Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

-Ahead of print
-Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
-Current Issue
-Archive
-Acknowledgments
-Special Issues
-Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

-Online Submission
-Online Review
-Instruction for Authors
-Instruction for Reviewers
-English Corner new!

About AJA

-About AJA
-Editorial Board
-Contact Us
-News

Resources & Services

-Advertisement
-Subscription
-Email alert
-Proceedings
-Reprints

Download area

-Copyright licence
-EndNote style file
-Manuscript word template
-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

-Proof-reading for the
    authors

-AJA Club (in English)
-AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 15, Issue 4 (July 2013) 15, 441–442; 10.1038/aja.2013.31

Screening and efficacy of radical prostatectomy

Michael Froehner

Department of Urology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden D-01307, Germany

Correspondence: Dr M Froehner, (Michael.Froehner@uniklinikum-dresden.de)

advance online publication, April 15, 2013

Abstract

In a recently published study, the results of the Prostate Cancer Intervention versus Observation Trial (PIVOT) trial were compared with that of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4 (SPCG-4). The authors concluded that the discrepancy of the mortality rates between both studies may be explained by screen-related lead time and over-diagnosis. In this comment, some potential biases are discussed and the limited applicability of the results of both randomized trials to healthy candidates for radical prostatectomy is underlined.

PDF | PDF |

 
Browse:  3998
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.