This web only provides the extract of this article. If you want to read the figures and tables, please reference the PDF full text on Blackwell Synergy. Thank you.
- Original Article -
Distribution profiles of transient receptor potential
melastatin-related and vanilloid-related channels in prostatic tissue in rat
Huai-Peng Wang*, Xiao-Yong
Pu*, Xing-Huan Wang
Department of Urology, Guangdong Provnicial People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, China
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the expression and distribution of the members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel
members of TRP melastatin (TRPM) and TRP vanilloid (TRPV) subfamilies in rat prostatic tissue.
Methods: Prostate tissue was obtained from male Sprague-Dawley rats. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to check the expression of all TRPM and TRPV
channel members with specific primers. Immunohistochemistry staining for TRPM8 and TRPV1 were also
performed in rat tissues. Results: TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM4, TRPM6, TRPM7, TRPM8, TRPV2 and TRPV4 mRNA
were detected in all rat prostatic tissues. Very weak signals for TRPM1, TRPV1 and TRPV3 were also detected. The
mRNA of TRPM5, TRPV5 and TRPV6 were not detected in all RT-PCR experiments. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
showed that TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM4, TRPM8, TRPV2 and TRPV4 were the most abundantly expressed TRPM
and TRPV subtypes, respectively. Fluorescence immunohistochemistry indicated that TRPM8 and TRPV1 are highly
expressed in both epithelial and smooth muscle
cells. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that mRNA or protein for
TRPM1, TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM4, TRPM6, TRPM7, TRPM8, TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3 and TRPV4 exist in rat
prostatic tissue. The data presented here assists in elucidating the physiological function of TRPM and TRPV
channels. (Asian J Androl 2007 Sep; 9: 634_640)
Keywords: transient receptor potential channels; prostate; cation channels
Correspondence to: Dr Xing-Huan Wang, Department of Urology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Tel: +86-20-8382-7812 Fax: +86-20-8382-7712
E-mail: urologist@126.com
*The authors equally contribute to the study and preparation of the manuscript.
Received 2006-11-19 Accepted 2007-04-04
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00291.x
1 Introduction
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in US men and its incidence rate is steadily rising in
China [1]. It is possible to effectively treat organ-confined prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy and radiation
therapy [2]. Targeted-cryosurgical ablation of the prostate with androgen deprivation therapy improves the quality of
life for high-risk prostate cancer patients. However, there are very limited treatment options for metastatic prostate
cancer. Therefore, it is of great importance to find novel markers for diagnosing early stages of the disease and to
closely monitor both progression and treatment of the disease, as well as to develop new therapeutic approaches. To
achieve this, we need to screen candidate molecules for biomarkers and compare their expression in normal prostatic
tissue and neoplastic tissue. To date, there are very few prostate-specific markers available. The best-known and
most well-characterized markers for prostate cancer are prostate specific antigen (PSA) [3] and prostate-specific
membrane antigen (PSMA) [4]. Each of these proteins
has also become the target for novel immunotherapy
approaches to the treatment of the disease [5, 6].
The transient receptor potential (TRP) channels, have
not yet been systematically studied in prostate even
though some subfamilies have been explored. The TRP
protein superfamily consists of a diverse group of cation
channels that bear structural similarities to
Drosophila TRP. Based on sequence homology, the TRP
superfamily can be divided into three major subfamilies of
canonical (TRPC), melastatin-related (TRPM) and
vanilloid-related (TRPV) channels and into four more distant
subfamilies of polycystin (TRPP), mucolipin (TRPML),
ankyrin (TRPA), and no mechanoreceptor potential C or
NOMPC (TRPN)-related channels/proteins. Of all the
TRP superfamily, only the TRPC subfamily is a
store-operated channel, whereas others appear to be activated
by production of diacylglycerol or regulated through an
exocytotic mechanism. Many members of TRPV function in sensory physiology and respond to heat, changes
in osmolarity, odorants and mechanical stimuli. Two
members of the TRPM family function in sensory perception and three TRPM proteins are chanzymes, which
contain C-terminal enzyme domains. As for TRPN and
TRPA, the proteins are characterized by many ankyrin
repeats. TRPN proteins function in mechanotransduction,
whereas TRPA1 is activated by noxious cold and is also
required for auditory response. In addition to these five
closely related TRP subfamilies, which comprise the
Group 1 TRP, members of the two Group 2 TRP subfamilies, TRPP and TRPML, are distantly related to
the Group 1 TRP. Mutations in the found members of
these latter subfamilies are responsible for human
diseases [7].
In the present study, we systematically analyzed the
expression of TRPM and TRPV channels, two important subfamilies of the TRP superfamily, in rat prostate.
Perhaps of the greatest interest is the observation that
some TRP channels appear to be expressed in a large
spectrum of normal prostate tissue. Some might
potentially be used as markers in prostate cancer diagnosis
and for monitoring disease progression during treatment.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Rat tissue
Care of animals conformed to standards established
by the National Institute of Health of China. The
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital Animal Care and
Use Committee approved all animal protocols.
Three-month-old Sprague-Dawley rats were killed with
pentobarbital sodium (130 mg/kg i.p.). They were
exsanguinated, and the prostate were isolated and removed quickly.
The prostate was cleaned free of connective tissue.
2.2 Reverse transcription reaction (PCR)
The prostate tissue was obtained and maintained
at _80ºC until processing for mRNA expression analysis.
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) from the prostate
tissue using the standard procedures. In a 20-μL reaction
1 μg of total RNA was resuspended in
dihexadecylphosphatidylcholine (DEPC)-treated water. The reverse
transcription (RT) reaction was performed using an RT system
procedure (Promega, Madison, USA). Briefly, 5 mmol/L
MgCl2, 1 × RT buffer (10 mmol/L tris-HCl, 50 mmol/L KCl
and 0.1% Triton X-100), 1 mmol/L deoxynucleoside
triphosphate (dNTP) mixture (equal amounts of deoxyadenosine
triphosphate [dATP], deoxycytidine triphosphate
[dCTP], deoxyguanosine triphosphate [dGTP] and deoxythymidine
triphosphate [dTTP]) (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 μg/μL
recombinant RNase (Jingmei Biotech, Shenzhen, China)
ribonuclease inhibitor, 15 U avian myeloblastosis
virus (dAMV) RT (high concentration) and 0.5 µg
oligodeoxythymidine (oligo DT) 15 primers were added to the RNA mixture.
The reaction was done at 37ºC for 5 min and 42ºC for
1 h, followed by 10 min of heating at 95ºC to destroy the
enzyme and RNA.
2.3 Conventional PCR amplification
Sense and anti-sense PCR primers specific to the
TRPM and TRPV channels were designed as Yang
et al. [8]. RT reaction (1 µL) was amplified in a 20-µL
reaction containing 1 × PCR buffer, 0.5 unit Taq (Promega,
Madision, NJ, USA) DNA polymerase, 0.25 mmol/L
dNTP mixture (equal amounts of dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP), 0.2 mmol/L sense and antisense primers,
and 0.25 µL dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Cycle
parameters consisted of a 30-s denaturing step at 94ºC, 45-s
annealing step at 56ºC and 90-s extension step at 72ºC
with 35 cycles per amplification. This was followed by
a final extension at 72ºC for 10 min and the products
were then stored at 4ºC. PCR products were
electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gel (Jingmei Biotech,
Shenzhen, China), stained with 0.5 µg/mL ethidium, and
visualized and photographed on an ultraviolet
transilluminator bromide (SIM International, Los Angeles, CA,
USA). Parallel reactions were run for each RNA sample
in the absence of Superscript III to ascertain that there
was no genomic DNA contamination.
2.4 Quantitative real-time PCR
Gene-specific real-time PCR primers were designed
based upon the published TRPM or TRPV sequences in
Genbank to obtain predicted PCR products of 100_150
bases. At least one primer of each set was designed to
span exon-exon junctions in order to minimize the
possibility of amplifying the genomic DNA. PCR reactions
were performed with QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), using 2 µL of
cDNA as the template in each 25 µL reaction mixture.
PCR assays were performed with an MJ Research Chrom4 Thermal Cycler System (MJ Research, Waltham,
MA, USA). The PCR protocol consisted of initial
enzyme activation at 95ºC for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles
at 95ºC for 15 s and 60ºC for 1 min. Using the same
protocol, standard curves were generated from serial
dilutions of purified PCR products with known copy
numbers measured by absorbance at 260 nm. The
absolute copy number of mRNA of interest was determined
by interpolation of the standard curve with the threshold
cycle value of each sample. To confirm the specificity
of PCR products, a melting curve was obtained at the
end of each run by slow heating with 0.1ºC/s increments
from 65ºC to 95ºC, with fluorescence detected at 0.1ºC
intervals. Standard gel electrophoresis was also
performed to ensure that the end product generated a single
band with the predicted size (100_150 bases). Data were
also normalized with the quantity of 18S rRNA in
individual samples to correct for sample variability.
2.5 Immunohistochemistry staining
Indirect immunohistochemistry staining was performed using the conventional procedure. The primary
antibodies were the same as those used for the Western
blot. Briefly, paraffin section slides were de-paraffinated
with 100% xylenes for three times, each time for 5 min,
then the sections were rehydrated with 100%, 85% and
70% alcohol. Slides were placed in PBS for 5 min, and
antigen retrieval was done by covering the sections with
0.02 mol/L citrate buffer, pH 6.0, and heating them in
a microwave oven for 3 min. After cooling for 3 min,
additional buffer was added and slides were reheated. This
process was repeated until four cycles of heating and
cooling had been performed. Slides were cooled down
to room temperature for 20 min, rinsed with PBS and
blocked with 8% normal goat serum in PBS for 45 min.
The sections were incubated overnight at 4ºC with
primary antibody containing 3% serum. After washing three
times with PBS/0.05% Tween-20 (PBST), sections were
incubated for 1 h at room temperature with
Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:800, Jackson
Immunolab, West Grove, USA). Sections were thoroughly washed with PBST, and then counterstained with
the nuclear dye Hoechest 32258 (1:1 200, Sigma; St.
Louis, MO, USA). Slides were mounted with Aquamount
solution and viewed with a Nikon Fluorescence
Microscope (Nikon Instruments, NY, USA). Images were
captured using a Nikon digital camera and SOP RT 3.4
software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Pictures were obtained
by merging the image of a Hoechst-stained slide and the
fluorescence image from the same field.
3 Results
3.1 Expression of TRPM/TRPV channels mRNA
Figures 1 and 2 shows amplified products using
conventional RT-PCR from prostate tissue of rats. PCR
products of TRPM2, TRPM3, TRPM4, TRPM6, TRPM7, TRPM8, TRPV1, TRPV2, and TRPV4 were
obtained consistently in four separate experiments. Much
weaker bands for TRPM1 and TRPV3 were also determined. All these RT-PCR amplified products had
sizes corresponding to the predicted values. The bands
of TRPM5, TRPV5 and TRPV6 were not detected completely in all experiments.
3.2 Quantification of TRPM and TRPV mRNA
The relative expression of TRPM and TRPV mRNA was determined by quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
TRPM8 expression was the highest among all TRPM subtypes in rat prostatic tissue, with levels equivalent to
0.0284 ± 0.0064% of 18S rRNA (Figure 3). TRPM2,
TRPM3 and TRPM4 were also highly expressed but less
than TRPM8, approximately equal to 71%, 69% and 68%
of TRPM8, respectively. In contrast, TRPM1, TRPM6
and TRPM7 transcripts were expressed at less than
2.5%, 14.0% and 16.5% of TRPM8, whereas the expression
of TRPM5 mRNA were exceedingly low even though their products were detectable. Overall, the expression
of TRPM channels are in the order of:
TRPM8 > TRPM2 > TRPM4 > TRPM3 >
TRPM7 > TRPM6 > TRPM1 > TRPM5.
For the TRPV subfamily, TRPV4 mRNA was most abundantly expressed, being equivalent to 0.0155 ± 0.0038%
of 18S rRNA (Figure 4). It was followed by TRPV2,
which was only approximately 3% TRPV4. The TRPV1 and TRPV3 were expressed by even less, at
0.3% and 0.2% of TRPV4. The TRPV5 and TRPV6 were the least
expressed among the detected TRPV channels and were
almost undetectable. The expression of TRPV transcripts
are in the order of:
TRPV4 > TRPV2 > TRPV1 > TRPV3 > TRPV5 >
TRPV6.
Experiments with samples from five different
animals were performed for the quantification of each
channel subtype.
3.3 Expression and localization of TRPM and TRPV
proteins
Figure 5 shows the expression and localization of
TRPM8 and TRPV1 in rat prostate tissues by fluorescence
immunohistochemistry. Clearly, positive staining was noted
in both epithelial and smooth muscle cells. The highest
TRPM8 and TRPV1 protein expressions were localized in
cytoplasm and cell membranes (Figures 5A
and 5C).
4 Discussion
The expression and function of some members of the TRPM and TRPV subfamilies are poorly understood
and still mysterious in prostatic tissue. For the first time,
we systematically studied the expression of TRPM and
TRPV channels in rat prostatic tissue. The study showed
that: (i) multiple TRPM and TRPV channel subtypes are
co-expressed in rat prostatic tissue; (ii) TRPM8,
TRPM2,TRPM4 and TRPM3 mRNA are most abundantly expressed among the TRPM members, whereas TRPV2
and TRPV4 mRNA are the predominant TRPV transcripts.
The systematic analysis of TRPM and TRPV expression clearly demonstrates at mRNA levels that
multiple TRPM and TRPV channels are co-expressed in
prostatic tissue of rat. TRPM8 was abundant expression in
the normal prostatic tissue in the present and in other
studies [9]. It is demonstrated that the TRPM8 channel
is expressed in both epithelial and smooth muscle cells in
rat prostatic tissues, which is in accordance with the
results of Bidaux et al. [10]. The physiological role of
TRPM8 as a cold receptor of the body has been revealed
by an expression cloning approach to identify a menthol
receptor from trigeminal neurons [11, 12]. The isolated
cDNA codes for TRPM8 and forms a calcium-permeable cation channel. In TRPM8-expressing cells,
application of menthol, icilin or other cooling agents induce
TRPM8 currents, which are comparable to activation of
TRPM8 by temperatures lower than 28ºC [13]. TRPM8
displays a cold receptor of the body, and its activation
can be modulated by many cooling compounds and odorants. In addition, TRPM8 is an important
determiner of Ca2+ homeostasis in prostate epithelial cells and
might be a potential target for the action of drugs in the
management of prostate cancer [14].
TRPM4 was found to be involved in the regulation
of Ca2+ oscillations during T lymphocyte activation
[15]. Recently, Fonfria and associates [16] observed the
expression of TRPM4 in human prostate using TaqMan
and SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR. The present study
also confirms the existence of TRPM4 channel in rat
prostate tissue.
Another finding of the present study was the
abundant expression of TRPM2 and TRPM3 mRNA in
prostatic tissue of rat. TRPM2 is highly expressed in the
brain, and is also found in a variety of peripheral cell
types [17]. It forms a nonselective cation channel
permeable to mainly Na+ and
Ca2+, as well as to K+ and
Cs+. A long and a short splice variant, TRPM2-L and
TRPM2-S, have been described [18]. Several diseases are linked
to this gene, including a form of nonsyndromic
hereditary deafness and holoprosencephaly [19]. TRPM3 forms
a cation channel permeable to divalent cations, especially
to Ca2+ and Mn2+ [20, 21]. TRPM3 is activated in
response to activation of an endogenous muscarinic
receptor by decreasing extracellular osmolarity. It has also
been considered as a store-operated channel [20, 21].
TRPM3 expression has been demonstrated in kidney and
brain, and at lesser levels in testis and spinal cord [20,
21]. No functional involvement of TRPM2 and TRPM3
has been established in prostatic disease.
In our results, there is little expression of TRPM6,
TRPM7, TRPM1, and no expression of TRPM5. TRPM5 was found in the tongue, lungs, testis, digestive system,
as well as in the brain [22]. TRPM5 channels in the taste
receptor cells of the tongue appear essential for the
transduction of sweet, amino acid (umami), and bitter taste
[23]. Fonfria and associates [16] observed the
expression of TRPM5 in human prostate using TaqMan and
SYBR Green real-time RT-PCR. However, our study did not find any expression of TRPM5 with either
traditional RT-PCR or real-time RT-PCR in five samples.
For the TRPV subfamily, our data indicate that TRPV4 and TRPV2 are the predominant transcripts
expressed in rat prostate tissue. TRPV4 has been found
widely expressed in the brain, dorsal root ganglion (DRG)
neurons, and multiple excitable and non-excitable
peripheral cell types [24]. We found that TRPV4 and TRPV2
are expressed in prostatic tissue of rat. The
physiological functions of TRPV4 are thought to include central
and peripheral thermosensing, mechano-sensing (including endothelial cell responses to shear stress),
osmosensing, and basal Ca2+ homeostasis [24]. TRPV2
has been described as a stretch-activated channel, and
has been found to mediate the hypotonic swelling-induced
and stretch-induced increase in [Ca2+]i in vascular smooth
muscle cells [25]. Expression of TRPV2 has been
reported in the brain, and in some non-neuronal tissues
and smooth muscle cells [26]. However, the functional
significance of TRVP2 and TRPV4 in the prostate is still
unclear. Further studies are required to address this point.
From our data, there is little expression of TRPV1,
TRPV3, and no expression of TRPV5 and TRPV6. TRPV5 and TRPV6 are highly expressed in the kidney
and intestine, respectively, where they form highly
selective Ca2+ channels essential for
Ca2+ reabsorption [27]. It is also demonstrated that TRPV6 is not expressed in
benign prostate tissues, including benign prostate
hyperplasia, but is upregulated in prostate cancer [28].
Here, we have identified a large repertoire of TRPM
and TRPV channels in prostatic tissue of rat. In addition,
we also found that some TRPM and TRPV channels are
widely co-expressed in prostatic tissue. Our data might
serve as the molecular and physiological basis for future
explorations of the relation of TRP channels and
prostatic disease. Further studies are required to investigate
the diverse functions of non-selective ion channels in the
prostate.
References
1 Xu XF, Zhou SW, Zhang X, Ye ZQ, Zhang JH, Ma X,
et al. Prostate androgen-regulated gene: a novel potential target for
androgen-independent prostate cancer therapy. Asian J Androl
2006; 8: 455_62.
2 Kang SH, Kim JW, Bae JH, Park HS, Moon DG, Yoon DK,
et al. Targeted-cryosurgical ablation of the prostate with
androgen deprivation therapy: quality of life in high-risk
prostate cancer patients. Asian J Androl 2006; 8:
629_36.
3 Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Wolfert RL, Wang TJ, Rittenhouse
HG, Ratliff TL, et al. Evaluation of percentage of free serum
prostate-specific antigen to improve specificity of prostate
cancer screening. JAMA 1995; 274: 1214_20.
4 Murphy GP, Maguire RT, Rogers B, Partin AW, Nelp WB,
Troychak MJ, et al. Comparison of serum PSMA, PSA levels
with results of Cytogen-356 ProstaScint scanning in prostatic
cancer patients. Prostate 1997; 33: 281_5.
5 Correale P, Walmsley K, Zaremba S, Zhu M, Schlom J, Tsang
KY. Generation of human cytolytic T lymphocyte lines
directed against prostate-specific antigen (PSA) employing a
PSA oligoepitope peptide. J Immunol 1998; 161:
3186_94.
6 Murphy GP, Tjoa BA, Simmons SJ, Jarisch J, Bowes VA,
Ragde H, et al. Infusion of dendritic cells pulsed with HLAA2-
specific prostate-specific membrane antigen peptides: a Phase
II prostate cancer vaccine trial involving patients with
hormone-refractory metastatic disease. Prostate 1999; 38: 73_8.
7 Montell C. The TRP superfamily of cation channels. Sci
STKE 2005; 3.
8 Yang XR, Lin MJ, McIntosh LS, Sham JS. Functional
expression of transient receptor potential melastatin- and
vanilloid-related channels in pulmonary arterial and aortic smooth
muscle. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2006; 290:
L1267_76.
9 Stein RJ, Santos S, Nagatomi J, Hayashi Y, Minnery BS, Xavier
M, et al. Cool (TRPM8) and hot (TRPV1) receptors in the
bladder and male genital tract. J Urol 2004; 172: 1175_8.
10 Bidaux G, Roudbaraki M, Merle C, Crepin A, Delcourt P,
Slomianny C, et al. Evidence for specific TRPM8 expression
in human prostate secretory epithelial cells: functional
androgen receptor requirement. Endocr Relat Cancer 2005; 12:
367_82.
11 McKemy DD, Neuhausser WM, Julius D. Identification of a
cold receptor reveals a general role for TRP channels in
thermosensation. Nature 2002; 416: 52_8.
12 Peier AM, Moqrich A, Hergarden AC, Reeve AJ, Andersson
DA, Story GM, et al. A TRP channel that senses cold stimuli
and menthol. Cell 2002; 108: 705_15.
13 Behrendt HJ, Germann T, Gillen C, Hatt H, Jostock R.
Characterization of the mouse cold-menthol receptor TRPM8 and
vanilloid receptor type-1 VR1 using a fluorometric imaging plate
reader (FLIPR) assay. Br J Pharmacol 2004; 141: 737_45.
14 Zhang L, Barritt GJ. Evidence that TRPM8 is an
androgen-dependent Ca2+ channel required for the survival of prostate
cancer cells. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 8365_73.
15 Launay P, Cheng H, Srivatsan S, Penner R, Fleig A, Kinet JP.
TRPM4 regulates calcium oscillations after T cell activation.
Science 2004; 306: 1374_7.
16 Fonfria E, Murdock PR, Cusdin FS, Benham CD, Kelsell RE,
McNulty S. Tissue distribution profiles of the human TRPM
cation channel family. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2006;
26:159_78.
17 Kraft R, Harteneck C. The mammalian melastatin-related
transient receptor potential cation channels: an overview. Pflugers
Arch 2005; 451: 204_11.
18 Zhang W, Chu X, Tong Q, Cheung JY, Conrad K, Masker K,
et al. A novel TRPM2 isoform inhibits calcium influx and
susceptibility to cell death. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 16222_9.
19 Nilius B, Voets T, Peters J. TRP channels in disease. Sci
STKE 2005; 295: 8.
20 Nishida M, Sugimoto K, Hara Y, Mori E, Morii T, Kurosaki
T, et al. Amplification of receptor signalling by
Ca2+ entry-mediated translocation and activation of PLCgamma2 in B
lymphocytes. EMBO J 2003; 22: 4677_88.
21 Rosker C, Graziani A, Lukas M, Eder P, Zhu MX, Romanin
C, et al. Ca(2+) signaling by TRPC3 involves Na(+) entry and
local coupling to the Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger. J Biol Chem
2004; 279: 13696_704.
22 Ullrich ND, Voets T, Prenen J, Vennekens R, Talavera K,
Droogmans G, et al. Comparison of functional properties of
the Ca2+-activated cation channels TRPM4 and TRPM5 from
mice. Cell Calcium 2005; 37:267_78.
23 Zhang Y, Hoon MA, Chandrashekar J, Mueller KL, Cook B,
Wu D, et al. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes:
different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell 2003;
112: 293_301.
24 Nilius B, Vriens J, Prenen J, Droogmans G, Voets T. TRPV4
calcium entry channel: a paradigm for gating diversity. Am J
Physiol Cell Physiol 2004: 286: C195_205.
25 Muraki K, Iwata Y, Katanosaka Y, Ito T, Ohya S, Shigekawa
M, et al. TRPV2 is a component of osmotically sensitive
cation channels in murine aortic myocytes. Circ Res 2003; 93:
829_38.
26 Pedersen SF, Owsianik G, Nilius B. TRP channels: an
overview. Cell Calcium 2005; 38: 233_52.
27 den Dekker E, Hoenderop JG, Nilius B, Bindels RJ. The
epithelial calcium channels, TRPV5 & TRPV6: from
identification towards regulation. Cell Calcium 2003; 33: 497_507.
28 Fixemer T, Wissenbach U, Flockerzi V, Bonkhoff H.
Expression of the Ca2+-selective cation channel TRPV6 in human
prostate cancer: a novel prognostic marker for tumor progression.
Oncogene 2003: 22: 7858_61.
|