Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 8, Issue 3 (May 2006) 8, 367–371; 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2006.00134.x

Evaluation of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Wei-Jun Fu, Bao-Fa Hong, Xiao-Xiong Wang, Yong Yang, Wei Cai, Jiang-Ping Gao, Yao-Fu Chen and Cui-E Zhang

Department of Urology, Chinese Peoples Liberation Army General Hospital, Military Postgraduate Medical College, Beijing 100853, China

Correspondence: Dr Wei-Jun Fu, Department of Urology, Chinese Peoples Liberation Army General Hospital, Military Postgraduate Medical College, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Hai dian District, Beijing 100853, China. Fax: +86-10-6818-5450. E-mail: fuweijun@hotmail.com

Received 15 September 2005; Accepted 23 December 2005

Abstract

Aim: To explore the feasibility and safety of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) on high-risk patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and to evaluate their clinical and voiding outcome.

Methods: A total of 85 high-risk patients with obstructive BPH underwent PVP with an 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser, which was delivered through a side-deflecting fiber with a 23 Fr continuous flow cystoscope. Operative time, blood loss, indwelling catheterzation, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life score (QoL), uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume and short-term complication rates were evaluated for all patients.

Results: All patients got through the perioperative period safely. The chief advantages of PVP were: short operative time (25.6 7.6 min), little bleeding loss (56.8 14.3 mL) and short indwelling catheterization (1.6 0.8 d). The IPSS and QoL decreased from (29.6 5.4) and (5.4 0.6) to (9.5 2.6) and (1.3 0.6), respectively. The vast majority of patients were satisfied with voiding outcome. The mean maximal urinary flow rate increased to 17.8 mL/s and postvoid residual urine volume decreased to 55.6 mL. These results are significantly different from preoperative data (P < 0.05). No patient required blood transfusion or fluid absorption. There were few complications and very high patient satisfaction after operation.

Conclusion: PVP has a short operative time and high tolerance, and is safe, effective and minimally invasive for high-risk patients, therefore it might be considered as a good alternative treatment for high-risk patients with obstructive urinary symptoms as a result of BPH.

Keywords: benign prostatic hyperplasia, photoselective vaporization of the prostate, high-risk, laser surgery, prostate

Full Text | PDF | 中文摘要 |

 
Browse:  3775
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.