| This web only provides the extract of this article. If you want to read the figures and tables, please reference the PDF full text on Blackwell Synergy. Thank you. - Original Article  - Characterization of Spindlin1 isoform2 in mouse testis Ke-Mei Zhang, Yu-Feng Wang, Ran Huo, Ye Bi, Min Lin, Jia-Hao Sha, Zuo-Min Zhou
             Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
             Abstract Aim: To investigate the expression of Spindlin 1 (Spin 
1) isoform2 and assess its function in mouse 
testis.  Methods: First, reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to determine whether Spin1 isoform2 is 
present in mouse testis.  Then the expression patterns of the isoform between newborn and adult mice testes were 
compared by immunoblot analysis.  Finally, the diversity of its localization in mice testes at different ages (days 0, 7, 
14, 21, 28 and 60) was observed by immunohistochemistry.  The localization of the protein in mouse sperm was also 
investigated by immunofluorescence.  
Results: The RT-PCR results show that Spin1 isoform2 is present in mouse 
testis.  As shown by immunoblot analysis, the isoform was more highly expressed in adult testes compared with 
newborn testes.  Interestingly, Spin1 isoform2 did not show up in the cytoplasm of primary spermatocytes until 
day 14.  Also, the protein exists at the tail of 
the mouse sperm.  Conclusion: Spin1 isoform2 is a protein expressed 
highly in adult testis, which might be involved in spermatogenesis and could be necessary for normal sperm motility. 
 (Asian J Androl 2008 Sep; 10: 741_748)
             Keywords:  Spindlin 1; spermatogenesis; sperm motility; isoform; mouse testis; primary spermatocyte; meiosis Correspondence to: Dr Zuo-Min Zhou, Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, 140 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing 
210029, China.
Tel/Fax: +86-25-8686-2908
 E-mail: zhouzm@njmu.edu.cn
 Received 2007-12-24       Accept 2008-04-30
 DOI:  10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00424.x			   
 1    Introduction
 Spindlin1 (Spin1), first reported as a maternal 
transcript in mice, has been suggested to play an important 
role during the transition from oocyte maturation to 
embryo development [1, 2].  It has also been demonstrated 
that the protein localizes to spindle of oocyte undergoing 
maturation division.  Since mouse Spin1 was first 
reported in 1997 by Oh et al. [1], a series of homologous 
genes have been discovered in chicken, gibel carp and 
humans [3_5].  There are two Spin-type genes in the 
chicken: chSpin-Z localizing on the long arm of the Z 
chromosome is transcribed in various tissues of adult 
chickens  and chSpin-W representing the counterpart gene 
that is transcribed most prominently in ovarian 
granulosa and thecal cells.  The function of chSpin is 
associated with chromosomes during mitosis [3].  Spin in gibel 
carp is a gene specifically expressed in oocyte and plays 
an important role by interacting with β-tubulin during 
oocyte maturation and egg fertilization [4].  Spin 1, a 
homologous gene in humans, contributes to tumorigenesis [5].
 All the genes above belong to the Spin/Ssty protein 
family, which contains a conserved motif of 
approximately 50 amino acids (Spin/Ssty repeat).  Three 
modules of Spin/Ssty repeats are thought to be independent 
functional units and are considered to be necessary for 
the structural and functional integrity of all known Spin 
family proteins [6].  Ssty, as a member of Spin/Ssty 
family, is present on the long arm of the mouse Y 
chromosome (Yq).  Partial Yq deletion can lead to reduction 
of Ssty expression and result in severe sperm defects 
and sterility.  Therefore, Ssty is considered to be 
essential for normal sperm differentiation [7_11].
 According to the NCBI Gene Database, there are two 
isoforms of Spin1 in mice.  All previous research on Spin1 
has focused on the isoform1 (Spin1 transcript variant 1; 
NP_035592).  However, the other isoform (Spin1 
transcript variant 2; NP_666155), obtained from sequencing 
work [12], has not been studied until now.  The full 
length of its cDNA is 1 064 bp, encoding a 
262-amino-acid protein.  The C-terminus of Spin1 isoform2, 
containing three Spin/Ssty repeats, is identical to that of Spin1 
isoform1.  Oh et al. [1, 2] reported that Spin1 isoform1 
is associated with oocyte maturation, which is only 
expressed in mouse oocyte and early embryos.  Therefore, 
we are very interested in the function of Spin1 isoform2 
in mouse testis.
 Spermatogenesis is the main function of the testis.  
It is a well-characterized developmental process for the 
genesis of male germ cells [13].  This process is 
regulated by programmed gene expression [14, 15].  Studies 
on the genes that were specifically expressed at different 
stages of testis development could reveal their function, 
especially in spermatogenesis [16].  Therefore, in the 
present study, the expression patterns of Spin1 isoform2 
in mice testes of different ages were investigated using 
western blot analysis and immunohistochemisty.
 2    Materials and methods
 2.1  Sample collection
 All pregnant Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice 
used in these studies were obtained from the Lab Animal 
Center of Nanjing Medical University (Nanjing, China) 
and were maintained under a controlled environment of 
20ºC_22ºC, 12:12 h LD cycle, at 50%_70% humidity, 
with food and water provided ad libitum.  After delivery, 
the testes of the male offspring were collected at 
different postpartum times (days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 60) and 
fixed in Bouin's solution for histological examination.  
Mature sperm were obtained from the epididymis by making small incisions throughout the epididymis cauda 
followed by extrusion and resuspension in phosphate 
buffered solution (PBS).
 2.2  Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction 
(RT-PCR) 
 Multiple tissues from adult mice, including hearts, 
livers, spleens, lungs, kidneys, brains, stomachs, 
intestines, skeletal muscle, testes and ovaries were 
collected and homogenized.  Total mRNA was extracted 
according to the Trizol RNA isolation protocol (Gibco 
BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA) and reverse-transcribed 
into cDNA with AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, 
Madison, WI, USA).  The cDNA was PCR amplified according to the manufacturer's instructions and 
conditions as follows: denaturation at 95ºC for 30 s, annealing 
at 55ºC for 30 s and extension at 72ºC for 30 s; 35 cycles.  
Primers were 5'-CCCCATTCGGGAAG ACAC-3' and 5'-ACAGGGAAGGATTCACAGG-3' for Spin1 isoform2; 
and 5'-ATGGCCTCTGCGTCA AGTCC-3' and 5'-CTAGGATGTTTTCACCAAAT-3' for Spin1 isoform1.  
The primers for Spin1 isoform2 were designed at exon2 
and exon4, respectively, and the PCR products span two 
introns, as shown in Figure 1D.  β-actin was used as the 
positive control.
 2.3  Expression of recombinant protein and preparation 
of antibody
 The full length coding sequence of Spin1 was subcloned into pET28a expression vector (GE Healthcare, 
San Francisco, CA, USA) coding for six N-terminally 
located histidine residues.
 For this purpose, PCR was performed with primers 
containing the following restriction sites: NdeI for the 
forward primer and XhoI for the reverse primer.  PCR 
amplification was performed with polymerase mix (BD 
Bioscience, Piscataway, NJ, USA) using an initial 
denaturing step at 95ºC for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 
incubation at 95ºC for 30 s, 55ºC for 30 s, 72ºC for 30 s, 
and a final extension step of 7 min at 72ºC.  The 
construct was used for transformation of competent BL21 
(DE3) cells.  These cells were grown in LB medium (10 g 
of tryptone, 10 g of yeast extract and 5 g of NaCl) 
containing Kanamycin (50 µg/mL).  When the absorbance at 
600 nm reached 0.6 (approximately 
1.7 × 108 cells/mL), 
isopropyl-1-thio-β-D-galactopyranoside was added to a 
final concentration of 1 mmol/L.  After 6 h of induction 
at 30ºC, cells were collected and resuspended in 200 mL 
of 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 500 mmol/L NaCl, 8 mol/L urea 
buffer.  The cells were sonicated for 10 min on ice, then 
centrifuged at 10 000 × g at 4ºC for 30 min.  The clear 
supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane 
and then purified through a Ni2+ affinity column by AKTA 
Basic (Amersham Biosciences) under denaturing 
conditions according to the manufacturer's protocol using 
HiTrap Chelating HP 1 mL.  The purity of the 
recombinant protein was confirmed by 12% SDS-PAGE.  
Purified protein was refolded by dialysis against a linear 
decrease gradient of 6, 4 and 2 mol/L urea buffer.
 Polyclonal antibodies were raised by immunization 
of a male New Zealand White rabbit with the purified 
recombinant protein.  The rabbit received approximately 
100 µg of recombinant protein with complete Freund's 
adjuvant for the primary injection.  Two additional boosts 
with 50 µg of protein in incomplete Freund's adjuvant 
were administered on the 14th and 21st days, respectively.  
The antibody titer of preimmune and immune sera was 
determined using ELISA.  When the antibody titer of 
immune rabbit serum reached 
105_106, rabbits were killed 
to collect the serum.
 2.4  Protein extraction and immunoblot analysis
 Mice testes at days 0 and 60 were collected and 
washed three times in chilled PBS, then treated with 
lysis buffer (7 mol/L urea, 2 mol/L thiourea, 4% [w/v] 
3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-1-propane 
sulfonate (CHAPS), 2% [w/v] dithiothreitol (DTT), 2% [v/v] 
immobilized pH gradient [IPG] buffer, pH 3_10) in the 
presence of 1% (v/v) protease inhibitors-cocktail kit 
(Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, Illinois, USA).  The 
mixture was homogenized (Ultra Turrax, IKA, Germany) 
at 11 000 rpm for 5 min on ice.  After centrifugation at 
40 000 × g at 4ºC for 1 h, the supernatant was collected 
and stored at _70ºC until use.  The concentration of 
extracted protein was determined by Bio-Rad DC protein 
assay (10) kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, 
Canada) using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard 
protein.
 The extracts of mice testes at days 0 and 60 were 
subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE.  100 µg testicular protein 
extract was loaded in each lane and the resolved proteins 
were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane.  After 
being blocked with blocking solution (5% non-fat milk 
powder in Tris-buffered saline [TBS; pH 7.4]) for 2 h, 
the membrane was incubated with anti-spin rabbit 
serum (1:1 000) or a polyclonal antibody against β-tubulin 
(Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1:2 000) diluted in 
blocking solution at 4ºC overnight.  After washing with TBS 
three times, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat antirabbit IgG (1:1 000; 
Beijing ZhongShan Biotechnology, China) for 1 h at 37ºC.  
After three washes, immunoreactivity was detected 
using an enhanced chemoluminescence reaction kit (Amersham Biosciences) and the images were captured 
by FluorChem 5500 (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, 
USA).  Molecular weights of the detected proteins were 
deduced by comparison with recombinant molecular weight standards (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, 
USA).
 For quantification of the data, the images were 
analyzed using Adobe PhotoShop (San Jose, CA).  Boxes of 
the same size were drawn around the appropriate band, 
and the average pixel intensity was measured.  The 
relative amount of Spin1 isoform2 was calculated as the 
ratio of its average pixel intensity to that of the 
β-tubulin loading control.  Three repeated experiments were 
performed independently.
 2.5  Immunohistochemistry
 Bouin's fixed testes were embedded in paraffin, 
sectioned at 5 µm, and mounted on silane-coated slides.  For 
immunohistochemistry, sections were dewaxed and rehydrated through descending grades of alcohol to 
distilled water, followed by incubation in 2% hydrogen 
peroxide to quench the endogenous peroxidase activity and 
washed in PBS.  Subsequently, they were blocked with 
goat serum (Beijing ZhongShan Biotechnology, China) 
for 2 h and incubated with primary antibody (anti-spin 
rabbit serum; 1:2 000) overnight at 4ºC.  Following three 
washes in PBS, sections were incubated with 
horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated goat anti-rabbit 
secondary antibody (Beijing ZhongShan Biotechnology, 
China) for 1 h at room temperature.  Immunoreactive 
sites were visualized brown with diaminobezidine (DAB) 
and mounted for bright field microscopy (Axioskop 2 
plus, Zeiss, Germany).  As one negative control, 
sections were incubated with the preimmune rabbit serum 
in place of the primary antibody.  In the other negative 
control, the sections were incubated with anti-spin 
rabbit serum, which was preabsorbed with the spin 
recombinant protein.
 2.6  Immunofluorescence
 Mouse sperm samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 1 h, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton 
X-100 /PBS for 20 min at 37ºC, and then blocked with 
goat serum (Beijing ZhongShan Biotechnology, China) 
for 2 h at room temperature.  Following incubation with 
a 1:1000 dilution of anti-spin serum overnight at 4ºC, 
sperm were incubated with the secondary anti-rabbit IgG 
labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC, Beijing 
ZhongShan Biotechnology, China) at 1:100 dilution for 
1 h at room temperature and observed under ZEISS 
Axioskop plus2 fluorescent microscopy at an excitation 
wave of 470 nm.  Negative controls were performed by 
the replacement of the anti-spin rabbit serum with 
preimmune rabbit serum.
 2.7  Statistical analysis
 Data were expressed as mean ± SME.  Student's 
t-test was used for statistical comparison. 
 P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 3    Results
 3.1  Identification of Spin1 isoform2 in mouse testis and 
other tissues
 To analyze the tissue-specific expression pattern of 
Spin1 isoform2, we performed Reserve-transcription 
polymerase chain reaction analysis with total RNA from 
different mouse tissues.  The data showed that Spin1 
variant2 is transcribed in adult mouse testis and that Spin1 
transcripts, leading to isoform2, are also present in other 
tissues, including hearts, livers, spleens, lungs, kidneys, 
brains, stomachs, intestines, skeletal muscle and ovaries 
(Figure 1A).  β-actin was performed as the positive 
control (Figure 1C).  Moreover, Spin1 isoform1 was proven 
to be only present in ovary tissue (Figure 1B).
 3.2  Expression level of Spin1 isoform2 in newborn and 
adult mice testes
 The expression level of Spin1 isoform2 between 
newborn and adult testes was investigated using immunoblot 
analysis.  Only a single band with an apparent molecular 
weight of approximately 29 kDa was detected in 
testicular protein extracts of newborn (day 0 post partum) and 
adult (day 60 post partum) mice (Figure 2A).  
β-tubulin was used as the positive control (Figure 2B).  
Semi-quantitation of Spin1 isoform2 demonstrated that the gene 
was highly expressed in adult testes compared with 
newborn testes (P < 0.001); the abundance of Spin1 isoform2 
in adult testes is approximately three times that in 
newborn testes (Figure 2C).
 3.3  Localization of Spin1 isoform2 in mice testes at 
different ages
 No obvious signals were detected in the germ cells 
of mice testes at days 0 and 7.  Only faint brown signals 
can be revealed in Leydig cells at days 7 (Figure 3A, B).  
Significant Spin1 isoform2 immunolabeling patterns 
showed up in the cytoplasm of primary spermatocytes 
after day 14, as well as Leydig cells (Figure 3C, D).  From 
day 21, Spin1 isoform2 was expressed extensively in 
Leydig cells, sertoli cells and germ cells from the 
primary spermatocyte phase to the spermatozoa phase with 
the development of testis (Figure 3E_G).  However, the 
signals in primary spermatocytes and Leydig cells at 
day 60 were conspicuously strong (Figure 3H).
 As negative controls, both anti-spin serum preabsorbed with the spin recombinant protein and 
preimmune rabbit serum produced background levels of 
staining in mice testes (Figure 3I_L).
 3.4  Localization of Spin1 isoform2 in mouse sperm
 The localization of Spin1 isoform2 in mouse sperm 
was further examined by immunostaining using the 
antiserum of the protein.  Bright fluorescence staining was 
invariably observed in the centriole, principal piece and 
end piece of sperm (Figure 4A, B).  Besides, a tenuous 
fluorescence signal is also visible in the mitochondrial 
sheath.  Therefore, Spin1 isoform2 was conformed to 
localize to the tail of the mouse sperm.
 In control experiments with preimmune serum, a little 
background staining was also detected (Figure 4C, D).
 4    Discussion
 In this study, we showed that Spin1 isoform2 is 
transcribed ubiquitously and that the transcript of Spin1 
isoform2 is also present in mouse testis.  At the same 
time, Spin1 isoform1 was proven to be specifically 
expressed.  The amino-acid sequences of the two isoforms at the C-terminus are totally identical, and the 
functional domains are also conserved.  Therefore, we 
presumed that Spin1 isoform2 might take a similar role 
in testes to Spin1 isoform1 in ovaries.
 By comparing the expression of Spin1 isoform2 
between newborn and adult mice testes, we demonstrated 
that the protein is expressed at a higher level in adult 
testes than in newborn testes.  The relative abundance of 
Spin1 isoform2 in adult testes is approximately three times 
that in newborn testes.  There are only sertoli cells and 
undifferentiated spermatogonia cells in the seminiferous 
tubules of newborn testes, whereas the seminiferous 
tubules of adult testes contain not only sertoli cells and 
spermatogenous cells, but also various spermatogenic 
cells.  In other words, there are many developmental 
germ cells in adult testes but not in newborn testes.  Thus, 
the results of western blot analysis provide an important 
clue to its function.  Spin1 isoform2 might be associated 
with testis development and spermatogenesis.
 To further explore the function of the protein, we 
investigated the expression patterns of Spin1 isoform2 
in testes at different ages (days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 60) 
by immunohistochemistry.  No obvious signals of Spin1 
isoform2 were detected in mice testes at day 0, which 
was not match the Western blot analysis result.  It is 
possible that the expression level of Spin1 isoform2 in 
newborn mice testes is too low to be visualized by 
immunohistochemistry.  At day 7, faint brown signals 
can be revealed in Leydig cells.  At day 14, significant 
Spin1 isoform2 immunolabeling patterns showed up in 
the cytoplasm of primary spermatocytes, as well as 
Leydig cells.  From days 21 to 60, Spin1 isoform2 was 
expressed extensively in Leydig cells, sertoli cells and 
germ cells from the primary spermatocyte phase to the 
spermatozoa phase with the development of testis.  
However, strong signals can be viewed only in primary 
spermatocytes and Leydig cells at day 60.  
Spermatogenesis takes place in three major phases: proliferation and 
differentiation of spermatogonia, meiosis and 
spermiogenesis.  We consider the aforesaid six time points to 
represent the major stages of germ cell development during 
the first wave of spermatogenesis: day 0, newborn testis 
with stem cell property; day 7, spermatogonia mitosis; 
day 14, spermatocyte meiosis; day 21, round spermatid 
production; day 28, elongated spermatid formation, also 
named spermiogenesis; day 60, normal postpubertal 
spermatogenesis [17].  Spin1 isoform2 showed up in the 
primary spermatocyte after day 14. While the day 14 was 
considered to be the time point of progressing the first 
wave of spermatocyte meiosis.  In addition, the protein 
was also expressed highly in the cytoplasm of primary 
spermatocyte in adult testes.  Accordingly, we presumed 
that Spin1 isoform2 might be associated with 
spermatocyte meiosis.  It has been reported that Spin1 isoform1 
is involved in the progression of the meiotic and first 
mitotic cell cycles and might be necessary for oocyte 
maturation and the initiation of development [1, 2].  
Another member of the Spin/Ssty protein family, Ssty 
(Y-linked spermiogenesis specific transcript), has also been 
demonstrated to be required for normal spermatogenesis.  
Reduction of Ssty expression can result in severe sperm 
defects and sterility [7_11].  Therefore, it is possible that 
Spin1 isoform2 has a similar role and could be essential 
for spermatogenesis.
 Interestingly, Spin1 isoform2 was also localized at 
the tail of mouse sperm.  Microtubule is the major 
constituent of the sperm tail and is absolutely necessary for 
sperm movement.  Spin1 isoform1 was reported to be 
associated with the spindle of ooycte [1, 2], and CagSpin 
in gible carp was confirmed to interact directly or 
indirectly with â-tubulin [4].  Therefore, we hypothesize that 
Spin1 isoform2 takes part in the organization of 
microtubule and might be absolutely necessary for normal 
sperm motility.
 In conclusion, we have characterized Spin1 isoform2, which encode the 29 kDa protein in mouse 
testis for the first time.  The results from the present 
study suggest that the protein is involved in 
spermatogenesis and could be essential for normal sperm motility.
 Acknowledgement
 This research was supported by grants from the 973 
Program (2006CB504002, 2006CB944002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30425006).
 References
 1     Oh B, Hwang SY, Solter D, Knowles BB.  Spindlin, a major 
maternal transcript expressed in the mouse during the transition 
from oocyte to embryo.  Development 1997; 124: 493_503.
 2     Oh B, Hampl A, Eppig JJ, Solter D, Knowles BB.  SPIN, a 
substrate in the MAP kinase pathway in mouse oocytes.  Mol 
Reprod Dev 1998; 50: 240_9.
 3     Itoh Y, Hori T, Saitoh H, Mizuno S.  Chicken spindlin genes 
on W and Z chromosomes: transcriptional expression of both 
genes and dynamic behavior of spindlin in interphase and 
mitotic cells.  Chromosome Res 2001; 9: 283_99.
 4     Wang XL, Sun M, Mei J, Gui JF.  Identification of a Spindlin 
homolog in gibel carp (Carassius auratus 
gibelio).  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 2005; 141: 159_67.
 5     Gao Y, Yue W, Zhang P, Li L, Xie X, Yuan H, 
et al. Spindlin1, a novel nuclear protein with a role in the transformation of NIH3T3 
cells.  Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 335: 343_50.
 6     Staub E, Mennerich D, Rosenthal A.  The Spin/Ssty repeat: a 
new motif identified in proteins involved in vertebrate 
development from gamete to embryo.  Genome Biol 2002; 3: 
RESEARCH0003.
 7     Toure A, Szot M, Mahadevaiah SK, Rattigan A, Ojarikre OA, 
Burgoyne PS.  A new deletion of the mouse Y chromosome long 
arm associated with the loss of Ssty expression, abnormal sperm 
development and sterility.  Genetics 2004; 166: 901_12.
 8     Toure A, Grigoriev V, Mahadevaiah SK, Rattigan A, Ojarikre 
OA, Burgoyne PS.  A protein encoded by a member of the 
multicopy Ssty gene family located on the long arm of the 
mouse Y chromosome is expressed during sperm development.  
Genomics 2004; 83: 140_7.
 9     Toure A, Clemente EJ, Ellis P, Mahadevaiah SK, Ojarikre OA, 
Ball PA, et al. Identification of novel Y chromosome encoded 
transcripts by testis transcriptome analysis of mice with 
deletions of the Y chromosome long arm.  Genome Biol 2005; 
6: R102.
 10     Ward MA, Burgoyne PS.  The effects of deletions of the 
mouse Y chromosome long arm on sperm function intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)-based analysis.  Biol 
Reprod 2006; 74: 652_8.
 11     Burgoyne PS, Mahadevaiah SK, Sutcliffe MJ, Palmer SJ.  
Fertility in mice requires X-Y pairing and a Y-chromosomal 
"spermiogenesis" gene mapping to the long arm.  Cell 1992; 
71: 391_8.
 12     Strausberg RL, Feingoldc EA, Grousea LH, Derged JG, 
Klausnera RD, Collinscet FS, et al. Generation of initial analysis 
of more than 15000 full-length human and mouse cDNA 
sequences.  PNAS 2002, 99: 16899_903.
 13     Krawetz SA, Kramer JA, McCarrey JR.  Reprogramming the 
male gamete genome: a window to successful gene therapy.  
Gene 1999; 234: 1_9.
 14     Eddy EM, O'Brien DA.  Gene expression during mammalian 
meiosis.  Curr Top Dev Biol 1998; 37: 141_200.
 15     Eddy EM.  Regulation of gene expression during 
spermatogenesis.  Semin.  Cell Dev Biol 1998; 9: 451_7.
 16     McCarrey JR.  Spermatogenesis as a model system for 
developmental analysis of regulatory mechanisms associated 
with tissue-specific gene expression.  Semin Cell Dev Bio 
1998; 9: 459_66.
 17     Eddy EM.  Male Germ Cell Gene Expression.  Recent Prog 
Horm Res 2002; 57: 103_28.
 |