Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

-Ahead of print
-Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
-Current Issue
-Archive
-Acknowledgments
-Special Issues
-Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

-Online Submission
-Online Review
-Instruction for Authors
-Instruction for Reviewers
-English Corner new!

About AJA

-About AJA
-Editorial Board
-Contact Us
-News

Resources & Services

-Advertisement
-Subscription
-Email alert
-Proceedings
-Reprints

Download area

-Copyright licence
-EndNote style file
-Manuscript word template
-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

-Proof-reading for the
    authors

-AJA Club (in English)
-AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 3, Issue 3 (September 2001) 3, 235–237;

Pressure assessment in intercavernous embedding of bulboperineal urethra for treatment of urinary incontinence after prostatic operation

.X. Qian, H.F. Wu, Y.G. Shui, W. Zhang, S.G. Cheng, M. Gu, Z.Q. Xu

Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China

Advance online publication 1 September 2001

Abstract

Aim: To put forward criteria for the pressure assessment in the operation of intercavernous embedding of bulboperineal urethra for the treatment of urinary in continence after prostatic operation. Methods: A F14 urethral catheter is inserted during the operation and upon suturing the corpora cavernosa centrally, the catheter is slowly pushed in and pulled out in order that the operator feels a certain degree of close-fit resistance. The degree of tightness of the stitches, which regulate the compression pressure, is adjusted in accordance with this close-fit sensation. To further ascertain the adequacy of the force of compression, the bladder is filled with 300 ml physiological saline and observe the appropriateness (size and continuity) of the outflow stream when the lower abdomen is depressed with a pressure of 80-90 cm H2O. The operation was given to six patients suffered from urinary incontinence for 20 or more months after prostatic operation. Results: Five cases achieved complete recovery, while the therapeutic effect of the 6th one was not satisfactory. A second stage operation was carried out 3 months later with the addition of one more stitch both proximally and distally to reinforce the compression force. The condition was improved dramatically.The follow-up period averaged 3.5 years. Conclusion: The adequacy of the compression pressure exerted by the juxtaposed corpora cavernosa is the key point deter mining the outcome of the operation. The measures for assessing the compression pressure suggested by the authors are helpful in obtaining the good results of the present paper (6/6 success) as compared with 25/34 success in the previous report.

Full Text |

 
Browse:  2950
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.