Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Online First

10.4103/aja202536

The importance of the season of biopsy on the Gleason score on biopsy: does exposure to sunshine have an influence?

Delouya, Guila; Taussky, Daniel

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montréal, Quebec H2X 0C1, Canada.

Correspondence: Dr. D Taussky (daniel.taussky.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca)

Received: 20 November 2024; Accepted: 15 April 2025; published online: 08 July 2025

Abstract

The circadian clock is strongly influenced by the sun exposure and prostate cancer has been shown to be inversely proportional to it. We investigated whether PCa aggressiveness in Montreal, Quebec, Canada, differs over the months during or following potentially longer exposure to sunlight. We analyzed 3447 patients treated between January 1995 and December 2023 with primary radiotherapy for localized PCa. We investigated whether the month when diagnostic biopsy was performed was associated with a more frequent diagnosis of a primary Gleason score (pGS) of 4 or 5. We grouped the months of biopsy into the four quarters (Q1–4) of the year. Multivariable logistic regression was used to predict a pGS of 4 or 5, adjusted for age and year of biopsy. There were significantly fewer biopsies (P = 0.027) with pGS 4 or 5 in the last 3 months of the year (Q4; 19.0%) than those in Q1–3 (22.9%). Age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and the number of positive biopsies were not significantly different between Q4 versus Q1–3. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a biopsy in Q4 was significantly predictive of a lower risk of pGS 4 or 5 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63–0.93, P = 0.007), as was older age (P < 0.001), but not the year of biopsy (P = 0.76). In conclusion, patients biopsied during Q4 had a 23% lower risk of a pGS 4 or 5 on diagnostic biopsy than those biopsied during the previous 9 months. Our results are not a proof of causality.

Keywords: biopsy; Gleason score; prostate cancer; sun exposure

Full Text  |  PDF  |  
Browse  22
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.