|
Volume 28, Issue 1 (January 2026) 28, 16–22; 10.4103/aja202593
Penile implant reservoir placement methods: is there a gold standard?
Sedigh, Omid1; Soleimanzadeh, Farzin2; Buffi, Nicolò3; Tondroanamag, Farhad2; Gobbo, Andrea4; Tallari, Alessandro1; Zehisaadat, Mahsa2; Tahmasbi, Fateme2; Alnadhari, Ibrahim5; Shamsodini, Ahmad5; Hosseini, Seyed Jalil6; Ralph, David J7; Bettocchi, Carlo8
1Urology and Reconstructive Andrology Department, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Torino 10125410158, Italy
2Research Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Iranian EBM Centre: A JBI Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz 5166614766, Iran
3Department of Biochemical Science, Humanitas University, Milan 20129, Italy
4Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London W1G 8PH, United Kingdom
5Al Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Al Wakra 3050, Qatar
6Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 3050, Iran
7Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, Great Britain, London NW1 2PB, United Kingdom
8Department of Andrology and Male Genitalia Reconstructive Surgery, University of Foggia, Foggia 70126, Italy
Correspondence: Dr. F Tondroanamag (farhadtond@gmail.com)
Received: 08 February 2025; Accepted: 22 October 2025; published online: 09 January 2026
| Abstract |
|
Erectile dysfunction (ED), a condition affecting nearly 150 million men worldwide, is expected to impact over 300 million by 2025. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) remain the first-line treatment for ED, yet a subset of patients exhibit inadequate responses. For these individuals, the inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) offers an effective alternative, with the three-piece IPP being particularly favored for its high satisfaction and low complication rates. However, the challenge of optimal reservoir placement, particularly in the extraperitoneal space of Retzius (SOR), has prompted investigations into alternative approaches. SOR placement is associated with complications, such as injury to iliac vessels, bladder puncture, and bowel perforation. Various alternative sites have been proposed, including epigastric extraperitoneal, intraperitoneal (IP), high submuscular (HSM), and lateral retroperitoneal (LRP) positions, each aiming to mitigate these risks while improving patient outcomes. Comparative studies have shown that methods such as IP and HSM reduce the risk of vessel compression and bladder injury, often yielding higher satisfaction rates compared with SOR. However, each technique carries unique drawbacks, including risks of palpability, improper placement, and longer operative times. This review synthesizes current evidence on reservoir placement strategies, evaluates their advantages and limitations, and highlights crucial considerations for patient selection, providing a comprehensive overview of IPP implantation techniques and their evolving roles in the management of ED.
Keywords: erectile dysfunction; penile diseases; penile prosthesis
Full Text |
PDF |
|
| |
| Browse: 7 |
|