|
Volume 23, Issue 2 (March 2021) 23, 129–134; 10.4103/aja.aja_62_20
Management of residual penile curvature after penile prosthesis placement
Denis V Krakhotkin1, David J Ralph2, Gideon A Blecher3,4, Volodymyr A Chernylovskyi5, Francesco Greco6, Evgeny E Bakurov7, Ruslan A Bugaev1
1 Central District Hospital, Outpatient Department, Kamenolomni, Rostov Region 346480, Russia
2 University College London St Peter's Andrology Centre and University College London Hospitals, London W1G 6BJ, United Kingdom
3 Monash University, Department of Surgery, Melbourne 3168, Australia
4 The Alfred Hospital, Department of Urology, Melbourne 3004, Australia
5 Department of Urology 1, City Clinical Hospital No. 4, Dnipro 49102, Ukraine
6 Department of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo 24125, Italy
7 Department of Surgery No. 1, Rostov Regional Hospital ROKB 1, Rostov-on-Don 344015, Russia
Correspondence: Dr. DV Krakhotkin (den_surgeon@mail.ru)
Date of Submission 28-Jan-2020 Date of Acceptance 26-Aug-2020 Date of Web Publication 23-Oct-2020
| Abstract |
|
Residual penile curvature is a common situation following the implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with Peyronie's disease. Currently, there is a variety of options for the correction of residual curvature, including penile modeling, plication techniques, as well as tunical incision/excision with or without grafting. A literature search of PubMed and Medline databases was conducted from 1964 until 2020, using search terms for all articles in the English language. In this article, we provide a review of the techniques and the outcomes, according to the published literature.
Keywords: grafting; modeling; penile curvature; penile implant; penile prosthesis; Peyronie's disease; tunical plication
Full Text |
PDF |
|
| |
| Browse: 1368 |
|
