Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 15, Issue 1 (January 2013) 15, 10–15; 10.1038/aja.2012.115

Simultaneous penile prosthesis and male sling/artificial urinary sphincter

Dominic Lee1, Claudio Romero2, Frances Alba2, O Lenaine Westney1 and Run Wang1,2

1 Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2 Division of Urology, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Correspondence: Correspondence: Prof R Wang, (Run.Wang@uth.tmc.edu)

Received 2 September 2012; Revised 5 October 2012; Accepted 8 October 2012 Advance online publication 3 December 2012

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) from urethral sphincteric deficiency is not an uncommon problem. The commonest etiology is intervention for localized prostate cancer and/or radical cystoprostatectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Despite advances in surgical technology with robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and nerve sparing techniques, the rates of ED and SUI remain relatively unchanged. They both impact greatly on quality of life domains and have been associated with poor performance outcomes. Both the artificial urinary sphincter and penile prosthesis are gold standard treatments with proven efficacy, satisfaction and durability for end-stage SUI and ED respectively. Simultaneous prosthesis implantation for concurrent conditions has been well described, mostly in small retrospective series. The uptake of combination surgery has been slow due in part to technical demands of the surgery and to an extent, a heightened anxiety over potential complications. This paper aims to discuss the technical aspect of concurrent surgery for both disease entity and the current published outcomes of the various surgical techniques with this approach.


Keywords:artificial urinary sphincter; dual implants; erectile dysfunction; penile prosthesis; stress urinary incontinence

PDF | PDF | 中文摘要 |

 
Browse:  4339
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.