermatids with nuclei showing
initial signs of elongation; stage V by one generation of
elongating spermatids having typically pointed and deeply
stained nuclei directed toward the limiting membrane;
and stage VI by primary and secondary spermatocytes
undergoing the first and second maturation divisions. The
stages of seminiferous epithelium cycle in the mouse testis
were defined following the criterion by Russell
et al. (as shown in Figure 5) [8].
2.6 Isolation of mouse seminiferous epithelium and
spermatogenic cells
Seminiferous cords and tubules were prepared from
mice (The Fourth Military Medical University, Animal
Research Center, Xi'an, China) by collagenase treatment.
Monodispersed suspensions of spermatogenic cells were
prepared from the seminiferous tubes with collagenase
treatment and trypsin digestion. Type A and B
spermatogonia were isolated from the testes of 8-day
prepubertal mice (30 animals). Preleptotene and
leptotene/zygotene spermatocytes were isolated from the testes of
17-day-old mice (30 animals). Pachytene spermatocytes
and round spermatids (steps 1-8) were isolated from
testes of > 60-day-old mice (20 animals). Each testis was
decapsulated by making a small incision in the testis and
forcing (by sterile tweezers) the content of the testis
through the incision into a 15-mL Falcon (CytRx Corporation, Los Angeles, CA , USA) tube containing
5 mL ice-cold separation medium. Then, 0.25 mL
collagenase (Calbiochem-Behring, La Jolla, CA, USA) from a
2 mg/mL stock solution (prepared in separation medium)
was added to the tube with the decapsulated testes, and
incubation was carried out for 5 min at 35_37ºC under
vigorous shaking. The seminiferous cords were then
allowed to sediment to the bottom of the tube while being
incubated on ice. The seminiferous cords were washed
twice in 10 mL separation medium, resuspended in 12 mL
separation medium containing 2.5 mg/mL trypsin and
1 U/mL DNase I (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim,
Germany), incubated for 2 min at 35_37ºC, and
transferred to ice. Using a Pasteur pipette, the seminiferous
cords were disintegrated into single cells and were then
filtered through a 50-mm nylon mesh, washed twice with
separation medium (centrifugation at 200_300
× g), and counted. The germ cells were separated by velocity
sedimentation at unit gravity on 2%_4% BSA gradients [11].
Populations of the spermatogenic cell types were > 80%
pure based on examination of cell morphology under phase
contrast optics. Animals were killed by cervical dislocation. Approval for these studies was received from
Institutional animal Care and Use Committee of The Fourth
Military Medical University.
2.7 Quantitative analysis of MTA1 expression of
different spermatogenic cells
Total RNA was extracted from isolated germ cells,
using TRIzol Reagent (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD,
USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
(RT-PCR), first-strand cDNA was synthesized with
Superscript III (Rnase H-Reverse Transcriptase; Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, California, USA) primed from oligo(dT),
exactly according to the manufacturer's instructions and
PCR was set up according to Promega's reverse transcription system protocol. Primer sequences were
designed as 5'-AGC CCA ACC CAA ACC AG-3' and 5'-GGC AAT GCG TGT CAA CT-3' (GenBank accession
number AF288137), 5'-GCC TCA AGA TCA GCA AT-3' and 5'-AGG TCC ACC ACT GAC ACG TT-3' (GAPDH)
(GenBank accession number NM 001001303). A single
denaturing step at 94ºC for 300 s was followed by the
chosen number of cycles: 94ºC for 30 s; 58ºC for 30 s;
72ºC for 30 s. The PCR products were electrophoresed
on 1.5% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide.
The anticipated sizes of the amplified fragments were
482 base pairs (bp) for MTA1 and 452 bp for GAPDH.
All PCR reactions for all samples were repeated for at
least three times, typical results are illustrated. Results
were normalized by the ratio of band density of MTA1
mRNA to GAPDH mRNA. Statistical analysis was performed with the paired
t-test.
Total protein extracts of different germ cells were
prepared and Western blotting was performed as described
previously. Densitometry was performed using a
computerized densitometer and proteins were quantitated
from the images using Sigma gel software (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).
2.8 Statistical analysis
Experiments were repeated for at least five times,
and one representative from at least three similar results
is presented. All data were presented as mean ± SD.
Data were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA).
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3 Results
3.1 Specificity of anti-human MTA1 goat polyclonal
antibody
Western blot analysis revealed a single band of
80 kDa in rat mammary adenocarcinoma cell line MTLn3, and in
normal mouse and human testes (Figure 1). The
antiserum did not cross-react with any other bands.
3.2 Immunolocalization of MTA1 in human testis
By immunohistochemical analysis, a widely
distri-buted staining for MTA1 in human and mouse testes was
observed. In particular, it was found that the staining
for human MTA1 protein was stronger in germ cells
except elongate spermatids, and was not detectable in the
testicular interstitium. Weak staining was observed in
the nuclei of spermatogonia and in the cytoplasm of
Sertoli cells. The most intensive staining was shown in the
nucleus of round spermatids and of primary
spermatocytes (Figure 2). In particular, the staining for MTA1
protein was consistent with the appearance of round
spermatids and primary spermatocytes. MTA1 first appeared
and reached the highest intensity at stages I_II, declining
to weak at stage III. When the spermatids began to
elongate at stage IV, MTA1 appeared in spermatocytes and
reached the highest intensity in the spermatocytes nuclei
at stage V, with weak staining at stage VI (Figure 3).
3.3 Immunolocalization of MTA1 in mouse testis
In mouse testis, MTA1 first appeared in the nucleus
of spermatogonia at stage I, with increased staining in
leptotene and zygotene spermatocytes at stages
II_VIII. We observed the most intense MTA1 staining in the
nucleus of leptotene, zygotene and pachytene
spermatocytes at stages IX and X. Staining was declining at stages
XI and XII. The positive staining could be found in
spermatogonia at all the stages (Figure 4). Some round
spermatids and Sertoli cells (cytoplasm) were stained but
the positive reaction was weak. In contrast, elongate
spermatids or Leydig cells, did not exhibit any
MTA1-specific immunostaining (Figure 5). Negative control
showed no reactivity.
3.4 MTA1 expression of purified germ cells
We conducted the expression analysis against the
extract of testicular cells from 8-day-old, 17-day-old and >
60-day-old mice. These ages correspond to the onset of
different germ cells during testis development [11].
Quantitative analysis revealed that mouse MTA1 was most
highly expressed in leptotene, zygotene and pachytene
spermatocytes (Figure 6).
4 Discussion
In the present study, evidence is provided for the
identification of a metastasis associated protein of
relative molecular mass 80 kDa in mature testis. The data
comprise three main observations. First, the antibody
against the denatured MTA1 only detected the 80 kDa
protein in rat mammary adenocarcinoma cell line MTLn3,
and in normal mouse and human testes. Immunoblotting
analysis ensured the specificity of the following
immunohistochemical results. Second, immunolocalizational
analysis on the adult testes demonstrated distinctive
expression patterns of MTA1. In human, the most intense
staining was found in round spermatids and primary
spermatocytes, while in mice, it was found in leptotene,
zygotene and pachytene spermatocytes and
spermatogonia, suggesting its regulatory role during both post-meiosis
and meiosis phases. The distribution pattern in mouse
testis was confirmed by the quantitative analysis on
purified germ cells. MTA1 possessed different expression
patterns in human and mouse testes, suggesting its
species-specific distribution during spermatogenesis.
Moreover, MTA1 expression in both species exhibited a
seminiferous cycle, indicating that its distribution may
be stage-specific. The physiological significance of these
observations warrants further investigation.
The transcription regulation during spermatogenesis
is complex and unique, and several mechanisms have
been demonstrated to be involved in this process. One
major strategy contributing to local and specific
transcription has so far been identified. Acetylation of
histone proteins opens up the chromatin structure and leads
to transcriptional activation; conversely, deacetylation of
histone proteins condenses the chromatin structure and is
associated with transcriptional repression [12]. The MTA1
complex contains histone deacetylases (HDAC1/2) and
can be further separated, resulting in a core MTA1-HDAC
complex, showing that the histone deacetylase activity
and transcriptional repression activity are integral
properties of the MTA1 complex [13]. Thus, our results
raised the possibility that MTA1 might contribute to the
deacetylation of histones during male gametogenesis.
The waves of histone acetylation occurring
throughout spermatogenesis have been studied thoroughly in
mice. Hazzouri et al. [12] reported that no acetylated
histones were observed throughout meiosis in leptotene
or pachytene spermatocytes. Histones remained
unacetylated in most round spermatids. Acetylated forms of
H2A and H2B, H3 and H4 reappeared in step 9 to 11 elongating spermatids, and disappeared later in
condensing spermatids. Our results are consistent with this
conclusion. MTA1 was not expressed in the most
condensed germ cells, namely, elongated spermatids and
spermatozoa in the testis of both humans and mice,
suggesting that acetylated core histones may be replaced by
transition proteins without being previously deacetylated.
Interestingly, MTA1 expression patterns were
different in developing germ cells among the two species,
implying that the possible function of MTA1 was
different in human and mouse testes. When a mammalian cell
divides it must rapidly synthesize large amounts of
histone variants during the brief S-phase, increasing
35-fold as cells enter S-phase and decreasing again at the
end of S-phase. The unique properties of the histone
variants are critical for this regulation [13]. Therefore
we believe that this species differences do exist and they
might be the results of the different combination of
histone variants. Indeed, disparate data from the published
literature suggest that the massive incorporation of
histone variants is associated with the induction of different
types of histone modifications [14]. In mouse, there are
two waves of histone synthesis during the meiotic prophase of germ cells; first during pre-leptotene and then
during pachytene. The tH2A, tH2B and ssH2B could start
to accumulate during these courses. Macro H2A1.2 is
also found at high concentrations in mice testis. While
in humans, tH2B first appears in spermatogonia, is
maximal in round spermatids, and then gradually disappears
during the elongation of spermatids [15]. These
observations may account for the species differences of
histone variants and succedent deacetylating modifications
in two species.
Furthermore, in addition to hormonal control by
gonadotrophins and testosterone, a number of locally
produced growth factors (such as EGFs and TGFs) and
other paracrine mediators have been suggested to play
an important role in the regulation of testicular function
[16]. The immunostaining of EGF in germ cells has
been observed in pachytene spermatocytes, round
spermatids and Sertoli cells [17]. In
vitro, growth factor stimulation could induce the overexpression of MTA1
and lead to the enhanced anchorage-independent growth
and hormone independence of certain malignant cells [18].
Mouse histone deacetylase 1 was also identified as a
growth factor-inducible gene [19]. Taken together, these
results may explain why the cytoplasm of Sertoli cells
was weakly stained in both species in the current study,
and raises the possibility that the function of MTA1 might
be regulated by growth factor stimulation.
Although we did not examine the function of MTA1 in
this study, the evidence for stage-specific expression and
localization in mouse meiotic spermatogenic cells suggested
the possible roles of MTA1 in spermatogenic cell
development and spermatocyte-Sertoli cell interactions. The
distinctive staining of round spermatids and primary
spermatocytes, but not elongated ones, of the human
testis also suggested a possible role of MTA1 in
spermatogenic differentiation. These possibilities give a
functional importance to MTA1, which needs further
attention in the future.
Acknowledgment
We are grateful to Prof. Rui-An Wang (Department
of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, the University of
Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA)
for his helpful advice and discussion regarding the
possible functions of MTA1. We also thank Miss Hui Wang
for her careful assistance in English. This study was
supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China
(2006: No. 30570982; 2003: No. 30370750; 2003: No.
30371584).
References
1 Kumar R, Wang RA, Bagheri-Yarmand R. Emerging roles of
MTA family members in human cancers. Semin Oncol 2003;
30 (5 Suppl 1): 30_7.
2 Toh Y, Pencil SD, Nicolson GL. Analysis of the complete
sequence of the novel metastasis-associated candidate gene,
mta1, differentially expressed in mammary adenocarcinoma
and breast cancer cell lines. Gene 1995; 159: 97_104.
3 Toh Y, Kuninaka S, Endo K, Oshiro T, Ikeda Y, Nakashima H,
et al. Molecular analysis of a candidate metastasis-associated
gene, MTA1: possible interaction with histone deacetylase 1.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2000; 19: 105_11.
4 Toh Y, Pencil SD, Nicolson GL. A novel candidate
metastasis-associated gene, mta1, differentially expressed in highly
metastatic mammary adenocarcinoma cell lines. cDNA cloning,
expression, and protein analyses. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:
22958_63.
5 Simpson A, Uitto J, Rodeck U, Mahoney MG. Differential
expression and subcellular distribution of the mouse
metastasis-associated proteins Mta1 and Mta3. Gene 2001; 273: 29_39.
6 Suarez-Quian CA, Martinez-Garcia F, Nistal M, Regadera J.
Androgen receptor distribution in adult human testis. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 350_8.
7 Muller D, Davidoff MS, Bargheer O, Paust HJ, Pusch W,
Koeva Y, et al. The expression of neurotrophins and their
receptors in the prenatal and adult human testis: evidence for
functions in Leydig cells. Histochem Cell Biol 2006; 7: 1_13.
8 Russell LD, Ettlin R, Sinha A, Clegg E. Histological and
histopathological evaluation of the testis. Florida: Cache River
Press; 1990. p54.
9 Zhang YQ, He XZ, Zhang JS, Wang RA, Zhou J, Xu RJ.
Stage-specific localization of transforming growth factor beta1
and beta3 and their receptors during spermatogenesis in men.
Asian J Androl 2004; 6: 105_9.
10 Kurth BE, Klotz K, Flickinger CJ, Herr JC. Localization of
sperm antigen SP-10 during the six stages of the cycle of the
seminiferous epithelium in man. Biol Reprod 1991; 44: 814_21.
11 Romrell LJ, Bellve AR, Fawcett DW. Separation of mouse
spermatogenic cells by sedimentation velocity. A
morphological characterization. Dev Biol 1976; 49: 119_31.
12 Hazzouri M, Pivot-Pajot C, Faure AK, Usson Y, Pelletier R,
Sele B, et al. Regulated hyperacetylation of core histones
during mouse spermatogenesis: involvement of histone
deacetylases. Eur J Cell Biol 2000; 79: 950_60.
13 Marzluff WF, Gongidi P, Woods KR, Jin J, Maltais LJ. The
human and mouse replication-dependent histone genes.
Genomics 2002; 80: 487_98.
14 Govin J, Caron C, Lestrat C, Rousseaux S, Khochbin S. The
role of histones in chromatin remodelling during mammalian
spermiogenesis. Eur J Biochem. 2004; 271: 3459_69.
15 Fauser BCJM, Rutherford AJ, Strauss JF, Van Steirteghem A.
Molecular biology in reproductive medicine. New York: The
Parthenon Publishing Group, 1999. p281.
16 Huleihel M, Lunenfeld E. Regulation of spermatogenesis by
paracrine/autocrine testicular factors. Asian J Androl 2004; 6:
259_68.
17 Radhakrishnan B, Oke BO, Papadopoulos V, DiAugustine
RP, Suarez-Quian CA. Characterization of epidermal growth
factor in mouse testis. Endocrinology 1992; 131: 3091_9.
18 Mazumdar A, Wang RA, Mishra SK, Adam L,
Bagheri-Yarmand R, Mandal M, et al. Transcriptional repression of
oestrogen receptor by metastasis-associated protein 1
corepressor. Nat Cell Biol 2001; 3: 30_7.
19 Bartl S, Taplick J, Lagger G, Khier H, Kuchler K, Seiser C.
Identification of mouse histone deacetylase 1 as a growth
factor-inducible gene. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 5033_43. |