Volume 13, Issue 3 (May 2011) 13, 499–504; 10.1038/aja.2010.153
The feasibility and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with low-dose external beam radiotherapy as supplemental therapy for advanced prostate cancer following hormonal therapy
Rui-Yi Wu1, Guo-Min Wang1, Lei Xu1, Bo-Heng Zhang2, Ye-Qing Xu1, Zhao-Chong Zeng3 and Bing Chen3
1 Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China 2 Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China 3 Department of Radiotherapy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
Correspondence: Professor GM Wang, (wang.guomin@zs-hospital.sh.cn)
Received 24 May 2010; Revised 2 July 2010; Accepted 14 October 2010; Published online 14 March 2011.
Abstract |
The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with (+) low-dose external beam radiotherapy (LRT) as supplemental therapy for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) following hormonal therapy (HT). Our definition of HIFU+LRT refers to treating primary tumour lesions with HIFU in place of reduced field boost irradiation to the prostate, while retaining four-field box irradiation to the pelvis in conventional-dose external beam radiotherapy (CRT). We performed a prospective, controlled and non-randomized study on 120 patients with advanced PCa after HT who received HIFU, CRT, HIFU+LRT and HT alone, respectively. CT/MR imaging showed the primary tumours and pelvic lymph node metastases visibly shrank or even disappeared after HIFU+LRT treatment. There were significant differences among four groups with regard to overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) curves (P=0.018 and 0.015). Further comparison between each pair of groups suggested that the long-term DSS of the HIFU+LRT group was higher than those of the other three groups, but there was no significant difference between the HIFU+LRT group and the CRT group. Multivariable Cox's proportional hazard model showed that both HIFU+LRT and CRT were independently associated with DSS (P=0.001 and 0.035) and had protective effects with regard to the risk of death. Compared with CRT, HIFU+LRT significantly decreased incidences of radiation-related late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity grade ≥II. In conclusion, long-term survival of patients with advanced PCa benefited from strengthening local control of primary tumour and regional lymph node metastases after HT. As an alternative to CRT, HIFU+LRT showed good efficacy and better safety.
Keywords: complication; high-intensity focused ultrasound; hormonal therapy; low-dose external beam radiotherapy; prostate cancer; survival rate
PDF |
PDF |
中文摘要 |
|
|
Browse: 3250 |
|