Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 3, Issue 1 (March 2001) 3, 55–62;

Application of seminal germ cell morphology and semenbiochemistry in the diagnosis and management of azoospermic subjects

S. Roy, A. Banerjee, H.C. Pandey, G. Singh, G.L. Kumari

1.National Institute of Health and Family Welfare (NIHFW), New Delhi-110067, India
    2.Reproductive Health Foundation (RHF), New Delhi, India

Advance online publication 1 March 2001

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate whether the study of seminal germ cell morphology (SGCM) and semen biochemistry could be fruitfully utilized for the diagnosis and management of azoospermic subjects. Methods: In the semen, mature and immature germ cells are contributed by the testes, 70% of glycerylphosphoryl choline (GPC) by the epididymis, fructose mostly or solely by the seminal vesicles and acid phosphate (ACP) by the prostate. In 16 normal volunteers, 12 vasectomized subjects and 186 azoospermic subjects, these parameters have been studied and the data have been analyzed. Results: Both mature and immature germ cells are absent in the semen of vasectomized subjects as well as in obstructive azoospermia; GPC level is also significantly decreased in both these groups. In cases with non-obstructive azoospermia immature germ cells are present and seminal GPC, ACP and fructose levels are normal. The diagnosis of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermiabased on these parameters correlated well with correct testicular biopsy findings. In some cases of azoospermia due to hypospermatogenesis or spermatogenic developmental arrest, the SGCM studies were very helpful in objectively monitoring the response of the germinal tissue to specific treatments. Conclusion: SGCM and semen biochemical parameters are very valuable non-invasive markers for differentiating obstructive from non-obstructive azoospermia. The SGCM findings serve as a dependable non-invasive testicular marker with high predictive value.
    
    

Full Text |

 
Browse:  2346
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.