Home  |   Archive  |   Online Submission  |   News & Events  |   Subscribe  |   APFA  |   Society  |   Contact Us  |   中文版
Search   
 
Journal

Ahead of print
Authors' Accepted
    Manuscripts
new!
Current Issue
Archive
Acknowledgments
Special Issues
Browse by Category

Manuscript Submission

Online Submission
Online Review
Instruction for Authors
Instruction for Reviewers
English Corner new!

About AJA

About AJA
Editorial Board
Contact Us
News

Resources & Services

Advertisement
Subscription
Email alert
Proceedings
Reprints

Download area

Copyright licence
EndNote style file
Manuscript word template
Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in English)

Guidance for AJA figures
    preparation (in Chinese)

Proof-reading for the
    authors

AJA Club (in English)
AJA Club (in Chinese)

 
Abstract

Volume 16, Issue 5 (September 2014) 16, 728–734; 10.4103/1008-682X.128515

The surgical learning curve for robotic‑assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience of a single surgeon with 500 cases in Taiwan, China

Yen‑Chuan Ou1,2, Chun‑Kuang Yang1, Kuangh‑Si Chang3, John Wang4, Siu‑Wan Hung5, Min‑Che Tung6, Ashutosh K Tewari7, Vipul R Patel8

1Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, China; 2School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, China; 3Department of Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, China; 4Department of Pathology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, China; 5Department of Radiation, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, China; 6Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, China; 7New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; 8Global Robotics Institute, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida, USA.

Correspondence: Dr. YC Ou (ycou228@gmail.com)

Received: 22 September 2013; Revised: 04 November 2013; Accepted: 28 December 2013

Abstract

To analyze the learning curve for cancer control from an initial 250 cases (Group I) and subsequent 250 cases (Group II) of robotic‑assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) performed by a single surgeon. Five hundred consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received RALP and were evaluated. Surgical parameters and perioperative complications were compared between the groups. Positive surgical margin (PSM) and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were assessed as cancer control outcomes. Patients in Group II had significantly more advanced prostate cancer than those in Group I (22.2% vs 14.2%, respectively, with Gleason score 8–10, P = 0.033; 12.8% vs 5.6%, respectively, with clinical stage T3,  0.017). The incidence of PSM in pT3 was decreased significantly from 49% in Group I to 32.6% in Group II. A meaningful trend was noted for a decreasing PSM rate with each consecutive group of 50 cases, including pT3 and high‑risk patients. Neurovascular bundle (NVB) preservation was significantly influenced by the PSM in high‑risk patients (84.1% in the preservation group vs 43.9% in the nonpreservation group). The 3‑year, 5‑year, and 7‑year BCR‑free survival rates were 79.2%, 75.3%, and 70.2%, respectively. In conclusion, the incidence of PSM in pT3 was decreased significantly after 250 cases. There was a trend in the surgical learning curve for decreasing PSM with each group of 50 cases. NVB preservation during RALP for the high‑risk group is not suggested due to increasing PSM.

Keywords: cancer control; learning curve; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; robotics; surgical margin

Full Text | PDF | 中文摘要 |

 
Browse:  1935
 
Asian Journal of Andrology CN 31-1795/R ISSN 1008-682X  Copyright © 2023  Shanghai Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences.  All rights reserved.