Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 19, Issue 3 (May 2017) 19, 321–325; DOI:10.4103/1008-682X.172822

Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses

Javier Romero Otero, César Rojas Cruz, Borja García Gómez, Joaquim Sarquella Geli, Jose Medina Polo, Eduard Ruiz Castañé, Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín

112 de Octubre University Hospital, Department of Urology, Madrid, Spain; 2Fundació Puigvert, Department of Andrology, Barcelona, Spain.

Correspondence: Dr. JR Otero (jromerootero@hotmail.com)

Date of Submission 01-Jul-2015 Date of Decision 30-Aug-2015 Date of Acceptance 23-Nov-2015 Date of Web Publication 22-Jan-2016

Abstract

Most widespread three‑component penile prosthesis models are 700CX™ and Titan®. Our purpose is to assess patient and partner
satisfaction after the first implant. This is a multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study in which all patients who met the
inclusion criteria between 2009 and 2013 were included. In total, 248 patients agreed to participate. To evaluate patient satisfaction,
a validated but modified 11‑question questionnaire was completed (EDITS); and a nonvalidated two‑item questionnaire was given to
the partner. Statistical analysis used an ordinal logistic regression model. Two hundred and forty‑eight patients (194 with 700CX™
vs 54 with Titan®) and 207 couples completed the questionnaire (165 with 700CX™ vs 42 with Titan®). Overall satisfaction was
high. Both showed great reliability for sexual intercourse and high compliance with prior expectations. Most patients were able to
manage the penile prosthesis correctly within 6 months. Postoperative penile shortening led to some dissatisfaction in 42% and
46% of cases (700CX™/Titan®). Significant differences were found in three questions of patients’ questionnaire. There were more
patients satisfied with the 700CX™ (P = 0.0001). No patient with Titan® implant took longer than 6 months to optimal management.
Only 4% of patients with 700CX™ implant were dissatisfied with the deflation, in contrast to 24% with the Titan® (P = 0.0031).
Of the two partners’ questions, one showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.0026). It seems that group 700CX™ would
recommend to re‑implant the prosthesis with a greater tendency. The overall satisfaction was very high for both prostheses. The
final aspect of the erected and flaccid penis was satisfactory, but both groups showed significant discontent with its final size.
Partners’ overall satisfaction was high.

Full Text | PDF |

 
Browse:  1196
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.