Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

-Ahead of print
-Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
-Current Issue
-Archive
-Acknowledgments
-Special Issues
-Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

-Online Submission
-Online Review
-Instruction for Authors
-Instruction for Reviewers
-English Corner new!

About AJA

-About AJA
-Editorial Board
-Contact Us
-News

Resources & Services

-Advertisement
-Subscription
-Email alert
-Proceedings
-Reprints

Download area

-Copyright licence
-EndNote style file
-Manuscript word template
-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

-Proof-reading for the
    authors

-AJA Club (in English)
-AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 18, Issue 4 (July 2016) 18, 575–579; DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.175096

Clinically available RNA profiling tests of prostate tumors: utility and comparison

Rong Na1,2, Yishuo Wu1,2, Qiang Ding1,2, Jianfeng Xu1,2,3

1 Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai; Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China
2 Fudan Institute of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China; Department of Urology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China; Program for Personalized Cancer Care, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA,

Correspondence: R Na (narong.hs@gmail.com)

1-3-2016

Abstract

In the postscreening era, physicians are in need of methods to discriminate aggressive from nonaggressive prostate cancer (PCa) to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment. However, studies have shown that prognoses (e.g., progression and mortality) differ even among individuals with similar clinical and pathological characteristics. Existing risk classifiers (TMN grading system, Gleason score, etc.) are not accurately enough to represent the biological features of PCa. Using new genomic technologies, novel biomarkers and classifiers have been developed and shown to add value to clinical or pathological risk factors for predicting aggressive disease. Among them, RNA testing (gene expression analysis) is useful because it can not only reflect genetic variations but also reflect epigenetic regulations. Commercially available RNA profiling tests (Oncotype Dx, Prolaris, and Decipher) have demonstrated strong abilities to discriminate PCa with poor prognosis from less aggressive diseases. For instance, these RNA profiling tests can predict disease progression in active surveillance patients or early recurrence after radical treatments. These tests may offer more dependable methods for PCa prognosis prediction to make more accurate and personal medical decisions.

Keywords: precision medicine; prostate cancer; RNA profiling

Full Text | PDF | 中文摘要 |

 
Browse:  2544
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.