Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

-Ahead of print
-Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
-Current Issue
-Archive
-Acknowledgments
-Special Issues
-Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

-Online Submission
-Online Review
-Instruction for Authors
-Instruction for Reviewers
-English Corner new!

About AJA

-About AJA
-Editorial Board
-Contact Us
-News

Resources & Services

-Advertisement
-Subscription
-Email alert
-Proceedings
-Reprints

Download area

-Copyright licence
-EndNote style file
-Manuscript word template
-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

-Proof-reading for the
    authors

-AJA Club (in English)
-AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 28, Issue 3 (May 2026) 28, 223–229; 10.4103/aja202572

Are men aware of normal penile length and sexual function? A narrative review of the literature

Faizal, Yoonus1; Wu, Winston2; Chan, Vincent3; Duns, Glenn3; Schubach, Kathryn M3; Katz, Darren J3,4,5

1Eastern Health, Victoria 3218, Australia

2Western Health, Victoria 3021, Australia

3Men’s Health Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

4Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia

5Department of Urology, Western Health, Victoria 3021, Australia

Correspondence: Dr. Y Faizal (yoonusfaizal@yahoo.co.uk)

Received: 18 February 2025; Accepted: 20 August 2025; published online: 20 January 2026

Abstract

Men frequently present to their health practitioners with concerns that they are not “normal” in the domains of sexual anatomy and function. This narrative review aims to synthesize the existing evidence on the general male population’s perception of normative sexual anatomy (penile length) and function (erectile and ejaculatory function). A structured literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, limited to English language studies that involved adult participants from non-medical backgrounds. Of the 1098 studies identified, only seven met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, indicating an insufficiency in research directly addressing men’s perceptions of normative sexual anatomy and function. The studies included in this review found that there was an inaccurate understanding of what empirically constitutes “normal”. Men considered above-average penis lengths to be common and perceived themselves as “small” despite being within the normal range. They tended to overestimate typical intercourse durations and were inaccurate in self-diagnosing ejaculatory dysfunction and erectile dysfunction. The inability to differentiate normal and abnormal sexual function reflects a poor understanding of what constitutes normal. These findings may inform future research and provide guidance for educating clinicians and the public to improve sexual health.

Keywords: adult; awareness; erectile dysfunction; male; normal; penile length; premature ejaculation

Full Text | PDF |

 
Browse:  867
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.