Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 28, Issue 1 (January 2026) 28, 38–42; 10.4103/aja2024112

Excellent long-term device survival of inflatable penile prosthesis over 27 years

Moncada, Ignacio1; Krishnappa, Pramod1,2; Martinez-Salamanca, Juan Ignacio3,4; Palma-Hendges, Luiz Pedro3; Gonzalez-Garcia, Francisco Javier3; Hernandez-Fernandez, Carlos5; Lledo-Garcia, Enrique5

1Department of Urology and Robotic Surgery, La Zarzuela University Hospital, Madrid 28023, Spain

2Andrology Division, Department of Urology and Robotic Surgery, AndroNeo, Orchidz Health, NU Hospitals, Bengaluru 560010, Karnataka, India

3Lyx Institute of Urology, Francisco de Vitoria University, Madrid 28006, Spain

4Department of Urology, Puerta De Hierro-Majadahonda University Hospital, Madrid 28222, Spain

5Department of Urology, Gregorio Maranon University General Hospital, Complutense University, Madrid 28007, Spain

Correspondence: Dr. P Krishnappa (pramod23dr@gmail.com)

Originally published: February 14, 2025 Received: May 27, 2024 Accepted: November 19, 2024

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the long-term device survival of a 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (PP) in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). This retrospective observational longitudinal study involved patients with drug-refractory ED who underwent primary 3-piece inflatable PP implantation at a single center from 1992 to 2019. The outcomes included complications of various inflatable PP models, and Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of PP survival. Of the total 426 patients, 140 (32.9%) were implanted in the period of 1992–2000, 128 (30.0%) in the period of 2001–2008, and 158 (37.1%) in the period of 2009–2019. The PP used in the study included AMS 700 CX (62.0%, n = 264), AMS 700 CXR (7.7%, n = 33), AMS Ultrex Plus (10.3%, n = 44), and Alpha I (20.0%, n = 85). The overall complication rate was 28.2% (120/426), and the majority happened after 6 months. The causes of device removal included mechanical failure (11.0%, n = 47), infection (3.9%, n = 17), cylinder extrusion (6.3%, n = 27), and unspecified (0.2%, n = 1). Of the total mechanical failures (n = 47), 18 (38.3%) occurred in the cylinders, 10 (21.3%) occurred in the pump, 7 (14.9%) occurred in the reservoir, 6 (12.8%) occurred in the connections, and 6 (12.8%) were nonspecific. Global average survival rates of the PP at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years were 96.2%, 86.7%, 77.5%, and 58.7%, respectively. The 3-piece inflatable PP has an excellent device survival rate at 5 years and 10 years.

Keywords: device survival; erectile dysfunction; infection; mechanical failure; penile prosthesis

Full Text | PDF |

 
Browse:  7
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.