Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Online First

10.4103/aja202517

Occlusive effectiveness of open-ended no-scalpel vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition: a descriptive study

Diabate, Souleymane1,2; Arellano, Marco1; Cloutier, Jonathan2,3,4; Dallaire, Michel3; Plourde, Simon3; Labrecque, Michel2,3,5

1Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6, Canada

2Research Center of the Quebec City University Hospital Center, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec G1S 4L8, Canada

3Vasectomy Quebec, Quebec City, Quebec G1H 7B5, Canada

4Department of Surgery, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6, Canada

5Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6, Canada

Correspondence: Dr. M Labrecque (michel.labrecque@fmed.ulaval.ca)

Originally published: April 25, 2025 Received: October 29, 2024 Accepted: February 17, 2025

Abstract

We aimed to assess the occlusive effectiveness of open-ended vasectomy with mucosal cautery and fascial interposition and to determine the factors associated with occlusion failure. We studied all vasectomies performed between September 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021, by four vasectomy surgeons from Quebec City, Quebec, Canada. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were extracted from the electronic medical records. Occlusive effectiveness was assessed in all men with at least one postvasectomy semen analysis (PVSA). The effectiveness criteria were adapted from those of the American Urological Association (AUA) vasectomy guideline. Among the 4000 eligible vasectomies, 2242 (56.1%) were followed by at least one PVSA, with 99 (4.4%) requiring more than one PVSA. Occlusive effectiveness was achieved in 2233 vasectomies (99.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 99.3%–99.8%), with 2199 (98.1%) and 34 (1.5%) classified as confirmed and probable success, respectively. The final status of the three vasectomies (0.1%) was indeterminate. Occlusive failure was observed in six vasectomies (0.3%; 95% CI: 0.1%–0.6%). The four surgeons had a similar risk of failure. The only significant factor associated with failure was the difficulty in performing the vas occlusion reported by the surgeon (7.4% [2/27] vs 0.2% [4/2212]; relative risk = 41.0; 95% CI: 7.8–214.2). The high occlusive effectiveness observed in our study validates AUA recommendations, supporting the use of this technique. Difficulty in occlusion of the vas deferens, as reported by surgeons, was the only factor associated with vasectomy failure. This finding highlights the need for PVSA in such cases.

Keywords: contraception; family planning services; semen analysis; treatment outcome; vasectomy

Full Text  |  PDF  |  
Browse  11
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.