This web only provides the extract of this article. If you want to read the figures and tables, please reference the PDF full text on Blackwell Synergy. Thank you.
- Clinical Experience -
Factors influencing the diagnosis and treatment of chronic
prostatitis among urologists in China
Long-Fei Liu1, Jin-Rui
Yang1, David A.Ginsberg3, Hui-Wen
Xie3, Jian-Ming Rao1, Long
Wang1, Zhuo Yin1, Qian
He1, Tu-Bao Yang2
1Department of Urology, the Second Xiang-Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, China
2Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,
School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China
3Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine,
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
Abstract
Aim: To identify the factors influencing diagnosis and treatment of chronic prostatitis (CP) among Chinese
urologists. Methods: A sample of 656 urologists from 29 provinces of China were asked to complete a questionnaire that
explored attitudes towards CP as well as diagnosis and treatment patterns in the management of CP. Both univariate and
multivariate logistic regression analysis schemes were used to determine the factors that influence the diagnosis and
treatment of CP. Results: A total of 656 questionnaires were given out. All were returned and 410 of those were
included in the final univariate and multivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that belief
of bacterial infection in the etiology of CP (odds ratio [OR], 2.544; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.650_3.923;
P < 0.001) was the most significant factor influencing the routine performance of bacterial culture test. Using the same model,
the type of hospital (OR, 2.799; 95% CI,
1.719_4.559; P < 0.001) and the routine use of the 4- or the 2-glass test
(OR, 3.194; 95% CI, 2.069_4.931; P < 0.001) were determined to be significant factors influencing the use of the
National Institutes of Health (NIH) new classification system. According to the same model, belief of bacterial
infection in the etiology of CP (OR, 3.415; 95% CI,
2.024_5.762; P < 0.001) and the routine use of bacterial
culture test (OR, 2.261; 95% CI, 1.364_3.749;
P < 0.01) were important factors influencing the routine prescription
of antibiotics. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that attitudes towards CP, and the characteristics of individual
urologists' practices may influence the diagnosis and treatment of CP among Chinese urologists.
(Asian J Androl 2008 Jul; 10: 675_681)
Keywords: hronic prostatitis; diagnosis; therapy; physicians' practice patterns; cross-sectional studies; multivariate analysis
Correspondence to: Dr Jin-Rui Yang, Department of Urology, the Second Xiang-Ya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011,
China.
Tel: +86-731-5295-134 Fax: +86-731-5533-525
E-mail:yjinrui@yahoo.com
Received 2008-01-28 Accepted 2008-4-16
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00416.x
1 Introduction
Chronic prostatitis (CP) is one of the most common
entities encountered in urologic practice and represents
an important international health problem [1]. Overall,
2%_10% of adult men suffer from symptoms compa-tible with CP at any time and approximately 15% of men
suffer from symptoms of prostatitis at some point in
their lives [1]. In the USA, the cost of prostatitis is
approximately USD 84 000 000 annually, exclusive of
pharmaceutical spending [2]. In cross-sectional studies, CP
is associated with reductions in patients' quality of life,
similar to or greater than those associated with angina,
congestive heart failure, Crohn's disease and diabetes
mellitus [3]. However, CP is generally acknowledged as
a source of great confusion and frustration for
physicians and patients alike [4]. Several surveys of
physicians have been undertaken in order to examine the
characteristics of their practice, attitude, diagnostics and
treatment modalities applied in patients with CP [4_12]. These
surveys demonstrate that physicians show large deficits
in familiarity with and knowledge of CP along with
significant variability in their approaches to diagnosis and
treatment. However, surveys concerning factors
influencing diagnosis and treatment of CP among urologists
are rarely seen. To our knowledge, no such survey has
been undertaken in China. In addition, the Chinese health
insurance system is different from that in other
countries and the practice patterns of Chinese urologists may
have their own characteristics compared with that in other
countries. With the goal of defining any influencing
factors affecting the diagnosis and treatment patterns for
cases of CP, we attempted to determine whether or not
physicians' individual or practice characteristics have any
influence on diagnostic and therapeutic patterns.
2 Materials and methods
We conducted this survey during the 13th China National Urology Academic Conference and the 8th
Global Chinese Urology Academic Conference (CUA 2006),
which was held in Shenyang, China on 13_15 October
2006. Study populations were drawn from the
representatives attending the CUA 2006 meeting, and the
questionnaires were sent to a sample of 656 urologists. All
physicians were screened to ensure that their specialty
was correct and they were in active clinical practice. The
questionnaires were self-written and a draft questionnaire
was piloted by the authors and a separate group of
urologists in Hunan Province, China. The questionnaire was
modified before being used at the national meeting.
Demographic and professional data were collected from the
urologists, including age, title of the respondents, years
devoted to clinical practice, type of hospital they worked
with and health-care level of working hospital. The
questionnaire also requested information on etiology,
diagnostic work-up and treatment practice. The
questionnaires were returned anonymously on the spot.
To determine the factors influencing the diagnosis
and treatment of CP, both univariate and multivariate
logistic regression analysis schemes (criteria for entry
P < 0.05 and removal P < 0.1) were used. Several
independent variables (IV) (X1 = title of the urologists,
X2 = practice duration as a urological specialist,
X3 = type of working
hospital, X4 = health-care level of working
hospital, X5 = beliefs in bacterial infection in the etiology
of CP, X6 = the routine performance of bacterial culture
test, and X7 = the routine performance of the 4- or the
2-glass test) and three dependent variables (DV)
(Y1 = whether urologists performed bacterial culture test
routinely, Y2 = whether urologists used the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) new classification system
routinely, Y3 = whether urologists prescribed antibiotics
against CP) were included in the univariate model
(X6 and X7 are IV for
Y3 and Y2, respectively). We stratified
the title of the urologists into three groups: the junior title
group, the intermediate title group and the senior title
group, as a reference group. Because practice duration
as a urological specialist did not constitute a normal
distribution, we stratified this variable into three groups:
25th percentile and below, 75th percentile and above,
and the middle remainder as a reference group. Only
those that were clearly statistically significant
(P < 0.05) in the univariate analysis were included in the
multivariate logistic model to determine the independent factors,
defined by the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence
interval (CI). A 5% level of significance was used for all
statistical test, and all tests were two sided. All statistical
calculations were performed using SPSS 10.0 software
(Windows version 10.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
3 Results
Of the 656 returned questionnaires, 627 (mean age
37.0 years, with a range of 21_72 years) were active
responses (95.6%) and 29 were inactive (4.4%). The
active respondents came from 291 hospitals in 141 cities
or counties of 29 provinces in China (including
autonomous regions and municipalities, except Taiwan, Macao,
Hong Kong, Tibet and Qinghai Provinces). Because some
urologists did not answer all of the questions, the valid
response number to each question varied. Among the
respondents, 19.7% (98/498) had a junior title, 31.9%
(159/498) had an intermediate title and 48.4% (241/498)
had a senior title. Of the respondents, 62.5% ( 338/541)
worked at general hospitals, and 37.5% (203/541) worked
at university hospitals. Most urologists (74.8%;
442/591) came from tertiary hospitals, 25.2% (149/591) came
from secondary hospitals. Most primary or secondary
hospitals in China do not have urology departments, which
is why most of the respondents in the present study are
based in tertiary hospitals. A total of 75.2% (440/585)
were practicing urological specialists with more than
5 years of clinical experience.
When asked to identify etiology of CP, most
urologists (64.6%; 394/610) considered nonbacterial infections
the most important cause. For routine diagnosis assessment, the most commonly used tests were
microscopic analysis of expressed prostatic secretions (EPS)
(86.3%; 535/620) and bacterial culture (57.4%; 356/620).
The simple culture of EPS (43.4%; 260/599) was performed more commonly compared with the 4 glass test
(27.1%; 162/599) and the 2 glass test (29.5%; 177/599).
Most urologists (62.3%; 372/597) used NIH new
classification of types I, II, IIIa/IIIb and IV to classify their
patients' disease. However, more than one-third (37.7%;
225/597) of the urologists still chose the traditional
classification system of chronic bacterial prostatitis, chronic
nonbacterial prostatitis and prostatodynia for diagnosis.
The first choice of pharmaceutical therapy for CP was
antibiotics (74.0%; 455/615) and the most frequent drug
type was fluoroquinolones (79.0%; 480/608), followed by
macrolides (45.7%; 278/608) and cephalosporins
(35.2%; 214/608). The next most commonly used drug
therapies were α-blockers (60.3%; 371/615), phytotherapy
(38.7%; 238/615) and Chinese herbal medicine (37.2%;
229/615). The most commonly used non-pharmacological therapy were psychotherapy (60.7%; 379/324)
and prostatic massage (54.2%; 338/624).
Because of incomplete or inaccurate filling in of the
various components of the questionnaire, 246
questionnaires were excluded from the univariate and
multivariate analysis. Therefore, 410 were included in the final
univariate and multivariate analysis. The average
number of years devoted to clinical practice was 13.0 years,
with a range from 1 to 50 years. The 25th and 75th
percentiles of years devoted to clinical practice were 5
and 18 years, respectively. In the univariate analysis,
type of working hospital (OR, 0.562; 95% CI,
0.373_0.845; P < 0.01), health-care level of working hospital
(OR, 0.528; 95% CI, 0.323_0.863; P < 0.05) and belief
of bacterial infection in the etiology of CP (OR,
2.382; 95% CI, 1.586_3.579; P < 0.001) were determined to
be possible factors influencing the routine performance
of bacterial culture test as a diagnostic tool in cases of
CP. In addition, no significant difference was found in
the performance of bacterial culture test between
urologists with junior titles and those with senior titles (OR,
1.039; 95% CI, 0.631_1.711; P > 0.05).
However, urologists with intermediate titles were significantly
more likely than those with senior titles to perform
bacterial culture tests (OR, 1.728; 95% CI,
1.119_2.670; P < 0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was
found in the performance of bacterial culture test
between urologists with 5 practice years and below
and those with 5_18 years (OR, 1.417; 95% CI, 0.817_2.458;
P > 0.05). However, urologists with 18 practice years
and above were significantly less likely than those with
5_18 practice years to perform bacterial culture test
(OR, 0.541; 95% CI, 0.340_0.863; P < 0.05).
According to the same model, the type of working hospital
(OR, 3.114; 95% CI, 1.979_4.899; P < 0.001), the
health-care level of hospital (OR, 1.961; 95% CI,
1.243_3.094; P < 0.01) and the beliefs regarding the etiology
of CP (OR, 0.619; 95% CI, 0.411_0.933;
P < 0.05) and performing the 4- or the 2-glass test (OR, 3.442; CI,
2.262_5.237; P < 0.001), were possible factors
influencing the routine use of the NIH new classification system
to classify patients' disease. Using the same model,
beliefs regarding the etiology of CP (OR, 3.923; 95% CI,
2.350_6.549; P < 0.001) and the routine performance
of bacterial culture test (OR, 2.778; 95% CI,
1.707_4.519; P < 0.001) were revealed to be possible
influencing factors on the routine prescription of antibiotics.
In the multivariate model used, belief regarding the
etiology of CP was determined to be an independent
factor influencing the routine performance of bacterial
culture test as a diagnostic tool in cases of CP. According
to the same model, the type of hospital and performing
the 4- or the 2-glass test were the significant factors
influencing the routine use of the NIH new classification
system. Using the same model used, belief of bacterial
infection in the etiology of CP and the routine
performance of bacterial culture test were revealed to be
independent factors influencing the routine prescription of
antibiotics (Table 1).
4 Discussion
Chronic prostatitis is an important and common
medical male health issue. However, little is known about the
etiology of patients with CP and the treatment of patients
with persistent prostatitis or related symptomatology is
difficult and often unsuccessful [12]. In the present
study, wide variation in the diagnosis and treatment of
CP was demonstrated to exist among urologists in China.
Although bacterial culture was one of the most
commonly used examinations for the evaluation of men who
had symptoms suggestive of CP, a minority of urologists performed the Meares-Stamey 4 glass test lower
urinary tract localization technique. This result is in
agreement with findings in similar surveys of physicians in
Canada, USA, Japan, Korea, Italy and France [4, 5,
8_10]. The simple culture of EPS is the most important
method performed by Chinese urologists. The
Meares-Stamey 4 glass test is the standard method used to
assess inflammation and determine the presence of
bacteria in the lower urinary tract in men presenting with the
chronic prostatitis syndrome [13]. However, the test is
considered expensive, not predictive of symptomatic
treatment response, and has many false positive and false
negative findings [8, 12, 13]. This is probably why
Chinese urologists have turned with increasing frequency to
use the simple culture of EPS, which is a simpler and
less expensive screening technique. However, because
of the contamination of normal flora located at the
urethral orifice or pathogenic bacteria existing when
urethritis occurs, the interpretation of the test results of
simple culture of EPS can be ambiguous and often
results in the abuse of antimicrobial agents. The
confusion noted by others is certainly reflected in the
confusion experienced by Chinese urologists in diagnosing this
disease as well. Dai et al. [14] suggested that
quantitative EPS endotoxin determination is a faster, cheaper and
more easily attainable approach than EPS culture and
some other special examinations. Kommu et al.
[15] considered this conclusion plausible, and asserted there
is a need to find novel biomarkers through the use of
proteomics. Nickels et al. [13, 16] suggested a 2-glass
test (the Pre and Post Massage Test), which has a
positive predictive value and a false-negative rate similar to
the Meares-Stamey 4-glass test. Clinicians who choose
to perform the 4-glass test should consider using the
2-glass test to classify patients with CP [17].
In the univariate analysis of the present study,
contrary to our hypothesis, urologists practicing at
university hospitals and tertiary hospitals were no more likely
than urologists at non-university hospitals and
secondary hospitals to perform the bacterial culture test,
respectively. Additionally, in contrast to our expectation
that urologists with longer practice duration as
urological specialists (18 years and more than 18 years) and with
senior titles would perform the culture test more often,
we found that younger urologists (5_18 years) and
urologists with intermediate titles performed the test more
frequently. The multivariate logistic regression analysis
indicated that belief regarding the etiology of CP was the
most significant factor influencing the routine
performance of bacterial culture test. These findings are
similar to surveys of urologists in the USA and Korea [8, 18].
In the USA, urologists practicing at teaching institutions
were no more likely than urologists at non-teaching
institutions to perform the 4-glass test, and younger
physicians (younger than 50 years) performed the 4-glass
test more often than older urologists (older than 50 years)
[8]. In Korea, the belief that bacterial culture test helped
to differentiate or diagnose the various types of CP was
a factor influencing the performance of EPS or other
culture tests [18]. Urologists with senior titles or with
longer practice duration may be more dependent upon
their clinical experience to code a diagnosis of CP.
The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) Chronic Prostatitis Workshop
held in 1995 resulted in a consensus working definition
and classification of prostatitis syndromes [19], which
has now been accepted by the urological community and
appears to be useful in clinical practice [20]. However,
our study shows poor use of the NIH new classification
system by Chinese urologists, and has been used by only
62% of urologists queried in the present study. Only
33% of British genitourinary medicine clinics use this
new classification system and 65% of French urologists
are unfamiliar with it [5, 7]. The potential reasons
associated with this situation may include lack of further
education about prostatitis and many urologists' greater
interest in surgical operation than in prostatitis problems.
The type of working hospital and the routine performance
of the 4- or the 2-glass test were revealed, in this study,
to be independent influencing factors with regard to the
routine performance of the NIH new classification system. Interestingly, we also found that urologists who
performed the 4- or the 2-glass tests routinely were
significantly more likely to use the NIH new classification
system to classify patients and code diagnosis as
compared with those who did not performed these tests
routinely. This finding confirms that the specific lower
urinary tract culture (the 4- or the 2-glass test), in fact,
is the foundation of the NIH new classification.
With regard to the treatment of CP, although most
Chinese urologists consider CP to be nonbacterial in
nature, a high degree of antibiotic usage was reported in
the present study, as demonstrated in similar surveys of
physicians in other countries. The high antibiotic usage
in the treatment of CP might reflect a misunderstanding
among urologists of the role of infection and also reflect
confusion between the diagnosis of chronic bacterial
prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) [7]. In
addition, current reports suggest that bacteria may have
a role in inflammatory prostatitis (NIH category III CPPS)
[21, 22]. This new evidence indicates that the high
usage of antibiotics appears to be justifiable. However,
routine use of antibiotics is not supported by existing
evidence and deserves further scrutiny [8, 17]. Moreover,
the high antibiotic usage might result in tremendous
economic waste, abuse of antibiotics, resistance of bacteria
and severe side effects [2, 8, 17], all of which cannot be
neglected.
Much like in a survey of Korean urologists [18], we
found that belief regarding the etiology of CP and the
routine performance of bacterial culture test were
independent factors influencing the routine prescription of
antibiotics in China. These findings confirm that beliefs
regarding the etiology of CP not only influence the
routine performance of bacterial culture test but also
influence the routine prescription of antibiotics. However, in
contrast to what we hypothesized, urologists who
performed the culture test were no less likely to prescribe
antibiotics for patients with CP than those who performed
the tests less often, which is similar to surveys of
physicians in Canada and the USA [4, 8]. In the USA,
physicians who routinely perform the 4 glass test do not
differ in antibiotic use from those who use the test less
often [8]. In addition, a survey in Canada indicated that
men diagnosed with prostatitis are treated with
antibiotics regardless of laboratory findings [4]. These findings
suggest that the specific lower urinary tract culture tests
do not significantly affect antibiotic treatment patterns
and they do not direct urologists toward more targeted
therapy.
Admittedly, the present study has some limitations.
First, the physicians report on their own behavior, and
their answers might reflect a more idealized version of
their practices than what actually takes place. Therefore,
the findings must be interpreted with caution. Second,
the study population is not a random sample. However,
with a relatively high valid response number (more than
500), which is much higher than that in similar studies in
Canada, the Netherlands, the UK, Korea and France
(n = 151, 136, 145, 275, 124, respectively) [4_7, 12] and
data from almost all administrative regions of China, the
demonstrated data are deemed representative and do
indeed reflect the current management of CP in China.
The findings provide a picture of current practices
in terms of the management of CP in China. Our
findings suggest that personal attitudes towards CP, and
the characteristics of individual urologists' practice might
have an influence on the patterns of routine treatments
for cases of CP. The survey also suggests that
continuing education on the management of CP should focus on
urologists from non-university hospitals. Therefore, The
right attitude towards and a sound knowledge of CP will
result in rational actions in physicians' clinical practice.
References
1 Krieger JN, Riley DE, Cheah PY, Liong ML, Yuen KH.
Epidemiology of prostatitis: new evidence for a world-wide
problem. World J Urol 2003; 21: 70_4.
2 Pontari MA, Joyce GF, Wise M, McNaughton-Collins M;
Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prostatitis. J Urol 2007;
177: 2050_7.
3 McNaughton-Collins M, Pontari MA, O'Leary MP, Calhoun
EA, Santanna J, Landis JR, et al. Quality of life is impaired in
men with chronic prostatitis: the Chronic Prostatitis
Collaborative Research Network. J Gen Intern Med 2001; 16:
656_62.
4 Nickel JC, Nigro M, Valiquette L, Anderson P, Patrick A,
Mahoney J, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of prostatitis in
Canada. Urology 1998; 52: 797_802.
5 Delavierre D. Chronic prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain
syndrome: a survey of French urologists. Prog Urol 2007; 17:
69_76.
6 Ku JH, Paick JS, Kim SW. Chronic prostatitis in Korea: a
nationwide postal survey of practicing urologists in 2004.
Asian J Androl 2005; 7: 427_32.
7 Luzzi GA, Bignell C, Mandal D, Maw RD; British
Co-operative Clinical Group. Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic
pain syndrome: national survey of genitourinary medicine
clinics. Int J STD AIDS 2002; 13: 416_9.
8 McNaughton-Collins M, Fowler FJ Jr, Elliott DB, Albertsen
PC, Barry MJ. Diagnosing and treating chronic prostatitis: do
urologists use the four-glass test? Urology 2000; 55: 403_7.
9 Rizzo M, Marchetti F, Travaglini F, Trinchieri A, Nickel JC.
Prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of prostatitis in Italy: a
prospective urology outpatient practice study. BJU Int 2003;
92: 955_9.
10 Kiyota H, Onodera S, Ohishi Y, Tsukamoto T, Matsumoto T.
Questionnaire survey of Japanese urologists concerning the
diagnosis and treatment of chronic prostatitis and chronic
pelvic pain syndrome. Int J Urol 2003; 10: 636_42.
11 Moon TD. Questionnaire survey of urologists and primary
care physicians' diagnostic and treatment practices for
prostatitis. Urology 1997; 50: 543_7.
12 de la Rosette JJ, Hubregtse MR, Karthaus HF, Debruyne FM.
Results of a questionnaire among Dutch urologists and general
practitioners concerning diagnostics and treatment of patients
with prostatitis syndromes. Eur Urol 1992; 22: 14_9.
13 Nickel JC, Shoskes D, Wang Y, Alexander RB, Fowler JE Jr,
Zeitlin S, et al. How does the pre-massage and post-massage
2-glass test compare to the Meares-Stamey 4-glass test in men
with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome? J Urol
2006; 176: 119_24.
14 Dai YP, Sun XZ, Zheng KL. Endotoxins in the prostatic
secretions of chronic prostatitis patients. Asian J Androl 2005;
7: 45_7.
15 Kommu SS, Reiss S. Endotoxins in the prostatic secretions of
chronic prostatitis patients: a need for further biomarkers
through the use of proteomics. Asian J Androl 2006; 8: 123_4.
16 Nickel JC. The Pre and Post Massage Test (PPMT): a simple
screen for prostatitis. Tech Urol 1997; 3: 38_43.
17 McNaughton Collins M, MacDonald R, Wilt TJ. Diagnosis
and treatment of chronic abacterial prostatitis: a systematic
review. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133: 367_81.
18 Ku JH, Paick JS, Kim SW. Factors influencing practices for
chronic prostatitis: a nationwide survey of urologists in South
Korea. Int J Urol 2005; 12: 976_83.
19 Krieger JN, Nyberg L Jr., Nickel JC. NIH consensus definition
and classification of prostatitis. JAMA 1999; 282: 236_7.
20 Nickel JC. Recommendations for the evaluation of patients
with prostatitis. World J Urol 2003; 21: 75_81.
21 Hochreiter WW, Duncan JL, Schaeffer AJ. Evaluation of the
bacterial flora of the prostate using a 16S rRNA gene based
polymerase chain reaction. J Urol 2000; 163: 127_30.
22 Shoskes DA, Shahed AR. Detection of bacterial signal by 16S
rRNA polymerase chain reaction in expressed prostatic
secretions predicts response to antibiotic therapy in men with
chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Tech Urol 2000; 6: 240_2.
|