This web only provides the extract of this article. If you want to read the figures and tables, please reference the PDF full text on Blackwell Synergy. Thank you.
- Original Article -
Association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms with idiopathic
azoospermia in a Chinese population
Ai-Hua Gu, Jie Liang, Ning-Xia Lu, Bin Wu, Yan-Kai Xia, Chun-Cheng Lu, Lin Song, Shou-Lin Wang, Xin-Ru Wang
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Toxicology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing
210029, China
Abstract
Aim: To assess the possible role of genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair gene XRCC1
(X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1) during spermatogenesis by investigating the associations of one promoter polymorphism
(T-77C) and two exonic polymorphisms (Arg194Trp and
Arg399Gln) in XRCC1 gene with risk of idiopathic
azoospermia in a Chinese population.
Methods: The genotype and allele frequencies of three observed polymorphisms were examined
by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism based on a Chinese population consisting of
171 idiopathic azoospermia subjects and 247 normal-spermatogenesis controls.
Results: In our study, all the observed genotype frequencies were in agreement with Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The 399A (GA+AA) allele
frequency for idiopathic azoospermia subjects and controls was 0.216 and 0.269, respectively. Compared with GG
genotype, the AA genotype of Arg399Gln showed a significant association with a decreased risk of idiopathic azoospermia
(odds ratio = 0.315; 95% confidence interval = 0.12_0.86). However,
no significant differences were found between the cases and controls
for T-77C and Arg194Trp polymorphisms.
The major haplotypes of XRCC1 gene were TCG, TTG and TCA, whereas no haplotypes appeared to be significantly associated with idiopathic azoospermia based on
the cutoff of P < 0.05.
Conclusion: In a selected Chinese population, AA genotype of
Arg399Gln appears to contribute to a decreased risk of idiopathic azoospermia, while we have not any evidence of involvement of
XRCC1 T-77C and Arg194Trp polymorphisms in idiopathic
azoospermia. (Asian J Androl 2007 Nov; 9: 843_848)
Keywords: DNA repair; XRCC1; polymorphism; male infertility; idiopathic azoospermia
Correspondence to: Dr Xin-Ru Wang, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Toxicology, Nanjing Medical
University, Nanjing 210029, China.
Tel: +86-25-8686-2939 Fax: +86-25-8666-2863
E-mail address: xrwang@njmu.edu.cn
Received 2007-02-12 Accepted 2007-06-06
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2007.00325.x
1 Introduction
Endogenous and exogenous mutagens can cause DNA
damage in most cells, including somatic cell and germ
cells and unrepaired damage can result in apoptosis
[1]. Apoptosis and DNA damage can prevent sperm from
maturing, and as a result of an imbalance in these
pathways, subjects might present with azoospermia [2]. Apoptotic DNA damage is more frequent in
subjects with complete spermatogenesis failure as
compared to subjects with incomplete spermatogenesis
failure [3]. However, humans have developed a set of
complex DNA repair systems to safeguard the integrity of genome by defending harmful consequences
of DNA damage. Among the DNA repair systems, the base excision repair (BER) pathway is a crucial
mechanism that corrects localized DNA damage, such as
methylated, oxidized or fragmented lesions and non-bulky
adducts, that might block DNA replication or cause
genetic instability [4].
The gene XRCC1 (X-ray repair cross complementing group 1), which is located on chromosome 19q13.2,
encodes a protein involved in DNA BER that is essential
in drawing different components of BER to the site of
DNA damage and promoting efficiency of the BER
pathway [5]. In rodents [6] and primates [7], the expression
of XRCC1 gene is significantly higher in testis than other
tissues and is involved in male germ cell
physiology. Walter et al. [8] describe
XRCC1 as being most abundant in pachytene spermatocytes as well as in round
spermatids and suggest that it might
maintain]spermatogenesis by repairing some DNA damages during
meiogenesis and recombination in germ cells.
Owing to its critical role for maintenance of normal
spermatogenesis, mutations or polymorphisms in XRCC1
gene might disturb normal spermatogenesis. Several
polymorphisms in XRCC1 have been reported [9], among
which three functional polymorphisms T-77C,
Arg194Trp (exon 6, base 26304 C to T) and
Arg399Gln (exon 10, base 28152 G to A), have been shown to alter DNA
repair capacity in some phenotypic studies and have
received considerable attention [10, 11]. However, no study
has reported the association between any XRCC1
polymorphisms and male infertility so far. In the current
study, we compared the genotype and allele frequencies of three XRCC1 gene polymorphisms,
T-77C (rs3213245), Arg194Trp (rs1799782),
Arg399Gln (rs25487), between subjects with idiopathic
azoospermia and controls, and further investigated the
association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms with the risk of
idiopathic azoospermia.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study subjects
In total, 667 infertile men were recruited from the
Center of Clinical Reproductive Medicine between April
2004 and July 2006. All of them received physical
examinations, semen analyses, serum determination of
follicle stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone and
testosterone, karyotyping, and Y-chromosome
microde-letions screening, which enabled us to exclude
199 individuals: three obstructive azoospermic cases, 16 with
abnormal karyotype (including eight with Klinefelter's
syndrome), 16 with Y-chromosome microdeletions, seven
with cryptorchidism and 157 secondary sterility cases.
The remaining 468 idiopathic infertility subjects were
divided into three groups according to semen parameters
described in the World Health Organization Laboratory
Manual [12]: 176 with non-obstructive azoospermia (no
sperm in ejaculation even after centrifugation), 80 with
oligozoospermia (sperm count
< 20 × 106/mL) and 212
with normozoospermia (sperm count
¡Ý 20 × 106/mL).
A group of 176 idiopathic azoospermia aged between
25 and 38 was chosen for use in the present study. The
control group included 248 fertile men with their ages
ranging from 26 to 40 years who had fathered at least
one child without assisted reproductive technologies and
had normal semen with an average sperm density of (53.6 ± 18.7) × 10
6/mL.
All participants in the present study were of Han
nationality, which makes up > 90% of the Chinese
population, and had provided informed consent. A short
questionnaire was handed out to obtain demographic and
medical history information, and the cases and controls
were matched by age (± 5 years). The response rate
was greater than 90% among the respondents. Each subject donated 5 mL of blood for genomic DNA
extraction. The research protocol was approved by the
ethics review board of Nanjing Medical University.
2.2 Genotype analysis by polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism
DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lympho-cytes. The
XRCC1 T-77C, Arg194Trp and
Arg399Gln polymorphisms were determined using the
PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. The
primers used to amplify the target fragments containing three
polymorphisms are shown in Table 1. The PCR
products were then digested with the restriction enzymes
BsrB I, PvuII and NciI (New England BioLabs Inc., Beverly,
MA, USA), respectively, and separated on a 3% agarose
gel.
The _77T allele produces three fragments of 116, 57
and 46 bp whereas the _77C allele produces two
fragments of 173 and 46 bp. The wild-type 194C (194Arg)
allele produces a 485 bp fragment, and the variant 194T
(194Trp) allele has 396 and 89 bp fragments because it
gains a PvuII site. Similarly, the wild-type 399G (399Arg)
allele generates two DNA bands (384 and 133 bp), the
variant 399A (399Gln) allele has a single 517 bp fragment,
and the heterozygote displays all three bands (517, 384
and 133 bp).
The polymorphism analysis was performed by two operators independently in a blind fashion. More than
10% of the samples were randomly selected for
confirma-tion, and the results were 100% concordant.
2.3 Statistical analysis
DNA quality or quantity was insufficient for
XRCC1 genotyping in six subjects (five cases and one control).
Therefore, the final analysis included 171 cases and 247
controls. We used the χ2-test to evaluate each allele and
genotype of XRCC1 polymorphisms between the cases
and controls. Unconditional univariate and logistic
regression analyses were performed to obtain odds ratios
(OR) for the risk of azoospermia and their 95%
confidence intervals (CI). A goodness-of-fit
χ2-test was used to determine the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium of the
observed genotype frequencies. 2LD software
(http://www.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/Personal/jinghua.zhao/soft
ware/2ld.zip) was used to calculate the D' value for
linkage disequilibrium (LD) among the three
XRCC1 polymorphisms and PHASE software (version 2.0.2;
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) was used to
reconstruct the haplotypes for each subject on the basis
of the known genotypes. The sample power was
calculated using the Power Calculator of the UCLA
Department of Statistics, based on DSTPLAN 4.2.
3 Results
Genotype and allele frequencies of the
T-77C, Arg194Trp and
Arg399Gln polymorphisms among the cases and controls and their
associations with risk of azoospermia are shown in Table 2. All observed single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) were in agreement with
the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
(χ2 test: P = 0.995,
0.655 and 0.606, respectively).
The T-77C genotype frequencies were 80.70% (TT),
18.13% (CT) and 1.17% (CC) in the cases and 79.76%
(TT), 19.03% (CT) and 1.21% (CC) in the controls.
Similarly, the frequencies of the CC, CT, and TT
genotypes of the Arg194Trp were 45.03%, 43.27% and
11.70%, respectively, among the test cases and 40.89%,
48.18% and 10.93%, respectively, among the controls.
For the Arg399Gln polymorphism, the frequencies of
the GG, GA and AA genotypes were 59.65%, 37.43% and 2.92%, respectively, among the test cases and
54.66%, 36.84% and 8.50%, respectively, among the controls. However, these differences were not
statistically significant using the P < 0.05 threshold
(P = 0.972 for T-77C,
P = 0.611 for Arg194Trp, and
P = 0.064 for Arg399Gln).
As shown in Table 2, the AA genotype of
Arg399Gln showed a significant association with a decreased risk
of idiopathic azoospermia compared with GG genotype
(OR = 0.315; 95% CI = 0.12_0.86). The allele
frequencies of _77C, 194T, and 399A were also showed in Table
2, while no significant differences were found between
the cases and controls (χ2-test:
P = 0.907 for _77C, P = 0.666 for 194T, and
P = 0.1 for 399A).
The LD analyses suggested that the T-77C locus
was in LD with both the Arg194Trp locus (D' = 0.933,
P < 0.05) and the Arg399Gln locus (D' = 0.816,
P < 0.05). The Arg194Trp locus was also in LD with the
Arg399Gln locus (D' = 0.7186,
P < 0.05). When we combined the
three loci together and performed the haplotype
inference using the PHASE 2.0.2 program (University of
Washington, Seattle, WA, USA), seven possible haplotypes were derived from the observed genotypes,
of which three common haplotypes (TCG, TCA and TTG) represented 89.8% of the chromosomes for the
cases and 84.7% for the controls. The distribution was
not significantly different between the idiopathetic
azoospermia cases and controls (Table 3). We also
found that, with the fixed sample of 171 cases and 247
controls and the genotype frequency of 59.11%, the
proactive effect was 57.10%, whereas the risk effect
was 1.804, with a significance of 0.05 and power of
80%.
4 Discussion
More than half of male infertility has uncertain causes
and a significant proportion of male infertility is
accompanied with idiopathic azoospermia, which is generally
assumed to be the result of genetic alterations, including
chromosomal abnormalities such as Y-chromosome microdeletions and specific gene mutations [13].
Furthermore, genetic polymorphisms might also be
factors susceptible to some forms of male infertility [14, 15].
However, up to now, few studies have reported the
association of DNA repair gene SNPs with male infertility,
although DNA repair system is indispensable in normal
spermatogenesis. Indeed, testes produce high levels of
reactive oxygen species during the process of
spermato-genesis, which induce a variety of DNA lesions [16].
Moreover, the heavy use of agricultural or industrial
chemicals and some drugs might also contribute to the
DNA damage of spermatogenic cells. Therefore, the
reduction of the DNA repair capability might be
associated with decreased sperm counts or abnormal sperm
[17]. Furthermore, the polymorphism of DNA repair
gene BRCA2 was also clarified to be
associated with idiopathic azoospermia [18]. As an essential gene in BER
pathway, XRCC1 plays a potential role in single-strand
breaks repair in meiotic recombination during
spermato-genesis. Qu and Morimoto [9] show that the functional
SNP of XRCC1 gene affects its DNA repair capability
and plays an important role in cancer development.
However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous
studies examine the association between the
XRCC1 polymorphisms and male infertility risk.
Here, we investigated the associations of one
promoter polymorphism (T-77C) and two
well-characterized exonic variants
(Arg194Trp and Arg399Gln) of
XRCC1 gene with risk of idiopathic azoospermia in a
Chinese population to detect the possible role of genetic
polymorphisms in XRCC1 gene during spermatogenesis.
It was found that 399A (GA + AA) allele frequency was
21.6% for idiopathic azoospermia subjects and 26.9%
for controls, in agreement with the previously reported
value of 0.27 among Asians and 0.34 among Europeans
[19], which indicated that the genotype distributions of
Arg399Gln varied with ethnicity. We also found that the
AA genotype of Arg399Gln might reduce the risk of
developing idiopathic azoospermia. Matsuo
et al. [20] report a trend that 399 AA genotype might play a
protective role for lymphomagenesis. Because
Arg399Gln is located in the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)
binding domain required for efficient SSB repair [5], it is
an important polymorphism of XRCC1 gene that might
contribute to DNA repair capability. Our results shed
some light on the potential protective role of the
XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism in idiopathic azoospermia, and
might provide preliminary information for future studies.
However, it is bewildering that a single polymorphic
marker with low penetrance provided such an OR value,
which might be a result of the relatively small sample
size in our study. Additional works with a larger
selected population are needed to confirm the effect of
Arg399Gln in azoospermia.
In the present study, we failed to find any
association between T-77C and
Arg194Trp polymorphism and azoospermia risk. Several reports have discussed the
relationship between these two polymorphisms and carcinomas, with results being somewhat conflicting. For
example, T-77C polymorphism is reported to be
associated with lung cancer risk in a Chinese population;
however, Brem et al. [21] found that
T-77C variant alone showed no association with breast cancer risk in French
women. We also combined the three loci to analyze
the distribution of XRCC1 haplotypes and no statistically
significant differences were found between the
azoospermia cases and controls. Therefore, they can not
account for the risk of idiopathic azoospermia. In fact,
spermatogenesis is a complex process and a highly
coordinated expression of genes is crucial for normal
germ cell development. Although our results suggest
that the SNP of XRCC1 do not directly cause idiopathic
azoospermia, maybe they affect male infertility by
combining some additional polymorphisms in other genes.
Further work has been performed to verify this
hypothesis (unpublished data).
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that in a
selected Chinese population of normal spermatogenesis
fertile men and idiopathic azoospermia subjects, the AA
genotype of Arg399Gln might contribute to a decreased
risk of idiopathic azoospermia, whereas
T-77C and Arg194Trp polymorphisms are not significantly
associated with idiopathic azoospermia and, therefore, do not
appear to be responsible for spermatogenic failure in male
infertility. More works with large and different ethnic
populations are needed to further validate the
contribution of Arg399Gln AA genotype to azoospermia and the
joint effects of other gene SNPs on idiopathic
azoospermia risk.
Acknowledgment
We thank Dr Guang-Fu Jin, Dr Jian-Tang Su, Dr
Yu-Zhu Peng and Dr Yan Han for their participation. The
present study was supported in part by the National 973
Project of China (No. 2002CB512908), the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30571582) and the
National Tenth-Five Key Technologies R&D Program of
China (No. 2004BA720A33-02).
References
1 Vispe S, Yung TM, Ritchot J, Serizawa H, Satoh MS. A
cellular defense pathway regulating transcription through
poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in response to DNA damage. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 9886_91.
2 Said TM, Paasch U, Glander HJ, Agarwal A. Role of caspases
in male infertility. Hum Reprod Update 2004; 10: 39_51.
3 Tesarik J, Greco E, Cohen-Bacrie P, Mendoza C. Germ cell
apoptosis in men with complete and incomplete
spermiogenesis failure. Mol Hum Reprod 1998; 4: 757_62.
4 Wood RD, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, Lindahl T. Human DNA
repair genes. Science 2001; 291: 1284_9.
5 Thompson LH, West MG. XRCC1 keeps DNA from getting
stranded. Mutat Res 2000; 459: 1_18.
6 Walter CA, Lu J, Bhakta M, Zhou ZQ, Thompson LH,
McCarrey JR. Testis and somatic Xrcc-1 DNA repair gene
expression. Somat Cell Mol Genet 1994; 20: 451_61.
7 Zhou ZQ, Walter CA. Expression of the DNA repair gene
XRCC1 in baboon tissues. Mutat Res 1995; 348: 111_6.
8 Walter CA, Trolian DA, McFarland MB, Street KA, Gurram
GR, McCarrey JR. Xrcc-1 expression during male meiosis in
the mouse. Biol Reprod 1996; 55: 630_5.
9 Qu T, Morimoto K. X-ray repair cross-complementing group
1 polymorphisms and cancer risks in Asian populations: a
mini review. Cancer Detect Prev 2005; 29: 215_20.
10 Hao B, Miao X, Li Y, Zhang X, Sun T, Liang G,
et al. A novel T-77C polymorphism in DNA repair gene XRCC1
contributes to diminished promoter activity and increased risk of
non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 2006; 25: 3613_20.
11 Wang Y, Spitz MR, Zhu Y, Dong Q, Shete S, Wu X. From
genotype to phenotype: correlating XRCC1 polymorphisms
with mutagen sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003; 2:
901_8.
12 World health Organization.
WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus
Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
13 Matzuk MM, Lamb DJ. Genetic dissection of mammalian
fertility pathways. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4 Suppl: s41_9.
14 A ZC, Yang Y, Zhang SZ, Li N, Zhang W. Single nucleotide
polymorphism C677T in the methylenetetrahydrofolate
reductase gene might be a genetic risk factor for infertility for
Chinese men with azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia.
Asian J Androl 2007; 9: 57_62.
15 Rajender S, Singh L, Thangaraj K. Phenotypic heterogeneity
of mutations in androgen receptor gene. Asian J Androl 2007;
9: 147_79.
16 Fisher HM, Aitken RJ. Comparative analysis of the ability of
precursor germ cells and epididymal spermatozoa to generate
reactive oxygen metabolites. J Exp Zool 1997; 277: 390_400.
17 Maduro MR, Casella R, Kim E, Lévy N, Niederberger C,
Lipshultz LI, et al. Microsatellite instability and defects in
mismatch repair proteins: a new aetiology for Sertoli cell-only
syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod 2003; 9: 61_8.
18 Zhoucun A, Zhang S, Yang Y, Ma Y, Zhang W, Lin L. The
common variant N372H in BRCA2 gene may be associated
with idiopathic male infertility with azoospermia or severe
oligozoospermia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;
124: 61_4.
19 Hamajima N, Takezaki T, Tajima K. Allele frequencies of 25
polymorphisms pertaining to cancer risk for Japanese,
Koreans and Chinese. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2002; 3: 197_206.
20 Matsuo K, Hamajima N, Suzuki R, Andoh M, Nakamura S,
Seto M, et al. Lack of association between DNA base excision
repair gene XRCC1 Gln399Arg polymorphism and risk of
malignant lymphoma in Japan. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2004;
149: 77_80.
21 Brem R, Cox DG, Chapot B, Moullan N, Romestaing P, Gérard
JP, et al. The XRCC1 -77T->C variant: haplotypes, breast
cancer risk, response to radiotherapy and the cellular response
to DNA damage. Carcinogenesis 2006; 27: 2469_74.
|