This web only provides the extract of this article. If you want to read the figures and tables, please reference the PDF full text on Blackwell Synergy. Thank you.
- Original Article -
Magnetic resonance evaluation of human mesenchymal stem
cells in corpus cavernosa of rats and rabbits
Yun-Seob Song1, Ja-Hyeon
Ku2, Eun-Seop Song3, Jung-Hoon
Kim4, Jin-Suck Jeon5, Kong-Hee
Lee6, Sook-Ja Kim7, Hee-Jeong
Cheong7, Ik-Sung Lim8, Dongho
Choi9, Jong-Ho Won10
1Department of Urology, Stem Cell therapy Center, Soonchunhyang School of Medicine, Seoul 140-743, Korea
2Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 110-744, Korea
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon 400-103, Korea
4Department of Radiology,
5Department of Internal Medicine,
6Department of Urology, 7Stem Cell therapy Center,
Soonchunhyang School of Medicine, Seoul 140-743, Korea
8Department of Industrial Management & Engineering, Namseoul University College of Engineering, Cheonan 330-707,
Korea
9Department of Surgery,
10Department of Internal Medicine, Stem Cell therapy Center, Soonchunhyang School of Medicine,
Seoul 140-743, Korea
Abstract
Aim: To investigate whether the biological process of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-labeled human
mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) may be monitored non-invasively by using
in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with conventional 1.5-T system examinations in corpus cavernosa of rats and rabbits.
Methods: The labeling efficiency and viability of SPIO-labeled hMSCs were examined with Prussian blue and Tripan blue, respectively. After
SPIO-labeled hMSCs were transplanted to the corpus cavernosa of rats and rabbits, serial T2-weighted MR images
were taken and histological examinations were carried out over a 4-week period.
Results: hMSCs loaded with SPIO compared to unlabeled cells had a similar viability. For SPIO-labeled hMSCs more than
1×105 concentration in
vitro, MR images showed a decrease in signal intensity. MR signal intensity at the areas of SPIO-labeled hMSCs in the rat
and rabbit corpus cavernosa decreased and was confined locally. After injection of SPIO-labeled hMSCs into the
corpus cavernosum, MR imaging demonstrated that hMSCs could be seen for at least 12 weeks after injection. The
presence of iron was confirmed with Prussian blue staining in histological sections.
Conclusion: SPIO-labeled hMSCs in corpus cavernosa of rats and rabbits can be evaluated non-invasively by molecular MR imaging. Our
findings suggest that MR imaging has the ability to test the long-term therapeutic potential of hMSCs in animals in the
setting of erectile dysfunction. (Asian J Androl 2007 May; 9: 361_367)
Keywords: human mesenchymal stem cells; magnetic resonance; stem cells; penis; cell labeling; corpus cavernosa
Correspondence to: Dr Jong-Ho Won, Department of Internal Medicine, Stem Cell therapy Center, Soonchunhyang School of
Medicine, Seoul 140-743, Korea.
Tel: +82-2709-9194 Fax: +82-2709-9200
E-mail: jhwon@hosp.sch.ac.kr
Dr Dongho Choi, Department of Surgery, Stem Cell therapy Center, Soonchunhyang School of Medicine, Seoul 140-743, Korea.
Tel: +82-2709-9240 Fax: +82-2795-1682
E-mail: dhchoi@hosp.sch.ac.kr
Received 2006-06-16 Accepted 2006-11-06
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00265.x
1 Introduction
The main cause of erectile dysfunction is the
damage of penile cavernous smooth muscle cells and sinus
endothelial cells by various metabolic conditions or
mechanical manipulations. Because the integrity of
cavernous endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells is critical
in maintaining and regulating erectile function,
accelerating intact cavernous smooth muscle cells and sinus
endothelial cells repair can be a novel treatment for erectile
dysfunction. Several drugs have been investigated
in vitro and in vivo in animal and/or human studies, and
showed relaxant activity in cavernous smooth muscle
and an increase in the percent of smooth muscle [1, 2].
Because several populations of bone marrow-derived
cells have the potential to differentiate into
endothelial-like cells, they may be good candidates for tissue repair.
Bone marrow contains several types of stem cells:
hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs),
endothelial stem/progenitor cells (EPCs), and multipotent
adult progenitor cells (MAPCs). MSCs fulfill all criteria
of true stem cells, that is, self-renewal, multilineage
differentiation, and in vivo reconstitution of tissue
[3]. Human (h)MSCs are a population of rapidly
self-renewing adult stem cells with varying differentiation potentials.
The relative ease of isolating MSCs from bone marrow
and the great plasticity of the cells make them ideal tools
for an autologous or allogeneic cell therapy.
A reliable in vivo imaging method to localize
transplanted cells and monitor their restorative effects will
enable a systematic investigation of cell therapy. However,
most studies of stem cell transplantation have been
carried out using immunohistological staining, which does
not provide an opportunity to follow the migration of
transplanted cells in vivo in the same host. Molecular
imaging aims to visualize targeted cells in living organisms.
Through molecular imaging with nanoparticles, the
biological process of transplanted stem cells can be
monitored non-invasively as materials can be evaluated
without sacrifice and repeated evaluation is possible [4,
5]. Among several molecular imaging
techniques, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging provides a high resolution and
sensitivity for transplanted cells [6].
Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles
are being used for intracellular magnetic labeling of stem
cells to monitor cell trafficking by MR imaging as part of
cellular-based repair, replacement and treatment strategies.
Because of the small crystal size (approximately 7_10
nm in diameter), SPIO particles exhibit magnetic
moments that are unaffected by lattice orientation and align
in an applied magnetic field, creating extremely large
microscopic field gradients around the particles that
de-phase the neighboring proton magnetic moments, thereby
reducing the T2 relaxation time and facilitating the
detection of labeled cells. Furthermore, SPIO particles have
shown no adverse effects on the viability and
proliferation of labeled cells [7, 8]. This study was performed to
investigate whether the biological process of
reticuloendothelial system-specific iron oxide nanocrystal
SPIO-labeled hMSCs in the corpus cavernosum of rats and
rabbits can be evaluated non-invasively by using molecular
MR imaging.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Preparation of hMSCs
hMSCs were isolated and culture-expanded according to the method described by Pittenger
et al. [9]. Briefly, 10 to 20 mL of bone marrow aspirate was
obtained under sterile conditions by puncture of the
posterior iliac crest of bone marrow transplantation donors
after receiving informed consent. Mononuclear cells were
isolated from the bone marrow using Ficoll-Hypaque
(1.077 g/cm3, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) density
centrifugation (400 × g for 25 min). The interface
mononuclear cells were collected and washed twice with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cells were re-suspended,
counted, and plated at 2 ×
105/cm2. The cells were cultured in hMSC medium composed of Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium with low glucose (DMEM-LG;
GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY,
USA) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic solution (GibcoBRL).
Cells were plated into 75-cm2 flasks (Falcon, Franklin
Lakes, NJ, USA) and the cultures were incubated at 37ºC
in 5% CO2 in air and 95% relative humidity. The
medium was replaced after 72 h, and every 3 to 4 days
thereafter. When the cultures reached approximately
90% of confluence, hMSCs were detached with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA solution
(GibcoBRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) and replated into passage culture at a density of 1 ×
106 cells per each 175-cm2 flask. In either case, the hMSCs
were confirmed to be negative for hematopoietic
markers by flow cytometry and capable of differentiating into
osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes in
vitro.
2.2 Labeling of cells with iron oxide particles
A liposome transfection agent, GenePORTER (GTS,
San Diego, CA, USA) was used as the transfection agent.
A stock solution of GenePORTER was added to the
culture medium at a dilution of 1:250 and mixed with SPIO
(Feridex; AMI, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 60 min at room
temperature on a rotating shaker. These cultures
containing the SPIO-GenePORTER were added to the hMSCs
such that the final concentration of SPIO was 25 mg/mL
and the final dilution of GenePORTER was 1:500. The
cell cultures were kept for 4 h at 37ºC, 5%
CO2 incubator with rotation.
Labeled cells were harvested for transplantation by
gentle trypsinization. To remove excess iron oxide
particles, trypsinized cells were washed in PBS and
concentrated by centrifugation, resuspended in PBS and kept
on ice. The labeling efficiency of the SPIO-labeled
hMSCs was examined with Prussian blue staining and
electron microscopic image (H-7600; Hitachi, Tokyo,
Japan). The labeling viability was done with Tripan blue
staining. For Prussian blue staining, which indicates the
presence of iron, the cells were fixed with methyl alcohol,
washed, incubated for 30 min with 2% potassium
ferrocyanide (i.e., Perl reagent) in 6% hydrochloric acid,
washed again, and counterstained with nuclear fast red.
2.3 In vitro MR imaging
We performed in vitro MR imaging of SPIO-labeled
hMSCs compared with the control. SPIO-labeled hMSCs
were labeled as described above, and a cell suspension at
variable concentrations of (at concentrations of 1 ×
102, 1 × 103, 1 ×
104, 1 × 105, and 2 ×
105 hMSCs/1 000 mL) was suspended in 2.0% agarose gel. It was compared
with distilled water and agarose gel without SPIO-labeled
hMSCs. All MR examinations were performed on a
1.5-T scanner (Sonata; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) by using
a surface coil. The imaging parameters for T2-weighted
images acquired were: TR, 600 msec; TE, 6.18 msec;
flip angle, 30°; and acquisition time 4 min and 37 sec;
field of view, 100 × 100 mm; matrix size, 512 × 512
pixels. To check the sensitivity of the MR imaging, we
performed in vitro imaging of SPIO-labeled hMSCs with
variable concentration.
2.4 In vivo MR Imaging
All procedures were conducted in accordance with
the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and
Use of Laboratory Animals (2001) and were approved
by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of
our hospital. Eight-week-old 250 g Sprague-Dawley rats
(n = 20) and 13_14-week-old 3 kg New Zealand White
male rabbits (n =10) were purchased. Rats and rabbits
were anesthetized with ketimine hydrochloride (50
mg/kg) and xylazine (5 mg/kg) i.p., respectively. Penile
skin incision was made. 1×106 SPIO-labeled hMSCs
were transplanted into the rat and rabbit cavernosa using
a 500 micrometer syringe with 26G needle. The incised
penile skin was sutured.
The imaging parameters for T2-weighted images were
as described above. MR examinations were performed
before and after transplantation of SPIO-labeled hMSCs.
Follow-up serial T2-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging was performed
within one hour and until 4 weeks in the rabbits and
12 weeks in the rats. Intraperitoneal Cypol (cyclosporine; Chong Kun Dang, Seoul, Korea) with
10 mg/kg injection was carried out everyday.
2.5 Histological examination
At the end of the in vivo MR imaging experiments (4
weeks for rabbits and 12 weeks for rats), animals were
killed under deep anesthesia. The penises were removed
and rinsed with PBS solution, cryoprotected in 30%
sucrose, embedded in OCT and frozen on a bed of
crushed dry ice. Twenty micrometer-thick cryosections
were made and alternate sections were stained with H&E
or Prussian blue.
3 Results
3.1 Cell labeling and histological analysis
hMSCs were separated and SPIO were transferred to hMSCs
in vitro using GenePORTER. Prussian blue staining of labeled human mesenchymal stem cells
revealed abundant uptake of the SPIO-GenePORTER
complex in the cytoplasm. However, no stainable iron was
detected in the nonlabeled human mesenchymal stem cells. Intracellular transfer of SPIO-GenePORTER
complex was confirmed by electron microscopic image
(Figure 1).
3.2 Viability
SPIO-labeled hMSCs were cultured for 6 days and
the viability of the labeled cells measured by using Tripan
blue staining. hMSCs loaded with SPIO compared to
unlabeled cells had similar viability. The viabilities of
hMSCs with and without SPIO-labeling were 98% and
95%, respectively (not shown).
3.3 In vitro MR imaging
In vitro MR imaging for SPIO-labeled hMSCs
compared with the control are shown in Figure 2A. Overall,
a dramatically decreased signal intensity was observed
in the SPIO-labeled hMSCs compared with that of
distilled water and agarose gel without SPIO-labeled hMSCs.
To check the sensitivity of the MR imaging, we
performed in vitro MR imaging with a variable
concentration of SPIO-labeled hMSCs. MR imaging showed a
clear hypo-intense signal at all concentrations greater than
1 × 105 hMSCs/1 000 mL (Figure 2B).
3.4 In vivo MR imaging
After the injection of SPIO-labeled hMSCs into the
corpus cavernosum of rabbits, their presence was
evident by distinct regional signal intensity loss induced by
the susceptibility effects of iron oxide particles (Figure
2). The distribution of the signal intensity loss was
located in the corpus cavernosum.
On follow-up serial T2-weighted gradient-echo MR
imaging, signal intensity loss faded but persisted for 4
weeks after SPIO-labeled hMSCs injection. After
injection of SPIO-labeled hMSCs into the corpus cavernosum
of rats, T2-weighted gradient-echo MR imaging clearly
demonstrated signal intensity loss induced by the
injection of labeled cells (Figure 3). The distribution of the
signal intensity loss was located in the corpus cavernosum.
The signal intensity decrease faded with successive
examinations but was observed 12 weeks after
SPIO-labeled hMSCs injection.
3.5 Histological examination
The presence of iron oxide was confirmed 4 weeks
after transplantation to the rabbit corpus cavernosum.
The presence of iron oxide was also confirmed with
Prussian blue staining 12 weeks after SPIO-labeled hMSCs
transplantation to the rat corpus cavernosum (Figure
4).
4 Discussion
There is increasing interest in using MR imaging to
monitor the in vivo behavior of stem cells. Such cell
trafficking studies would be a valuable tool for
development and evaluation of cell-based repair, replacement or
treatment strategies. Cells labeled with iron oxide
particles exhibit much higher stability in
vivo and reveal stronger contrast [8, 10]. Iron oxide-labeled cells
appear as hypo-intense areas in tissues associated with the
decreased signal intensity on iron sensitive T2-weighted
and T2-weighted gradient echo images. The major
advantage of using iron oxide particles for labeling cells is
that it is an FDA-approved MR contrast agent, and therefore, quality control, sterility, and stability have all
been well documented. Several modifications of
dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles have been used for
cell labeling in the past. The use of transfection agents
significantly improves the internalization of iron oxide
particles without altering cell physiology and therefore is
preferable for long-term MR imaging monitoring of
labeled cells.
Iron in its cationic states (i.e.,
Fe2+ and Fe3+) is essential for the normal cycle and growth of cells.
Increases in intracellular unbound iron result in oxidative
stress and injury to the cells by causing the formation of
reactive oxygen species, which may also lead to cell death
[11, 12]. The introduction of SPIO-nonviral
transfection agent complex into cells may increase the formation
of reactive oxygen species and hydroxyl-free radicals.
This phenomenon, in turn, may alter cell metabolism or
increase the rate of apoptosis or cell death [11,
12]. However, SPIO particles that are used for cellular
labeling have not demonstrated any adverse effects in cell
viability and differentiation [13]. In this study,
intracellular endosomal magnetic labeling of hMSCs with SPIO
combined with the appropriate dilution of the nonviral
transfection agent, GenePORTER, caused no toxic effect on stem cell viability (data not shown).
Labeling stem cells with iron oxide particles enhances
the cell-to-background contrast and makes them visible
in MR images. In in vitro study, the decrease of MR
signal intensity was found only in SPIO-labeled hMSCs
using GenePORTER but not in other control groups,
including distilled water, agarose gel and hMSCs only. The
intensity and area of the negative (hypo-intense) signal
caused by SPIO particles depend on the concentration
of iron oxide particles per cell and the image acquisition
parameters. In the present study, in vitro
experiments were carried out to estimate the minimum concentration
of iron oxide particles that would generate optimal
contrast for in vivo studies. Through the minimal
concentration of 1 × 105 SPIO-labeled hMSCs that could be
detected on a magnetic field, if the cells form a cluster of
1 × 105 or more it will be possible to detect them for
in vivo experiments. However, we decided to use a
concentration of 1 × 106 SPIO-labeled hMSCs for
in vivo studies to compensate for signal loss caused by cell
division and phagocytosis.
In this study, we confirmed the ability of in
vivo MR imaging to detect labeled stem cells in normal rabbit and
rat corpus cavernosa. Transplanted SPIO-labeled hMSCs
were observed in vivo up to 12 weeks after injection.
No migration/relocation of transplanted cells was noted
in the corpus cavernosum after 12 weeks of
transplan-tation. It is interesting to note that, with serial imaging,
hypo-intense MR imaging decreases over time because
of the presence of SPIO-labeled hMSCs. This could
possibly result from the dilution of iron (cell division)
and/or metabolism of iron oxide particles. However, we
observed that even after 12 weeks of injection, the
majority of the cells remain at or near the injection site. In
the present study, validation of intracytoplasmic iron in
labeled cells by using simple Prussian blue staining was
shown.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by a grant (SC3210)
from the Stem Cell Research Center of the 21st Century
Research Program funded by the Ministry of Science
and Technology, Republic of Korea.
References
1 Ma LL, Liu YQ, Tang WH, Zhao LM, Jiang H. Experimental
study of verapamil on the relaxation of isolated human corpus
cavernosum tissues. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 195_8.
2 Liu WJ, Xin ZC, Xin H, Yuan YM, Tian L, Guo YL. Effects of
icariin on erectile function and expression of nitric oxide
synthase isoforms in castrated rats. Asian J Androl 2005; 7: 381_8.
3 Verfailie CM. Adult stem cells: assessing the case for
pluripotency. Trends Cell Biol 2002; 12: 502_8.
4 Ittrich H, Lange C, Dahnke H, Zander AR, Adam G,
Nolte-Ernsting C. Labeling of mesenchymal stem cells with different
superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide and detectability
with MRI at 3T. Rofo 2005; 177: 1151_63.
5 Matuszewski L, Persigehl T, Wall A, Schwindt W, Tombach B,
Fobker M, et al. Cell tagging with clinically approved iron oxides:
feasibility and effect of lipofection, particle size, and surface
coating on labeling efficiency. Radiology 2005; 235: 155_61.
6 Bulte JW, Duncan ID, Frank JA. In
vivo magnetic resonance tracking of magnetically labeled cells after transplantation. J
Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002; 22: 899_907.
7 Kostura L, Kraitchman DL, Mackay AM, Pittenger MF, Bulte
JW. Feridex labeling of mesenchymal stem cells inhibits
chondrogenesis but not adipogenesis or osteogenesis. NMR Biomed
2004; 17: 513_7.
8 Bulte JW, Douglas T, Witwer B, Zhang SC, Strable E, Lewis
BK, et al. Magnetodendrimers allow endosomal magnetic
labeling and in vivo tracking of stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2001;
19: 1141_7.
9 Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas
R, Mosca JD, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human
mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999; 284: 143_7.
10 Kraitchman DL, Heldman AW, Atalar E, Amado LC, Martin
BJ, Pittenger MF, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of
mesenchymal stem cells in myocardial infarction. Circulation
2003; 107: 2290_3.
11 Gutteridge JM, Rowley DA, Halliwell B. Superoxide-dependent
formation of hydroxyl radicals and lipid peroxidation in the
presence of iron salts. Detection of `catalytic' iron and anti-oxidant
activity in extracellular fluids. Biochem J 1982; 206: 605_9.
12 Emerit J, Beaumont C, Trivin F. Iron metabolism, free radicals,
and oxidative injury. Biomed Pharmacother 2001; 55: 333_9.
13 Arbab AS, Bashaw LA, Miller BR, Jordan EK, Lewis BK,
Kalish H, et al. Characterization of biophysical and metabolic
properties of cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide
nanoparticles and transfection agent for cellular MR imaging.
Radiology 2003; 229: 838_46. |