Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 24, Issue 2 (March 2022) 24, 125–134; 10.4103/aja.aja_53_21

Severe male factor in in vitro fertilization: definition, prevalence, and treatment. An update

Rossella Mazzilli1,2, Alberto Vaiarelli1, Lisa Dovere1, Danilo Cimadomo1, Nicolò Ubaldi3, Susanna Ferrero1, Laura Rienzi1, Francesco Lombardo4, Andrea Lenzi4, Herman Tournaye5, Filippo Maria Ubaldi1

1 Clinica Valle Giulia, GeneraLife IVF Centers, Via G. De Notaris, Rome 2B 00197, Italy
2 Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome 00189, Italy
3 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Via della Pineta Sacchetti 217, Rome 00168, Italy
4 Department of Experimental Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, Rome 00161, Italy
5 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Free University Brussels (UZ Brussel), Brussels 1090, Belgium

Correspondence: Dr. FM Ubaldi (ubaldi.fm@gmail.com)

Date of Submission 04-Dec-2020 Date of Acceptance 13-Apr-2021 Date of Web Publication 06-Jul-2021

Abstract

Infertility affects 10%–15% of couples worldwide. Of all infertility cases, 20%–70% are due to male factors. In the past, men with severe male factor (SMF) were considered sterile. Nevertheless, the development of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) drastically modified this scenario. The advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART), specifically regarding surgical sperm retrieval procedures, allowed the efficacious treatment of these conditions. Yet, before undergoing ICSI, male factor infertility requires careful evaluation of clinical and lifestyle behavior together with medical treatment. Epidemiologically speaking, women whose male partner is azoospermic tend to be younger and with a better ovarian reserve. These couples, in fact, are proposed ART earlier in their life, and for this reason, their ovarian response after stimulation is generally good. Furthermore, in younger couples, azoospermia can be partially compensated by the efficient ovarian response, resulting in an acceptable fertility rate following in vitro fertilization (IVF) techniques. Conversely, when azoospermia is associated with a reduced ovarian reserve and/or advanced maternal age, the treatment becomes more challenging, with a consequent reduction in IVF outcomes. Nonetheless, azoospermia seems to impair neither the euploidy rate at the blastocyst stage nor the implantation of euploid blastocysts. Based on the current knowledge, the assessment of male infertility factors should involve: (1) evaluation – to diagnose and quantify seminologic alterations; (2) potentiality – to determine the real possibilities to improve sperm parameters and/or retrieve spermatozoa; (3) time – to consider the available “treatment window”, based on maternal age and ovarian reserve. This review represents an update of the definition, prevalence, causes, and treatment of SMF in a modern ART clinic.

Keywords: azoospermia; in vitro fertilization; infertility; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; severe male factor; sperm

Full Text | PDF |

 
Browse:  783
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.