Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

-Ahead of print
-Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
-Current Issue
-Archive
-Acknowledgments
-Special Issues
-Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

-Online Submission
-Online Review
-Instruction for Authors
-Instruction for Reviewers
-English Corner new!

About AJA

-About AJA
-Editorial Board
-Contact Us
-News

Resources & Services

-Advertisement
-Subscription
-Email alert
-Proceedings
-Reprints

Download area

-Copyright licence
-EndNote style file
-Manuscript word template
-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

-Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

-Proof-reading for the
    authors

-AJA Club (in English)
-AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Online First

10.4103/aja202649

Penile length after inflatable penile prosthesis implant: a single-center, high-volume experience

Anna Ricapito1,*, Marco Finati1,* Piero Fischetti1 Matteo Rubino1 Ugo Giovanni Falagario1 Fabrizio Palumbo2 Gian Maria Busetto1 Luigi Cormio1,3 Giuseppe Carrieri1 Carlo Bettocchi1

1University of Foggia, Andrology Unit-Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Foggia 71122, Italy
2“Di Venere” Hospital, Bari 70131, Italy
3University of Foggia, Department of Urology, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Andria (BAT) 76123, Italy

Correspondence: Dr. A Ricapito (annaricapito96@gmail.com)

Received: 01 December 2025; Accepted: 14 July 2026; published online: 13 October 2026

Abstract

enile shortening after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implant represents one of the most common concerns in patients. In this study, our aim is to compare both flaccid and stretched penile length before, immediately after, and up to 1 year after surgery. We prospectively collected measurements in 142 patients undergoing IPP implant. Standardized measurements of flaccid and stretched penile length were performed before IPP. Penile length measurements in erect and flaccid positions were then performed at the end of the IPP and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1 year of follow-up visits. Data concerning age, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, and comorbidities were collected. Penile length was compared using Wilcoxon-paired test, after assessing lack of normal distribution through Shapiro–Wilk test. Linear regression was used to correlate comorbidities and time from erectile dysfunction diagnosis to IPP with postoperative length. Mean (standard deviation [s.d.]) of preoperative flaccid and stretched lengths was 10.3 (1.9) cm and 13.3 (1.9) cm, respectively. A statistically significant difference was shown between preoperative and postoperative stretched penile length (+0.21 cm, P < 0.001), while no difference was observed for flaccid length (+0.20 cm, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.01 to 0.08, P = 0.1). Erect length remained stable up to 1 year after surgery, with 21% of patients showing an increase of ≥1 cm. At linear regression, a higher BMI was associated with shorter postoperative flaccid length (P = 0.03). Erect penile length after IPP implant is shown to remain stable up to 1 year of follow-up visits. Higher BMI may negatively impact flaccid length, but no other factors were associated with changes.

Keywords: inflatable penile prosthesis; penile length; penile shortening

Full Text  |  PDF  |  
Browse  18
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.