Home  |  Archive  |  Online Submission  |  News & Events  |  Subscribe  |  APFA  |  Society  |  Links  |  Contact Us  |  中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

Links

Meetings
Journals
Societies & Institutes
Hospitals
Databases & Libraries
Companies
Websites
Other links

 
Abstract

Volume 17, Issue 2 (March 2015) 17, 298–303; doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.143251

The reference values for semen parameters of 1213 fertile men in Guangdong Province in China

Yun‑Ge Tang1,2,3, Li‑Xin Tang1,2,3, Qi‑Ling Wang1,2,3, Ge Song1,4, Yan‑Jia Jiang1,2, Shun‑Mei Deng1,2, Fang Jiang1,2,3, Wei‑Bing Qin1,2,3

1Key Laboratory of Male Reproductive and Genetics, National Health and Family Planning Commission, Guangzhou 510600, China; 2Department of Male Reproduction, Family Planning Research Institute of Guangdong, Guangzhou 510600, China; 3Human Sperm Bank of Guangdong Province, Guanzghou 510600, China; 4Reproductive Medicine Center, Family Planning Research Institute of Guangdong, Guangzhou 510600, China.

Correspondence: Dr. YG Tang (tyg813@126.com) or Dr. WB Qin (guardqin@163.com)

2014-11-18

Abstract

Semen samples were collected from 1213 fertile men whose partners had a time‑to‑pregnancy (TTP) ≤12 months in Guangdong Province in Southern China, and semen parameters including semen volume, sperm concentration, total counts, motility, and morphology were evaluated according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 guideline. All semen parameters analyzed were normal in ~62.2% of the total samples, whereas ~37.8% showed at least one of the semen parameters below normal threshold values. The fifth centiles (with 95% confidence intervals) were 1.3 (1.2–1.5) ml for semen volume, 20 × 106 (18×106–20×106) ml−1 for sperm concentration, 40 × 106 (38×106–44×106) per ejaculate for total sperm counts, 48% (47%–53%) for vitality, 39% (36%–43%) for total motility, 25% (23%–27%) for sperm progressive motility, 5.0% (4%–5%) for normal morphology. The pH values ranged from 7.2 to 8.0 with the mean ± standard deviation at 7.32 ± 0.17. No effects of age and body mass index were found on semen parameters. Occupation, smoking and alcohol abuse, varicocele appeared to decrease semen quality. Sperm concentration, but not sperm morphology, is positively correlated with TTP, whereas vitality is negatively correlated with TTP. Our study provides the latest reference values for the semen parameters of Chinese fertile men in Guangdong Province, which are close to those described in the new WHO guidelines (5th Edition).

Keywords: Chinese fertile men; semen parameters; semen quality; time‑to‑pregnancy

Full Text | PDF | 中文摘要 |

 
Browse:  651
 
Copyright 1999-2017  Shanghai Materia Medica, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.  All rights reserved